Visions of Quality Assurance in Online MBA Programs

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i4.1514

Keywords:

Quality Assurance, Online Learning, Online Programs, Business, MBA Programs, Delphi

Abstract

Online MBA programs have undergone significant growth in recent years. However, quality assurance measures have not kept pace with this growth. The purpose of this study was to identify and prioritize aspects of quality assurance specific to AACSB-accredited online MBA programs. The Delphi methodology was used to facilitate a group conversation between expert administrators, faculty, and instructional designers around the topic of quality assurance for online MBA programs over the next 3-5 years. This paper reports the results of this study and how they will help to direct the efforts of those involved in the delivery of a quality online MBA program.

Author Biography

Patrick R. Lowenthal, Boise State University

Patrick R. Lowenthal, Ph.D., is an Associate Professor at Boise State University, where he teaches master’s and doctoral students in fully online graduate programs. He researches how people communicate using emerging technologies—with a specific focus on issues of presence, identity, and community online.

References

AACSB. (n.d.). AACSB accreditation. Retrieved from http://www.aacsb.edu/accreditation/

AACSB. (2013). AACSB assurance of learning standards: An interpretation. Retrieved from http://www.aacsb.edu/publications/whitepapers

AACSB. (2015). Eligibility procedures and accreditation standards for business accreditation. Retrieved from http://www.aacsb.edu/accreditation/standards/2013-business

Associated Press. (2007). College loan investigation: Capella arrives at accord with attorney generals. Retrieved from http://www.twincities.com/2007/05/15/college-loan-investigation-capella-arrives-at-accord-with-attorneys-general/

AQC. (2016). Approved quality curriculum. Retrieved from http://www.deac.org/AQC/index.aspx

Arbaugh, J. B. (2005). How much does “subject matter” matter? A study of disciplinary effects in on-line MBA courses. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(1), 57-73. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMLE.2005.16132549

Arbaugh, J. B., Bangert, A., & Cleveland-Innes, M. (2010). Subject matter effects and the community of inquiry (CoI) framework: An exploratory study. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1), 37-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.006

AACSB. (n.d.). AACSB accreditation. Retrieved from http://www.aacsb.edu/accreditation/

AACSB. (2007). Quality issues in distance learning. Retrieved from http://www.aacsb.edu/~/media/AACSB/Publications/white-papers/wp-quality-issues-in-distance-edu.ashx

AACSB. (2013). AACSB assurance of learning standards: An interpretation. Retrieved from http://www.aacsb.edu/publications/whitepapers

AACSB. (2015). Eligibility procedures and accreditation standards for business accreditation. Retrieved from http://www.aacsb.edu/accreditation/standards/2013-business

AACSB. (2016). Eligibility procedures and accreditation standards for business accreditation. Retrieved from http://www.aacsb.edu/accreditation/standards

Brooks, E., & Morse, R. (2015). Methodology: Best online MBA programs ranking. Retrieved from http://www.usnews.com/education/online-education/articles/mba-methodology

Brooks, E., & Morse, R. (2016). Methodology: Best online MBA program rankings. Retrieved from http://www.usnews.com/education/online-education/articles/mba-methodology

California State University, Chico. (2016). Exemplary online instruction. Retrieved from http://www.csuchico.edu/eoi/

Chico. (2016). Exemplary online instruction. Retrieved from http://www.csuchico.edu/eoi/

Cohen, D., & Crabtree, B. (2008). Peer debriefing. Retrieved from http://www.qualres.org/HomePeer-3693.html

Cole, Z., Donohoe, H., & Stellefson, M. (2013). Internet-based Delphi research: Case based discussion. Environmental Management, 51(3), 511-523. doi:10.1007/s00267-012-0005-5

Creswell, J. W., & Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory into Practice, 39(3), 124-130. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip3903_2

CRAC. (2011). Distance education programs: Interregional guidelines for the evaluation of distance education programs (online learning). Philadelphia, PA: Middle State Commission on Higher Education.

Dalkey, N. (1969). The Delphi method: An experimental study of group opinion. Santa Monica, CA: Clearinghouse for Federal Scientific and Technical Information.

Dalkey, N., & Helmer, O. (1963). An experimental application of the Delphi method to the use of experts. Management Science, 9(3), 458-467. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.9.3.458

DEAC. (2016). Welcome to DEAC. Retrieved from http://www.deac.org

Delbecq, A. L., Van de Ven, A. H., & Gustafson, D. H. (1975). Group techniques for program planning: A guide to nominal group and Delphi processes. Glenview, Ill.: Scott, Foresman.

Dunn, O.J. (1964). Multiple comparisons using rank sums. Technometrics, 6(3), 241-252. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1964.10490181

European Commission. (2016). Quality and relevance in higher education. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/education/policy/higher-education/quality-relevance_en.htm

Federal Student Aid. (2011). Fraud in postsecondary distance education. Retrieved from http://www.ifap.ed.gov/dpcletters/GEN1117.html

Franklin, K. K., & Hart, J. K. (2007). Idea generation and exploration: Benefits and limitations of the policy Delphi research method. Innovative Higher Education, 31(4), 237-246. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10755-006-9022-8

Gaytan, J. (2013). Ensuring quality in online courses: Applying the AACSB International's distance learning quality issues. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 16(4), 62-75.

Hsu, C., & Sandford, B. A. (2007). The Delphi technique: Making sense of consensus. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 12(10), 1-8.

ION. (2015). Quality online course initiative. Retrieved from http://www.ion.uillinois.edu/initiatives/qoci/index.asp

Laerd Statistics. (2013). Kruskal-Wallis H test using SPSS statistics. Retrieved from https://statistics.laerd.com/premium/spss/kwht/kruskal-wallis-test-in-spss-9.php

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Linstone, H. A., & Turoff, M. (2002). The Delphi method techniques and applications. Retrieved from http://is.njit.edu/pubs/delphibook/

Ludwig, B. (1997). Predicting the future: Have you considered using the Delphi methodology? The Journal of Extension, 35(5), 1-3.

Maryland Online. (n.d.). Preparing for a Quality Matters course review. Retrieved from https://www.qualitymatters.org/reviews/preparing

Mariasingam, M. A., & Inglis, A. (2012). Quality assessment and quality assurance in online learning. Paper presented at the 28th Annual Conference on Distance Teaching and Learning, Madison, WI. Paper retrieved from http://www.uwex.edu/disted/conference/resource_library/proceedings/62559_2012.pdf

Nelson, C. (2016, October 17). Continued growth in accessibility of AACSB-accredited online degrees [Blog post]. Retrieved from http://aacsbblogs.typepad.com/dataandresearch/mba-programs/

OLC. (2014). OLC Quality Scorecard 2014. Retrieved from http://onlinelearningconsortium.org/consult/quality-scorecard/

OnlineCollege.org. (2011, June 22). Considering online programs: Do you know quality when you see it? Retrieved from http://www.onlinecollege.org/2011/06/22/considering-online-programs-do-you-know-quality-when-you-see-it/

Pina, A. A. (2010). Online diploma mills: Implications for legitimate distance education. Distance Education, 31(1), 121-126.

Rowe, G., & Wright, G. (1999). The Delphi technique as a forecasting tool: Issues and analysis. International Journal of Forecasting, 15(4), 353-375. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2070(99)00018-7

Shelton, K., & Creghan, K. A. (2015). Demystifying the Delphi method. In V. C. X. Wang (Ed.), Handbook of research on scholarly publishing and research methods (pp. 375-395). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-7409-7.ch019

Shelton, K., & Pedersen, K. (2015). Benchmarking quality in online learning programs in higher education. Paper presented at the Global Learn 2015, Berlin, Germany. Retrieved from https://www.editlib.org/p/150872/

University of Illinois. (2015). Weaknesses of online learning. Retrieved from http://www.ion.uillinois.edu/resources/tutorials/overview/weaknesses.asp

U.S. Department of Education. (2016). Accreditation in the United States. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/admins/finaid/accred/index.html

von der Gracht, H. A. (2012). Consensus measurement in Delphi studies: Review and implications for future quality assurance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79(8), 1525-1536. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2012.04.013

Downloads

Published

2019-01-25

Issue

Vol. 22 No. 4 (2018)

Section

Special Conference Issue: AERA Online Teaching and Learning SIG

License

As a condition of publication, the author agrees to apply the Creative Commons – Attribution International 4.0 (CC-BY) License to OLJ articles. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

This licence allows anyone to reproduce OLJ articles at no cost and without further permission as long as they attribute the author and the journal. This permission includes printing, sharing and other forms of distribution.

Author(s) hold copyright in their work, and retain publishing rights without restrictions