RECIPROCITY ANALYSIS OF ONLINE LEARNING NETWORKS

Authors

  • Reuven Aviv
  • Zippy Erlich
  • Gilad Ravid

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v9i4.1775

Keywords:

Asynchronous Learning Networks, Learning Effectiveness, Social Network Analysis, Cohesion Analysis, Role Analysis, Power Analysis, Content Analysis

Abstract

Asynchronous Learning Networks (ALNs) make the process of collaboration more transparent, because a transcript of conference messages can be used to assess individual roles and contributions and the collaborative process itself. This study considers three aspects of ALNs: the design; the quality of the resulting knowledge construction process; and cohesion, role and power network structures. The design is evaluated according to the Social Interdependence Theory of Cooperative Learning. The quality of the knowledge construction process is evaluated through Content Analysis; and the network structures are analyzed using Social Network Analysis of the response relations among participants during online discussions. In this research we analyze data from two three-month-long ALN academic university courses: a formal, structured, closed forum and an informal, non-structured, open forum. We found that in the structured ALN, the knowledge construction process reached a very high phase of critical thinking
and developed cohesive cliques. The students took on bridging and triggering roles, while the tutor had relatively little power. In the non-structured ALN, the knowledge construction process reached a low phase of cognitive activity; few cliques were constructed; most of the students took on the passive role of teacher-followers; and the tutor was at the center of activity. These differences are statistically significant. We conclude that a well-designed ALN develops significant, distinct cohesion, and role and power structures lead the knowledge construction process to high phases of critical thinking.

References

Mayadas, A. F. Testimony of A. Frank Mayadas, Program Director, Alfred P. Sloan Foundation. Web-based Education Commission 2000.

Anderson, T. and F. Elloumi. Theory and Practice of Online Learning. Athabasca: Athabasca University: 2004. Online: http://cde.athabascau.ca/online_book/.

Harasim, L. M. On-line Education: Perspectives on a New Environment. New York, NY: Praeger, 1990.

Harasim, L. M. Learning Networks: A Field Guide to Teaching and Learning Online. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press: 1995.

Hiltz, S. R. The Virtual Classroom: Learning Without Limits via Computer Networks. Norwood, NJ: Ablex: 1994.

Dede, C. Emerging Technologies and Distributed Learning. American Journal of Distance Education 10: 4–36, 1996. Online: http://www.virtual.gmu.edu/SS_research/cdpapers/ajdepdf.htm.

Vygotsky, L. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press: 1978.

Oshima, J., C. Bereiter, and M. Scardamalia. Information-Access Characteristics for High Conceptual Progress in a Computer Networked Learning Environment. In Schnase, J. L. and E.L. Cunnius (eds.) Support for Collaborative Learning '95, 259–267. Bloomington, IN: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1995.

Hsiao, D. CSCL Theories, 2000. Online: www.edb.utexas.edu/csclstudent/Dhsiao/theories.html.

Milo, R., S. Shen-Orr, S. Itzkovitz, N. Kashtan, D. Chklovskii, and U. Alon. Network Motifs: Simple Building Blocks of Complex Networks. Science 298(5594): 824–827, 25 October 2002. Online: http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/298/5594/824?ijkey=ab1b429470fac7806f92dcca80a17336e6e402f3&keytype2=tf_ipsecsha.

Martinez, A., Y. Dimitriadis, B. Rubia, E. Gomez, L. Garrachon, and J. A. Marcos. Studying Social Aspects of Computer-Supported Collaboration with a Mixed Evaluation Approach. In Stahl, G. (ed.) Proceedings of Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (CSCL 2002) Conference, 631–632. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2002.

Cho, H., M. Stefanone and G. Gay. Social Network Analysis of Information Sharing Networks in a CSCL Community. In Stahl, G. (ed.) Proceedings of Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (CSCL) 2002 Conference, 43–50. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2002.

Reffay, C. and T. Chanier. Social Network Analysis Used for Modeling Collaboration in Distance Learning Groups. In Cerri, S. A., G. Guarderes, and F. Paraguaco. (eds.) Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS): 31–40, 2002.

Aviv, R., Z. Erlich, G. Ravid, and A. Geva. Network Analysis of Knowledge Construction in Asynchronous Learning Networks. Journal of Asynchronous Networks 7: 1–23, 2003. Online: http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/jaln/v7n3/v7n3_aviv.asp.

Aviv, R., Erlich, Z. and Ravid, G. Design and Mechanisms of Knowledge Constructing Online Learning Communities The 2nd Annual International MIT LINC Symposium & Workshop, Cambridge, MA: 2004.

Haythornthwaite, C., M. Kazmer, J. Robins, and S. Shoemaker. Community Development Among Distance Learners: Temporal and Technological Dimensions. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication. 6 (1) 2000. Online: http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol6/issue1/haythornthwaite.html.

Swan, K. Building Learning Communities in Online Courses: The Importance of Interaction. Education, Communication and Information 2: 23–49, 2002.

Swan, K., P. Shea, E. Fredericksen, A. Pickett, W. Pelz, and G. Maher. Building Knowledge Building Communities: Consistency, Contact and Communication in the Virtual Classroom. Journal of Educational Computing Research 23: 389–413, 2000.

Seabright, P. The Company of Strangers: A Natural History of Economic Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2004.

Wellman, B. and M. Gulia. Net Surfers Don't Ride Alone: Virtual Communities as Communities. In Kollock, P. and M. Smith. (eds.) Communities and Cyberspace. New York, NY: Routledge, 1999.

Herring, S. C. Computer-Mediated Discourse. In Schiffrin, D., D. Tannen, and H. Hamilton. (eds.) The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, 612–634. Oxford: Blackwell, 2001.

Schwier, R. A. Shaping the Metaphor of Community in Online Learning Environments 2002. Online: http://cde.athabascau.ca/ISEC2002/papers/schwier.pdf.

Chickering, A. and S. Ehrmann. Implementing the Seven Principles: Technology as a Lever. AAHE Bulletin, 49: 3–6, 1996. Online: http://www.tltgroup.org/programs/seven.html.

WebCT, WebCT Course Setup and Maintenance, 2003.

Skvoretz, J. and K. Faust. Relations, species, and network structure. Journal of Social Structure, 2002. Online: http://www.cmu.edu/joss/content/articles/volume3/SkvoretzFaust.html.

Monge, P. R. and N. S. Contractor. Emergence of Communication Networks. In Jablin, F. M. and L.L. Putnam, (eds.) New Handbook of Organizational Communication, 440–502. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 2001. Online: http://www.tec.spcomm.uiuc.edu/nosh/HOCNets.html.

Edwards, C. Discourses on Collaborative Networked Learning Networked Learning Conference, Sheffield, UK 2002. Online: http://www.shef.ac.uk/nlc2002/proceedings/symp/05.htm.

Halloran, J., Y. Rogers, and M. Scaife. Taking the ‘No’ out of Lotus Notes: Activity Theory, Groupware, and Student Groupwork. In Stahl, G. (ed.). Computer Support for Collaborative Learning: Foundations for a CSCL Community, 169–178. Boulder, CO: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2002.

Lakkala, M., L. Ilomaki, J. Lallimo, and K. Hakkarainen. Virtual Communication in Middle School Students’ and Teachers’ Inquiry. In Stahl, G. (ed.) Computer Support for Collaborative Learning: Foundations for a CSCL Community, 443–452. Boulder, CO: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2002: 443-452.

Hakkinen, P., S. Jarvela, and A. Byman. Sharing and Making Perspectives in Web-based Conferencing. In Dillenbourg, P., A. Eurelings, and K. Hakkarainen (eds.) Proceedings of the First European Conference on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 285–292. Maastricht: Universiteit Maastricht, 2001.

Arnseth, H. C., S. Ludvigsen, B. Wasson, and A. Morch. Collaboration and Problem Solving in Distributed Collaborative Learning Proceedings of EuroCSCL, 75–82. Maastricht, the Netherlands: University of Maastricht, 2001.

Wang, Y. and D. R. Fesenmaier. Understanding the Motivation of Contribution in Online Communities: An Empirical Investigation of an Online Travel Community. Electronic Markets 13: 33–45, 2003. Online: http://www.ttra.com/pub/uploads/011.pdf.

Homans, G. C. Social Behavior as Exchange. American Journal of Sociology 19: 22–24, 1958.

Blau, P. M. Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York, NY: Wiley, 1964.

Bienenstock, E. J. and P. Bonacich. Network Exchange as a Cooperative Game. Rationality and Society 9: 37–65, 1997.

Markovsky, B., D. Willer, and T. Patton. Power Relations in Exchange Networks. American Sociological Review 53: 220–236, 1998.

Willer, D. Network Exchange Theory. Westport, CT: Praeger, 1999.

Axelrod, R. The Evolution of Cooperation. New York, NY: Basic Books, 1990.

Aron, L. A Meeting of Minds: Mutuality in Psychoanalysis. Hillside, NJ: Analytic Press, 1996.

Kadushin, C. Some Basic Network Concepts and Propositions (Draft) 2004. Online: http://stat.gamma.rug.nl/snijders/Kadushin_Concepts.pdf.

Rafaeli, S. From New Media to Communication Saage Annual Review of Communication Research: Advancing Communication Science, 110–134. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1988.

Rafaeli, S. and R. J. LaRose. Electronic Bulletin Boards and “Public Goods” Explanations of Collaborative Mass Media. Communication Research 20: 277–297, 1993.

Snijders, T. A. B. Enumeration and Simulation Methods for 0–1 Matrices with Given Marginals. Psychometrika 56: 397–417, 1991.

Zeggelink, E. P. H. Strangers into Friends. The Evolution of Friendship Networks Using an Individual Oriented Modeling Approach. Amsterdam: Thesis Publishers, 1993.

Kapferer, B. Strategy and Transaction in an African Factory. Manchester: Manchester Univ. Press, 1972.

Knoke, D. and J. Kuklinski. Network Analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1982.

Krackhardt, D. Cognitive Social Structures. Social Networks 9: 104–134, 1987.

Wasserman, S. and K. Faust. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1999.

Rao, A. R. and S. Bandyopadhyay. Measures of Reciprocity in a Social Network. Sankhy 49 Ser. A.: 141–148, 1987.

Mandel, M. Measuring Tendency Towards Mutuality in a Social Network. Social Networks 22: 285–298, 2000.

Hiltz, S. R., K. Johnson, and M. Turoff. Experiments in Group Decision Making: Communication Process and Outcome in Face-to-Face versus Computerized Conferences. Human Communication Research 13: 225–252, 1986.

Walther, J. B. Anticipated Ongoing Interaction versus Channel Effects on Relational Communication in Computer-Mediated Interaction. Human Communication Research 20: 473–501, 1994.

Constant, D., L. Sproull, and S. Kiesler. The Kindness of Strangers: The Usefulness of Electronic Weak Ties for Technical Advice. Organization Science 7: 119–135, 1996.

Aviv, R., Z. Erlich, and G. Ravid. Design and Mechanisms of Knowledge Constructing Online Learning Communities. The 2nd Conference of the Learning International Network Consortium (LINC). Boston: MIT, 2004.

Aviv, R., Z. Erlich, and G. Ravid. Mechanisms and Architecture of Online Learning Communities IEEE ICALT, Jonesuu, Finland 2004.

Johnson, D. W. and R.T. Johnson. Learning Together and Alone: Cooperative, Competitive and Individualistic Learning. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon, 1999.

Johnson, D. W. and R. T. Johnson. Positive Interdependence: The Heart of Cooperative Learning. Edina, MN: Interaction, 1992.

Aviv, R. Educational Performance of ALN via Content Analysis. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 4: 53–72, 2000.Online: http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/jaln/v4n2/v4n2_aviv.asp.

Aviv, R., Z. Erlich, and G. Ravid. Cohesion and Roles: Network Analysis of CSCL Communities IEEE ICALT, Athens, Greece 2003.

Shen-Orr, S., R. Milo, S. Mangan, and U. Alon. Network Motifs in the Transcriptional Regulation Network of Escherichia coli. Nature Genetics 31: 64–68, 2000.

Barabasi, A. L. and J. Hawoong. Mean-Field Theory for Scale-Free Random Networks. Physica A. 272: 173–187, 1999.

Dorogovtsev, S. N. and J. F. F. Mendes. Evolution of Networks: From Biological Nets to the Internet and WWW. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.

Newman, M. E. J., A. L. Barabasi, and D. J. Watts. The Structure and Dynamics of Networks. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2003.

Anderson, C. J., S. Wasserman and B. Crouch. A p* Primer: Logit Model for Social Networks. Social Networks 21: 37–66, 1999.

Wasserman, S. and P. Pattison. Logit Models and Logistic Regression for Social Networks. Part I. An Introduction to Markov Graphs and p*. Psychometrika 60: 401–426, 1996.

Skvoretz, J. Biased Net Theory: Approximations, Simulations, and Observations. Social Networks 12: 217–238, 1990.

Downloads

Published

2019-03-19

Issue

Section

Empirical Studies