Student Preferences for Learning Resources on a Land-based Postgraduate Online Degree Programme

Authors

  • Duncan Royd Slater Myerscough College, Lancashire
  • Richard Davies University of Central Lancashire

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v24i1.1976

Keywords:

learning resources, online learning, online lectures, podcasts

Abstract

Creating engaging online resources is an important part of the rapidly changing discipline of e-tutoring. There is increasing use of a wide range of media for online training but only a limited number of studies assessing their effectiveness. This study involved an educator working collegiately with cohorts of online students studying a specialist land-based postgraduate degree programme (n = 79).  The opinions of these mature online students, on current and potential learning resources, informed two interventions that provided novel online resources to the course. Student opinion on these new resources was captured and subjected to thematic analysis. The results identify that these students’ favoured resources were online lectures, course notes, primary literature and tutors’ opinion pieces because they were perceived as accessible, easy to engage with, assignment-related and/or provided something akin to a ‘university campus experience’.  In contrast, podcasts and knowledge review quizzes were strongly disfavoured by the majority of respondents. The implications of this study in relation to online teaching practice are discussed.

Author Biographies

Duncan Royd Slater, Myerscough College, Lancashire

Senior lecturer in arboriculture, Greenspace department, Myerscough College

Richard Davies, University of Central Lancashire

Higher Education and Research Development Lead

Centre for Excellence in Learning and Teaching

References

Anderson T (ed.) (2008) The Theory and Practice of Online Learning; 2nd Edition; Edmonton, Canada: AU Press.

Augar N, Raitman R, Lanham E and Zhou W (2006) Building virtual learning communities; In Ma Z (ed.) Web-based intelligent e-learning systems: Technologies and applications, 72-100; London: Information Science Publishing.

Beaudoin M F (2002) Learning or lurking?: Tracking the “invisible” online student; Internet & Higher Education 5 (2), 147-155.

Bell D (2008) The university in your pocket; In Salmon G and Edirisingha P (eds) Podcasting for learning in universities, 178-187; Maidenhead, Berks: OUP.

Beuschel W, Gaiser B and Draheim S (2003) Communication needs of online students; In Aggarwal A K (ed.) Web-based Education: Learning from experience, 203-222; London: Information Science Publishing.

Bonk C J (2001) Online Teaching in an Online World; Bloomington, Indiana: CourseShare.

Bonk C J and Zhang K (2008) Empowering online learning: 100+ activities for reading, reflecting, displaying and doing; San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Borup J, Graham C and Velasquez A (2011) The use of asynchronous video communication to improve instructor immediacy and social presence in a blended learning environment; In Kitchenham A (Ed.) Blended Learning across Disciplines: Models for Implementation (pp.38-57); Hershey, PA: IGI Global.

Burton N, Brundrett M and Jones M (2008) Doing your education research; London: Sage Publications Ltd.

Carmichael M, Reid A-K and Karpicke J D (2017) Assessing the impact of educational video on student engagement, critical thinking and learning: The current state of play; Sage White Paper: Sage Publishing Inc.

Cole M T, Shelley D J and Swartz L B (2014) Online instruction, e-learning and student satisfaction: A three-year study; The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning 15 (6).

Conrad R and Donaldson J (2004) Engaging the online learner: Activities and resources for creative instruction; San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Crook C and Schofield L (2017) The video lecture; The Internet and Higher Education 34, 56–64.

Fisher M (2003) Designing courses and teaching on the web: A “how-to” guide to proven, innovative strategies; Lanham, Maryland US: Scarecrow Education.

Forsyth I (2001) Teaching and learning materials and the internet; 3rd edition; London: Kogan Page Ltd.

Galletta A (2013) Mastering the Semi-Structured Inteview and Beyond: From research design to analysis and publication; New York University Press.

Garrison D R and Anderson T (2011) E-learning in the 21st Century: a framework for research and practice; 2nd Edition; London: RoutledgeFalmer.

Gillani B B (2003) Learning theories and the design of e-learning environments; Maryland, US: University Press of America Inc.

Gillett-Swan J (2017) The challenges of online learning: Supporting and engaging the isolated learner; Journal of Learning Design 10 (1), 20-30.

Inglis A, Long P and Joosten V (2002) Delivering digitally: managing the transition to the knowledge media; 2nd edition; London: Kogan Page Ltd.

Kinash S, Knight D and McLean M (2015) Does digital scholarship through online lectures affect student learning?; Journal of Educational Technology & Society 18 (2), 129–139.

Lawlor B and Donnelly R (2010) Using podcasts to support communication skills development: A case study for content format preferences among postgraduate research students; Computers & Education 54 (4), 962–971.

Lee S J, Srinivasan S, Trail T, Lewis D and Lopez S (2011) Examining the relationship among student perception of support, course satisfaction and learning outcomes in online learning; The Internet and Higher Education 14 (3), 158-163.

Lockwood F and Gooley A (eds) (2001) Innovation in open and distance learning: Successful development of online and web-based learning; London: Kogan Page Ltd.

MacDonald J (2006) Blended learning and online tutoring: A good practice guide; Aldershot, Hampshire: Gower Publishing Ltd.

McVay-Lynch M (2002) The online educator: A guide to creating the virtual classroom; London: RoutledgeFalmer.

Mitra B, Lewin-Jones J, Barrett H and Williamson S (2010) The use of video to enable deep learning; Research in Post-Compulsory Education 15 (4), 405–414.

Means B, Toyama Y, Murphy R, Bakia M and Jones K (2009) Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies; Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development, U.S. Department of Education.

Moore M G and Kearsley G (2012) Distance Education: A Systems View of Online Learning; 3rd Edition; Belmont, USA: Cengage Learning.

Muilenburg L Y and Berge Z L (2005) Student barriers to online learning: a factor analytic study; Distance Education 26, 29-48.

Palloff R M and Pratt K (1999) Building Learning Communities in Cyberspace: effective strategies for the online classroom; San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Picciano A G (2002) Beyond student perceptions: Issues of interaction, presence and performance in an online course; Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 6 (1), 21-40.

Pomales-Garcia C and Liu Y (2006) Web-based distance learning technology: The impacts of web modules’ length and format; American Journal of Distance Education 20 (3), 163-179.

Race P (2005) 500 tips for open and online learning; 2nd edition; London: RoutledgeFalmer.

Richardson W (2006) Blogs, wikis, podcasts and other powerful web tools for classrooms; London: Sage Publications Ltd.

Salmon G (2008) The future of podcasting; In Salmon G and Edirisingha P (eds) Podcasting for learning in universities, 178-187; Maidenhead, Berks: OUP.

Scagnoli N I, Choo J and Tian J (2017) Students’ insights on the use of video lectures in online classes; British Journal of Educational Technology doi:10.1111/bjet.12572

Seale J, Boyle T, Ingraham B, Roberts G and McAvinia C (2007) Designing digital resources for learning; In Conole G and Oliver M (eds) Contemporary perspectives in e-learning research: themes, methods and impact on practice, 121-133; Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.

Selwyn N, Gorard S and Furlong J (2006) Adult learning in the digital age; Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.

Sharples M, Taylor J and Vavoula G (2006) A theory of learning for the mobile age: In Andrews and Haythornthwaite, The Sage Handbook of E-Learning Research, 221-247, London: Sage Publications Ltd.

Smith R M (2008) Conquering the content: A step-by-step guide to online course design; San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Song L, Singleton SS, Hill J R and Koh M H (2004) Improving online learning: Student perceptions of useful and challenging characteristics; Internet and Higher Education 7, 59-70.

Tracy S J (2013) Qualitative Research Methods; London: Wiley-Blackwell.

Vonderwell S (2003) An examination of asynchronous communication experiences and perspectives of students in an online course: A case study; The Internet and Higher Education 6 (1), 77-90.

Weller M (2007) The distance from isolation: Why communities are the logical conclusion in e-learning?; Computers & Education 49, 148-159.

Downloads

Published

2020-03-01

Issue

Section

Students, Community, and Online Learning