Student Perceptions of Online Teacher and On-site Facilitator Support in Supplemental Online Courses

Jered Borup, Chawanna B. Chambers, Rebecca Stimson

Abstract


In an attempt to better support their students and reduce online course attrition rates, some brick-and-mortar schools provide their online students with an on-site facilitator who supports students face-to-face. However, little is known about how students perceive the support provided by their on-site facilitator and online teacher. For this report, we surveyed 70 students and conducted eight focus groups with 51 students to better understand the support that online teachers and on-site facilitators provided them. Our findings focused on the following support indicators: (1) advising students regarding course enrollments, (2) orienting students to online learning procedures and expectations, (3) facilitating interactions, (4) developing caring relationships, (5) motivating students to more fully engage in learning activities, (6) organizing and managing student learning, and (7) instructing students regarding the course content. The majority of support appeared to come from students’ on-site facilitators. An important exception was that the large majority of the content-related support came from the online teacher. While students were largely positive when describing the support from their on-site facilitators, students were split and more critical of the support (or the lack of support) from their online teacher.


Keywords


Parental engagement, online learning, student engagement, virtual schooling, online teachers, on-site facilitators

Full Text:

PDF

References


Archambault, L., Kennedy, K., Shelton, C., Dalal, M., McAllister, L., & Huyett, S. (2016). Incremental Progress: Re-examining Field Experiences in K-12 Online Learning Contexts in the United States. Journal of Online Learning Research, 2(3), 303-326.

Barbour, M. K., & Hill, J. (2011). What are they doing and how are they doing it? Rural student experiences in virtual schooling. Journal of Distance Education, 25(1). Retrieved from http://www.jofde.ca/index.php/jde/article/view/725/1248

Borup, J., West, R. E., Graham, C. R., & Davies, R. S. (2014). The Adolescent Community of Engagement: A framework for research on adolescent online learning. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 22(1), 107–129.

Cavanaugh, C. (2007). Student achievement in elementary and high school. In M. G. Moore (Ed.), Handbook of distance education (2nd ed., pp. 157–168). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

de la Varre, C., Irvin, M. J., Jordan, A. W., Hannum, W. H., & Farmer, T. W. (2014). Reasons for student dropout in an online course in a rural K–12 setting. Distance Education, 35(3), 324–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2015.955259

de la Varre, C., Keane, J., & Irvin, M. J. (2011). Dual perspectives on the contribution of on-site facilitators to teaching presence in a blended learning environment. Journal of Distance Education, 25(3). Retrieved from http://www.jofde.ca/index.php/jde/article/viewArticle/751/1285

Drysdale, J. S., Graham, C. R., & Borup, J. (2016). Teacher and student perspectives on facilitating a sense of community through an online high school’s “shepherding” program. International Journal of E-Learning, 15(2), 149–178.

Eraut, M. (2006). Feedback. Learning in Health and Social Care, 5, 111–118. https://doi.org/doi:10.1111/j.1473-6861.2006.00129.x

Evergreen Educational Group. (2017). Keeping pace with K-12 online learning 2016. Evergreen Education Group. Retrieved from http://www.kpk12.com/wp-content/uploads/EEG_KP2016-web.pdf

Freidhoff, J. R. (2018). Michigan’s k-12 virtual learning effectiveness report: 2016-17. Lansing, MI: Michigan Virtual University. Available from: https://mvlri.org/research/effectiveness-report/

Freidhoff, J. R., Borup, J., Stimson, R. J., & DeBruler, K. (2015). Documenting and sharing the work of successful on-site mentors. Journal of Online Learning Research, 1(1), 107–128.

Glaser, B. G. (1965). The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. Social Problems, 12(4), 436–445. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/798843

Hannum, W. H., Irvin, M. J., Lei, P., & Farmer, T. W. (2008). Effectiveness of using learner-centered principles on student retention in distance education courses in rural schools. Distance Education, 29(3), 211–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587910802395763

Harms, C. M., Niederhauser, D. S., Davis, N. E., Roblyer, M. D., & Gilbert, S. B. (2006). Educating educators for virtual schooling: Communicating roles and responsibilities. The Electronic Journal of Communication, 16(1 & 2).

Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge, New York.

Hawkins, A., Barbour, M. K., & Graham, C. R. (2011). Strictly business: Teacher perceptions of interaction in virtual schooling. The Journal of Distance Education, 25(2).

Hawkins, A., Barbour, M. K., & Graham, C. R. (2012). “Everybody is their own island”: Teacher disconnection in a virtual school. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 13(2), 124–144.

Hendrix, N., & Degner, K. (2016). Supporting online AP students: The rural facilitator and considerations for training. American Journal of Distance Education, 30(3), 133–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2016.1198194

Hillman, D. C., Willis, D. J., & Gunawardena, C. (1994). Learner-interface interaction in distance education: An extension of contemporary models and strategies for practitioners. American Journal of Distance Education, 8(2), 30–42.

Kim, C., Park, S. W., & Cozart, J. (2013). Affective and motivational factors of learning in online mathematics courses. British Journal of Educational Technology, n/a-n/a. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01382.x

Larkin, I. M., Brantley-Dias, L., & Lokey-Vega, A. (2015). Job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and turnover intention of online teachers in the K-12 setting. Online Learning, 20(3), 26–52.

Lin, C., Zheng, B., & Zhang, Y. (2017). Interactions and learning outcomes in online language courses. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(3), 730–748. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12457

Lowes, S., & Lin, P. (2015). Learning to learn online: Using locus of control to help students become successful online learners. Journal of Online Learning Research, 1(1), 17–48.

Michigan Department of Education. (2014). 5-O-A: Virtual learning, distance learning, & independent study. In Pupil accounting manual (pp. 5-O-A-1 – 5-O-A-5). Lansing, MI: Author. Retrieved from http://mi.gov/documents/5O-VirtualHS-DistLearn- ing_41466_7.pdf

Michigan Public Act § No. 60. (2013). Retrieved from http://www.legislature.mi.gov/docu- ments/2013-2014/publicact/htm/2013-PA-0060.htm

Moore, M. G. (2007). The Theory of Transactional Distance. In M. G. Moore (Ed.), Handbook of distance education (2nd ed., pp. 89–105). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.

Moore, M. G. (1993). Theory of transactional distance. In D. Keegan (Ed.), Theoretical principles of distance education (pp. 22–28). New York, NY: Routledge.

Murphy, E., & Rodríguez-Manzanares, M. A. (2009). Teachers’ perspectives on motivation in high school distance education. Journal of Distance Education, 23(3), 1–24.

O’Dwyer, L. M., Carey, R., & Kleiman, G. (2007). A study of the effectiveness of the Louisiana algebra I online course. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 39(3), 289–306.

Oviatt, D. R., Graham, C. R., Borup, J., & Davies, R. S. (2018). Online student use of a proximate community of engagement in an independent study program. Online Learning, 22(1), 223–251. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i1.1153

Rice, K. L. (2006). A comprehensive look at distance education in the K-12 context. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38(4), 425–449.

Rice, M. F., & Carter, R. A. (2016). Online teacher work to support self-regulation of learning in students with disabilities at a fully online state virtual school. Online Learning, 20(4), 118–135.

Roblyer, M. D., Davis, L., Mills, S. C., Marshall, J., & Pape, L. (2008). Toward practical procedures for predicting and promoting success in virtual school students. American Journal of Distance Education, 22(2), 90–109.

Roblyer, M. D. (2006). Virtually successful: Defeating the dropout problem through online programs. The Phi Delta Kappan, 88(1), 31–36.

Roblyer, M. D., Davis, L., Mills, S. C., Marshall, J., & Pape, L. (2008). Toward practical procedures for predicting and promoting success in virtual school students. American Journal of Distance Education, 22(2), 90–109.

Roblyer, M. D., Freeman, J., Stabler, M., & Schneidmiler, J. (2007). External evaluation of the Alabama ACCESS initiative phase 3 report. Eugene, OR: International Society for Technology in Education. Retrieved from http://accessdl.state.al.us/2006Evaluation.pdf

Rose, R. M., Smith, A., Johnson, K., & Glick, D. (2015). Ensuring equitable access in online and blended learning. In T. Clark & M. K. Barbour (Eds.), Online, blended, and distance education in schools: Building successful programs (pp. 71–83). Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.

Velasquez, A., Graham, C. R., & Osguthorpe, R. D. (2013). Caring in a technology-mediated online high school context. Distance Education, 34(1), 97–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2013.770435

Weil, L. G., Fleming, S. M., Dumontheil, I., Kilford, E. J., Weil, R. S., Rees, G., … Blakemore, S. (2013). The development of metacognitive ability in adolescence. Consciousness and Cognition, 22(1), 264–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2013.01.004




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v23i4.1565



Copyright (c) 2019 Jered Borup, Chawanna B. Chambers, Rebecca Stimson

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/