Perceived and Actual Cognitive Presence: A Case Study of an Intentionally-Designed Asynchronous Online Course

Gamze Ozogul, Meina Zhu, Tanner M. Phillips

Abstract


Online instructional design and how to engage students cognitively in online asynchronous courses have been an ongoing question. This case study presents an intentional design of an asynchronous online graduate course to foster cognitive presence. The research questions investigate students’ cognitive presence (CP) captured by two measures: Community of Inquiry (CoI) survey (for self-report) and Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC) software (for actual behaviors) in this online course. Additionally, it also addresses how cognitive presence is related to other presences and how the online course design elements were perceived by students. Results showed that students perceived high levels of cognitive presence and they showed high cognitive presence in their discussion board acts. There was a relationship between three presences; and findings showed that teacher and social presence were strong predictors of perceived cognitive presence. Although students in the study rated themselves high on the CoI instrument and scored high on the LIWC for cognitive presence, self-presentation bias still emerged. Strategies that helped students to stay cognitively present in this asynchronous online course included: instructor responsiveness in discussion posts and creating dialogue, creating course assignments as online hands-on project, interviewing guest speakers on specific course topics, weekly recap and orientation videos, feedback, case-based discussions, and other elements.


Keywords


Cognitive presence, Asynchronous, Online, LIWC

Full Text:

PDF

References


Akyol, Z., & Garrison, D. R. (2008). The development of a community of inquiry over time in an online course: Understanding the progression and integration of social, cognitive and teaching presence. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 12(3–4), 3–22. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ837483.pdf

Allen, I. E., Seaman, J., Poulin, R., & Straut, T. T. (2016). Online report card: Tracking online education in the United States. Sloan Consortium, 1–4. http://onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/onlinereportcard.pdf

Arbaugh, J. B., Cleveland-Innes, M., Diaz, S. R., Garrison, D. R., Ice, P., Richardson, J. C., & Swan, K. P. (2008). Developing a community of inquiry instrument: Testing a measure of the community of inquiry framework using a multi-institutional sample. The Internet and Higher Education, 11(3-4), 133-136.

Archibald, D. (2010). Fostering the development of cognitive presence: Initial findings using the community of inquiry survey instrument. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1–2), 73–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.001

Arnold, N., & Ducate, L. (2006). Future foreign language teachers’ social and cognitive collaboration in an online environment. Language Learning and Technology, 10(1), 42. http://llt.msu.edu/vol10num1/arnoldducate/default.html

Blumenfeld, P. C., Kempler, T. M., & Krajcik, J. S. (2006). Motivation and cognitive engagement in learning environments. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences. (pp. 475–488). Cambridge University Press.

Bonk, C. J. (2020). Pandemic ponderings, 30 years to today: Synchronous signals, saviors, or survivors? Distance Education, 41(4), 589–599.

Brown, J. S., & Adler, R. P. (2008, January/February). Minds on fire: Open education, the long tail, and learning 2.0. EDUCAUSE Review, 43(1), 16–32. https://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ERM0811.pdf

Cole, M. T., Shelley, D. J., & Swartz, L. B. (2014). Online instruction, e-learning, and student satisfaction: A three year study. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(6) 112–131.

Creswell, J. W., & Plano-Clark, V. L. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage.

Cui, Y., & Wise, A. F. (2015). Identifying content-related threads in MOOC discussion forums. Proceedings of the 2nd ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale (L@S 2015) (pp. 299–303). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2724660.2728679

Darabi, A., Arrastia, M. C., Nelson, D. W., Cornille, T., & Liang, X. (2011). Cognitive presence in asynchronous online learning: A comparison of four discussion strategies. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(3), 216–227.

Ertmer, P. A., & Koehler, A. A. (2015). Facilitated vs. non-facilitated online case discussions: Comparing differences in problem space coverage. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 27(2), 69–93.

Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109.

Galikyan, I., & Admiraal, W. (2019). Students’ engagement in asynchronous online discussion: The relationship between cognitive presence, learner prominence, and academic performance. The Internet and Higher Education, 43, 1479–1493.

Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 7–23.

Garrison, D. R. (2003). Cognitive presence for effective asynchronous online learning: The role of reflective inquiry, self-direction and metacognition. Elements of Quality Online Education: Practice and Direction, 4(1), 47–58.

Garrison, D. R. (2009). Communities of inquiry in online learning. In P. L. Rogers, G. A. Berg, J. V. Boettcher, C. Howard, L. Justice, & K. D. Schenk (Eds.), Encyclopedia of distance learning (2nd ed., pp. 352–355). IGI Global.

Garrison, D. R. (2011). E-learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice. Routledge.

Garrison, D. R. (2016). E-Learning in the 21st century: A Community of Inquiry framework for research and practice (3rd ed.). Routledge.

Garrison, D. R., & Akyol, Z. (2013). The Community of Inquiry Theoretical Framework. In M. G. Moore (Ed.), Handbook of Distance Education (pp. 104–119). Routledge.

Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6

Garrison, D. R., and Anderson, T. (2003). E-Learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice. Routledge Falmer.

Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2010a). The first decade of the community of inquiry framework: A retrospective. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1–2), 5–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.003

Garrison, D. R., & Arbaugh, J. B. (2007). Researching the community of inquiry framework: review, issues, and future directions. The Internet and Higher Education, 10(3), 157–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2007.04.001

Garrison, D. R., Cleveland-Innes, M., & Fung, T. (2010b). Exploring causal relationships among cognitive, social and teaching presence: Student perceptions of the Community of Inquiry framework. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1–2), 31–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.002

Gutiérrez-Santiuste, E., Rodríguez-Sabiote, C., & Gallego-Arrufat, M. J. (2015). Cognitive presence through social and teaching presence in communities of inquiry: A correlational–predictive study. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 31(3). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1666

Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Educause Review, 27.

Holbeck, R., & Hartman, J. (2018). Efficient strategies for maximizing online student satisfaction: Applying technologies to increase cognitive presence, social presence, and teaching presence. Journal of Educators Online, 15(3), n3.

Jiang, M., & Ting, E. (2000). A study of factors influencing students’ perceived learning in a web-based course environment. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 6(4), 317–338. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/8482/

Joksimovic, S., Gasevic, D., Kovanovic, V., Adesope, O., & Hatala, M. (2014). Psychological characteristics in cognitive presence of communities of inquiry: A linguistic analysis of online discussions. The Internet and Higher Education, 22, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.03.001

Kanuka, H., & Garrison, D. R. (2004). Cognitive presence in online learning. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 15(2), 21–39.

Kanuka, H., Rourke, L., & Laflamme, E. (2007). The influence of instructional methods on the quality of online discussion. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(2), 260–271. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00620.x

Ke, F. (2010). Examining online teaching, cognitive, and social presence for adult students. Computers & Education, 55(2), 808–820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.03.013

Kilis, S., & Yildirim, Z. (2019). Posting patterns of students’ social presence, cognitive presence, and teaching presence in online learning. Online Learning, 23(2), 179–195.

Kopcha, T. J., & Sullivan, H. (2007). Self-presentation bias in surveys of teachers’ educational technology practices. Educational technology research and development, 55(6), 627–646.

Kovanović, V., Joksimović, S., Waters, Z., Gašević, D., Kitto, K., Hatala, M., & Siemens, G. (2016). Towards auto-mated content analysis of discussion transcripts: A cognitive presence case. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge (LAK ’16) (pp. 15–24). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2883851.2883950

Kozan, K. (2016). A comparative structural equation modeling investigation of the relationships among teaching, cognitive and social presence. Online Learning, 20(3), 210–227. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1113302.pdf

Kozan, K., & Richardson, J. C. (2014). Interrelationships between and among social, teaching, and cognitive presence. The Internet and Higher Education, 21, 68–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.10.007

Lockee, B. B. (2021). Online education in the post-COVID era. Nature Electronics, 4(1), 5–6.

Manfuso, L. G. (2020, May 7). From emergency remote teaching to rigorous online learning. EdTech. https://edtechmagazine.com/higher/article/2020/05/emergency-remote-teaching-rigorous-online-learning-perfcon

Marsicano, C. (2020). COVID-19 data dashboard. The College Crisis Initiative. https://collegecrisis.shinyapps.io/dashboard/

Martin, F., Wang, C., & Sadaf, A. (2018). Student perception of helpfulness of facilitation strategies that enhance instructor presence, connectedness, engagement and learning in online courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 37, 52–65.

Pennebaker, J. W., Booth, R. J., Boyd, R. L., & Francis, M. E. (2015). Linguistic inquiry and word count: LIWC2015 operator’s manual. Pennebaker Conglomerates. https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/downloads.liwc.net/LIWC2015_OperatorManual.pdf

Pennebaker, J. W., Francis, M. E., & Booth, R. J. (2001). Linguistic inquiry and word count (LIWC): LIWC 2001. Erlbaum.

Richardson, J. C., & Ice, P. (2010). Investigating students' level of critical thinking across instructional strategies in online discussions. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1-2), 52-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.009

Richardson, J. C., & Swan, K. (2003). Examining social presence in online courses in relation to students’ perceived learning and satisfaction. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(1), 68–88.

Rolim, V., Ferreira, R., Lins, R. D., & Gǎsević, D. (2019). A network-based analytic approach to uncovering the relationship between social and cognitive presences in communities of inquiry. The Internet and Higher Education, 42, 53–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2019.05.001

Sadaf, A., & Olesova, L. (2017). Enhancing cognitive presence in online case discussions with questions based on the practical inquiry model. American Journal of Distance Education, 31(1), 56–69.

Seaman, J. E., Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2018). Grade increase: Tracking distance education in the United States. Babson Survey Research Group.

Seckman, C. (2018). Impact of interactive video communication versus text-based feedback on teaching, social, and cognitive presence in online learning communities. Nurse Educator, 43(1), 18–22.

Shea, P., & Bidjerano, T. (2009). Community of Inquiry as a theoretical framework to foster “epistemic engagement” and “cognitive presence” in online education. Computers and Education, 52(3), 543–553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.10.007

Shea, P., Li, C-S., Swan, K., & Pickett, A. (2005). Developing learning community in online asynchronous college courses: The role of teaching presence. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 9(4), 59–82.

Shelley, D. J., Swartz, L. B., & Cole, M. T. (2008). A comparative analysis of online and traditional undergraduate business law classes. In C.V Slyke (Ed.), Information Communication Technologies: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications. 3391–3404.

Swan, K., Garrison, D. R., & Richardson, J.C. (2009). A constructivist approach to online learning: The community of inquiry framework. In C. R. Payne (Ed.), Information technology and constructivism in higher education: Progressive learning frameworks (pp. 43–57). IGI Global.

Swan, K., Richardson, J., Ice, P., Shea, P., Cleveland-Innes, M., Diaz, S. & Garrison, R. (2008). Researching Online Communities of Inquiry: New CoI Survey Instrument. In J. Luca & E. Weippl (Eds.), Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2008—World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications (pp. 5812–5820).Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/29188/.

Swan, K., & Shih, L-F. (2005). On the nature and development of social presence in online course discussions. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 9(3), 115–136.

Tausczik, Y. R., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2010). The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 29(1), 24–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X09351676

Tolu, A., & Evans, L. (2013). From distance education to communities of inquiry: A review of historical developments. In Z. Akyol & D. R. Garrison (Eds.), Educational Communities of Inquiry: Theoretical Framework, Research, and Practice (pp. 45–65). IGI Global. doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-2110-7.ch004

Vaughan, N., & Garrison, D. R. (2006). How blended learning can support a faculty development community of inquiry. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 10(4), 139–152. https://qubeshub.org/app/site/collections/4787/Vaughan_and_Garrison_2006.pdf

Wavle, S., & Ozogul, G. (2019). Investigating the impact of online classes on undergraduate degree completion. Online Learning, 23(4), 281–295.

Wen, M., Yang, D., & Rosé, C. P. (2014). Linguistic reflections of student engagement in massive open online courses. Proceedings of the 8th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (pp. 525–534). AAAI Press. http://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/ICWSM14/paper/view/8057

Xie, X., Siau, K., & Nah, F. F. H. (2020). COVID-19 pandemic—online education in the new normal and the next normal. Journal of Information Technology Case and Application Research, 22(3), 175–187.

Wisneski, J. E., Ozogul, G., & Bichelmeyer, B. A. (2017). Investigating the impact of learning environments on undergraduate students’ academic performance in a prerequisite and post-requisite course sequence. The Internet and Higher Education, 32, 1–10.

Xu, X., Murray, T., Woolf, B. P., & Smith, D. (2013, July). Mining social deliberation in online communication—If you were me and I were you. Educational Data Mining 2013. http://socialdeliberativeskills.com/documents/2013EDM_Xu_Camera_Ready.pdf

Yoo, J., & Kim, J. (2014). Can online discussion participation predict group project performance? investigating the roles of linguistic features and participation patterns. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 24(1), 8–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-013-0010-8

Zhu, M., Herring, S. C., & Bonk, C. (2019). Exploring presence in online learning through three forms of computer-mediated discourse analysis. Distance Education, 40(2), 205–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2019.1600365




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v26i1.3051



Copyright (c) 2022 Gamze Ozogul, Meina Zhu, Tanner Phillips

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/