Educational Performance of ALN via Content Analysis

Authors

  • Reuven Aviv

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v4i2.1901

Keywords:

ALN, Open University of Israel, Content Analysis

Abstract

Learning in an ALN mode is modeled by a set of educational processes. The group is modeled by an abstract entity that provides services to the learners via its group educational processes. The learners reciprocate by their corresponding educational processes. Following findings of the Social Interdependence Theory of Cooperative Learning, we conjecture that the ALN is Cooperative Learning enhanced by extended think time. If ALN is structured for effective cooperation then the group dynamics will regulate the high level reasoning and the interpersonal relationships of the learners towards their highest levels.
If this conjecture is found to be true, it identifies the maximization of reasoning and interpersonal relationships as one of the educational benefits of an ALN.
To test the conjecture, we developed a methodology for the evaluation of the performance profiles of the ALN educational processes. Performance profiles are calculated via content analysis of the information flows exchanged between the participants, and the results are tested for reproducibility. We use this methodology to analyze three weeks of asynchronous discussions embedded in an ALN course of the Open University of Israel (OUI). The results of this analysis indicate the plausibility of our conjecture.

References

Bourne, J. What is ALN? The ALN Web, The Center for Asynchronous Learning Networks, http://www.aln.org/alnweb/aln.htm.

Gasen, J., and Preece, J. Collaborative team projects: Key issues for effective learning. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, Vol. 24, No. 4, pp. 381-394, 1996.

Bourne, J. R., Brodersen, J. A., Campbell, J. O., Dawant, M. S., and Shiavi, R. G. A model for on-line learning networks in engineering education. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 73-96, 1997.

Harris, D. A., and DiPablo, A. Institutional policy for ALN. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 1-6, 1999.

Carswell, L., Thomas, P., Petre, M., Price, B., and Richards, M. Understanding the electronic student: Analysis of functional requirements for distributed education. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 7-18, 1999.

Graham, M., Scarborough, H., and Goodwin, C. Implementing computer-mediated communication in an undergraduate course: A practical experience. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 32-45, 1999.

Hiltz S., R., and Turoff, M. The Network Nation: Human Communication via Computer, Cambridge: The MIT Press, 1993.

Moonen, J. The efficiency of telelearning. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 68-77, 1997.

Mason, R., and Kay, A. Mindweave: Communication, Computers and Distance Education, Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1989.

Salomon, G. No distribution without individual’s cognition: A dynamic interactional view. Distributed Cognition: Psychological and Educational Considerations, pp. 111-138, Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

McReary, E. Eliciting more rigorous cognitive outcomes through analysis of computer-mediated discussion. Fifteenth International Conference on Improving University Teaching, Vancouver, 1989.

Newman, B., Webb, B., and Cochrane, C. A content analysis method to measure critical thinking in face-to-face and computer supported group learning, http://www.qub.ac.uk/mgt/papers/methods/contpap.html.

Henri, F. Computer conferencing and content analysis. In: Collaborative Learning Through Computer Conferencing, Kay, A., R., Ed., Berlin, Springer Verlag, 1991.

Wegereif R. The social dimension of asynchronous learning networks. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 68-77, 1997.

Ellis, M., L., and Mcreary, E., K. The structure of message sequence in computer conference: Comparative study. Workshop on Computer Conferencing and Electronic Messaging, Guelph, University of Guelph, Canada, 1985.

Harasim, L. On-line education as a new domain. In: Mindweave: Communication, Computers and Distance Education. Mason, R., D., and Kay, A., R., Eds. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1989.

Johnson, D., W., and Johnson, R., T. Learning Together and Alone, Cooperative, Competitive and Individualistic Learning, Allyn and Bacon (a Viacom Company): Needham Heights, MA, 1999.

Johnson, D., W., and Johnson, R. Cooperation and Competition: Theory and Research, Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company, 1989.

Gabbert, B., Johnson, D., W., and Johnson, R. Cooperative learning, group-to-individual transfer, process gain and the acquisition of cognitive reasoning strategies. Journal of Psychology, Vol. 120, No. 3, pp. 265-278, 1986.

Johnson, D., W., and Johnson, R. Effects of cooperative and individualistic learning experiences on interethnic interaction., Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 73, No. 3, pp. 454-459, 1981.

Skon, L., Johnson D., W., and Johnson, R. Cooperative peer interaction versus individual competition and individual efforts: Effects on the acquisition of cognitive reasoning strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 73, No. 1, pp. 83-92, 1981.

Hiltz, S., R. Impacts of college-level courses via Asynchronous Learning Networks: Some preliminary results. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 1-19, 1997.

Winieki, D., J. Keeping the thread: Adapting conversational practice to help distance students and instructors manage discussions in an Asynchronous Learning, DEOSNEWS 9 (2), 1999. http://www.ed.psu/ACSDE/.

Quellmaz, R., S. Needed: Better methods for testing higher-order thinking skills. Educational Leadership, Vol. 43, No. 2, pp. 29-35, 1985.

Biggs, J. What the student does: teaching for enhanced learning. Higher Education Research & Development, Vol. 18, No. 1, 1999.

Mason, R. Methodologies for evaluating applications of computer conferencing. In Collaborative Learning Through Computer Conferencing, Kay, A. R., Ed., Berlin: Springer Verlag, 1991.

Bonanno, D., M. Evaluating electronic communication patterns over a semester: A qualitative content analysis, http://trochim.cornell.edu/Webeval/webcomm/webcomm.html.

Krippendorf, K. Content analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology, Beverly Hills: SAGE Publications, 1980.

G. Alexander and C. Lincoln. The thought box: A computer-based communication system to support distance learning. In Mindweave: Communication, Computers and Distance Education, Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1989.

S. Ehermann Improving a distributed learning environment with computers and telecommunications. In Mindweave: Communication, Computers and Distance Education, Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1989.

Downloads

Published

2019-03-19

Issue

Section

Empirical Studies