EXPLORING FOUR DIMENSIONS OF ONLINE INSTRUCTOR ROLES: A PROGRAM LEVEL CASE STUDY

Xiaojing Liu, Curt J. Bonk, Richard J. Magjuka, Seung-hee Lee, Bude Su

Abstract


The purpose of this study was to understand the practice of online facilitation in a Midwestern university which has a highly successful traditional MBA program. This study explored the instructors’ perceptions regarding four dimensions of instructor roles using Berge’s [1] classifications: pedagogical, managerial, social, and technical. This study also examined the challenges and issues confronting online instructors when fulfilling these roles. The results suggest that instructors carried out several important roles to varying degrees. The findings reveal a stronger emphasis on the pedagogical roles (course designer, profession-inspirer, feedback-giver, and interaction-facilitator). Emphasizing those roles, the instructors promote three types of interactions: student-content, student-student, and student-teacher. A lesser
emphasis on social roles represented mixed feelings regarding its importance to the instructors. While students rated the instructors very positively, the results also indicate that instructors still need to have their roles transformed pedagogically, socially, and technologically if they are to establish a more engaging and fruitful environment for online learning.


Keywords


Instructor Roles,Online Learning,Facilitation,Pedagogical Role,Managerial Role,Social Role,Technical Role

Full Text:

PDF

References


Berge, Z. L. Facilitating Computer Conferencing: Recommendations from the Field. Educational Technology 15(1): 22–30, 1995. http://www.emoderators.com/moderators/teach_online.html.

Morine-Dershimer, G. What’s in a Case and What Comes Out? In Colbert J., K. Trimble, and P. Desberg (Eds.), The Case for Education: Contemporary Approaches to Using the Case Methods, 100–123. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon, 1996.

Coppola, N. W., S. R. Hiltz, and N. Rotter. Becoming a Virtual Professor: Pedagogical Roles and ALN. Proceedings of the 34th Hawaii International Conference on System Science. Maui, Hawaii, 2001.

Heuer, B. P., and K. King. Leading the Band: the Role of the Instructor in Online Learning for Educators. Journal of Interactive Learning Online 3(1): 2004. http://www.ncolr.org/jiol/issues/PDF/3.1.5.pdf.

Bonk, C. J. My Hat’s on to the Online Instructor. e-Education Advisor: Education Edition 1(1): 10–

, 2000.

Berge, Z. L. New Roles for Learners and Teachers in Online Education, 2001. http://www.globaled.com/articles/BergeZane2000.pdf

Bonk, C. J., R. A. Wisher, and J. Lee. Moderating Learner-centered E-learning: Problems and Solutions, Benefits and Implications. In Roberts, T. S. (Ed.),Online Collaborative Learning: Theory and Practice, 54–85, Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing, 2003.

Ashton, S., T. Roberts, and L. Teles. Investigation the Role of the Instructor in Collaborative Online Environments. Poster session presented at the CSCL '99 Conference, Stanford University, CA, 1999.

Bonk, C. J., J. R. Kirkley, N. Hara, and N. Dennen. Finding the Instructor in Post-secondary Online Learning: Pedagogical, Social, Managerial, and Technological Locations. In Stephenson, J. (Ed.), Teaching and Learning Online: Pedagogies for New Technologies, 76–97, London: Kogan Page, 2001.

Salmon, G. E-moderating: The Key to Teaching and Learning Online. London: Kogan Page, 2000.

Cummings, J. A. Debate in the Virtual Classroom. Unpublished manuscript, Indiana University at Bloomington, USA, 2000.

Johnson, C. M. A Survey of Current Research on Online Communities of Practice. Internet and Higher Education 4(1): 45–60, 2001.

Powers, S., and S. Guan. Examining the Range of Student Needs in the Design and Development of a Web-based course. In Abbey, B. (Ed.), Instructional and Cognitive Impacts of Web-based Education, 200–216, Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing, 2000.

Kerr, E. Electronic Leadership: A Guide to Moderating Online Conferences. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communications 29(1): 12–18, 1986.

Wenger, E. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity. London: Cambridge University Press, 1998.

Lave, J., and E. Wenger. Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. London: Cambridge University Press, 1991.

Anderson, T., L. Rourke, W. Archer, and R. Garrison. Assessing Teaching Presence in Computer Conferencing Context. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 5(2): 1–17, 2001. http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/jaln/v5n2/v5n2_anderson.asp.

Eastmond, D. V. Alone but Together: Adult Distance Study through Computer Conferencing, Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, 1995.

Conrad, D. University Instructors’ Reflections on their First Online Teaching Experiences. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 8(2): 31–44, 2004. http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/jaln/v8n2/pdf/v8n2_conrad.pdf.

Mason, R. Moderating Educational Conference. DEOSNEWS 1(19): 1998. http://www.emoderators.com/papers/mason.html.

Pincas, A. Successful Online Course Design: Virtual Frameworks for Discourse Construction. Educational Technology and Society 1(1): 1998. http://www.ifets.info/journals/1_1/pincas.html.

Teles L., S. Ashton, T. Roberts, and I. Tzoneva. The Role of the Instructor in E-Learning Collaborative Environments. TechKnowlogia 6/7, 2001.

Hara, N., and R. Kling. Students’ Distress with a Web-based Distance Education Course: An Ethnographic Study of Participants' Experiences. Information, Communication & Society 3(4): 557–579, 2000.

Kanuka, H and C. Caswell. University Instructor’s Perceptions of the Use of Asynchronous Text-based Discussion in Distance Education. The American Journal of Distance Education 16(3): 151–167, 2002.

Stake, R. Case Studies. In Denzin, N. K. and Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1994.

Merriam, S. B. Case Study Research in Education: A Qualitative Approach. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1998.

Miles, M. B., and A. M. Huberman. Qualitative Data Analysis, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 1994.

Peffers, K. and S. Bloom. Internet-based Innovation for Teaching IS Courses: The State of Adoption: 1998–2000, Journal of Information Technology Theory and Applications 1(1): 1999.

Salmon, G., and K. Giles. Moderating Online, 1997. http://www.emoderators.com/moderators/gilly/MOD.html.

Knowles, M. S. Adult learning. In Craig, R. L. (Ed.), ASTD Training & Development Handbook: A Guide to Human Resource Development. New York: McGraw Hill. 1996.

Wilson, B., S. Ludwidg-Hardman, C. L. Thornam, and J. C. Dunlap. Bounded Community:Designing and Facilitating Learning Communities in Formal Courses. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA, 2004. http://carbon.cudenver.edu/~bwilson/BLCs.html.

Bonk, C. J., and V. Dennen. Frameworks for Research, Design, Benchmarks, Training, and Pedagogy in Web-based Distance Education. In Moore, M. G. and W. G. Anderson (Eds.), Handbook of Distance Education. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. 2003.

Berge, Z.L. and L. Y. Muilenburg. Obstacles Faced at Various Stage of Capability Regarding Distance Education in Institutions of Higher Education. Tech Trends 46(4): 40–45, 2001.

Howell, S.T., F. Saba, N. K. Lindsay, and P. B. Williams. Seven Strategies for Enabling Faculty Success in Distance Education. Internet and Higher Education 7(1): 33–49, 2004.

Anderson, T. Modes of Interaction in Distance Education: Recent Developments and Research Questions. In Moore, M. G. and W. G. Anderson (Eds.), Handbook of Distance Education. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 2003.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v9i4.1777



Copyright (c) 2019 Xiaojing Liu, Curt J. Bonk, Richard J. Magjuka, Seung-hee Lee, Bude Su