A professional learning program for novice online teachers: Application of professional development guidelines using threshold concepts and online learning perceptions

Maria Northcote, Kevin P Gosselin, Peter Kilgour, Daniel Reynaud, Catherine McLoughlin

Abstract


The professional development of online teachers is now commonplace in most universities. Alongside the relatively straightforward decision to provide professional learning support for novice and experienced online educators within universities, decisions about the nature and content of such support are not always as clear cut. The study aimed to gather evidence about the experiences and views of current students and staff which, in turn, informed a set of pedagogical guidelines that could be used as the basis of professional learning programs for novice online teachers. Using a mixed methods research design, data were gathered using questionnaires, reflective journals and focus groups to determine the threshold concepts about online teaching, and perceptions of ideal online learning contexts. As well as identifying threshold concepts about online teaching and perceptions of teachers’ and students’ ideal views of online learning contexts (reported elsewhere), the study produced curricular guidelines to inform the design of professional development outputs for online teachers in higher education contexts. This article reports on an example of how these professional development guidelines were implemented at one higher education institution to provide wide-scale implementation of a professional development program for academic staff engaged in online teaching.

Keywords


threshold concepts, online teaching, professional development curricula

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ashong, C. Y., & Commander, N. E. (2012). Ethnicity, gender, and perceptions of online learning in higher education. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 8(2), 98.

Baran, E., Correia, A.-P., & Thompson, A. (2011). Transforming online teaching practice: Critical analysis of the literature on the roles and competencies of online teachers. Distance Education, 32(3), 421-439.

Baran, E., Correia, A.-P., & Thompson, A. (2013). Tracing successful online teaching in higher education: Voices of exemplary online teachers. Teachers College Record, 115(3), 1-41.

Bonk, C. J., & Dennen, V. (2003). Frameworks for research, design, benchmarks, training, and pedagogy in web-based distance education. In M. G. Moore & W. G. Anderson (Eds.), Handbook of distance education (pp. 331-348). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Boyd, D. E., & Lonsbury, J. (2016). Guiding on the Edge: Online and F2F course design as a threshold process. Paper presented at the 6th Biennial Threshold Concepts Conference: Thresholds on the Edge, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada. https://www.dal.ca/dept/clt/events-news/Threshold_Concepts/program3/C4_2116a.html

Bunnell, S. L., & Bernstein, D. J. (2012). Overcoming some threshold concepts in scholarly teaching. Journal of Faculty Development. Special Issue: Threshold Concepts in Educational Development, 26(3), 14-18.

Carmichael, P. (2012). Tribes, Territories and Threshold Concepts: Educational materialisms at work in higher education. Educational Philosophy and Theory: Special Issue: The Future of Educational Materialism, 44(Supplement s1), 31–42.

Cousin, G. (2006, 23 January 2015). An introduction to threshold concepts. Planet. Retrieved from http://www.et.kent.edu/fpdc-db/files/DD%2002-threshold.pdf

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Davies, P., & Mangan, J. (2008). Embedding threshold concepts: From theory to pedagogical principles to learning activities. In R. Land, J. H. F. Meyer, & J. Smith (Eds.), Threshold concepts within the disciplines. Rotterdam: Sense.

Elliott, M., Rhoades, N., Jackson, C. M., & Mandernach, B. J. (2015). Professional development: Designing initiatives to meet the needs of online faculty. Journal of Educators online, 12(1), 160-1888.

Fraser, B. J. (1998). Classroom environment instruments: Development, validity and applications. Learning environments research, 1(1), 7-34.

Garrison, D. R., & Anderson, T. (2000). Transforming and enhancing university teaching: Stronger and weaker technological influences. London: Kogan Page.

Gosselin, K. P. (2009). Development and psychometric exploration of the online teaching self-efficacy inventory. (PhD), Texas Tech University.

Gosselin, K. P., Northcote, M., Reyaud, D., Kilgour, P., Anderson, M., & Boddey, C. (2016). Development of an evidence-based professional learning program informed by online teachers' self-efficacy and threshold concepts. Online Learning Journal, 20(3), 178-194.

Green, N. C., Edwards, H., Wolodko, B., Stewart, C., Brooks, M., & Littledyke, R. (2010). Reconceptualising higher education pedagogy in online learning. Distance Education, 31(3), 257-273. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2010.513951

Hill, H. C., Beisiegel, M., & Jacob, R. (2013). Professional development research: Consensus, crossroads, and challenges. Educational Researcher, 42(9), 476-487.

Hitch, D., Mahoney, P., & Macfarlane, S. (2018). Professional development for sessional staff in higher education: A review of current evidence. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(2), 285-300.

doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2017.1360844

Jooganah, K. (2010). Student transition to advanced mathematical thinking: A focus on ‘proof ‘as a threshold concept. Paper presented at the 3rd Biennial Threshold Concepts Symposium: Exploring transformative dimensions of threshold concepts, University of NSW and University of Sydney. http://www.thresholdconcepts2010.unsw.edu.au/Abstracts/JooganahK.pdf

Keeney, S., Hasson, F., & McKenna, H. (2006). Consulting the oracle: Ten lessons from using the Delphi technique in nursing research. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 53(2), 205-212.

Keeney, S., Hasson, F., & McKenna, H. (2011). The Delphi Technique in nursing and health research. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

Lee, A., & McWilliam, E. (2008). What game are we in? Living with academic development. International Journal for Academic Development, 13(1), 67-77. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13601440701860284

Marshall, S. J., Orrell, J., Cameron, A., Bosanquet, A., & Thomas, S. (2011). Leading and managing learning and teaching in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 30(2), 87-103.

Mbati, L., & Minnaar, A. (2015). Guidelines towards the facilitation of interactive online learning programmes in higher education. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(2). doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v16i2.2019

McLoughlin, C., & Lee, M. J. W. (2009). Personalised learning spaces and self-regulated learning: Global examples of effective pedagogy. Paper presented at the Same places, different spaces: ASCILITE Conference 2009, Auckland.

Meyer, J. H. F., & Land, R. (2003). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge: Linkages to ways of thinking and practising within the disciplines. Retrieved from Edinburgh: http://www.etl.tla.ed.ac.uk//docs/ETLreport4.pdf

Meyer, J. H. F., & Land, R. (2005). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (2): Epistemological considerations and a conceptual framework for teaching and learning. Higher Education, 49(3), 373–388.

Meyer, J. H. F., & Land, R. (2006). Overcoming barriers to student understanding: Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge. New York: Routledge.

Mills, R., & Wilson, A. (2012). There's a right answer but only some students can get it: Threshold concepts in the professional development of physics demonstrators. Paper presented at the Fourth Bienniel Conference on Threshold Concepts: From personal practice to communities of practice, Trinity College, Dublin. http://www.nairtl.ie/documents/EPub_2012Proceedings.pdf#page=158

Mohr, S. C., & Shelton, K. (2017). Best practices framework for online faculty professional development: A Delphi study. Online Learning, 21(4), 123-140.

Northcote, M., Gosselin, K., Kilgour, P., McLoughlin, C., & Boddey, C. (2017). Using threshold concepts about online teaching to support novice online teachers: Designing professional development guidelines to individually assist academic staff (“me”) and collectively guide the institution (“us”). In H. Partridge, K. Davis, & J. Thomas (Eds.), Me, Us, IT! Proceedings ASCILITE2017: 34th International Conference on Innovation, Practice and Research in the Use of Educational Technologies in Tertiary Education (pp. 328-336). University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Queensland: ASCILITE.

Northcote, M., Gosselin, K. P., Reynaud, D., Kilgour, P., & Anderson, M. (2015). Navigating learning journeys of online teachers: Threshold concepts and self-efficacy. Issues in Educational Research, 25(3), 319-344.

Northcote, M., Reynaud, D., Beamish, P., Martin, T., & Gosselin, K. P. (2011). Bumpy moments and joyful breakthroughs: The place of threshold concepts in academic staff development programs about online learning and teaching. ACCESS: Critical Perspectives on Communication, Cultural & Policy Studies, 30(2), 75-90.

Pearson, J., & Trinidad, S. (2005). OLES: An instrument for refining the design of e-learning environments. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(6), 396-404.

Perkins, D. (2006). Constructivism and troublesome knowledge. In J. Meyer & R. Land (Eds.), Overcoming barriers to student understanding: Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (pp. 33-47). New York: Routledge.

Powell, C. (2003). The Delphi technique: Myths and realities. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 41(4), 376-382.

Trinidad, S., Aldridge, J., & Fraser, B. (2005). Development, validation and use of the Online Learning Environment Survey. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 21(1), 60-81.

Ward, M. E., Peters, G., & Shelley, K. (2010). Student and faculty perceptions of the quality of online learning experiences. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 11(3), 57-77.

Young, A., & Norgard, C. (2006). Assessing the quality of online courses from the students' perspective. The Internet and Higher Education, 9(2), 107-115. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2006.03.001




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v23i4.1573



Copyright (c) 2019 Maria Northcote, Kevin P Gosselin, Peter Kilgour, Daniel Reynaud, Catherine McLoughlin

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/