DEVELOPING LEARNING COMMUNITY IN ONLINE ASYNCHRONOUS COLLEGE COURSES: THE ROLE OF TEACHING PRESENCE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v9i4.1779Keywords:
Online Teaching, Teaching Presence, Class Community, Social Learning, Learning CommunityAbstract
This paper builds on the model we have developed for creating quality online learning environments for higher education. In that model we argue that college-level online learning needs to reflect what we know about learning in general, what we understand about learning in higher-education contexts, and our emerging knowledge of learning in largely asynchronous online environments. Components of the model include a focus on learner roles, knowledge building, assessment, community, and various forms of “presence.” In this paper we focus on two components—teaching presence and community—and review the rationale and benefits for an emphasis on community in online learning environments. We argue that learning is social in nature and that online learning environments can be designed to reflect and leverage the social nature of learning. We suggest that previous research points to the critical role that community can play in building and sustaining productive learning and that teaching presence, defined as the core roles of the online instructor, is among the most promising mechanism for developing online learning community. We present a multi-institutional study of 2,036 students across thirty-two different colleges that supports this claim and provides insight into the relationship between online learning community and teaching presence. Factor and regression analysis indicate a significant link between students’ sense of
learning community and their recognition of effective instructional design and directed facilitation on the part of their course instructors—and that student gender plays a small role in sense of learning community. We conclude with recommendations for online course design, pedagogy, and future research.
References
Bransford, D., A. Brown, and R. Cocking, eds. How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience and School. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 1999.
Johnson, D. W., R. T. Johnson, and K. Smith. Active Learning: Cooperation in the College Classroom. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company, 1998.
Millis, B. and P. Cottell. Cooperative Learning for Higher Education Faculty. Westport, CT: American Council on Education/Oryx Press, 1998.
Scardamalia, M. and C. Bereiter. Computer support for knowledge-building communities. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 3 (3): 265–283, 1994.
Wenger, E. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
Dede, C. The evolution of distance education: Emerging technologies and distributed learning. American Journal of Distance Education 10 (2): 4–36, 1996.
Rovai, A. P. A preliminary look at structural differences in sense of classroom community between higher education traditional and ALN courses. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 6 (1): 41–56, 2002.
Rovai, A. P. Development of an instrument to measure classroom community. The Internet and Higher Education 5 (2002): 197–211.
Sergiovanni, T. J. Building Community in Schools. San Francisco: Jossey Bass, 1994.
Haythornthwaite, C., M. M. Kazmer, G. Robins, and S. Shoemaker. Community development among distance learners: Temporal and technological dimensions. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communications 6 (1): 2000. Online: http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol6/issue1/haythornthwaite.html.
Morgan, C. K., and M. Tam. Unraveling the complexities of distance education student attrition. Distance Education 20 (1):96–108, 1999.
Carr, S. As distance education comes of age, the challenge is keeping the students. The Chronicle of Higher Education 46 (23): 39–41, 2000.
Bruffee, K. A. Collaborative Learning: Higher Education, Interdependence, and the Authority of Knowledge. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1993.
Walker, J., S. Wasserman, and B. Wellman. Statistical models for social support networks. In S. Wasserman and J. Galaskiewicz, (eds.) Advances in Social Network Analysis,, 53–78. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1994.
Wellman, B. and M. Gulia. The network basis of social support: A network is more than the sum of its ties. In B. Wellman, (ed.) Networks in the Global Village, 83-–18. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. 1994.
Garrison, D. R., T. Anderson, and W. Archer. Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education 11 (2): 1–14, 2000. Online: http://communitiesofinquiry.com/documents/CTinTextEnvFinal.pdf.
Shea, P., E. Fredericksen, A. Pickett, and W. Pelz. A preliminary investigation of teaching presence in the SUNY Learning Network. In J. Bourne and J.C. Moore, (eds.), Elements of Quality Online Education: Practice and Direction, 279–312. Needham, MA: Sloan Consortium, 2003.
Jiang, M., and E. Ting. A study of factors influencing students’ perceived learning in a web-based course environment. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications 6 (4): 317–338, 2000.
Swan, K., and P. Shea. Social presence and the development of virtual learning communities. In S. Hiltz and R. Goldman, Learning Together Online: Research on Asynchronous Learning Networks, 239–260. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2005.
Richardson, J. and K. Swan. Examination of social presence in online learning: Students’ perceived learning and satisfaction. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 7 (1): 68–88, 2003.
Dzuiban, C., P. Shea, and J. B. Arbaugh. Faculty roles and satisfaction in ALNs. In S. Hiltz and R. Goldman, Learning Together Online: Research on Asynchronous Learning Networks, 169–190. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2005.
Swan, K., P. Shea, E. Fredericksen, A. Pickett, W. Pelz, and G. Maher. Building knowledge building communities: Consistency, contact and communication in the virtual classroom. Journal of Educational Computing Research 23 (4): 389–413, 2000.
Picciano, A. G. Beyond student perceptions: Issues of interaction, presence, and performance in an online course. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 6 (1); 21–40, 2002.
Brown, R. The process of community building in distance learning classes. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 5 (2): 18–35, 2001.
Shea, P. J., K. Swan, E. E. Fredericksen, and A. M. Pickett. Student satisfaction and reported learning in the SUNY Learning Network. In J. Bourne and J. C. Moore, (ed.) Elements of Quality Online Education, Volume 3 in the Sloan-C Series, 145–155. Needham, MA: Sloan Consortium, 2001.
Shea, P., E. Fredericksen, A. Pickett, and W. Pelz. Faculty development, student satisfaction, and reported learning in the SUNY Learning Network. In T. Duffy and J. Kirkley, (eds.) Learner-centered Theory and Practice in Distance Education, 343–377. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2003.
Chickering, A. W. and A. F. Gamson. Seven Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education. Racine, WI: The Johnson Foundation, Inc./Wingspread, 1987.
Arbaugh, J. B. and S. C. Hornik. Predictors of perceived learning and satisfaction in web-based MBA courses: A test and extension of Chickering and Gamson’s (1987) 7 principles of good practice in education. Presented at the 33rd Annual Meeting of the Decision Sciences Institute, San Diego, CA. Online: http://www.sbaer.uca.edu/research/dsi/2002/papers/176.pdf.
Anderson, T., L. Rourke, D. R. Garrison, and W. Archer. Assessing teaching presence in a computer conferencing context. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 5 (2): 1–17, 2001.
Berge, S.L. Facilitating computer conferencing: Recommendations from the field. Educational Technology 15 (1): 22–30, 1995.
Shea, P., A. Pickett, and W. Pelz. A follow-up investigation of teaching presence in the SUNY Learning Network. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 7 (2): 61–80, 2003.
Cattan, M., M. White, J. Bond, A. Learmouth. Preventing social isolation and loneliness among older people: A systematic review of health promotion interventions. Ageing and Society 25 (1): 41–50, 2005.
Yeh, S. J. and K. L. Sing. Living alone, social support and feeling lonely among the elderly. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal 32 (2): 129–139, 2004.
Vandervoort, D. Social isolation and gender. Current Psychology 19 (3): 229–23, 2000.
Shumaker, S. and D. Hill. Gender differences in social support and physical health. Health Psychology 10 (2): 102–111, 1991.
Bostock, S. and W. Lizhi. Gender in students’ online discussions. Innovations in Education and Teaching International 42 (1): 73–86, 2005.
Goldstein, J. and P. Sadhana. The brink of change: Gender in technology-rich collaborative learning environments. Journal of Science Education and Technology 13 (4): 505–523, 2004.
Tabachnick, B. G. and L. S. Fidell. Using Multivariate Statistics.. Boston, MA: Pearson Allyn & Bacon, 2001.
Tharp, R. and R. Gallimore. Rousing Minds to Life: Teaching, Learning, and Schooling in Social Context. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1988.
Applebee, A. Curriculum as Conversation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1996.
Shea, P., E. Fredericksen, A. Pickett, W. Pelz, and K. Swan. Measures of learning effectiveness in the SUNY Learning Network. In J. Bourne and J.C. Moore, (eds.) Online Education: Learning Effectiveness, Faculty Satisfaction, and Cost Effectiveness 2, 31–54. Needham, MA: Sloan Consortium, 2001.
Benbunan-Fich, R. and S. R. Hiltz. Correlates of effectiveness of learning networks: The effects of course level, course type, and gender on outcomes. Paper presented at the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Big Island, HI, 2002. Online: http://csdl2.computer.org/comp/proceedings/hicss/2002/1435/01/14350005b.pdf.
Astleiner, H. and R. Steinberg. Are there gender differences in web-based learning? An integrated model and related effect sizes. AACE Journal 13 (1): 47–63, 2005.
Rovai, A. P., M. J. Wighting, and R. Lucking. The Classroom and School Community Inventory: Development, refinement, and validation of a self-report measure for educational research. The Internet and Higher Education 7 (4): 263–280, 2004.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
As a condition of publication, the author agrees to apply the Creative Commons – Attribution International 4.0 (CC-BY) License to OLJ articles. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
This licence allows anyone to reproduce OLJ articles at no cost and without further permission as long as they attribute the author and the journal. This permission includes printing, sharing and other forms of distribution.
Author(s) hold copyright in their work, and retain publishing rights without restrictions
