The Role of Prior Online Learning Experience on Student Community of Inquiry, Engagement, and Satisfaction Scores

Mohammad Shams Ud Duha, Jennifer C. Richardson, Yukiko Maeda, Sevda Kucuk

Abstract


The increase in online education creates a need to explore how learning outcomes, student satisfaction, and student perceptions about online courses are affected by prior online learning experiences. This study examined the role of prior online learning experience on students’ perceived cognitive presence, social presence, teaching presence, engagement, and satisfaction. The archival data of online learners at a large midwestern university (a total n=878), including survey responses related to Community of Inquiry (CoI), engagement, and satisfaction, were utilized to conduct statistical analyses to determine whether student responses differed by the number of online courses taken previously. We found that only social presence scores (CoI sub-scale) and emotional engagement scores (engagement sub-scale) differed by the number of the online courses taken. However, the effect size was small. We concluded that student satisfaction, engagement, and perceptions of cognitive and teaching presence are not related to prior online course experiences. Implications are discussed.


Keywords


online learning, prior online learning, Community of Inquiry, engagement, satisfaction

Full Text:

PDF

References


Akyol, Z., & Garrison, D. R. (2008). The development of a community of inquiry over time in an online course: Understanding the progression and integration of social, cognitive and teaching presence. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 12, 3-22. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v12i3-4.1680

Ali, A., & Ahmad, I. (2011). Key factors for determining students' satisfaction in distance learning courses: A study of Allama Iqbal Open University. Contemporary Educational Technology, 2(2), 118-134. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/6047

Anderson, T., Liam, R., Randy, G. D., & Waiter, A. (2001). Assessing Teaching Presence in a Computer Conference Context. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(2), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v5i2.1875

Aragon, S., & Johnson, E. (2008). Factors influencing completion and non-completion of community college online courses. American Journal of Distance Education, 22(3), 146-158. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923640802239962

Arbaugh, J. B. (2005). Is there an optimal design for on-line MBA courses?. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(2), 135-149. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2005.17268561

Arbaugh, J. B., Cleveland-Innes, M., Diaz, S. R., Garrison, D. R., Ice, P., Richardson, J. C., & Swan, K. P. (2008). Developing a community of inquiry instrument: Testing a measure of the community of inquiry framework using a multi-institutional sample. The Internet and Higher Education, 11(3-4), 133-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.06.003

Archibald, D. (2010). Fostering the development of cognitive presence: Initial findings using the community of inquiry survey instrument. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1-2), 73-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.001

Artino, K. A. (2011). Undergraduate students perceptions of a quality online course: online experience versus no online experience [Master’s thesis, The University of Akron]. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.938.7609&rep=rep1&type=pdf

Astani, M., Ready, K. J., & Duplaga, E. A. (2010). Online course experience matters: Investigating students’ perceptions of online learning. Issues in Information Systems, 11(2), 14-21. https://doi.org/10.48009/2_iis_2010_14-21

Biner, P. M., Welsh, K. D., Barone, N. M., Summers, M., & Dean,

R. S. (1997). The impact of remote‐site group size on student satisfaction and relative performance in interactive telecourses. American Journal of Distance Education, 11(1), 23-33. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923649709526949

Caskurlu, S., Maeda, Y., Richardson, J. C., & Lv, J. (2020). A meta-analysis addressing the relationship between teaching presence and students’ satisfaction and learning. Computers & Education, 157, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103966

Ferguson, S. (2020). Attrition in online and face-to-face calculus and precalculus courses: A comparative analysis. Journal of Educators Online, 17(1). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1241557

Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2010). The first decade of the community of inquiry framework: A retrospective. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1-2), 5-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.003

Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 7-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923640109527071

Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2-3), 87-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1096-7516(00)00016-6

Hachey, A. C., Wladis, C., & Conway, K. (2015). Prior online course experience and G.P.A. as predictors of subsequent online STEM course outcomes. The Internet and Higher Education, 25, 11-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.10.003

Hachey, A. C., Conway, K., & Wladis, C. (2013). Community colleges and underappreciated assets: Using institutional data to promote success in online learning. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 16(1). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1004010

Hixon, E., Ralston-Berg, P., Buckenmeyer, J., & Barczyk, C. (2016). The impact of previous online course experience on students' perceptions of quality. Online Learning, 20(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v20i1.565

Hu, S., & Kuh, G. D. (2002). Being (dis)engaged in educationally purposeful activities: The influences of student and institutional characteristics. Research in Higher Education, 43(5), 555-575. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1020114231387

Jan, S. K. (2015). The relationships between academic self-efficacy, computer self-efficacy, prior experience, and satisfaction with online learning. American Journal of Distance Education, 29(1), 30-40. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2015.994366

Joo, Y. J., Joung, S., & Kim, J. (2014). Structural relationships among self-regulated learning, learning flow, satisfaction, and learning persistence in cyber universities. Interactive Learning Environments, 22(6), 752-770. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2012.745421

Kauffman, H. (2015). A review of predictive factors of student success in and satisfaction with online learning. Research in Learning Technology, 23. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v23.26507

Küçük, S., & Richardson, J. C. (2019). A structural equation model of predictors of online learners' engagement and satisfaction. Online Learning Journal, 23(2), 196-216. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v23i2.1455

Kuo, Y. C., Walker, A. E., Belland, B. R., & Schroder, K. E. (2013). A predictive study of student satisfaction in online education programs. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(1), 16-39. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v14i1.1338

Mason, R. B. (2011). Student engagement with, and participation in, an e-forum. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 14(2), 258-268. https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/jeductechsoci.14.2.258.pdf

Park, J. H., & Choi, H. J. (2009). Factors influencing adult learners' decision to drop out or persist in online learning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 12(4), 207-217. https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/jeductechsoci.12.4.207.pdf?_=1459005475270

Reeve, J. (2013). How students create motivationally supportive learning environments for themselves: The concept of agentic engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 579-595. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032690

Richardson, J. C., & Swan, K. (2003). Examining social presence in online courses in relation to students’ perceived learning and satisfaction. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(1), 68-88. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v7i1.1864

Richardson, J. C., & Newby, T. (2006). The role of students' cognitive engagement in online learning. American Journal of Distance Education, 20(1), 23-37. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15389286ajde2001_3

Richardson, J. C., Maeda, Y., & Swan, K. (2010). Adding a web-based perspective to the self-assessment of knowledge: Compelling reasons to utilize affective measures of learning. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 9(2), 329-334. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.9.2.zqr329

Richardson, J. C., Maeda, Y., Lv, J., & Caskurlu, S. (2017). Social presence in relation to students' satisfaction and learning in the online environment: A meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 402-417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.001

Roach, V., & Lemasters, L. (2006). Satisfaction with online learning: A comparative descriptive study. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 5(3), 317-332. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1066798

Robinson, C. C., & Hullinger, H. (2008). New benchmarks in higher education: Student engagement in online learning. Journal of Education for Business, 84(2), 101-109. https://doi.org/10.3200/joeb.84.2.101-109

Sahin, I., & Shelley, M. (2008). Considering students' perceptions: The distance education student satisfaction model. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 11(3), 216-223. https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/jeductechsoci.11.3.216.pdf

Seaman, J. E., Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2018). Grade increase: Tracking distance education in the United States. Babson Survey Research Group. https://onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/gradeincrease.pdf

Shea, P., & Bidjerano, T. (2012). Learning presence as a moderator in the community of inquiry model. Computers & Education, 59(2), 316-326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.01.011

Shen, D., Cho, M. H., Tsai, C. L., & Marra, R. (2013). Unpacking online learning experiences: Online learning self-efficacy and learning satisfaction. The Internet and Higher Education, 19, 10-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.04.001

Shih, P. C., Muñoz, D., & Sánchez, F. (2006). The effect of previous experience with information and communication technologies on performance in a Web-based learning program. Computers in Human Behavior, 22(6), 962-970. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2004.03.016

Swan, K. (2001). Virtual interaction: Design factors affecting student satisfaction and perceived learning in asynchronous online courses. Distance Education, 22(2), 306-331. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158791010220208

Swan, K., Garrison, D. R., & Richardson, J. C. (2009). A constructivist approach to online learning: The community of inquiry framework. In C.R. Payne (Ed.), Information technology and constructivism in higher education: Progressive learning frameworks (pp. 43-57). IGI global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60566-654-9.ch004

Wang, C. H., Shannon, D. M., & Ross, M. E. (2013). Students’ characteristics, self-regulated learning, technology self-efficacy, and course outcomes in online learning. Distance Education, 34(3), 302-323. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2013.835779

Yoo, S. J., & Huang, W. D. (2013). Engaging online adult learners in higher education: Motivational factors impacted by gender, age, and prior experiences. The Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 61(3), 151-164. https://doi.org/10.1080/07377363.2013.836823




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v26i4.2949



Copyright (c) 2022 Mohammad Shams Ud Duha, Jennifer C. Richardson, Yukiko Maeda, Sevda Kucuk

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/