GENDER, VOICE, AND LEARNING IN ONLINE COURSE ENVIRONMENTS

David M. Anderson, Carol J. Haddad

Abstract


A self-selected sample of 109 online students at a midwestern regional university was surveyed and asked to compare expression of voice, control over learning, and perceived deep learning outcomes in face-to-face versus online course environments. We found that females experience greater perceived deep learning in online than in face-to-face courses, and that expression of voice appears to contribute to this outcome. This effect did not occur for male students. We also found that professor support and, to a lesser extent, control over one's learning each had positive relationships with perceived deep learning in both course environments. Concern for the feelings of other students did not have a negative impact on voice as was originally hypothesized.


Keywords


Online teaching,online learning,women,gender,voice,postsecondary education

Full Text:

PDF

References


Waits, T., and Lewis, L. Distance Education at Degree-Granting Postsecondary Institutions: 2000–2001. National Center for Education Statistics, NCES 2003-017. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, 2003, pp v, 3, 6. Online: http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2003/2003017.pdf.

National Center for Education Statistics. Digest of Education Statistics, 2000, Table 248. Washington, DC: U.S. Depart-ment of Education, 2000. Online: http://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=72.

Thompson, M. M. Distance learners in higher education. In C.C. Gibson (ed.), Distance Learners in Higher Education: Institutional Responses for Quality Outcomes, 9–24. Madison, WI: Atwood Publishing, 1998.

Kramarae, C. The Third Shift. Women Learning Online. Washington, DC: American Association of University Women Educational Foundation, 2001.

Ory, J. C., C. Bullock, and K. Burnaska. Gender similarity in the use of and attitudes about ALN in a university setting. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 1 (1): 1–16, 1997.

Wood, J. T. Communication Theories in Action. An Introduction, 276. 2nd Edition. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, Thomson Learning, 2000.

Poole, D. M. Student participation in a discussion-oriented online course: a case study. Journal of Research on Compu-ting in Education 33 (2): 162–177, 2000.

Schleiter, M. K. Using computer conferencing to break down racial and gender barriers in the college classroom. Feminist Collections: A Quarterly of Women’s Studies Resources 17 (2): 16, 1996.

Belenky, M. F., B. M. Clinchy, N. R. Goldberger, and J. M. Tarule. Women’s Ways of Knowing: The Development of Self, Voice, and Mind. New York: Basic Books, 1986.

Kerka, S. Women, human development, and learning. ERIC Digest No: ED358379. Columbus, OH: ERIC Clearinghouse on Adult Career and Vocational Education, 1993: 3. Online: http://www.ed.gov/databases/ERIC_Digests/ed358379.html.

Witkin, H. A., C. A. Moore, D. R. Goodenough, and P. W. Cox. Field-dependent and field-independent cognitive styles and their educational implications. Review of Educational Research 47: 1–64, 1977.

Murphy, H. J., B. Casey, and J. D. Young. Field dependence/independence and undergraduates’ academic performance in an information management program. College Student Journal 31: 45–50, 1997.

Gallini, J. K., and D. D. Barron. Participants’ perceptions of Web-infused environments: a survey of teaching beliefs, learning approaches, and communication. Journal of Research on Technology in Education 34 (2): 139–156, 2001/02.

Card, K. A., and L. Horton. Providing access to graduate education using computer-mediated communication. Internation-al Journal of Instructional Media 27 (3): 235–245, 2000.

Bandura, A. Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology 52: 1–26, 2001.

Joo, Y., M. Bong, and H. Choi. Self-efficacy for self-regulated learning, academic self-efficacy, and Internet self-efficacy in Web-based instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development 48 (2): 5–17, 2000.

Meyer, K. A. Face-to-face versus threaded discussions: The role of time and higher-order thinking. Journal of Asynchro-nous Learning Networks 7 (3): 1–11, 2003. Online: http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/jaln/v7n3/v7n3_meyer.asp.

Smith, G. G., D. Ferguson, and M. Caris. Teaching college courses online vs. face to face. T.H.E. Journal 28 (9): 18–26, 2001.

Warschauer, M. Computer-mediated collaborative learning: Theory and practice. The Modern Language Journal 81: 470–481, 1997.

Van Dusen, G. C. Digital dilemma: Issues of access, cost, and quality in media-enhanced and distance education. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Reports 27 (5): 1–120, 2000.

Caverly, D. C., and L. MacDonald. Online learning communities. Journal of Developmental Education 25 (3): 36–37, 2002.

Luk, S. C. The relationship between cognitive style and academic achievement. British Journal of Educational Technology 29 (2): 7, 137–147, 1998.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v9i1.1799



Copyright (c) 2019 David M. Anderson, Carol J. Haddad