The Social Dimension of Asynchronous Learning Networks

Rupert Wegerif

Abstract


This paper argues that the social dimension is important to effectiveness of Asynchronous Learning Networks (ALNs) and needs to be taken into account in the design of courses. Evidence from an ethnographic study of the Teaching and Learning Online (TLO) course offered by the Institute of Education Technology at the Open University is presented in support of this argument. This study found that individual success or failure on the course depended upon the extent to which students were able to cross a threshold from feeling like outsiders to feeling like insiders. Factors affecting the construction of a sense of community are drawn out from interviews with students. The significance of these findings is discussed in relation to a situated model of learning as induction into a community of practice. Finally recommendations are made for the support of community building in the design of courses.


Keywords


Collaborative Learning,Evaluation Of Alns,Situated Learning

Full Text:

PDF

References


Lave, J. and E. Wenger, Situated Learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press(1991).

Lave, J., Word problems: a microcosm of theories of learning, in Context and Cognition: ways of learning and knowing, P. Light and G. Butterworth, Editors. Harvester-Wheatsheaf.: Hemel Hempstead. (1992).

Lave, J., Situated Learning in Communities of Practice, in Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition, L. In Resnick, J. Levine, and S. Teasley, Editors. American Psychological Association: Washington, D.C. (1991).

Harasim, L., et al., Learning Networks. Cambridge, Ma: MIT (1995).

Mason, R. and A. Kaye, eds. Mindweave: Computers, Communication and Distance Education. . Pergamon: Oxford (1989).

Mason, R., ed. Computer Conferencing. The Last Word...,. . Beach Holme Publishers Ltd: Victoria, British Columbia (1993).

McConnell, D., Implementing Computer Supported Cooperative Learning. London: Kogan Page (1994).

Rowntree, D., Tutoring Online. British Journal of Educational Technology, 26, 3 (1995).

Mason, R., Evaluating technology-based learning, in Innovative adult learning with innovative technology, B. Collis and G. Davies, Editors. Elsevier: Oxford. (1995).

Yates, S., The Textuality of Computer Mediated Communication, . 1993, Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis. Open University.

Eggins, S., An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics. London: Pinter (1994).

Wegerif, R. and N. Mercer, Using computer-based text analysis to integrate quantitative and qualitative methods in the investigation of collaborative learning. Language and Education, 11, 3 (1997).

Harasim, Online Education: a New Domain, in Mindweave: Communication, Computers, and Distance Education, R.D. Mason and A.R. Kaye, Editors. Pergamon: Oxford. (1989).

Graddol, D., Some CMC discourse properties and their educational significance, in Mindweave, A. Kaye, Editor. Pergamon: Oxford. (1989).

Habermas, J., Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. Cambridge: Polity Press (1990).

Habermas, J., The Theory of Communicative Action. Vol 1. Cambridge: Polity Press (1991).

Wegerif, R. and N. Mercer, Computers and reasoning through talk in the classroom. Language and Education, 10, 1 (1996).

Mercer, N. and E. Fisher, Scaffolding through talk, in Computers and Talk in the Primary Classroom, R. Wegerif and P. Scrimshaw, Editors. Multilingual Matters: Clevedon, Avon. (1997).

Kaye, A., Learning together apart, in Collaborative Learning Through Computer Conferencing, A. Kaye, Editor. Springer-Verlag: Heidelberg. (1991).




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v2i1.1928



Copyright (c) 2019 Rupert Wegerif