Fostering Cognitive Presence in Online Courses: A Systematic Review (2008-2020)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v26i1.3071Keywords:
cognitive presence, community of inquiry, COI, online courses, practical inquiry modelAbstract
Within the Community of Inquiry (CoI) framework, cognitive presence has been central to success in higher education settings. This systematic review examined 24 articles published between 2008-2020 that empirically analyzed cognitive presence in online courses. We share the patterns that emerged regarding the interplay between teaching and cognitive presence and social and cognitive presence. We also explore how the four phases of cognitive presence—triggering event, exploration, integration, and resolution—were evident within specific instructional activities. We conclude with implications for practice that will be helpful for course instructors and designers seeking to foster greater cognitive presence within their online courses.
References
Abe, J. A. A. (2020). Big five, linguistic styles, and successful online learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2019.100724
Adedoyin, O. B., & Soykan, E. (2020). Covid-19 pandemic and online learning: the challenges and opportunities. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1813180
Akcaoglu, M., & Lee, E. (2016). Increasing social presence in online learning through small group discussions. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(3), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i3.2293
Akyol, Z., & Garrison, D. R. (2008). The development of a Community of Inquiry over time in an online course: Understanding the progression and integration of social, cognitive and teaching presence. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 12(3–4), 3–22. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,uid&db=eue&AN=36559412&site=ehost-live NS -
Akyol, Z., Vaughan, N., & Garrison, D. R. (2011). The impact of course duration on the development of a community of inquiry. Interactive Learning Environments, 19(3), 231–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820902809147
Arbaugh, J. B., Cleveland-Innes, M., Diaz, S. R., Garrison, D. R., Ice, P., Richardson, J. C., & Swan, K. (2008). Developing a community of inquiry instrument: Testing a measure of the Community of Inquiry framework using a multi-institutional sample. Internet and Higher Education, 11(3–4), 133–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.06.003
Baber, H. (2020). Determinants of students’ perceived learning outcome and satisfaction in online learning during the pandemic of COVID-19. Journal of Education and E-Learning Research, 7(3), 285–292.
Bissessar, C., Black, D., & Boolaky, M. (2020). International online graduate students’ perceptions of CoI. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 23(1), 61–83. https://doi.org/10.2478/eurodl-2020-0005
Brooker, A., Corrin, L., de Barba, P. G., Lodge, J., & Kennedy, G. (2018). A tale of two MOOCs: How student motivation and participation predict learning outcomes in different MOOCs. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34(1), 73–87. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3237
Cercone, K. (2008). Characteristics of adult learners with implications for online learning design. AACE Journal, 16(2), 137–159.
Chen, Y., Lei, J., & Cheng, J. (2019). What if online students take on the responsibility: Students’ cognitive presence and peer facilitation techniques. Online Learning, 23(1), 37–61. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v23i1.1348
Cho, M.-H., & Tobias, S. (2016). Should instructors require discussion in online courses? Effects of online discussion on Community of Inquiry, learner time, satisfaction, and achievement. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(2), 123–140. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i2.2342
Choo, J., Bakir, N., Scagnoli, N. I., Ju, B., & Tong, X. (2020). Using the Community of Inquiry framework to understand students’ learning experience in online undergraduate business courses. TechTrends, 64(1), 172–181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00444-9
Clark, C., Strudler, N., & Grove, K. (2015). Comparing asynchronous and synchronous video vs. text based discussions in an online teacher education course. Online Learning, 19(3), 48–70.
DuBois, B., Krasny, M. E., & Russ, A. (2019). Online professional development for environmental educators: strategies to foster critical thinking and social interactions. Environmental Education Research, 25(10), 1479–1494. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2018.1564247
Fiock, H. (2020). Designing a community of inquiry in online courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 21(1), 134–152. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i5.3985
Galikyan, I., & Admiraal, W. (2019). Students’ engagement in asynchronous online discussion: The relationship between cognitive presence, learner prominence, and academic performance. The Internet and Higher Education, 43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2019.100692
Garrison, D. R. (2003). E-Learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice. Routledge.
Garrison, D. R. (2007). Online community of inquiry review: social, cognitive, and teaching presence issues. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 11(1), 61–72. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.05513-11
Garrison, D. R. (2016). Thinking collaboratively: Learning in a Community of Inquiry. Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (1999). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 87–105. https://doi.org/0.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923640109527071
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2010). The first decade of the community of inquiry framework: A retrospective. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1–2), 5–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.003
Garrison, D. R., Cleveland-Innes, M., & Fung, T. S. (2010). Exploring causal relationships among teaching, cognitive and social presence: Student perceptions of the community of inquiry framework. Internet and Higher Education, 13(1–2), 31–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.002
Gašević, D., Adesope, O., Joksimović, S., & Kovanović, V. (2015). Externally-facilitated regulation scaffolding and role assignment to develop cognitive presence in asynchronous online discussions. The Internet and Higher Education, 24, 53–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.09.006
Gibson, A. M., Ice, P., Mitchell, R., & Kupczynski, L. (2012). An inquiry into relationships between demographic factors and teaching, social, and cognitive presence. Internet Learning, 1(1), 7–16.
Guo, C., Chen, X., & Hou, Y. (2019). A case study of students’ participation and knowledge construction in two online discussion settings. Proceedings of the 2019 4th International Conference on Distance Education and Learning - ICDEL 2019, 45–49. https://doi.org/10.1145/3338147.3338177
Gurjar, N. (2020). Reducing transactional distance with synchronous and asynchronous video-based discussions in distance learning. Proceedings of the SITE 2020 Annual Conference, 268–272.
Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. EDUCAUSE Review Online. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning
Hsu, H.-C. K., Wang, C. V., & Levesque-Bristol, C. (2019). Reexamining the impact of self-determination theory on learning outcomes in the online learning environment. Education and Information Technologies, 24(3), 2159–2174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09863-w
Ice, P., Gibson, A. M., Boston, W., & Becher, D. (2011). An exploration of differences between Community of Inquiry indicators in low and high disenrollment online courses. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 15(2), 44–69. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,uid&db=eue&AN=63580768&site=ehost-live NS -
Joo, Y. J., Lim, K. Y., & Kim, E. K. (2011). Online university students’ satisfaction and persistence: Examining perceived level of presence, usefulness and ease of use as predictors in a structural model. Computers & Education, 57(2), 1654–1664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.02.008
Ke, F. (2010). Examining online teaching, cognitive, and social presence for adult students. Computers & Education, 55(2), 808–820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.03.013
Kilis, S., & Yıldırım, Z. (2018). Investigation of community of inquiry framework in regard to self-regulation, metacognition and motivation. Computers & Education, 126(June), 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.032
Kozan, K., & Caskurlu, S. (2018). On the N th presence for the Community of Inquiry framework. Computers & Education, 122(May 2017), 104–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.03.010
Kreijns, K., Van Acker, F., Vermeulen, M., & Van Buuren, H. (2014). Community of Inquiry: Social presence revisited. E-Learning and Digital Media, 11(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.2304/elea.2014.11.1.5
Kucuk, S., & Richardson, J. C. (2019). A structural equation model of predictors of online learners’ engagement and satisfaction. Online Learning, 23(2), 196–216. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v23i2.1455
Kumar, S., Dawson, K., Black, E. W., Cavanaugh, C., & Sessums, C. D. (2011). Applying the community of inquiry framework to an online professional practice doctoral program. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 12(6), 126. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v12i6.978
Leader-Janssen, E. M., Nordness, P. D., Swain, K. D., & Hagaman, J. L. (2016). Students’ perceptions of an online graduate program in special education for emotional and behavioral disorders. Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children, 39(4), 246–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406416637411
Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Clarke, M., Devereaux, P. J., Kleijnen, J., & Moher, D. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanation and elaboration. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100
Lidice, A., Sağlam, G., & Dikilitaş, K. (2020). Evaluating an online professional learning community as a context for professional development in classroom-based research. The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language, 24(3), 1–17.
Lowenthal, P., Borup, J., West, R. E., & Archambault, L. M. (2020). Thinking beyond Zoom: Using asynchronous video to maintain connection and engagement during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 28(2), 1–9.
Lowenthal, P., & Moore, R. L. (2020). Exploring student perceptions of Flipgrid in online courses. Online Learning, 24(4), 28–41. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v24i4.2335
Masonbrink, A. R., & Hurley, E. (2020). Advocating for children during the COVID-19 school closures. Pediatrics, 146(3), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2020-1440
Molnar, A. L., & Kearney, R. C. (2017). A comparison of cognitive presence in asynchronous and synchronous discussions in an online dental hygiene course. Journal of Dental Hygiene : JDH, 91(3), 14–21.
Moore, R. L. (2014). Importance of developing community in distance education courses. TechTrends, 58(2), 20–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-014-0733-x
Moore, R. L. (2016). Interacting at a distance: Creating engagement in online learning environments. In L. Kyei-Blankson, J. Blankson, E.
Ntuli, & C. Agyeman (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Strategic Management of Interaction, Presence, and Participation in Online Courses (pp. 401–425). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-9582-5.ch016
Moore, R. L. (2020). Developing lifelong learning with heutagogy: contexts, critiques, and challenges. Distance Education, 41(3), 381–401. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2020.1766949
Moore, R. L., Blackmon, S. J., & Markham, J. (2018). Making the connection: Using mobile devices and poll everywhere for experiential learning for adult students. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 29(3), 397–421.
Moore, R. L., Oliver, K. M., & Wang, C. (2019). Setting the pace: examining cognitive processing in MOOC discussion forums with automatic text analysis. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(5–6), 655–669. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1610453
Oliver, K. M., & Moore, R. L. (2016). Supporting Documentation of Informal Learning and Making from a Distance with Voicethread Summary of Voicethread Design Documentation and Peer Response. 966–970.
Oyarzun, B., Martin, F., & Moore, R. L. (2020). Time management matters: Online faculty perceptions of helpfulness of time management strategies. Distance Education, 41(1), 106–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2020.1724773
Patwardhan, V., Rao, S., Thirugnanasambantham, C., & Prabhu, N. (2020). Community of Inquiry (CoI) framework and course design as predictors of satisfaction in emergency remote teaching: Perspectives of hospitality management students. Journal of E-Learning & Knowledge Society, 16(4), 94–103. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,uid&db=eue&AN=149213106&site=ehost-live NS -
Pillai, R., & Sivathanu, B. (2019). An empirical study on the online learning experience of MOOCs: Indian students’ perspective. International Journal of Educational Management, 34(3), 586–609. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-01-2019-0025
Poluekhtova, I. A., Vikhrova, O. Y., & Vartanova, E. L. (2020). Effectiveness of online education for the professional training of journalists: Students’ distance learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Psychology in Russia. State of the Art, 13(4), 26–37. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,uid&db=aph&AN=148197556&site=ehost-live NS -
Roitsch, J., Moore, R. L., & Horn, A. L. (2021). Lessons learned: What the COVID-19 global pandemic has taught us about teaching, technology, and students with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Enabling Technologies, 15(2), 108–116. https://doi.org/10.1108/JET-12-2020-0053
Rolim, V., Ferreira, R., Lins, R. D., & Gǎsević, D. (2019). A network-based analytic approach to uncovering the relationship between social and cognitive presences in communities of inquiry. The Internet and Higher Education, 42, 53–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2019.05.001
Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (1999). Assessing social presence in asynchronous text-based computer conferencing. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education, 14(2), 50–71. http://www.ijede.ca/index.php/jde/article/viewArticle/153/341
Saadatmand, M., Uhlin, L., Hedberg, M., Åbjörnsson, L., & Kvarnström, M. (2017). Examining learners’ interaction in an open online course through the community of inquiry framework. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 20(1), 61–79. https://doi.org/10.1515/eurodl-2017-0004
Saçak, B., & Kavun, N. (2020). Rethinking Flipgrid and VoiceThread in the context of online collaborative learning theory. In E. Alqurashi (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Fostering Student Engagement With Instructional Technology in Higher Education (pp. 211–228). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-0119-1.ch012
Schrire, S. (2004). Interaction and cognition in asynchronous computer conferencing. Instructional Science, 32(6), 475–502.
Schuck, R. K., & Lambert, R. (2020). “Am I Doing Enough?” Special Educators’ Experiences with Emergency Remote Teaching in Spring 2020. Education Sciences, 10(11), 320. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10110320
Seckman, C. (2018). Impact of interactive video communication versus text-based feedback on teaching, social, and cognitive presence in online learning communities. Nurse Educator, 43(1), 18–22. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000000448
Shea, P., & Bidjerano, T. (2008). Measures of quality in online education: An investigation of the community of inquiry model and the net generation. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 39(4), 339–361. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.39.4.b
Shea, P., & Bidjerano, T. (2009). Community of inquiry as a theoretical framework to foster “epistemic engagement” and “cognitive presence” in online education. Computers & Education, 52(3), 543–553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.10.007
Shea, P., Hayes, S., Vickers, J., Gozza-Cohen, M., Uzuner, S., Mehta, R., Valchova, A., & Rangan, P. (2010). A re-examination of the community of inquiry framework: Social network and content analysis. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1–2), 10–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.11.002
Shea, P., Sau Li, C., & Pickett, A. (2006). A study of teaching presence and student sense of learning community in fully online and web-enhanced college courses. Internet and Higher Education, 9(3), 175–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2006.06.005
Song, M., & Yuan, R. (2015). Beyond social presence: Increasing cognitive presence through meaningful interaction. Global Learn 2015, 731–736.
Stenbom, S. (2018). A systematic review of the Community of Inquiry survey. The Internet and Higher Education, 39(June), 22–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2018.06.001
Stenbom, S., Jansson, M., & Hulkko, A. (2016). Revising the community of inquiry framework for the analysis of one-to-one online learning relationships. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 17(3), 36–53. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i3.2068
Swan, K., Richardson, J. C., Ice, P., Garrison, D. R., Cleveland-Innes, M., & Arbaugh, J. B. (2008). Validating a measurement tool of presence in online communities of inquiry. E-Mentor, 2(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/7
Tirado Morueta, R., Maraver López, P., Hernando Gómez, Á., & Harris, V. W. (2016). Exploring social and cognitive presences in communities of inquiry to perform higher cognitive tasks. The Internet and Higher Education, 31, 122–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.07.004
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
As a condition of publication, the author agrees to apply the Creative Commons – Attribution International 4.0 (CC-BY) License to OLJ articles. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
This licence allows anyone to reproduce OLJ articles at no cost and without further permission as long as they attribute the author and the journal. This permission includes printing, sharing and other forms of distribution.
Author(s) hold copyright in their work, and retain publishing rights without restrictions
