Using ALNs to Support a Complete Educational Experience
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v3i2.1917Keywords:
ALN, Penn State World Campus, Student Satisfaction, Online Learning Communities, EvaluationAbstract
The most obvious factor influencing students’ satisfaction with distance learning is convenience of access. While ALNs clearly can provide convenient access to educational content, how do they measure up in terms of access to the broader range of elements that make up a “complete” educational experience?
Within traditional education, a complete education has been viewed as inseparable from the resident experience, with its access to instructional as well as co-curricular activities and support services. ALN programs that hope to meet the educational— rather than merely informational—needs of distant students must find ways to offer comparable opportunities and services.
Penn State’s World Campus is working to realize the potential of ALNs by using innovative strategies for meeting several specific objectives. These objectives include access to high-quality course content; interactions between faculty members and students beyond those in direct instruction; interaction among students at the program level; broad access to information and instructional resources; flexible access to appropriate support services; and developing students’ feeling of “belonging” to the institution.
This paper provides specific examples of online strategies for meeting these objectives and reports preliminary evaluation results relating to student satisfaction in courses offered during the first two semesters of World Campus programming.
References
Hezel, R., and P. Dirr, Understanding Television-based Distance Education: Identifying Barriers to University Attendance, Research in Distance Education, 3(1), 2–5, 1991.
Thompson, M. M., Overview of Distance Learners in Higher Education, In The Distance Learner in Higher Education, ed. C. Gibson, 9-24. Madison, WI: Atwood, 1998.
Going the Distance, Washington, D.C.: The Annenberg/CPB Project, 1994.
Hyatt, S., Developing and Managing a Multi-modal Distance Learning Program in the Two-Year College. Paper presented at the Annual International Conference of the National Institute for Staff and Organizational Development on Teaching Excellence, Austin, Texas, May 24–27, 1992. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service ED 349 009)
Willis, B., Distance Education: Strategies and Tools, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications, 1995.
Tallman, F. D., Satisfaction and Completion in Correspondence Study: The Influence of Instructional and Student-Support Services. The American Journal of Distance Education 8(2): 43–55, 1994.
May, S., Collaborative Learning: More is Not Necessarily Better, The American Journal of Distance Education 7(3):39-50, 1993.
Garland, M. R., The Adult Need for “Personal Control” Provides a Cogent Guiding Concept for Distance Education. Journal of Distance Education, IX (1), 45–59, 1994.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
As a condition of publication, the author agrees to apply the Creative Commons – Attribution International 4.0 (CC-BY) License to OLJ articles. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
This licence allows anyone to reproduce OLJ articles at no cost and without further permission as long as they attribute the author and the journal. This permission includes printing, sharing and other forms of distribution.
Author(s) hold copyright in their work, and retain publishing rights without restrictions
