Studying cultural relevance in online courses: A thematic inquiry

Megan Adams, Sanjuana Rodriguez, Kate Zimmer


This study investigated if culturally relevant pedagogy was embedded into online reading courses at the undergraduate and graduate level in at a southeastern university college of education. The goals of the study were: to highlight the importance of a fully developed syllabus for adjunct and part-time faculty who rely heavily on the syllabus; to emphasize the importance of syllabi for curriculum and course integrity when programs move to fully online; to investigate whether the cultural relevance emphasized at the program level was evident in the syllabi. The findings indicate that alignment between assessment and objectives and a detailed syllabus in online courses are critical in creating culturally relevant online courses. This study is important to the field in several ways. First, colleges of education may benefit from the findings on explicit instructions in shared syllabi and in alignment in programs and courses. Additionally, including democratic classrooms and ensuring depth of knowledge in reading programs is important in program evaluation.


culturally relevant pedagogy; online learning; curriculum alignment; qualitative inquiry

Full Text:



Bartolome, L. (1994). Beyond the methods fetish: Toward a humanizing pedagogy. Harvard Educational Review, 64(2), 173-195.

Beauboeuf-Lafontant, T. (1999). A movement against and beyond boundaries. Teachers College Record, 100(4), 702-23.

Bonk, C. J. & Cunningham, D. J. (1998). Searching for learner-centred, constructivist, and socio-cultural components of collaborative educational tools. In Electronic Collaborators. C. J. Bonk & C. S. King (Eds.). Mawah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Cobb, P., Confrey, J., DiSessa, A., Lehrer, R. & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiements in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9-13.

Conway, C. M., Eros, J., Pellegrino, K., & West, C. (2010). The role of graduate and undergraduate interactions in the development of preservice and music teacher educator identity: A self-study in teacher education. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 183, 49-64.

Conway, C., Palmer, C. M., Edgar, S., & Hansen, E. (2016). Learning to teach graduate students: A self-study by students and a faculty member.

Corbin, J. & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Creswell, J. W. (2015). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.

Darling-Hammond, L. (1997). Doing what matters most: Investing in quality teaching. National Commission on Teaching & America's Future. New York, NY.

Darling-Hammond, L. (2012). Creating a comprehensive system for evaluating and supporting effective teaching. Report for the Stanford Center for Opportunity Policy in Education. Retrieved from

Davis, E. A. & Krajcik, J. S. (2005, April). Designing educative curriculum materials to promote teacher learning. Educational Research, 34(3), 3-14.

Dell, C. A., Dell, T. F., & Blackwell, T. L. (2015). Applying universal design for learning in online courses: Pedagogical and practical considerations. Journal of Educators Online, 12(2), 166-192.

Drake, C., Land, T. J., & Tyminski, A. M. (2014). Using educative curriculum materials to support the development of prospective teachers' knowledge. Educational Researcher, 43(3), 154-162.

Fink, L. D. (2003). A self-directed guide to designing courses for significant learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Glaser, B. G. (1965, Spring). The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. Social Problems, 12(4), 436-445.

Glaser, B. G. (1992). Basics of grounded theory analysis. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.

Griner, A. C. & Stewart, M. L. (2012). Addressing the achievement gap and disproportionality through the use of culturally responsive teaching practices. Urban Education, 48(4), 585-621.

Hannon, J. & D'Netto, B. (2007). Cultural diversity online: Student engagement with learning technologies. International Journal of Educational Management, 21(5), 418-432.

Harris, J., Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2009). Teachers' technological pedagogical content knowledge and learning activity types: Curriculum-based technology integration reframed. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41(4), 393-416.

Hastie, P. A., Martin, E., & Buchanan, A. M. (2006). Stepping out of the norm: an examination of praxis for a culturally‚Äźrelevant pedagogy for African‚ÄźAmerican children. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 38(3), 293-306.

Howard, T. C. (2003). Culturally relevant pedagogy: Ingredients for critical teacher reflection. Theory into practice, 42(3), 195-202.

Kraglund-Gauthier, W., Chareka, O., Orr, A. M., & Foran, A. (2010). Teacher education in online classrooms: An inquiry into instructors' lived experiences. Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 1(2). DOI:

International Literacy Association Standards (2017). Retrieved from:

Ladson-Billings, G. (1995a). But that's just good teaching! The case for culturally relevant pedagogy. Theory into Practice, 34(3), 159-166.

Ladson-Billings, G. (1995b). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 455-461.

Ladson-Billings, G. (1998). Just what is critical race theory and what's it doing in a nice field like education? International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 11(1), 7-24.

Ladson-Billings, G. (2004). New directions in multicultural education. In J. Banks Handbook of Multicultural Education, (pp. 50-65), San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Lauzon, A. C. (1999). Situating cognition and crossing borders: Resisting the hegemony of mediated education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 30(3), 261-277.

Lauzon, A. C. (2000). Distance education and diversity: Are they compatible? The American Journal of Educational Technology, 14(2), 61-70.

Shin, M. & Lee, Y. (2009). Changing the landscape of teacher education via online teaching and learning. Techniques: Connecting Education and Careers (J1), 84(1), 32-33.

Macedo, D. & Bartolome, L. I. (2014). Multiculturalism permitted in English only. International Multilingual Research Journal, 8, 24-37.

McLoughlin, C. (2001). Inclusivity and alignment: Principles of pedagogy, task and assessment design for effective cross-cultural online learning. Distance Education, 22(1), 7-29.

Moore, J. C., Sener, J., & Fetzner, M. (2009). Getting better: ALN and student success. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 13(3), 85-114.

Oblinger, D. G. & Hawkins, B. L. (2006). The myth about online course development: "A faculty member can individually develop and deliver an effective online course". EDUCAUSE Review, 41(4), 14-15.

Penuel, W. R., Fishman, B. J., Cheng, B. H., & Sabelli, N. (2011). Organizing research and development at the intersection of learning, implementation, and design. Educational Researcher, 40(7), 331-337.

Quality Matters Standards (2016). Retrieved from:

Rogers, R. L. (2000). Barriers to adopting emerging technologies in education. Journal of Computing Research, 22(4), 455-472.

Softchalk. (2017). Course management tools. Retrieved from:

Smartt, S. M. & Reschly, D. J. (2007). Barriers to the preparation of highly qualified teachers in reading. TQ Research & Policy Brief. National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality. Washington DC: US Department of Education.

Smith, D. R. & Ayers, D. F. (2006). Culturally responsive pedagogy and online learning: Implications for the globalized community college. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 30, 401-415.

Stoddart, T., Bravo, M., Mosqueda, E., & Solis, J. (2013, April). Restructuring pre-service teacher education to respond to increasing student diversity. Research in Higher Education Journal, 19, 1-19.

Villegas, A. M., & Lucas, T. (2002). Preparing culturally responsive teachers rethinking the curriculum. Journal of teacher education, 53(1), 20-32.

Wang, C. & Chen, X. (2009, May). The characteristics and enlightening of NCATE. International Education Studies, 2(2), 72-76.

Wiggins, G. & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by Design (2nd Ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.


Copyright (c) 2018 Megan Adams, Sanjuana Rodriguez, Kate Zimmer