Designing MOOCs to Facilitate Participant Self-monitoring for Self-directed Learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v23i4.2037Keywords:
massive open online courses (MOOCs), self-monitoring, self-directed learning, instructional design, MOOC instructorsAbstract
This study investigates the design and delivery of MOOCs to facilitate student self-monitoring for self-directed learning (SDL) using mixed methods. The data sources of this study include an online survey with 198 complete respondents, semi-structured interviews with 22 MOOC instructors, and document analysis of 22 MOOCs. Study results indicated that MOOC instructors considered self-monitoring skills critical for SDL. To foster students’ self-monitoring, MOOC instructors reported that they facilitated students’ self-monitoring by helping students with internal feedback and providing external feedback. Students’ internal feedback includes cognitive and metacognitive processes. To facilitate cognitive processes, MOOC instructors provided quizzes, tutorials, learning strategies, learning aids, and progress bars. For metacognition, these instructors provided reflection questions and attempted to create learning communities. In addition, MOOC instructors, teaching assistants, and peers provided external feedback for students’ self-monitoring. Across these findings, technology played a central role in supporting student’s self-monitoring.
References
Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Barak, M., & Rafaeli, S. (2004). On-line question-posing and peer-assessment as means for web-based knowledge sharing in learning. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 61(1), 84–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2003.12.005
Beaven, T., Codreanu, T., & Creuzé, A. (2014). Motivation in a language MOOC: Issues for course designers. Retrieved from https://www.degruyter.com/downloadpdf/books/9783110422504/9783110422504.4/9783110422504.4.pdf
Blaschke, L. M. (2012). Heutagogy and lifelong learning: A review of heutagogical practice and self-determined learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(1), 56–71. doi:10.19173/irrodl.v13i1.1076
Bonk, C. J., Lee, M. M., Reeves, T. C., & Reynolds, T. H. (Eds.). (2015). MOOCs and open education around the world. New York: Routledge.
Bonk, C. J., Zhu, M., Kim, M., Xu, S., Sabir, N., & Sari, A. (2018). Pushing toward a more personalized MOOC: Exploring instructor selected activities, resources, and technologies for MOOC design and implementation. The International Review of Research on Open and Distributed Learning (IRRODL), 19(4), 92–115. Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/3439/4765
Boud, D., Keogh, R., & Walker, D. (2013). Reflection: Turning experience into learning. New York, NY: Routledge.
Brockett, R. G., & Hiemstra, R. (1991). Self-direction in adult learning: Perspectives on theory, research, and practice (Vol. 20). London: Routledge.
Candy, P. C. (1991). Self-direction for lifelong learning. A comprehensive guide to theory and practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Chang, M. M. (2007). Enhancing web-based language learning through self-monitoring. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(3), 187–196. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00203.x
Chen, P. S. D., Lambert, A. D., & Guidry, K. R. (2010). Engaging online learners: The impact of Web-based learning technology on college student engagement. Computers & Education, 54(4), 1222–1232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.11.008
Cho, H., & LaRose, R. (1999). Privacy issues in Internet surveys. Social Science Computer Review, 17(4), 421–434. https://doi.org/10.1177/089443939901700402
Clements, J. C. (2015). Using Facebook to enhance independent student engagement: A case study of first-year undergraduates. Higher Education Studies, 5(4), 131–146. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/hes.v5n4p131
Coleman M. C., & Webber J. (2002). Emotional and behavioral disorders. Boston, MA: Pearson Education Company.
Creswell, J. W., & Plano-Clark, V. L. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Delclos, V. R., & Harrington, C. (1991). Effects of strategy monitoring and proactive instruction on children’s problem-solving performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(1), 35. Retrieved from https://psycnet.apa.org/buy/1991-19728-001
Dochy, F. J. R. C., Segers, M., & Sluijsmans, D. (1999). The use of self-, peer and co-assessment in higher education: A review. Studies in Higher Education, 24(3), 331–350. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079912331379935
Dow, S., Kulkarni, A., Klemmer, S., & Hartmann, B. (2012, February). Shepherding the crowd yields better work. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on computer supported cooperative work (pp. 1013–1022). ACM. Retrieved from https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2145355
Fischer, G. (2005). From reflective practitioners to reflective communities. In Proceedings of the HCI international conference (HCII), Las Vegas. Retrieved from http://l3d.cs.colorado.edu/~gerhard/papers/reflective-communities-hcii-2005.pdf
Fischer, G., & Sugimoto, M. (2006). Supporting self-directed learners and learning communities with sociotechnical environments. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 1(1), 31–64. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/0ed6/e061fc277045f4cc5e711bc7f539c60ec4a5.pdf
Fisher, M. J., & King, J. (2010). The self-directed learning readiness scale for nursing education revisited: A confirmatory factor analysis. Nurse Education Today, 30(1), 44–48. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2009.05.020
Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2009). The nature of qualitative research. How to design and evaluate research in education (7th ed., p. 420). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
Garrison, D. R. (1997). Self-directed learning: Toward a comprehensive model. Adult Education Quarterly, 48(1), 18–33. Retrieved from http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/074171369704800103
Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82. doi:10.1177/1525822X05279903
Gutiérrez-Rojas, I., Alario-Hoyos, C., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., Leony, D., & Delgado-Kloos, C. (2014). Scaffolding self-learning in MOOCs. Proceedings of the European MOOC Stakeholder Summit, 2014, 43–49. Retrieved from http://educate.gast.it.uc3m.es/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/Scaffolding_self-learning_in_MOOCs.pdf
Haney, W., Russell, M., Gulek, C., & Fierros, E. (1998). Drawing on education: Using student drawings to promote middle school improvement. Schools in the Middle, 7(3), 38–43. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ561666
Hewitt-Taylor, J. (2001). Self-directed learning: Views of teachers and students. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 36(4), 496–504. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.02001.x
Jonassen, D. (1999). Designing constructivist learning environments. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models (Vol. II, pp. 215–239). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Junco, R., Heiberger, G., & Loken, E. (2011). The effect of Twitter on college student engagement and grades. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(2), 119–132. doi:10.1111/j.13652729.2010.00387.x
Kell, C., & Deursen, R. V. (2002). Student learning preferences reflect curricular change. Medical Teacher, 24(1), 32–40. doi:10.1080/00034980120103450
Kop, R., & Fournier, H. (2011). New dimensions to self-directed learning in an open networked learning environment. International Journal for Self-Directed Learning, 7(2), 1–19. Retrieved from https://docs.wixstatic.com/ugd/dfdeaf_b1740fab6ad144a980da1703639aeeb4.pdf
Kuhn, D., Schauble, L., & Garcia-Mila, M. (1992). Cross-domain development of scientific reasoning. Cognition and Instruction, 9(4), 285–327. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0904_1
Kulkarni, C., Wei, K. P., Le, H., Chia, D., Papadopoulos, K., Cheng, J., … Klemmer, S. R. (2013). Peer and self-assessment in massive online classes. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 20(6), 33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2505057
Leech, N. L., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2007). An array of qualitative data analysis tools: A call for data analysis triangulation. School Psychology Quarterly, 22(4), 557. doi:10.1037/1045-3830.22.4.557
Loizzo, J., Ertmer, P. A., Watson, W. R., & Watson, S. L. (2017). Adult MOOC learners as self-directed: Perceptions of motivation, success, and completion. Online Learning, 21(2). doi:10.24059/olj.v21i2.889
Lunyk-Child, O. I., Crooks, D., Ellis, P. J., Ofosu, C., & Rideout, E. (2001). Self-directed learning: Faculty and student perceptions. Journal of Nursing Education, 40(3), 116–123. doi:10.3928/0148-4834-20010301-06
Maag, J. W., Rutherford, R. B., Jr., & Digangi, S. A. (1992). Effects of self-monitoring and contingent reinforcement on on-task behavior and academic productivity of learning disabled students: A social validation study. Psychology in the Schools, 29(2), 157–172. https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6807(199204)29:2<157::AID-PITS2310290211>3.0.CO;2-F
Malone, L. D., & Mastropieri, M. A. (1991). Reading comprehension instruction: Summarization and self-monitoring training for students with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 58(3), 270–279. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440299105800309
Margaryan, A., Bianco, M., & Littlejohn, A. (2015). Instructional quality of massive open online courses (MOOCs). Computers & Education, 80, 77–83. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.08.005
Merriam, S. B. (1988). Case study research in education: A qualitative approach. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Merriam, S. B. (2001). Andragogy and self-directed learning: Pillars of adult learning theory. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 2001(89), 3–14. doi:10.1002/ace.3
Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Merrill, M. D., & Gilbert, C. (2008). Effective peer interaction in a problem-centered instructional strategy. Distance Education, 29(2), 199–207. doi:10.1080/01587910802154996
Parker, D. L., Webb, J., & D’Souza, B. (1995). The value of critical incident analysis as an educational tool and its relationship to experiential learning. Nurse Education Today, 15(2), 111–116. doi: 10.1016/S0260-6917(95)80029-8
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Two decades of developments in qualitative inquiry: A personal, experiential perspective. Qualitative Social Work, 1(3), 261–283. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325002001003636
Pintrich, P. R., & Zusho, A. (2002). Student motivation and self-regulated learning in the college classroom. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp. 55–128). Springer, Dordrecht.
Prociuk, J. L. (1990). Self-directed learning and nursing orientation programs: Are they compatible? The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 21(6), 252–256. doi:10.3928/0022-0124-19901101-07
Puzziferro, M. (2008). Online technologies self-efficacy and self-regulated learning as predictors of final grade and satisfaction in college-level online courses. The American Journal of Distance Education, 22(2), 72–89. doi:10.1080/089236408020390
Rashid, T., & Asghar, H. M. (2016). Technology use, self-directed learning, student engagement and academic performance: Examining the interrelations. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 604–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.084
Rohs, M., & Ganz, M. (2015). MOOCs and the claim of education for all: A disillusion by empirical data. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(6). doi:10.19173/irrodl.v16i6.2033
Ross, J., Sinclair, C., Knox, J., & Macleod, H. (2014). Teacher experiences and academic identity: The missing components of MOOC pedagogy. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 10(1), 57. Retrieved from http://jolt.merlot.org/vol10no1/ross_0314.pdf
Schon, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
Schraw, G. (1998). Promoting general metacognitive awareness. Instructional Science, 26(1-2), 113–125. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1003044231033
Schraw, G., Crippen, K. J., & Hartley, K. (2006). Promoting self-regulation in science education: Metacognition as part of a broader perspective on learning. Research in Science Education, 36(1-2), 111–139. doi:10.1007/s11165-005-3917-8
Schunk, D. H. (1982). Progress self-monitoring: Effects on children’s self-efficacy and achievement. The Journal of Experimental Education, 51(2), 89–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.1982.11011845
Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (1996). Modeling and self-efficacy influences on children’s development and self-regulation. In J. Juvonen & K. Wentzel (Eds.), Social motivation: Understanding children’s school adjustment (pp. 154–180). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Shah, D. (2017). MOOCs find their audience: Professional learners and universities. Class Central. Retrieved from https://www.classcentral.com/report/moocs-find-audience-professional-learners-universities/
Shah, D. (2019). Year of MOOC-based degrees: A review of MOOC stats and trends in 2018. Class Central. Retrieved from https://www.class-central.com/report/moocs-stats-and-trends-2018/
Sze-Yeng, F., & Hussain, R. M. R. (2010). Self-directed learning in a socioconstructivist learning environment. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 1913–1917. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.423
Terras, M. M., & Ramsay, J. (2015). Massive open online courses (MOOCs): Insights and challenges from a psychological perspective. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(3), 472–487. doi: 10.1111/bjet.12274
Watson, S. L., Loizzo, J., Watson, W. R., Mueller, C., Lim, J., & Ertmer, P. A. (2016). Instructional design, facilitation, and perceived learning outcomes: An exploratory case study of a human trafficking MOOC for attitudinal change. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(6), 1273–1300. doi:10.1007/s11423-016-9457-2
Williamson, S. N. (2007). Development of a self-rating scale of self-directed learning. Nurse Researcher, 14(2), 66–83. Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/openview/c7980aea8ee20b570c57e9102cf5b9ea/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=33100
Zimmerman, B. J. (1999) Commentary: Toward a cyclically interactive view of self-regulated learning. International Journal of Educational Research 31, 545–551.
Zimmerman, B. J., & Paulsen, A. S. (1995). Self-monitoring during collegiate studying: An invaluable tool for academic self-regulation. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1995(63), 13–27. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.37219956305
Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (Eds.). (2001). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives. New York, NY: Routledge.
Zhu, M., Bonk, C. J., & Sari, A. R. (2018). Instructor experiences designing MOOCs in higher education: Pedagogical, resource, and logistical considerations and challenges. Online Learning, 22(4), 203–241. doi:10.24059/olj.v22i4.1495
Zhu, M., & Bonk, C. J. (2019). Designing MOOCs to facilitate participant self-directed learning: An analysis of instructor perspectives and practices. International Journal of Self-Directed Learning, 16(2), 39-60. Retrieved from http://publicationshare.com/pdfs/Designing-MOOCs-for-SDL.pdf
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
As a condition of publication, the author agrees to apply the Creative Commons – Attribution International 4.0 (CC-BY) License to OLJ articles. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
This licence allows anyone to reproduce OLJ articles at no cost and without further permission as long as they attribute the author and the journal. This permission includes printing, sharing and other forms of distribution.
Author(s) hold copyright in their work, and retain publishing rights without restrictions
