Quiet Participation: Investigating non-posting activities in online learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i4.1518Keywords:
Online learning discussions, rereading, revisiting, non-posting participationAbstract
Despite the growth in online learning offerings in K-12 and higher education, limited research has been undertaken to better understand less visible online learning activities. Reading and rereading are not typically valued as important indicators of learning since number or frequency of entries, words or key phrases are usually visible and easily tracked. This paper addresses reading, writing and revisiting behaviours by cluster groups in eight online courses, and looks for patterns related to rereading. Participant perceptions of the value of rereading entries in online learning are discussed. The findings highlight the importance of a more nuanced understanding of the different roles reading and rereading play in online learning discussions. This research informs our understanding of the importance of non-posting behaviors to student learning. Instructionally, these results may encourage valuing of different “paths” to online learning success beyond the criterion of written entries.
Despite the growth in online learning offerings in K-12 and higher education, limited research has been undertaken to better understand less visible online learning activities. Reading and rereading are not typically valued as important indicators of learning since number or frequency of entries, words or key phrases are usually visible and easily tracked. This paper addresses reading, writing and revisiting behaviours by cluster groups in eight online courses, and looks for patterns related to rereading. Participant perceptions of the value of rereading entries in online learning are discussed. The findings highlight the importance of a more nuanced understanding of the different roles reading and rereading play in online learning discussions. This research informs our understanding of the importance of non-posting behaviors to student learning. Instructionally, these results may encourage valuing of different “paths” to online learning success beyond the criterion of written entries.
References
Barbour, M. K. & LaBonte, R. (2017). State of the Nation: K-12 E-Learning in Canada, 2017 Edition. Retrieved from http://k12sotn.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/StateNation17.pdf
Bhattacharya, H. (2008). Interpretive research. In Lisa M. Given (Ed.), The Sage encyclopedia of qualitative research methods (pp. 465–468). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Blatter, J. K. (2008). Case study. In Lisa M. Given (Ed.), The Sage encyclopedia of qualitative research methods (pp. 68–71). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Bonk, C. J., & Cunningham, D. J. (1998). Searching for learner-centered, constructivist, and sociocultural components of collaborative educational learning tools. In C.J. Bonk & K. S. King (Eds.), Electronic collaborators: Learner-centered technologies for literacy, apprenticeship and discourse (pp. 25–50). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Creelman, A. (2017). NVL: Silent learners—a guide. Retrieved from http://lnu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1171709/FULLTEXT01.pdf
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Dennen, V. P. (2006). Shaping Learners’ Online Dialogues: The Role of Discourse Models. Technology, Instruction, Cognition and Learning, 3, 249-264.
Dennen, V. P. (2008). Looking for evidence of learning: Assessment and analysis methods for online discourse. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 205–219.
Dennen, V. P., & Wieland, K. (2007). From interaction to intersubjectivity: Facilitating online group discourse processes. Distance Education, 28(3), 281–297. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01587910701611328
Ebner, M., & Holzinger, A.. (2005). Lurking: an underestimated human-computer phenomenon. IEEE 12(4), 70-75. doi 10.1109/MMUL.2005.74
Goodfellow, R. (2004). Online literacies and learning: Operational, cultural and critical dimensions. Language and Education, 18(4), 379-399.
Green, S. B. & Salkind, N. J. (2011). Using SPSS for Windows and Macintosh: Analyzing and Understanding Data. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105-117). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Harasim, L. (2012). Learning Theory and Online Technologies. New York, NY: Routledge.
Ho, C.-H., & Swan, K. (2007). Evaluating online conversation in an asynchronous learning environment: An application of Grice’s Cooperative Principle. Internet and Higher Education, 10, 3-14.
Hrastinski, S. (2008). What is online participation? A literature review. Computers & Education, 51, 1755-1765.
Hrastinski, S. (2009). A theory of online learning as online participation. Computers & Education, 52, 78-82.
John-Steiner, V., & Souberman, E. (1978). Afterword. In M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman (Eds.), Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Cummins, M., Estrada, V., Freeman, A., & Ludgate, H. (2014). NMC Horizon Report: 2014 K-12 Edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium. Available at http://cdn.nmc.org/media/2014-nmc-horizon-report-k12-EN.pdf
Knobel, M., & Lankshear, C. (2015, June 3). Researching and understanding new literacies from a social languages perspective. Opening keynote paper presented at the Futuuri! Language Summer School and the Language Centre Conference, Jyvaskyla, Finland. Retrieved from http://www.academia.edu/12829531/Researching_and_Understanding_New_Literacies_from_a_Social_Languages_Perspective
Kvale, S. (2007). Analyzing interviews. In S. Kvale (Ed.), Doing Interviews (pp. 102–120). London, England: Sage Publications. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781849208963.n9
Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2004, December 2). “New” literacies: research and social practice. Plenary address at the Annual Meeting of the National Reading Conference, San Antonio, TX. Retrieved from http://everydayliteracies.net/files/nrc.html
Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2007). Sampling “the New in New Literacies.” In M. Knobel & C. Lankshear (Eds.), A new literacies sampler (pp. 1–24). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning. Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2010, September). Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/tech/evidence-based-practices/finalreport.pdf
Nagel, L., Blignaut, A. S., & Cronjé, J. C. (2009). Read-only participants: A case for student communication in online classes. Interactive Learning Environments, 17(1), 37–51.
Nonnecke, B. & Preece, J. (2003). Chapter 6: Silent Participants: Getting to know lurkers better. In C. Lueg & D. Fisher (Eds.) From Usenet to CoWebs: Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 110-132).
Perkins, J. & Newman, K. (1996). Two archetypes in e-discourse: Lurkers and Virtuosos. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications 2, 155-170.
Peters, V. L. & Hewitt, J. (2010). An investigation of student practices in asynchronous computer conferencing courses. Computers & Education, 54(4). 951-961.
Picciano, A. G. (2016). Paradigms, methodologies, methods, and the role of theory in online and blended learning research. In C. D. Dziuban, A. G. Picciano, C. R. Graham, & P. D. Moskal (Eds.), Conducting research in online and blended learning environments: New pedagogical frontiers (pp. 12–27). New York, NY: Routledge.
Rourke, L., & Kanuka, H. (2009). Learning in communities of inquiry: A review of the literature. Journal of Distance Education, 23(1), 19-48. Retrieved from http://www.jofde.ca/index.php/jde/article/view/474/815
Rovai, A. P. (2000). Building and sustaining community in asynchronous learning networks. The Internet and Higher Education, 3, 285−297.
Sipe, L., & Constable, S. (1996). A chart of four contemporary research paradigms: Metaphors for the modes of inquiry. Taboo: The Journal of Culture and Education, 153–163.
Sutton, L. (2001). The principle of vicarious interaction in computer mediated communications. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 7(3), 223-242).
Swan, K. (2001). Virtual interaction: Design factors affecting students’ satisfaction and perceived learning in asynchronous online courses. Distance Education, 22(2), 306-331.
Swan, K., Shen, J. & Hiltz, S. R. (2006). Assessment and collaboration in online learning. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 10(1), 45-62.
Vogler, J. S., Schallert, D. L., Park, Y., Song, K., Chiang, Y. V., Jordan, M. E., Lee, S., Cheng, A. J., Lee, J., Park, J., & Sanders, A. J. Z. (2013). A microgenetic analysis of classroom discussion practices: How literacy processes intermingle in the negotiation of meaning in an online discussion. Journal of Literacy Research, 45(3), 211–239. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1086296X13499846
Vygotsky, L. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Author, (2017).
Author, (2015).
Wise, A. F., Perera, N., Hsiao, Y., Speer, J., & Marbouti, F. (2012). Microanalytic case studies of individual participation patterns in an asynchronous online discussion in an undergraduate blended course. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(2), 108-117.
Wise, A.F., Hausknecht, S., & Zhao, Y. (2013a). Relationships between listening and speaking in online discussions: An empirical investigation. In N. Rummel, M. Kapur, M. Nathan & S. Puntambekar (Eds.) Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning Vol I (pp. 534-541). Madison, Wisconsin.
Wise. A. F., Speer, J., Marbouti, F., & Hsiao, Y. T. (2013b). Broadening the notion of participation in online discussions: Examining patterns in learners’ online listening behaviors. Instructional Science, 41(2), 323-343.
Yin, R. K. (2014). Case Study Research: Design and Methods, (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
As a condition of publication, the author agrees to apply the Creative Commons – Attribution International 4.0 (CC-BY) License to OLJ articles. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
This licence allows anyone to reproduce OLJ articles at no cost and without further permission as long as they attribute the author and the journal. This permission includes printing, sharing and other forms of distribution.
Author(s) hold copyright in their work, and retain publishing rights without restrictions
