The Impact of the Cooperative Mentorship Model on Faculty Preparedness to Develop Online Courses

Larisa Olesova, Susan Campbell

Abstract


The 2017 survey of Faculty Attitude on Technology conducted by Insider Higher Ed reported on the low percentage of partnerships between university faculty and instructional designers in online course development. Experts said it is not a surprise because instructional designers are underutilized and their role in Higher Education is still not clear. This qualitative study examined the faculty members’ perceptions about their mentorship relations with instructional designers when they designed and developed asynchronous online courses. This study also explored factors that may lead to successful mentorship relationships between instructional designers as mentors and faculty members as mentees. Higher education administration, university faculty, and instructional designers will benefit from the results of this study. 


Keywords


mentorship, instructional design, asynchronous online teaching and learning

Full Text:

PDF

References


Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2015). Grade level: Tracking online education in the United States. Retrieved from http://www.onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/gradelevel.pdf

Barczyk, C., Buckenmeyer, J., & Feldman, L. (2010). Mentoring professors: A model for developing quality online instructors and courses in higher education. International Journal on E-Learning, 9(1), 7–26.

Barczyk, C., Buckenmeyer, J., Feldman, J., & Hixon, L. (2011). Assessment of a university-based distance education-mentoring program from a quality management perspective. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 19(1), 5-24. doi:10.1080/13611267.2011.543567

Buckenmeyer, J., Hixon, E., Barczyk, C., & Feldman, L. (2013). Does participation in a faculty distance education mentoring program comprehensively improve teaching methods? International Journal on E-Learning, 12(2), 139-152.

Campbell, K., Schwier, R. A., & Kenny, R. F. (2007). The critical, relational practice of instructional design in higher education: an emerging model of change agency. Educational Technology Research and Development, 57(5), 645-663.

Dimeo, J. (2017, November 1). Why instructional designers are underutilized. Retrieved from https://www.insidehighered.com/digital-learning/article/2017/11/01/reasons-why-faculty-members-dont-collaborate-instructional#.WmplM4F5D09.facebook

Dittmar, E., & McCracken, H. (2012). Promoting continuous quality improvement in online teaching: The META model. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 16, 163–175. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ971050.pdf

Dooley, K., Lindner, J., Telg, R., Irani, T., Moore, L., & Lundy, L. (2007). Roadmap to measuring distance education instructional design competencies. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 8(2), 151-159.

Drouin, M., Stewart, J., & Van Gorder, K. (2015) Using methodological triangulation to examine the effectiveness of a mentoring program for online instructors, Distance Education, 36:3, 400-418, DOI: 10.1080/01587919.2015.1081735

Gabriel, M. A., & Kaufield, K. J. (2008). Reciprocal mentorship: An effective support for online instructors. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 16, 311–327. doi:10.1080/13611260802233480

Glazer, E.M., & Hannafin, M.J. (2006). The collaborative apprenticeship model: Situated professional development within school settings. Teacher & Teacher Education: An International Journal of Research and Studies, 22, 179-193.

Gunawardena, C. N., Jennings, B., Ortegano-Layne, L. C., Frechette, C., Carabajal, K., Lindemann, K., & Mummert, J. (2004). Building an online wisdom community: A transformational design model. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 15, 40–62. doi:10.1007/BF02940929

Gunawardena, C. N., Ortegano-Layne, L., Carabajal, K., Frechette, C., Lindemann, K., & Jennings, B. (2006). New model, new strategies: Instructional design for building online wisdom communities. Distance Education, 27, 217–232. doi:10.1080/01587910600789613

Hixon, E., Barczyk, C., Buckenmeyer, J., & Feldman, L. (2011). Mentoring university faculty to become high quality online educators: A program evaluation. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 14(4). Retrieved from http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/

Kenny, R. F., Zhang, Z., Schwier, R. A., & Campbell, K. (2005). A review of what instructional designers do: Questions answered and questions not asked. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, La Revue Canadienne De L’Apprentissage Et De La Technologie, 31(1). Retrieved from http://www.cjlt.ca/index.php/cjlt/article/view/147/140

Kumar, S., & Ritzhaupt, A. (2017). What do instructional designers in higher education really do? International Journal on E-Learning, 16(4), 371-393

Martin, F., Budhrani, K., Kumar, S., & Ritzhaupt, A. (2019). Award-winning faculty online teaching practices: Roles and competencies. Online Learning, 23(1), 184-205.

Maryland Online (2006). Quality Matters: Inter-institutional quality assurance in online learning. Retrieved July 27, 2019, from http://www.qualitymatters.org.

McNaught, C. (2003). The effectiveness of an institution-wide mentoring program for improving online teaching and learning. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 15, 27–45. doi:10.1007/BF02940851

Pan, C. C., Deets, J., Phillips, W., & Cornell, R. (2003). Pulling tigers' teeth without getting bitten: Instructional designers and faculty. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 4(3), 289-302.

Patton, M.Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Reiser, R., & Dempsey, J. (2011). Trends and issues in instructional design and technology.

(3rd Ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.

Richardson, J., Ashby, I., Alshammari, A., Cheng, Z., Johnson, B., Krausse, T., Lee, D., Randloph, A., & Wang, H. (2019). Faculty and instructional designers on building successful collaborative relationships. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67,855-880.

Ritzhaupt, A. D., & Kumar, S. (2015). Knowledge and skills needed by instructional designers in higher education. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 28(3), 51 – 69. doi:10.1002/piq.21196

Smith, J., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theory, method and research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Vaill, A.L., & Testori, P.A. (2012). Orientation, mentoring and ongoing support: A three-tiered approach to online faculty development. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 16(2), 111-119.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v23i4.2089



Copyright (c) 2019 Larisa Olesova

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/