Relationships between Connectedness, Performance Proficiency, Satisfaction, and Online Learning Continuance
Keywords:Online learning continuance intention, online student connectedness, performance proficiency, satisfaction
Maintaining momentum is vital in terms of how soon students can complete a program, especially for those who are in the early stage of taking online courses. This study attempted to extend the existing literature by examining the influence of online students’ perceived sense of connectedness, performance proficiency, and satisfaction on their intentions to continue an online learning course. A quantitative survey approach was adopted to test our hypothesized structural model. Three hundred and sixty-nine students who had taken fewer than three fully online courses participated in this study. The results revealed that three out of four testing hypotheses were all supported at the 0.01 significance level, and one of the path coefficients indicated that online students’ confidence in their ability or competency to perform academic tasks did not directly influence their intention to take future online courses. Instead, the influence of performance proficiency on online learning continuance intention was mediated through the factor of satisfaction. In addition, satisfaction was found to have a significantly direct impact on online learning continuance intention, suggesting that when students taking online courses are satisfied with their online learning experience, the likelihood for them to continue taking other online courses is higher.
Abdullatif, H., & Velázquez-Iturbide, J. Á. (2020). Relationship between motivations, personality traits and intention to continue using MOOCs. Education and Information Technologies, 25(5), 4417-4435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10161-z
Abedin, B., Daneshgar, F., & D’Ambra, J. (2010). Underlying factors of sense of community in asynchronous computer supported collaborative learning environments. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 6(3). http://jolt.merlot.org/vol6no3/abedin_0910.htm
Adelman, C. (2006). The toolbox revisited: Paths to degree completion from high school through college. Washington, DC: Department of Education. http://www2.ed.gov/rschstat/research/pubs/toolboxrevisit/toolbox.pdf
Ainin, S., Naqshbandi, M. M., Moghavvemi, S., & Jaafar, N. I. (2015). Facebook usage, socialization and academic performance. Computers & Education, 83, 64-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.12.018.
Al-Fraihat, D., Joy, M., & Sinclair, J. (2020). Evaluating E-learning systems success: An empirical study. Computers in Human Behavior, 102, 67-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.004
Alraimi, k., Zo, H., & Ciganek, A. (2015). Understanding the MOOCs continuance: The role of openness and reputation. Computers & Education, 80, 28-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.08.006
Al-Samarraie, H., Teng, B. K., Alzahrani, A. I., & Alalwan, N. (2018). E-learning continuance satisfaction in higher education: a unified perspective from instructors and students. Studies in Higher Education, 4(11), 2003-2019. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2017.1298088
Attewell, P., Heil, S., & Reisel, L. (2012). What is academic momentum? And does it matter? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 34(1), 27–44. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373711421958
Authors. (2013). Deleted for peer review.
Baber, H. (2020). Determinants of students’ perceived learning outcome and satisfaction in online learning during the pandemic of COVID-19. Journal of Education and E-Learning Research, 7(3), 285-292. https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.509.2020.73.285.292
Bawa, P. (2016). Retention in online courses: Exploring issues and solutions-A literature review. Sage Open, 6(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015621777
Bolliger, D. U., & Inan, F. A. (2012). Development and validation of the online student connectedness survey (OSCS). International Review of Research in Open & Distance Learning, 13(3), 41-65. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v13i3.1171
Bornschlegl, M., & Cashman, D. (2018). Improving distance student retention through satisfaction and authentic experiences. International Journal of Online Pedagogy and Course Design (IJOPCD), 8(3), 60-77. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJOPCD.2018070105
Chao, G. T., O’Leary-Kelly, A. M., Wolf, S., Klein, H. J., & Gardner, P. D. (1994). Organizational socialization: its content and consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(5), 730–743.
Chen, C. C., Lee, C. H., & Hsiao, K. L. (2018). Comparing the determinants of non-MOOC and MOOC continuance intention in Taiwan: Effects of interactivity and openness. Library Hi Tech, 36(4), 705-719. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-11-2016-0129
Chiu, C.-M., Hsu, M.-H., Sun, S.-Y., Lin, T.-C., & Sun, P.-C. (2005). Usability, quality, value and e-learning continuance decisions. Computers & Education, 45(4), 399-416. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2004.06.001.
Chu, A. M., Liu, C. K., So, M. K., & Lam, B. S. (2021). Factors for sustainable online learning in higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sustainability, 13(9), 5038. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13095038
Cidral, W. A., Oliveira, T., Di Felice, M., & Aparicio, M. (2018). E-learning success determinants: Brazilian empirical study. Computers & Education, 122, 273-290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.12.001
Cortes, S. T. (2020). Flexible learning as an instructional modality in environmental science course during COVID-19. Aquademia, 4(2), ep20024. https://doi.org/10.29333/aquademia/8444
Dağhan, G., & Akkoyunlu, B. (2016). Modeling the continuance usage intention of online learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 60, 198-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.066
Dai, H. M., Teo, T., & Rappa, N. A. (2020). Understanding continuance intention among MOOC participants: The role of habit and MOOC performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 112, 106455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106455
Demmans Epp, C., Phirangee, K., & Hewitt, J. (2017). Student actions and community in online courses: The roles played by course length and facilitation method. Online Learning, 21(4), 53-77. http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v21i4.1269
Eom, S. B., & Ashill, N. (2016). The determinants of students’ perceived learning outcomes and satisfaction in university online education: An update. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 14(2), 185-215. https://doi.org/10.1111/dsji.12097
Ergün, E., & Avcı, Ü. (2018). Knowledge sharing self-efficacy, motivation and sense of community as predictors of knowledge receiving and giving behaviors. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 21(3), 60-73. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26458507
Essa, M. M., Subramanian, K. P., & Jayasuriya, H. P. (2020). COVID-19 impact on undergraduate education: Academicians’ perspective. Journal of Health and Allied Sciences NU, 10(03), 138-140. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1718609
Goh, C., Leong, C., Kasmin, K., Hii, P., & Tan, O. (2017). Students’ experiences, learning outcomes and satisfaction in e-learning. Journal of E-learning and Knowledge Society, 13(2), 117-128. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/188116/.
Guo, Z., Xiao, L., Van Toorn, C., Lai, Y., & Seo, C. (2016). Promoting online learners’ continuance intention: An integrated flow framework. Information & Management, 53(2), 279-295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2015.10.010
Gurley, L.E. (2018). Educators’ preparation to teach, perceived teaching presence, and perceived teaching presence behaviors in blended and online learning environments. Online Learning, 22(2), 197-220. http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i2.1255
Hagerty, B. M., Lynch-Sauer, J., Patusky, K. L., & Bouwsema, M. (1993). An emerging theory of human relatedness. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 25(4), 291-296. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.1993.tb00262.x
Hart, C. (2012). Factors associated with student persistence in an online program of study: a review of the literature. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 11(1), 19-42.
Henriksen, D., Creely, E., & Henderson, M. (2020). Folk pedagogies for teacher transitions: Approaches to synchronous online learning in the wake of COVID-19. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 28(2), 201-209. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/216179/.
Hewson, E. R. F. (2018). Students’ emotional engagement, motivation and behaviour over the life of an online course: Reflections on two market research case studies. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 1(10), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.472
Hu, L., & Bentler, P.M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
Jan, S. K. (2015). The relationships between academic self-efficacy, computer self-efficacy, prior experience, and satisfaction with online learning. American Journal of Distance Education, 29(1), 30-40. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2015.994366
Jiang, M. & Koo, K. (2020). Emotional presence in building an online learning community among non-traditional graduate students. Online Learning, 24(2), 93-111. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v24i4.2307
Joo, Y. J., Lim, K. Y., & Kim, J. (2013). Locus of control, self-efficacy, and task value as predictors of learning outcome in an online university context. Computers & Education, 62, 149-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.027
Kanuka, H., & Jugdev, K. (2006). Distance education MBA students: An investigation into the use of an orientation course to address academic and social integration issues. Open Learning, 21(2), 153-166.
Kauffman, H. (2015). A review of predictive factors of student success in and satisfaction with online learning. Research in Learning Technology, 23. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v23.26507
Kizilcec, R. F., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., & Maldonado, J. J. (2017). Self-regulated learning strategies predict learner behavior and goal attainment in Massive Open Online Courses. Computers & Education, 104, 18-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.10.001
LaBarbera, R. (2013). The relationship between students' perceived sense of connectedness to the instructor and satisfaction in online courses. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 14(4), 209-220.
Lee, Y., & Choi, J. (2013). A structural equation model of predictors of online learning retention. The Internet and Higher Education, 16, 36-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.01.005
Lew, S. L., Lau, S. H., & Leow, M. C. (2019). Usability factors predicting continuance of intention to use cloud e-learning application. Heliyon, 5(6), e01788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01788
Li, K. (2019). MOOC learners’ demographics, self-regulated learning strategy, perceived learning and satisfaction: A structural equation modeling approach. Computers & Education, 132, 16-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.01.003
Lin, W.-S. (2012). Perceived fit and satisfaction on web learning performance: IS continuance intention and task-technology fit perspectives. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 70, 498-507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2012.01.006
Lin, Y. C., Chung, P., Yeh, R. C., & Chen, Y. C. (2016). An empirical study of college students' learning satisfaction and continuance intention to stick with a blended e-learning environment. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 11(2). https://www.learntechlib.org/p/172220/.
Maddrell, J. A., Morrison, G. R., & Watson, G. S. (2017). Presence and learning in a community of inquiry. Distance Education, 38(2), 245-258. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2017.1322062
Martin, F., & Bolliger, D. U. (2018). Engagement matters: Student perceptions on the importance of engagement strategies in the online learning environment. Online Learning, 22(1), 205-222. http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i1.1092
McClannon, T. W., Cheney, A. W., Bolt, L. L., & Terry, K. P. (2018). Predicting sense of presence and sense of community in immersive online learning environments. Online Learning, 22(4), 141-159. http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i4.1510
McGill, T. J., Klobas, J. E., & Renzi, S. (2014). Critical success factors for the continuance of e-learning initiative. The Internet and Higher Education, 22, 24-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.04.001
Moore, J. C. (2005). The Sloan Consortium Quality Framework and the Five Pillars. Newburyport, MA: The Sloan Consortium.
Panigrahi, R., Srivastava, P. R., & Sharma, D. (2018). Online learning: Adoption, continuance, and learning outcome—A review of literature. International Journal of Information Management, 43, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.05.005
Pelletier, C., Rose, J., Russell, M., Guberman, D., Das, K., Bland, J., Bonner, H., & Chambers, C. R. (2017). Connecting student engagement to student satisfaction: A case study at East Carolina University. Journal of Assessment and Institutional Effectiveness, 6(2), 123-141. https://doi.org/10.5325/jasseinsteffe.6.2.0123
Redmond, P., Heffernan, A., Abawi, L., Brown, A., & Henderson, R. (2018). An online engagement framework for higher education. Online Learning, 22(1), 183-204. https://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i1.1175
Reinhart, J. (2010). Graduate students’ communication practices and perceived sense of community. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 11(4), 223-238.
Rovai, A. P. (2002a). Development of an instrument to measure classroom community. The Internet and Higher Education, 5(3), 197–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(02)00102-1
Rovai, A. P. (2002b). Sense of community, perceived cognitive learning, and persistence in asynchronous learning networks. The Internet and Higher Education, 5(4), 319–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(02)00130-6
Seaman, J. E., Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2018). Grade increase: Tracking distance education in the United States. Babson Survey Research Group and Quahog Research Group, LLC. http://www.onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/gradeincrease.pdf
Seiver, J. G., & Troja, A. (2014). Satisfaction and success in online learning as a function of the needs for affiliation, autonomy, and mastery. Distance Education, 35(1), 90-105. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2014.891427
Shea, P., Li, C. S., Swan, K., & Pickett, A. (2005). Developing learning community in online asynchronous college courses: The role of teaching presence. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 9(4), 59-82.
Shin, N. (2003). Transactional presence as a critical predictor of success in distance learning. Distance Education, 24(1), 69-86.
Tang, E., & Lam, C. (2014). Building an effective online learning community (OLC) in blog-based teaching portfolios. The Internet and Higher Education, 20, 79-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.002
Todorova, M., & Karamanska, D. (2015). A study of motivation and satisfaction of students in e-learning environment. Applied Technologies and Innovations, 11(2), 82-89. http://dx.doi.org/10.15208/ati.2015.09
Trespalacios, J., & Lowenthal, P. (2019). What do they really like? An investigation of students’ perceptions of their coursework in a fully online educational technology program. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 35(5), 60-78. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.4364
Uğur, N. G., & Turan, A. H. (2018). E-learning adoption of academicians: a proposal for an extended model. Behaviour & Information Technology, 37(4), 393-405. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2018.1437219
Weidlich, J., & Bastiaens, T. J. (2018). Technology matters–the impact of transactional distance on satisfaction in online distance learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(3), 222-242. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i3.3417
Wu, W.-C. V., Chen Hsieh, J. S., & Yang J. C. (2017). Creating an online learning community in a flipped classroom to enhance EFL learners’ oral proficiency. Educational Technology & Society, 20(2), 142–157. http://www.jstor.org/stable/90002170
Wu, J.-H., Tennyson, R. D., & Hsia, T.-L. (2010). A study of student satisfaction in a blended e-learning system environment. Computers & Education, 55, 155-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.12.012
Yang, D., Baldwin, S., & Snelson, C. (2017). Persistence factors revealed: Students’ reflections on completing a fully online program. Distance Education, 38(1), 23-36. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2017.1299561
Yau, H. K., Cheng, A. L. F., & Ho, W. M. (2015). Identify the motivational factors to affect the higher education students to learn using technology. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 14(2), 89-100.
Yu, A. Y., Tian, S. W., Vogel, D., & Kwok, C. (2010). Can learning be virtually boosted? An investigation of online social networking impacts. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1494-1503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.06.015
Zhang, Y. L. (2019). Early academic momentum: Factors contributing to community college transfer students’ STEM degree attainment. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice. https://doi.org/10.1177/1521025119881130
Zhou, J. (2017). Exploring the factors affecting learners’ continuance intention of MOOCs for online collaborative learning: An extended ECM perspective. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33(5), 123-135. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.2914
As a condition of publication, the author agrees to apply the Creative Commons – Attribution International 4.0 (CC-BY) License to OLJ articles. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
This licence allows anyone to reproduce OLJ articles at no cost and without further permission as long as they attribute the author and the journal. This permission includes printing, sharing and other forms of distribution.
Author(s) hold copyright in their work, and retain publishing rights without restrictions