Going the Distance - Online Course Performance and Motivation of Distance-Learning Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i4.1516Abstract
This study was designed to better understand what drives the learning and performance of students enrolled in distance-learning courses. Between 1999 and 2008, the number of students enrolled in at least one online course increased from 10% to 24% (NCES, 2014). In 2015, the number of students enrolled in at least one distance-learning course approached 6 million, with close to half of those students enrolled in programs that are exclusively online (NCES, 2018; Allen & Seaman, 2017). This enrollment growth, however, is coupled with an alarmingly high attrition rate - a rate as high as 50% greater than campus-offered programs (Willging & Johnson, 2009). As GPA and course performance have been linked to distance-learning persistence and retention, we found it imperative to explore differences in motivational orientations as they relate to passing and failing status for an individual course. To do so, we surveyed distance learning students and identified correlations between motivational constructs such as instrumentality, self-efficacy, connectedness, use of knowledge building strategies, and final course performance. Differences related to gender and major/non-major status are also reviewed and discussed. These findings offer insights into next steps for research, but also inform teaching practice.References
Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2017). Digital learning compass: Distance education enrollment report 2017. Retrieved from https://onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/digtiallearningcompassenrollment2017.pdf
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: W.H Freeman and Company.
Bembenutty, H. (2009). Academic delay of gratification, self-regulation of learning, gender differences, and expectancy-value. Personality and Individual Differences, 46(3), 347-352.
Bong, M. (2001). Role of self-efficacy and task-value in predicting college students' course performance and future enrollment intentions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26(4), 553-570.
Boston, W. & Ice, P. (2010). Comprehensive Assessment of Student Retention in Online Learning Environments. In J. Sanchez & K. Zhang (Eds.), Proceedings of E-Learn 2010--World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp. 1593-1599). Orlando, Florida, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved July 19, 2018 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/35779/.
Chemers, M. M., Hu, L. T., & Garcia, B. F. (2001). Academic self-efficacy and first year college student performance and adjustment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 55-64.
Craig, A. J., & Ward, C. V. L.(2009) Retention of community college students: Related student and institutional characteristics. Journal of College Student Retention, 9(4), 505-517.
Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (1995). In the mind of the actor: The structure of adolescents’ achievement task values and expectancy-related beliefs. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 215-225.
Gravel, C.A. (2012). Student-advisor interaction in undergraduate online degree programs: A factor in student retention. NACADA Journal, 32(2), 56-67. https://doi.org/10.12930/0271-9517-32.2.56
Hilpert, J. C., Husman, J., Stump, G. S., Kim, W., Chung, W.-T., &
Duggan, M. A. (2012). Examining students’ future time perspective: Pathways to knowledge building. Japanese Psychological Research, 54(3), 229-240.
Holder, B. (2007). An investigation of hope, academics, environment, and motivation as predictors of persistence in higher education online programs. The Internet and Higher Education, 10(4), 245-260.
Honicke, T., & Broadbent, J. (2016). The influence of academic self-efficacy on academic performance: A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 17, 63-84.
Husman, J., Derryberry, W. P., Crowson, H. M., & Lomax, R. (2004). Instrumentality, task value and intrinsic motivation: Making sense of their independent interdependence. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 63-76.
Husman, J., & Lens, W. (1999). The role of the future in student motivation. Educational Psychologist, 34(2), 113-125.
Kim, W. (2016). Endogenous and Exogenous Instrumentality on Student Motivation and Achievement. (Doctoral Dissertation). Retrieved from https://repository.asu.edu/items/40307.
Lang, F. R., & Carstensen, L. L. (2002). Time counts: Future time perspective, goals, and social relationships. Psychology & Aging, 17(1), 125-139.
Liaw, S. S. (2008). Investigating students’ perceived satisfaction, behavioral intention, and effectiveness of e-learning: A case study of the Blackboard system. Computers & Education, 51(2), 864-873.
Lens, W. (2002). How to combine intrinsic task-motivation with the motivational effects of the instrumentality of present tasks for future goals. In J. K. A. Efklides, Trends and Prospects in Motivation Research. Netherlands: Springer.
Malka, A., & Covington, M. V. (2005). Perceiving school performance as instrumental to future goal attainment: Effects on graded performance. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30(1), 60-80.
Miller, R. B., DeBacker, T. K., & Greene, B. A. (1999). Perceived instrumentality and academics: The link to task valuing. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 26(4), 250-260.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2014). Enrollment in distance education courses, by state: Fall 2012. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2014/2014023.pdf
National Center for Education Statistics. (2018). Digest of Education Statistics, 2016. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=80 .
Puruhito, K. (2017). Connecting to the future: a revised measure of exogenous perceptions of instrumentality (Doctoral Dissertation). Retrieved from: https://repository.asu.edu/attachments/186650/content/Puruhito_asu_0010E_17111.pdf .
Richardson, J. T. (2007). Motives, attitudes and approaches to studying in distance education. Higher education, 54(3), 385-416.
Rovai, A. P. (2003). In search of higher persistence rates in distance education online programs. The Internet and Higher Education, 6(1), 1-16.
Rush, K. (2013). A Quantitative Evaluation of Gender, Nationality, and Generational/Age Influence on Academic Motivation (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest LLC. (Accession No. 3574680)
Shell, D. F., & Husman, J. (2001). The multivariate dimensionality of personal control and future time perspective beliefs in achievement and self-regulation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26(4), 481-506.
Shell, D. F., Husman, J., Turner, J. E., Cliffel, D. M., Nath, I., & Sweany, N. (2005). The impact of computer supported collaborative learning communities on high school students’ knowledge building, strategic learning, and perceptions of the classroom. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 33(3), 343-360.
Shell, D. F., & Soh, L. K. (2013). Profiles of motivated self-regulation in college computer science courses: Differences in major versus required non-major courses. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22, 899-913.
Simons, J., Dewitte, S., & Lens, W. (2004). The role of different types of instrumentality in motivation, study strategies, and performance: Know why you learn, so you'll know what you learn! British Journal of Educational Psychology, 74(3), 343-360.
Simpson, O. (2013). Student retention in distance education: Are we failing our students? Open Learning: The Journal of Open and Distance Learning, 28(2), 105-119.
Spahr, M. L. (2015). Gender, Instructional Method, and Graduate Social Science Students' Motivation and Learning Strategies (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Walden University, Minneapolis, MN.
Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (1992). The development of achievement task values: A theoretical analysis. Developmental Review, 265-310.
Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2002). The development of competence beliefs, expectancies for success, and achievement values from childhood through adolescence. In A. Wigfield, & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Development of Achievement Motivation. San Diego: Academic Press.
Willging, P. A., & Johnson, S. D. (2009). Factors that influence students' decision to dropout of online courses. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 13(3), 115-127.
Yoo, S., & Huang, W. (2013). Engaging online adult learners in higher education: Motivational factors impacted by gender, age, and prior experiences. The Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 61(3), 151-164.
Zajacova, A., Lynch, S. M., & Espenshade, T. J. (2005). Self-efficacy, stress, and academic success in college. Research in Higher Education, 46(6), 677-706.
Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. N. (1999). Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable individual-differences metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1271-1288.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
As a condition of publication, the author agrees to apply the Creative Commons – Attribution International 4.0 (CC-BY) License to OLJ articles. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
This licence allows anyone to reproduce OLJ articles at no cost and without further permission as long as they attribute the author and the journal. This permission includes printing, sharing and other forms of distribution.
Author(s) hold copyright in their work, and retain publishing rights without restrictions
