Doctoral E-mentoring: Current Practices and Effective Strategies

David James Byrnes Jr., Lida J. Uribe-Flórez, Jesús Trespalacios, Jodi Chilson

Abstract


Effective mentoring has been the cornerstone of a successful doctoral experience. Traditional doctoral education uses an apprenticeship model for mentoring to help students learn what is required as an academic professional. However, online environments present unique challenges to creating and maintaining mentor-mentee relationships. Using keywords specific to e-mentoring and online graduate education, literature searches were conducted to isolate relevant research from the last decade. From this literature, it was possible to synthesize current practices in e-mentoring and identify effective strategies to use for doctoral students conducting research. Using Yob and Crawford (2012) framework, results were organized into the following six independent categories: Competence, Availability, Induction, Challenge, Communication, and Emotional Support. Other aspects that impact the mentoring relationship are also discussed.


Keywords


E-mentoring; Higher Education; Graduate Education; Literature Review; Faculty-Student Collaboration

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adams, J., & DeFleur, M. (2005). The acceptability of a doctoral degree earned online as a credential for obtaining a faculty position. The American Journal of Distance Education, 19(2), 71-85.

Andrew, M. (2012). Supervising doctorates at a distance: Three trans-Tasman stories. Quality Assurance in Education, 20(1), 42-53.

Andrews, K. (2012). Correlation between mentors and learners perceptions of mentors behaviors in completing online doctoral dissertations. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 16(2), 71-80.

Barnes, B. J., & Austin, A. E. (2009). The role of doctoral advisors: A look at advising from the advisor’s perspective. Innovative High Education, 33, 297-315.

Columbaro, N. (2009). e-Mentoring possibilities for online doctoral students: A literature review. Adult Learning, 20(3-4), 9-15.

Crawford, L. M., Randolph, J. J., & Yob, I. M. (2014). Theoretical development, factorial validity, and reliability of the online graduate mentoring scale. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 22(1), 20-37.

Crossouard, B., (2008). Developing alternative models of doctoral supervision with online formative assessment. Studies in Continuing Education, 30(1), 51-67.

de Beer, M., & Mason, R. B. (2009). Using a blended approach to facilitate postgraduate supervision. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 46(2), 213-226.

Doyle, N., Jacobs, K., & Ryan, C. (2016). Faculty mentors’ perspectives on e-mentoring post-professional occupational therapy doctoral students. Occupational Therapy International, 23(4), 305-317.

Erichsen, E. A., Bolliger, D. U., & Halupa, C. (2014). Students satisfaction with graduate supervision in doctoral programs delivered in distance education settings. Studies in Higher Education, 39(2), 321-338.

Ewing, H., Mathieson, K., Alexander, J. L., & Leafman, J. (2012). Enhancing the acquisition of research skills in online doctoral programs: The Ewing model©. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 8(1), 34-44.

Gardner, S. K. (2008). Fitting the mold of graduate school: A qualitative study of socialization in doctoral education. Innovative Higher Education, 33, 125-138.

Grady, M. L. (2016). Doctoral students in a distance program: Advising and degree completion strategies. Journal of Academic Administration in Higher Education, 12(2), 49-52.

Heinrich, K. T. (2005). Halfway between receiving and giving: A relational analysis of doctorate-prepared nurse--scholars’ first 5 years after graduation. Journal of Professional Nursing, 21(5), 303-313.

Jacobs, K., Doyle, N., & Ryan, C. (2015). The nature, perception, and impact of e-mentoring on post-professional occupational therapy doctoral students. Occupational Therapy in Health Care, 29(2), 201-213.

Kumar, S., & Coe, C. (2017). Mentoring and student support in online doctoral programs. American Journal of Distance Education, 31(2), 128-142.

Kumar, S., & Johnson, M. (2017). Mentoring doctoral students online: Mentor strategies and challenges. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 25(2), 202-222.

Kumar, S., Johnson, M., & Hardemon, T. (2013). Dissertations at a distance: Students’ perceptions of online mentoring in a doctoral program. International Journal of E-learning & Distance Education, 27(1). Retrieved from http://www.ijede.ca/index.php/jde/article/view/835/1481

Loureiro, M., Huet, I., Baptista, A., & Casanova, D. (2010). Using ICT to enhance the online research supervision process. Acta Academica, 1, 151-174.

Mason, M. M. (2012). Motivation, satisfaction, and innate psychological needs. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 7, 259-277.

Melrose, S. (2006). Mentoring online graduate students: Partners in scholarship. Education for Primary Care, 17(1), 57-62.

Nasiri, F., & Mafakheri, F. (2010). Postgraduate research supervision at a distance: A review of challenges and strategies. Studies in Higher Education, 40(10), 1962-1969.

National Center for Education Statistics. (2012). Number and percentage of graduate students taking distance education or online classes and degree programs, by selected characteristics: Selected years, 2003-04 through 2011-12. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d15/tables/dt15_311.32.asp

National Center for Education Statistics. (2014). Distance learning. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=80

Pinheiro, D., Melkers, J., & Youtie, J. (2014). Learning to play the game: Students publishing as an indicator of future scholarly success. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 81, 56-66.

Pinto Zipp, G., Cahill, T., & Clark, M. (2009). The role of collaborative scholarship in the mentorship of doctoral students. Journal of College Teaching & Learning, 6(8), 29-36.

Rademaker, L. L., O’Connor Duffy, J., Wetzler, E., & Zaikina-Montgomery, H. (2016). Chair perceptions of trust between mentor and mentee in online doctoral dissertation mentoring. Online Learning, 20(1), 1-13.

Roumell, E. A. L., & Bolliger, D. U. (2017). Experience of faculty with doctoral student supervision in programs delivered via distance. The Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 65(2), 82-93.

Stadtlander, L. M., & Giles, M. J. (2010). Virtual instruction: A qualitative research laboratory course. Teaching of Psychology, 37(4), 281-286.

Stewart, S. (2006). A pilot study of email in an e-mentoring relationship. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 12(3), 83-85.

Terry, T., & Ghosh, R. (2015). Mentoring from different social spheres: How can multiple mentors help in doctoral student success in Ed.D. programs? Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 23(3), 187-212.

Ugrin, J. C., Odom, M. D., & Pearson, J. M. (2008). Exploring the importance of mentoring for new scholars: A social exchange perspective. Journal of Information Systems Education 19(3), 343-350.

Welch, S. (2017). Virtual mentoring program within an online doctoral nursing education program: A phenomenological study. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, 14(1), doi:10.1515/ijnes-2016-0049

White, T., & Coetzee, E. (2014). Postgraduate supervision: E-mail as an alternative. African Education Review, 11(4), 658-673.

Wikeley, F., & Muschamp, Y. (2004). Pedagogical implications of working with doctoral students at a distance. Distance Education, 25(1), 125-142.

Yob, I., & Crawford, L. (2012). Conceptual framework for mentoring doctoral students. Higher Learning Research Communications, 2(2), 34-47.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v23i1.1446