Predicting Sense of Presence and Sense of Community in Immersive Online Learning Environments

Terry W. McClannon, Amy Cheney, Les Bolt, Krista Terry

Abstract


This study is based on survey research conducted between 2010 and 2017, involving 1053 graduate students using immersive online learning environments for their coursework. Investigators used course structural factors and student engagement factors to predict students’ perceptions of community and presence in the online immersive space. Utilizing the Sense of Community II index (SCI-2) and the Community of Inquiry survey (COI) median scores as cut scores for predicted outcomes, researchers demonstrated that purely online environments which encouraged student engagement in the online immersive space can enhance sense of presence and sense of community.  In addition, students in graduate programs that used online immersive delivery methods longer developed a stronger sense of community. Both dependent measures proved to have stable subscale structures for this inquiry based on a cursory confirmatory factor analysis

Keywords


Sense of Community, Sense of Presence, Online pedagogy, Immersive environment

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abfalter, D., Zaglia, M. E., & Mueller, J. (2012). Sense of virtual community: A follow up on its

measurement. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 400–404.

Angelino, L. M., Williams, F. K., & Natvig, D. (2007). Strategies to engage online students and reduce

attrition rates. Journal of Educators Online, 4(2), 1-4. Retrieved from

https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ907749.pdf.

Arbaugh, J.B., Bangert, A., & Cleveland-Innes, M. (2010). Subject matter effects and the Community

of Inquiry (CoI) framework: An exploratory study. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1-2), 37-44. Elsevier Inc. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.006.

Arbaugh, J., Cleveland-Innes, M., Diaz, S., Garrison, D., Ice, P, Richardson, J., et al. (2008).

Developing a community of inquiry instrument: Testing a measure of the Community of

Inquiry framework using a multi-institutional sample. The Internet and Higher Education,

(3-4), 133-136. Elsevier Inc. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.06.003.

Bastian, B., & Haslam, N. (2010). Excluded from humanity: The dehumanising effects of social

ostracism. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 107–113.

Bronack, S., Sanders, R. Cheney, A., Riedl, R., Tashner, J. & Matzen, N. (2008). Presence pedagogy:

Teaching and learning in a 3D immersive world. International Journal of Teaching and

Learning in Higher Education, 20(1), 59-69. Retrieved from

http://www.isetl.org/ijtlhe/pdf/IJTLHE453.pdf.

Burgess, M. L., Slate, J. R., Rojas-LeBouef, A., & LaPrairie, K. (2010). Teaching and learning in

Second Life: Using the Community of Inquiry (CoI) model to support online instruction with

graduate students in instructional technology. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1-2),

-88. Elsevier B.V. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.12.003.

Burroughs, S. M., & Eby, L. T. (1998). Psychological sense of community at work: A

measurement system and explanatory framework. Journal of Community Psychology, 26(6),

–532.

Chavis, D. M., Hogge, J. H., McMillan, D. W., & Wandersman, A. (1986). Sense of

community through Brunswik’s lens: A first look. Journal of Community Psychology, 14(1), 24–40.

Chavis, D. M., Lee, K. S., & Acosta, J. D. (2008). The Sense of Community (SCI) Revised: The

Reliability and Validity of the SCI-2. Paper presented at the 2nd International Community

Psychology Conference. Lisboa, Portugal.

Chavis, D.M., & Pretty, G.M.H. (1999). Sense of community: Advances in measurement and

application. Journal of Community Psychology, 27(6), 635–642.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6629(199911)27:6<635::AID-JCOP1>3.0.CO;2-F.

Cheney, A. W., & Bronack, S. C. (2011). Presence pedagogy as framework for research in virtual

environments. International Journal of Gaming and Computer-Mediated Simulations, 3(1),

–85. doi: 10.4018/jgcms.2011010106.

Cheney, A., Sanders, R., Matzen, N. & Tashner, J. (2009). Instructional design and pedagogical issues

with Web 2.0 tools. In T. Kidd and I. Chen (Eds.) Wired for Learning: An Educator’s Guide to

Web 2.0. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

Dalgarno, B., & Lee, M. J. W. (2010). What are the learning affordances of 3-D virtual environments?

British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(1), 10–32 doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01038.x

Dickey, M. D. (2002). Constructing learners in 3D: An investigation of design affordances and

constraints of active worlds educational universe. Presented at the the National Convention of

the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Dallas, TX.

Felton, B. J., & Shinn, M. (1992). Social integration and social support: Moving ‘social

support’ beyond the individual level. Journal of Community Psychology, 20(1),

–115.

Gardner, M. R., & Elliott, J. B. (2014). The Immersive Education Laboratory: Understanding

affordances, structuring experiences, and creating constructivist, collaborative processes, in

mixed-reality smart environments. EAI Endorsed Transactions on Future Intelligent

Educational Environments, 1(1), e6. http://doi.org/10.4108/fiee.1.1.e6

Garrison, D., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (1999). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment:

Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2-3),

-105. doi: 10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6.

Garrison, D. R., & Cleveland-Innes, M. (2005). Facilitating Cognitive presence in online learning:

Interaction is not enough. American Journal of Distance Education, 19(3), 133–148.

http://doi.org/10.1207/s15389286ajde1903_2.

Hunter, A., & Rigers, S. (1986). The meaning of community in community mental

health. Journal of Community Psychology, 14(1), 55–71.

Immersion (virtual reality). (2015, January 31). In Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Retrieved from

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Immersion_(virtual_reality)&oldid=642731454.

Jonassen, D. H. (1997). INSYS 527: Designing constructivist learning environments. Retrieved July

, 2011, from http://www.coe.missouri.edu/~jonassen/INSYS527.html.

Kanuka, H., & Jugdev, K. (2006). Distance education MBA students: An investigation into the use of

an orientation course to address academic and social integration issues. Open Learning, 21(2),

-166. doi: 10.1080/02680510600715578.

Kovanović V., Joksimović S., Poquet O., Hennis T., Čukić I., de Vries P., Hatala M., Dawson S.,

Siemens G., & Gašević D. (2017). Exploring communities of inquiry in massive open online courses. Computers & Education, 119, 44-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.11.010.

McKerlich, R., & Anderson, T. (2007). Community of inquiry and learning in immersive

environments. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 11(4), 35-53. Retrieved from

https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/bd3b/2e2100a1369baf1e7dbafdeb1f8af4816e94.pdf.

McKerlich, R., Riis, M., Anderson, T., & Eastman, B. (2011). Student perceptions of teaching

presence, social presence, and cognitive presence in a virtual world. MERLOT Journal of

Online Teaching and Learning, 7(3). Retrieved from http://jolt.merlot.org/vol7no3/mckerlich_0911.htm.

McMillan, D. & Chavis, D. (1986). Sense of community: A definition and theory. Journal of

Community Psychology, 14, 6–23.

Oliver, M. & Carr, D. (2009). Learning in virtual worlds: Using communities of

practice to explain how people learn from play. British Journal of Educational Technology,

(3). p. 414–426. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00948.x.

Pellas, N., Peroutseas, E., & Kazanidis, I. (2013). Virtual communities of inquiry (VCoI) for learning

basic algorithmic structures with open simulator and Scratch4OS: a case study from the

secondary education in Greece. In Proceedings of the 6th Balkan Conference in Informatics

(pp. 187–194). doi: 10.1145/2490257.2490278.

Pellas, N. & Kazanidis, I. (2014). The impact of computer self-efficacy, situational interest and

academic self-concept in virtual communities of inquiry during the distance learning

procedures through Second Life. World Wide Web, 17(4): 695-722. https://doi-org.proxy006.nclive.org/10.1007/s11280-013-0266-9.

Rodgers, C. R., & Raider-Roth, M. B. (2006). Presence in teaching. Teachers & Teaching, 12(3),

-287. doi:10.1080/13450600500467548.

Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical

Software, 48(2), 1-36. Retrieved from https://www.jstatsoft.org/article/view/v048i02.

Russo, T., & Benson, S. (2005). Learning with invisible others: Perceptions of online presence and

their relationship to cognitive and affective learning. Educational Technology and Society, 8(1),

–62. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.8.1.54.

Sadera, W.A., Robertson, J., Song, L. & Midon, M.N. (2009). The role of community in online

learning success. MERLOT Journal of Online Teaching and Learning, (5)2, 277-284. Retrieved

from http://jolt.merlot.org/vol5no2/sadera_0609.pdf.

Sanders, R.L. & Melton, S. (2010). The AETZone experience: A qualitative analysis of the use of

presence pedagogy in a 3D immersive learning environment. MERLOT Journal of Online

Learning and Teaching, 6(1). Retrieved from http://jolt.merlot.org/vol6no1/sanders_0310.pdf.

Sayer, E., Beaven, A., Stringer, P., & Hermena, E. (2013). Investigating sense of community in primary schools. Educational & Child Psychology, 30(1), 9–25.

Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1994). The systemic vision of the educational learning. The Journal

of the Learning Sciences, 3(3), 265–283.

Scherer Bassani, P.B. (2011). Interpersonal exchanges in discussion forums: A study of learning

communities in distance learning settings. Computers & Education, 56(4), pp. 931–938.

Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/50822/.

Schroeder, R., & Axelsson, A.S. (2006). Avatars at work and play: Collaboration and

interaction in shared virtual environments. Dodrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

Sense of Community Index (SCI) – Sense of Community. (n.d.). Retrieved from

https://www.senseofcommunity.com/soc-index/.

Shea, P., & Bidjerano, T. (2010). Learning presence: Towards a theory of self-efficacy, self-regulation,

and the development of a communities of inquiry in online and hybrid learning environments.

Computers & Education, 55(4), 1721-1731. Elsevier Ltd. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.07.017.

Swan, K. P., Richardson, J. C., Ice, P., Garrison, R., Cleveland-Innes, M., & Arbaugh, B.

(2008). Validating a measurement tool of presence in online communities of inquiry. E-mentor,

(24), 1-12. Retrieved from www.e-mentor.edu.pl/eng.

Vaughan, N. D. (2010). A hybrid community of inquiry approach: Linking student engagement and

course redesign. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1-2), 60-65. Elsevier Inc. doi:

1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.007.

Wilson, B., & Ryder, M. (1996). Dynamic learning communities: An alternative to designed

instructional systems. Proceeding of Selected Research and Development Presentations at the

National Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology. Indianapolis, IN. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED397847.pdf.

Yang, J. C., Quadir, B., Chen, N-S. & Miao, Q. (2016). Effects of online presence on learning

performance in a blog-based online course. Internet and Higher Education, 30, 11-20.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.04.002.

Yang, F., Wang, M., Shen, R., & Han, P. (2007). Community-organizing agent: An artificial intelligent

system for building learning communities among large numbers of learners. Computers and

Education, 49(2), 131–147. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2005.04.019.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i4.1510

Bookmark and Share