Community in the Open: Supports, Challenges, and Impacts of Local Learning Communities of K-12 Adolescent MOOC Learners from Nepal
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v28i3.3463Keywords:
Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs), local community, K-12 Learners, blended learning, Global SouthAbstract
This exploratory qualitative study investigates the obstacles, local support, and learning outcomes for adolescent learners in Nepal taking massive open online courses (MOOCs). This study found that the major difficulties these learners faced were a lack of scaffolding, language barriers, limited technology and internet access, and unmatched learning capacity and MOOC learning objectives that were designed for adults originally. To address these challenges, a local community of teachers, peers, schools, and families played a significant role in inspiring learning, providing scaffolding and guidance, fostering a collective and open local learning environment, instilling motivation, and offering both emotional and technical support. MOOC learning increases the independence of these adolescent learners, supplementing school learning, supporting their career paths, providing practical skills beyond theories, and achieving mental well-being.
References
Adam, T. (2019). Digital neocolonialism and massive open online courses (MOOCs): Colonial pasts and neoliberal futures. Learning, Media and Technology, 44(3), 365-380. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2019.1640740
Alamri, M. M. (2022). Investigating students’ adoption of MOOCs during COVID-19 pandemic: Students’ academic self-efficacy, learning engagement, and learning persistence. Sustainability, 14(2), 714. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14020714
Albó, L., & Hernández-Leo, D. (2020). Conceptualising a visual representation model for MOOC-based blended learning designs. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 36(4), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.5178
Alghamdi, T., Hall, W., & Millard, D. (2019, July). A classification of how MOOCs are used for blended learning. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Information and Education Innovations (pp. 1-7). https://doi.org/10.1145/3345094.3345107
Antonaci, A., Klemke, R., Lataster, J., Kreijns, K., & Specht, M. (2019). Gamification of MOOCs adopting social presence and sense of community to increase user’s engagement: An experimental study. In Transforming Learning with Meaningful Technologies: 14th European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning, EC-TEL 2019, Delft, The Netherlands, September 16–19, 2019, Proceedings 14 (pp. 172-186). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29736-7_13
Bralić, A., & Divjak, B. (2018). Integrating MOOCs in traditionally taught courses: achieving learning outcomes with blended learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0085-7
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis. American Psychological Association.
Breslow, L., Pritchard, D. E., DeBoer, J., Stump, G. S., Ho, A. D., & Seaton, D. T. (2013). Studying learning in the worldwide classroom: Research into edX’s first MOOC. Research & Practice in Assessment, 8(1), 13–25.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1989). Ecological systems theory. In R. Vasta (Ed.), Annals of child development (pp. 178-248). JAI Press.
Briggs, S., & Crompton, H. (2016). Taking advantage of MOOCs in K-12 education: A blended approach. In D. Parsons (Ed.), Mobile and blended learning innovations for improved learning outcomes (pp. 297-309). Information Science Reference (IGI Global). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-0359-0.ch015
Bruff, D. O., Fisher, D. H., McEwen, K. E., & Smith, B. E. (2013). Wrapping a MOOC: Student perceptions of an experiment in blended learning. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9(2), 187.
Canessa, E., & Pisani, A. (2013). High school open on-line courses (HOOC): A case study from Italy. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 16(1), 131-140. http://www.eurodl.org/materials/contrib/2013/Canessa_Pisani.pdf
Che, X., Luo, S., Wang, C., & Meinel, C. (2016). An attempt at MOOC localization for Chinese-speaking users. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 6(2), 90. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJIET.2016.V6.665
Cohen, L., & Magen-Nagar, N. (2016). Self-regulated learning and a sense of achievement in MOOCs among high school science and technology students. American Journal of Distance Education, 30(2), 68-79. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2016.1155905
Colas, J. F., Sloep, P. B., & Garreta-Domingo, M. (2019). The effect of multilingual facilitation on active participation in MOOCs. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(4), 280-314. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i4.2470
Crane, R. A., & Comley, S. (2021). Influence of social learning on the completion rate of massive online open courses. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 2285-2293. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10362-6
de Moura, V. F., de Souza, C. A., & Viana, A. B. N. (2021). The use of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) in blended learning courses and the functional value perceived by students. Computers & Education, 161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104077
de Waard, I., Gallagher, M. S., Zelezny-Green, R., Czerniewicz, L., Downes, S., Kukulska-Hulme, A., & Willems, J. (2014). Challenges for conceptualising EU MOOC for vulnerable learner groups. Proceedings of the European MOOC Stakeholder Summit 2014, 33-42.
Deng, R., Benckendorff, P., & Gannaway, D. (2019). Progress and new directions for teaching and learning in MOOCs. Computers & Education, 129, 48-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.10.019
Duru, I., Sunar, A. S., White, S., Diri, B., & Dogan, G. (2019). A case study on English as a second language speakers for sustainable MOOC study. Sustainability, 11(10), 2808.
Ferdig, R.E. (2013). What massive open online courses have to offer K-12 teachers and students. Michigan Virtual Learning Research Institute. http://media.mivu.org/institute/pdf/mooc_report.pdf
Firmansyah, M., & Timmis, S. (2016). Making MOOCs meaningful and locally relevant? Investigating IDCourserians—an independent, collaborative, community hub in Indonesia. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 11(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-016-0032-6
Gamage, D., & Whitting, M. E. (2021, May). Together we learn better: leveraging communities of practice for MOOC learners. Asian CHI Symposium 2021 (pp. 28-33). https://doi.org/10.1145/3429360.3468176
Ghimire, B. K. (2018). Maximizing continuous professional and academic development through MOOC. In S. Shrestha (Ed.), NELTA Forum (pp. 114–123). Nepal English Language Teachers’ Association (NELTA).
Ghimire, B. K., & Gautam, B. R. (2020). Nepali high school students in massive open online courses (MOOCs): Impressive results and a promising future. In K. Zhang, C. J. Bonk, T. C. Reeves, & T. H. Reynolds (Eds.), MOOCs and open education in the Global South (pp. 90-98). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429398919
Godwin-Jones, R. (2014). Global reach and local practice: The promise of MOOCS. Language Learning & Technology, 18(3), 5–15. http://llt.msu.edu/issues/october2014/emerging.pdf.
Graham, L., LaBonte, R., Roberts, V., O’Byrne, I., & Osterhout, C. (2014). Open learning in K–12 online and blended learning environments. Handbook of research on K–12 online and blended learning. Carnegie Mellon University Press.
Grover, S., Pea, R., & Cooper, S. (2016, February). Factors influencing computer science learning in middle school. In Proceedings of the 47th ACM Technical Symposium on Computing Science Education (pp. 552-557). https://doi.org/10.1145/2839509.2844564
Guggemos, J., Moser, L., & Seufert, S. (2022). Learners don't know best: Shedding light on the phenomenon of the K-12 MOOC in the context of information literacy. Computers & Education, 188, 104552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104552
Guo, P. J., & Reinecke, K. (2014, March). Demographic differences in how students navigate through MOOCs. In Proceedings of the first ACM conference on Learning@ scale conference (pp. 21-30). https://doi.org/10.1145/2556325.2566247
Koutsakas, P., Chorozidis, G., Karamatsouki, A., & Karagiannidis, C. (2020). Research trends in K–12 MOOCs: A review of the published literature. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 21(3), 285-303. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i4.2470
Koxvold, I. (2014). MOOCs: Opportunities for their use in compulsory-age education, (Research report). UK Department of Education. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/315591/DfE_RR355_-_Opportunities_for_MOOCs_in_schools_FINAL.pdf
Impey, C., & Formanek, M. (2021). MOOCS and 100 Days of COVID: Enrollment surges in massive open online astronomy classes during the coronavirus pandemic. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 4(1), 100177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2021.100177
Lambert, S. R. (2020). Do MOOCs contribute to student equity and social inclusion? A systematic review 2014–18. Computers & Education, 145, 103693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103693
Lemme, B. H. (2006). Development in adulthood (4th ed.). Allyn and Bacon.Li, N., Verma, H., Skevi, A., Zufferey, G., Blom, J., & Dillenbourg, P. (2014). Watching MOOCs together: Investigating co-located MOOC study groups. Distance Education, 35(2), 217-233.
Li, Z., Zhu. M., Kadirova, D., & Bonk, C. J. (2023). Toward self-directed learning: How do Nepali adolescents learn with MOOCs?. Distance Education, 44(4), 655-674. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2023.2267460
Liu, S., Liang, T., Shao, S., & Kong, J. (2020). Evaluating localized MOOCs: The role of culture on interface design and user experience. IEEE Access, 8, 107927-107940. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2986036
Ma, L., & Lee, C. S. (2019). Understanding the barriers to the use of MOOCs in a developing country: An innovation resistance perspective. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57(3), 571-590. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633118757732
Mendoza, G. A. G., Jung, I., & Kobayashi, S. (2017). A review of empirical studies on MOOC adoption: Applying the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. International Journal for Educational Media and Technology, 11(1).
Müller, C., & Mildenberger, T. (2021). Facilitating flexible learning by replacing classroom time with an online learning environment: A systematic review of blended learning in higher education. Educational Research Review, 34, 100394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100394
Najafi, H., Evans, R., & Federico, C. (2014). MOOC integration into secondary school courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(5), 306-322. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i5.1861
Panyajamorn, T., Kohda, Y., Chongphaisal, P., & Supnithi, T. (2016, November). The effectiveness and suitability of MOOCs hybrid learning: A case study of public schools in Thai rural area. In 2016 11th International Conference on Knowledge, Information and Creativity Support Systems (KICSS) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
Rasheed, R. A., Kamsin, A., & Abdullah, N. A. (2020). Challenges in the online component of blended learning: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 144, 103701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103701
Rice, M. F., & Cun, A. (2023). Leveraging digital literacies to support refugee youth and families' success in online learning: A theoretical perspective using a socioecological approach. Online Learning, 27(3). http://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v27i3.3628
Ruipérez-Valiente, J. A., Jaramillo-Morillo, D., Joksimović, S., Kovanović, V., Muñoz-Merino, P. J., & Gašević, D. (2021). Data-driven detection and characterization of communities of accounts collaborating in MOOCs. Future Generation Computer Systems, 125, 590-603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2021.07.003
Staubitz, T., Teusner, R., & Meinel, C. (2019, April). MOOCs in secondary education-experiments and observations from German classrooms. In 2019 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON) (pp. 173-182). https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2019.8725138
Stevens, L., & Wrenn, C. (2013). Exploratory (qualitative) research. Concise encyclopedia of church and religious organization marketing, 53.
Stoltzfus, M., Scragg, B., & Tressler, C. (2015). Mind the gap: Connecting K–12 and higher education educators to improve the student experience. New Horizons: The Technologies Ahead in Educause Review.
Stratton, C., & Grace, R. (2016). Exploring linguistic diversity of MOOCs: Implications for international development. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 53(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.2016.14505301071
Swedberg, R. (2020). Exploratory research. In Elman, C., Gerring, J., & Mahoney, J. (Eds).The production of knowledge: Enhancing progress in social science, 17-41. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108762519
Terry, G., Hayfield, N., Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2017). Thematic analysis. In C. Willig & W. S. Rogers (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research in psychology, pp. 17-37. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526405555
Wang, W., Guo, L., He, L., & Wu, Y. J. (2019). Effects of social-interactive engagement on the dropout ratio in online learning: Insights from MOOC. Behaviour & Information Technology, 38(6), 621-63. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2018.1549595
Wenger, E. (1998), Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge
University Press.
Wenger, E. (2011). Communities of practice: A brief introduction. https://scholarsbank.uoregon.edu/xmlui/handle/1794/11736
Yilmaz, R., Yurdugül, H., Yilmaz, F. G. K., Şahi̇n, M., Sulak, S., Aydin, F., Tepgeç, M., Müftüoğlu, C. T., & Ömer, O. R. A. L. (2022). Smart MOOC integrated with intelligent tutoring: A system architecture and framework model proposal. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100092
Yin, Y., Adams, C., Goble, E., & Francisco Vargas Madriz, L. (2015). A classroom at home: Children and the lived world of MOOCs. Educational Media International, 52(2), 88-99. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2015.1053287
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Zixi Li, Curtis J. Bonk, Meina Zhu
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
As a condition of publication, the author agrees to apply the Creative Commons – Attribution International 4.0 (CC-BY) License to OLJ articles. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
This licence allows anyone to reproduce OLJ articles at no cost and without further permission as long as they attribute the author and the journal. This permission includes printing, sharing and other forms of distribution.
Author(s) hold copyright in their work, and retain publishing rights without restrictions
