Cheating on Unproctored Online Exams: Prevalence, Mitigation Measures, and Effects on Exam Performance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v26i1.2620Keywords:
Online Exams, Cheating, Academic Honesty, Proctor, Undergraduate,Abstract
As online courses become increasingly common at the college level, an ongoing concern is how to ensure academic integrity in the online environment. One area that has received particular attention is that of preventing cheating during unproctored online exams. In this study, we examine students’ behavior during unproctored exams taken in an online introductory biology course. A feature of the learning management platform used for the course gave us the ability to detect cheating behavior involving students leaving the test page and viewing other material on their computers. This allowed us to determine what proportion of students cheated and examine the efficacy of various measures to mitigate cheating. We also explored the relationship between cheating behavior and exam performance. We found that 70% of students were observed cheating, and most of those who cheated did so on the majority of test questions. Appealing to students’ honesty or requiring them to pledge their honesty were found to be ineffective at curbing cheating. However, when students received a warning that we had technology that could detect cheating, coupled with threats of harsh penalties, cheating behavior dropped to 15% of students. Unexpectedly, we did not find evidence that students’ exam performance changed when their cheating behavior changed, indicating that this common form of cheating might not be as effective as students, or their instructors believe it to be.
References
Alessio, H. M., Malay, N., Maurer, K., Bailer, A. J., & Rubin, B. (2017). Examining the effect of proctoring on online test scores. Online Learning, 21(1), 146-161. http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v21i1.885
Alessio, H. M., Malay, N., Maurer, K., Bailer, A. J., & Rubin, B. (2018). Interaction of Proctoring and Student Major on Online Test Performance. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(5). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i5.3698
Beck, V. (2014). Testing a model to predict online cheating—Much ado about nothing. Active Learning in Higher Education, 15(1), 65-75. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787413514646
Cassady, J. C., & Johnson, R. E. (2002). Cognitive test anxiety and academic performance. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27(2), 270-295. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.2001.1094
Cluskey, G. R., Ehlen, C. R., & Raiborn, M. H. (2011). Thwarting online exam cheating without proctor supervision. Journal of Academic and Business Ethics, 4(1).
Dunn, T. P., Meine, M. F., & McCarley, J. (2010). The remote proctor: An innovative technological solution for online course integrity. International Journal of Technology, Knowledge & Society, 6(1), 1-8.
Dyer, J. M., Pettyjohn, H. C., & Saladin, S. (2020). Academic dishonesty and testing: How student beliefs and test setting impact decisions to cheat. Journal of the National College Testing Association, 4(1), 1-30.
Fask, A., Englander, F., & Wang, Z. (2014). Do online exams facilitate cheating? An experiment designed to separate possible cheating from the effect of the online test taking environment. Journal of Academic Ethics, 12(2), 101-112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-014-9207-1
Flaherty, C. (2020, May 11). Big proctor. Inside HigherEd. Retrieved from https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2020/05/11/online-proctoring-surging-during-covid-19.
Grajek, S. (2020, April 10). EDUCAUSE COVID-19 QuickPoll Results: Grading and Proctoring. EDUCAUSE Review. Retrieved from https://er.educause.edu/blogs/2020/4/educause-covid-19-quickpoll-results-grading-and-proctoring#fn2
Grijalva, T., Nowell, C., & Kerkvliet, J. (2006). Academic honesty and online courses. College Student Journal, 40(1), 180-185.
Harmon, O. R., & Lambrinos, J. (2008). Are online exams an invitation to cheat? The Journal of Economic Education, 39(2), 116-125. https://doi.org/10.3200/JECE.39.2.116-125
Hollister, K. K., & Berenson, M. L. (2009). Proctored versus unproctored online exams: Studying the impact of exam environment on student performance. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 7(1), 271-294. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4609.2008.00220.x
Hylton, K., Levy, Y., & Dringus, L. P. (2016). Utilizing webcam-based proctoring to deter misconduct in online exams. Computers & Education, 92, 53-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.10.002
Instructure (2020). Canvas Learning Management System [computer software]. Retrieved from https://www.instructure.com/canvas/
Kerkvliet, J., & Sigmun, C. L. (1999). Can we control cheating in the classroom? Journal of Economic Education, 30(4), 331–351.
Mazar, N., Amir, O., & Ariely, D. (2008). The dishonesty of honest people: A theory of self-concept maintenance. Journal of Marketing Research, 45(6), 633–644. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.45.6.633
McGee, P. (2013). Supporting academic honesty in online courses. Journal of Educators Online, 10(1), 1-31. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/114388/
McNabb, L., & Olmstead, A. (2009). Communities of integrity in online courses: Faculty member beliefs and strategies. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 5(2), 208–23.
Respondus (2020a). Lockdown Browser [computer software]. Retrieved from https://web.respondus.com/he/lockdownbrowser/
Respondus (2020b). Respondus Monitor [computer software]. Retrieved from https://web.respondus.com/he/monitor/
Shu, L.L., Mazar, N., Gino, F., Ariely, D. and Bazerman, M.H. (2012) Signing at the beginning makes ethics salient and decreases dishonest self-reports in comparison to signing at the end. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109(38): 15197–15200. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1209746109
Stephens, J. M., Young, M. F., & Calabrese, T. (2007). Does moral judgment go offline when students are online? A comparative analysis of undergraduates’ beliefs and behaviors related to conventional and digital cheating. Ethics & Behavior, 17(3), 233–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508420701519197
Stogner, J., Miller, B., & Marcum, C. (2013). Learning to e-cheat: A criminological test of internet facilitated academic cheating. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 24(2), 175-199. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511253.2012.693516
Stuber-McEwen, D., Wiseley, P., and Hoggatt, S. (2009). Point, click, and cheat: Frequency and type of academic dishonesty in the virtual classroom. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 12(3), 1-10.
Watson, G. R., & Sottile, J. (2010). Cheating in the digital age: Do students cheat more in online courses? Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 13(1), 1-13.
Wiley (2020, July 22). Academic integrity in the age of online learning. Retrieved from https://read.uberflip.com/i/1272071-academic-integrity-in-the-age-of-online-learning/0?
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
As a condition of publication, the author agrees to apply the Creative Commons – Attribution International 4.0 (CC-BY) License to OLJ articles. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
This licence allows anyone to reproduce OLJ articles at no cost and without further permission as long as they attribute the author and the journal. This permission includes printing, sharing and other forms of distribution.
Author(s) hold copyright in their work, and retain publishing rights without restrictions
