Higher Education in an Era of Digital Competition: Emerging Organizational Models

Authors

  • Donald E. Hanna

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v2i1.1930

Keywords:

Universities and Organizational Models, Virtual Universities, Learning Technologies

Abstract

Growing demand among learners for improved accessibility and convenience, lower costs, and direct application of content to work settings is radically changing the environment for higher education in the United States and globally. In this rapidly changing environment, which is increasingly based within the context of a global, knowledge-based economy, traditional universities are attempting to adapt purposes, structures, and programs, and new organizations are emerging in response. Organizational changes and new developments are being fueled by accelerating advances in digital communications and learning technologies that are sweeping the world. Growing demand for learning combined with these technical advances is in fact a critical pressure point for challenging the dominant assumptions and characteristics of existing traditionally organized universities in the 21st century. This combination of demand, costs, application of content and new technologies is opening the door to emerging competitors and new organizations that will compete directly with traditional universities and with each other for students and learners.

This paper describes and analyzes seven models of higher education organization that are challenging the future preeminence of the traditional model of residential higher education. These models are emerging to meet the new conditions and to take advantage of the new environment that has created both opportunity and risk for all organizations, and which demands experimentation of structure, form, and process.

Each of the seven models discussed offers an alternative to traditional residential higher education. Several models are in their infancy. Several others operate at the margin of organizations with other core businesses or priorities. At least one of the models depends upon extensive collaborations. All of the models incorporate features that are designed to enable universities to better respond to new educational demands and opportunities at a national and international level. Taken together, these organizational models are emerging as significant forces in providing education and training, and as powerful competitors to traditional universities. They offer the prospect of rapidly changing where, when, how and for what purpose education is organized within both the corporate and the higher education communities in the United States and throughout the world. The result is a dynamic competitive environment among traditional universities that are adapting learning processes and administrative procedures, alternative nontraditional universities that are adapting technologies to better serve their existing primarily adult constituencies, and new universities that are being formed around the promise of virtual environments. The thesis of this paper is that growth in worldwide demand for learning is combining with improved learning technologies to force existing universities to rethink their basic assumptions and marketing strategies. This new digital environment is further encouraging and enabling the creation of new and innovative organizational models of that are challenging traditional residential universities to change more quickly and dynamically.

References

Steiner, P. "On the Internet Nobody Knows You're a Dog." Cartoon. The New Yorker, (Vol.69 (LXIX) no. 20), July 5, 1993, p. 61.

Baldridge, J. and Deal, T. The Dynamics of Organizational Change in Education. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan Publishing Company, 1983.

Toffler, A. The Adaptive Corporation. New York: McGraw Hill, 1985.

Lenzner, R. and Johnson, S. "Seeing Things as They Really Are." An Interview with Peter Drucker. Forbes Magazine, March 10, 1997, pp. 126-127.

Noam, E. "Will Books Become the Dumb Medium?" Keynote Address to EDUCOM'97, Minneapolis, Minnesota, October 27, 1997 [http://www.group-mind.com/educom/conf/97/noamaddress.html].

Oakley, B. "Will Universities Survive in the Knowledge Economy?" Interface, IEEE Newsletter, April, 1997.

Davis, S. and Botkin, J. The Monster under the Bed. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1994.

Sperling, J. and Tucker, R. For Profit Higher Education. New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Publishers, 1997.

Tapscott, D. The Digital Economy: Promise and Peril in the Age of Networked Intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1996.

Ghazi, K and Irani, I. Emerging Trends in the $670 Billion Education Market. New York: Lehman Brothers Education Services, 1997.

Ghazi, K. The Adult Education Market: A Comprehensive Guide. New York: Lehman Brothers Education Services, 1997.

Post-secondary Education Quick Information Survey on Distance Education Courses Offered by Higher Education Institutions. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Educational Statistics, Table 1, 1995.

Primary Research Group. The Survey of Distance Learning Programs in Higher Education. New York: Primary Research Group, 1997, p, 18.

See Washington State University. Web Address: [http://www.wsu.edu/vwsu/].

Spanier, G. "A Conversation With President Spanier." The Penn Stater, September/October 1997.

Spanier, G. "1997 President's State of the University Address." Penn State University, September 12, 1997. [http://www.psu.edu/ur/state/stateofuniv97.html].

"University of Wisconsin System Planning Document." University of Wisconsin System, September, 1997.

"California State University Institute: Higher Education's Entrepreneurs." California State University Web Address: [http://www.co.calstate.edu/CSUI/info/summary.html].

Olcott, D. "Renewing the Vision: Past Perspectives and Future Imperatives for Distance Education." The Journal of Continuing Higher Education, Volume 45, Number 3, Fall, 1997, p. 2.

See the University of Phoenix. Web Address: [http://www.uophx.edu/uop/_campus.htm].

Keegan, D. "On defining Distance Education." Distance Education: International Perspectives (Eds. Sewart, D., Keegan, D. and Holmberg, B.). New York: Routledge, Chapman & Hall, Inc., 1988.

Daniel, J. S. Mega-Universities and Knowledge Media: Technology Strategies for Higher Education. London: Biddles Ltd., 1996.

Keegan, D. "The Competitive Advantages of Distance Teaching Universities." Open Learning 9, 2, 1994, pp. 9-36.

Hall, J. Access Through Innovation: New Colleges for New Students. New York: American Council on Education & Macmillan, 1991, pp. 127-141.

Thompson, G. "Unfulfilled Prophecy: The Evolution of Corporate Colleges." University of Saskatchewan. Publication Forthcoming, 1998, p. 6.

Eurich, N. Corporate Classrooms : The Learning Business. Princeton, N.J. Princeton University Press, 1985.

Nash, N. and Hawthorne, E. Formal Recognition of Employer-sponsored Instruction: Conflict and Collegiality in Post-secondary Education. College Station, Tex.: Association for the Study of Higher Education, ERIC Higher Education Report No. 3 (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 286 437, 1987.

Hague, Sir Douglas. Beyond Universities: A New Republic of the Intellect. London: Institute of Economic Affairs, 1991.

Meister, J. C. Corporate Quality Universities: Lessons in Building a World-class Work Force. New York: Irwin, 1994.

Duderstadt, J. "The Future of the University in an Age of Knowledge." Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, Volume 1, Issue 2. August, 1997 [ISSN 1092-8235]. Web Address: [http://www.aln.org/].

Utsumi, T. "Invitation to Membership of GLOSAS (Global Systems and Simulation Association." Web address: [http://library.fortlewis.edu/~instruct/glosas/invite.htm.

See the Laurasian Institute Web Address: [http://www.laurasian.org/TLI_home_folder/TLI_educ.html].

"GATE Vision: Achieving Worldwide Access to Quality Education and Training." Global Alliance for Training and Education (GATE) Web Address: [http://www.edugate.org/vision.html].

Haworth, J, and Conrad, C. Emblems of Quality: Developing and Sustaining High Quality Programs. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1997.

Downloads

Published

2019-03-19

Issue

Section

Empirical Studies