Synchronous and Asynchronous Discussions: Effects on Cooperation, Belonging, and Affect

Amy T Peterson, Patrick N. Beymer, Ralph T. Putnam

Abstract


Supporting productive peer-to-peer interaction is a central challenge in online courses.  Although cooperative learning research provides robust evidence for the positive outcomes of face-to-face cooperative learning (Johnson & Johnson, 1989), online modes of cooperative learning have provided mixed results. This study examines the effects of synchronous versus asynchronous interaction on students’ sense of cooperation, belonging, and affect in online small-group discussions. Fifty-two undergraduate students were assigned to synchronous and asynchronous interaction conditions.  The findings support prior research that asynchronous communication interferes with the relationship between cooperative goals and the outcomes of cooperation. Results inform theory and practice, by showing that asynchronous cooperative learning may not work as designed because the presence of cooperative goals do not predict cooperative outcomes.


Keywords


online learning, synchrony, asynchronous, cooperative learning, belonging, affect, cognitive processes

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arguello, J., Butler, B., Joyce, E., Kraut, R., Ling, K. S., Rosé, C., & Wang, X. (2006). Talk to me: Foundations for successful individual-group interactions in online communities. In CHI 2006 Proceedings (pp. 959–968). Montreal, Quebec: CHI.

Author, & Roseth, C. J. (2015). Effects of four CSCL strategies for enhancing online discussion forums: Social interdependence, summarizing, scripts, and synchronicity. International Journal of Educational Research, 76, 147–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2015.04.009

Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong : Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497–529.

Cohen, J. W. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Deutsch, M. (1949). A theory of cooperation and competition. Human Relations, 2, 129–152. doi:10.1177/001872674900200204

Deutsch, M. (2012). A theory of cooperation: Competition and beyond. In P. A. M. Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology: Volume 2 (pp. 275–294). London: Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446249222.n40

Ferrin, D. L., Bligh, M. C., & Kohles, J. C. (2008). It takes two to tango: An interdependence analysis of the spiraling of perceived trustworthiness and cooperation in interpersonal and intergroup relationships. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 107, 161–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.02.012

Furrer, C., & Skinner, E. (2003). Sense of relatedness as a factor in children's academic engagement and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 148-162. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.95.1.148

Jeong, H.,& Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2012). Technology supports in CSCL. In J. van Aalst, K. Thompson, M. J. Jacobson, & P. Reinmann (Eds.), The future of learning: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS 2012)—Volume 1, Full papers (pp. 339–346). Sydney, Australia: Society of the Learning Sciences.

Jeong, H., & Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2016). Seven affordances of computer-supported collaborative learning: How to support collaborative learning? How can technologies help? Educational Psychologist, 51, 247-265. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2016.1158654

Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1989). Cooperation and competition: Theory and research. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.

Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2005). New developments in social interdependence theory. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 131, 285–358. https://doi.org/10.3200/MONO.131.4.285-358

Johnson, D. W., & Norem-Hebeisen, A. (1977). Attitudes toward interdependence among persons and psychological health. Psychological Reports, 40, 843-850.

Linnenbrink, E. A. (2005). The dilemma of performance-approach goals: The use of multiple goal contexts to promote students’ motivation and learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 197–213. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.97.2.197

Moons, W. G., Spoor, J. R., Kalomiris, A. E., & Rizk, M. K. (2013). Certainty broadcasts risk preferences: Verbal and nonverbal cues to risk-taking. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 37, 79–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-013-0146-0

Pekrun, R., Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2012). Academic emotions and student engagement. In S. L. Christenson et al. (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Student Engagement (pp. 259–282). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_12

Pennebaker, J. W. (2011). The secret life of pronouns: What our words say about us [E-reader version]. New York: Bloomsbury Press.

Pennebaker, J.W., Booth, R.J., Boyd, R.L., & Francis, M.E. (2015). Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count: LIWC2015. Austin, TX: Pennebaker Conglomerates (www.LIWC.net).

Rodrigo, M. M. T. (2017). Exploratory analysis of discourses between students engaged in a debugging Task. In W. Chen (Ed.), Proceedings for the 25th International Conference on Computers in Education. New Zealand: Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education. Retrieved from http://icce2017.canterbury.ac.nz/sites/default/files/proceedings/main/C2/Exploratory Analysis of Discourses between Students Engaged in a Debugging Task.pdf

Roseth, C. J., Saltarelli, A. J., & Glass, C. R. (2011). Effects of face-to-face and computer-mediated constructive controversy on social interdependence, motivation, and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 804–820. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024213

Saltarelli, A. J., & Roseth, C. J. (2014). Effects of synchronicity and belongingness on face-to-face and computer-mediated constructive controversy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106, 946–960.

Schunk, D. H., Meece, J. L., & Pintrich, P. R. (2014). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.

Tausczik, Y. R., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2010). The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 29(1), 24–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X09351676

Tov, W., Ng, K. L., Lin, H., & Qiu, L. (2013). Detecting well-being via computerized content analysis of brief diary entries. Psychological Assessment, 25, 1069–1078. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033007

Walther, J. B., & Bunz, U. (2005). The rules of virtual groups: Trust, liking, and performance in computer-mediated

communication. Journal of Communication, 55, 828–846.

Watson, L., & Spence, M. T. (2007). Causes and consequences of emotions on consumer behaviour: A review and integrative cognitive appraisal theory. European Journal of Marketing, 41(5–6), 487–511. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560710737570

Worchel, S., Axsom, D., Ferris, F., Samaha, G., & Schweizer, S. (1978). Determinants of the effect of intergroup cooperation on intergroup attraction. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 22, 429–439. https://doi.org/10.1177/002200277802200304

Zschocke, K., Wosnitza, M., & Bürger, K. (2015). Emotions in group work: insights from an appraisal-oriented perspective. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 31, 359–384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-015-02




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i4.1517