Student Webcam Behaviors and Beliefs: Emergent Norms, Student Performance, and Cultural Differences
Keywords:Synchronous learning, webcams, norms, higher education
This study presents findings from a survey of 2298 university students from three countries (South Korea, Turkey, United States) focused on their use of and beliefs about webcams to support synchronous learning, including behaviors such as turning cameras on and multitasking. Additionally, it explores differences due to national culture, school achievement, and classroom seating preferences. As expected, findings show synchronous learning use increased during the pandemic. Student preferences for passive viewing behaviors are strong, along with preferences for keeping cameras off. Differences based on classroom seating preferences suggest that students who sit at the front are more likely than their peers to make decisions about webcam use based on involvement, attention, and preparedness. Cultural differences suggest different pedagogical expectations. Multitasking proved to be a complex behavior and is not always linked to poor achievement outcomes. This study has implications both for future research directions on synchronous learning, student webcam practices, and achievement and for how instructors design synchronous classes.
Aguilera-Hermida, A. P., Quiroga-Garza, A., Gomez-Mendoza, S., Del Rio Villanueva, C. A., Avolio Alecchi, B., & Avci, D. (2021). Comparison of students' use and acceptance of emergency online learning due to COVID-19 in the USA, Mexico, Peru, and Turkey. Education and Information Technologies, 26(6), 6823-6845. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10473-8
Al-Samarraie, H. (2019). A scoping review of videoconferencing systems in higher education. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 20(3). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i4.4037
Alghamdi, A., Karpinski, A. C., Lepp, A., & Barkley, J. (2020). Online and face-to-face classroom multitasking and academic performance: Moderated mediation with self-efficacy for self-regulated learning and gender. Computers in Human Behavior, 102, 214-222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.018
Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2017). Digital compass learning: Distance education enrollment report 2017. https://onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/digtiallearningcompassenrollment2017.pdf
Alvarez-Risco, A., Estrada-Merino, A., Anderson-Seminario, M. d. l. M., Mlodzianowska, S., García-Ibarra, V., Villagomez-Buele, C., & Carvache-Franco, M. (2020). Multitasking behavior in online classrooms and academic performance: case of university students in Ecuador during COVID-19 outbreak. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 18(3), 422-434. https://doi.org/10.1108/itse-08-2020-0160
Beyth-Marom, R., Saporta, K., & Caspi, A. (2005). Synchronous vs. asynchronous tutorials. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 37(3), 245-262. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2005.10782436
Boyle, G. J., Wongsri, N., Bahr, M., Macayan, J. V., & Bentler, P. M. (2020). Cross-
cultural differences in personality, motivation and cognition in Asian vs. Western societies. Personality and Individual Differences, 159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.109834
Cardall, S., Krupat, E., & Ulrich, M. (2008). Live lecture versus video-recorded lecture: Are students voting with their feet? Academic Medicine, 83(12). https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e31818c6902
Castelli, F. R., & Sarvary, M. A. (2021). Why students do not turn on their video cameras during online classes and an equitable and inclusive plan to encourage them to do so. Ecol Evol, 11(8), 3565-3576. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7123
Day, J., & Verbiest, C. (2021). Lights, camera, action? A reflection of utilizing web cameras during synchronous learning in teacher education. The Teacher Educators’ Journal, 4, 3-21.
Dennen, V. P., & Burner, K. J. (2017). Identity, context collapse, and Facebook use in higher education: Putting presence and privacy at odds. Distance Education, 38(2), 173-192. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2017.1322453
Dennen, V. P., Word, K. D., & Arslan, Ö. (2021). Webcams at work: A survey of learning professionals’ practices and perceptions. [Research Brief] Instructional Systems & Learning Technologies, Florida State University.
Ekuni, R., Macacare, O. T., & Pompeia, S. (2022). Reducing the negative effects of multitasking on online or distance learning by using retrieval practice [Advance online publication]. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/stl0000314
Goodfellow, R., Jefferys, I., Milest, T., & Shirra, T. (1996). Face-to-face language learning at a distance? A study of a videoconference try-out. ReCALL, 8(2), 5-16. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0958344000003530
Gupta, A., & Saks, N. S. (2013). Exploring medical student decisions regarding attending live lectures and using recorded lectures. Med Teach, 35(9), 767-771. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2013.801940
Hao, S., Cui, M., Dennen, V. P., Türel, Y. K., & Mei, L. (2017). Analysis of mobile learning as an innovation in higher education: A comparative study of three countries. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 11(4), 314-339.
Hod, Y., & Ben-Zvi, D. (2015). Students negotiating and designing their collaborative learning norms: a group developmental perspective in learning communities. Interactive Learning Environments, 23(5), 578-594. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2015.1063511
Hodges, C., & Barbour, M. K. (2021). Assessing learning during Emergency Remote Teaching. Italian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(2), 85-98. https://doi.org/10.17471/2499-4324/1208
Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. EDUCAUSE review, 27.
Jamet, E., Gonthier, C., Cojean, S., Colliot, T., & Erhel, S. (2020). Does multitasking in the classroom affect learning outcomes? A naturalistic study. Computers in Human Behavior, 106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106264
Joshi, G. P., Jha, S., Cho, S., Seo, C., Son, L. H., & Thong, P. H. (2019). Influence of multimedia and seating location in academic engagement and grade performance of students. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 28(2), 268-281. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22190
Lawrence, B. H. (1995). Teaching and learning via videoconference: The benefits of cooperative learning. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 24(2), 145-149. https://doi.org/10.2190/9WFK-58Q2-E5XQ-0DKA
Lepp, A., Barkley, J. E., Karpinski, A. C., & Singh, S. (2019). College students’ multitasking behavior in online versus face-to-face courses. SAGE Open, January-March, 1-9.
Lindquist, S. I., & McLean, J. P. (2011). Daydreaming and its correlates in an educational environment. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(2), 158-167. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2010.12.006
Margaryan, A., Littlejohn, A., & Vojt, G. (2011). Are digital natives a myth or reality? University students’ use of digital technologies. Computers & Education, 56(2), 429-440.
Marquart, M., & Russell, R. (2020). Dear professors: Don't let student webcams trick you. EDUCAUSE review. https://er.educause.edu/blogs/2020/9/dear-professors-dont-let-student-webcams-trick-you
Nikou, S. A. (2020-21). Web-based videoconferencing for teaching online: Continuance intention to use in the post-COVID-19 period. Interaction Design and Architecture(s) Journal, 47, 123-143.
Peper, E., Wilson, V., Martin, M., Rosegard, E., & Harvey, R. (2021). Avoid zoom fatigue, be present and learn. NeuroRegulation, 8(1), 47-56. https://doi.org/10.15540/nr.8.1.47
Rajab, M. H., & Soheib, M. (2021). Privacy concerns over the use of webcams in online medical education during the COVID-19 pandemic. Cureus, 13(2), e13536. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.13536
Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations. Simon & Schuster.
Suggs, C., Myers, J., & Dennen, V. (2010). Raise your hand if you wanna speak: Navigating turn-taking in a Webex course. In E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp. 2212-2219). AACE.
Torchia, R. (2021). The pros and cons of requiring students to turn on their cameras. Ed Tech Magazine, 7. https://edtechmagazine.com/k12/article/2021/07/pros-and-cons-requiring-students-turn-their-cameras
Tu, C.-H. (2002). The relationship between social presence and online privacy. The Internet and Higher Education, 5(4), 293-318. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(02)00134-3
Wiederhold, B. K. (2020). Connecting through technology during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic: Avoiding “zoom fatigue". Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking, 23(7), 437-438. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2020.29188.bkw
Will, P., Bischof, W. F., & Kingstone, A. (2020). The impact of classroom seating location and computer use on student academic performance. PLOS ONE, 15(8), e0236131. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236131
Wolf, J. P. (2008). The effects of backchannels on fluency in L2 oral task production. System, 36(2), 279-294. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2007.11.007
Xi, l., Yuan, Z., Yunqi, B., & Feng-Kuang, C. (2017). An investigation of university students' classroom seating choices. 2017, 6(3). http://libjournal.uncg.edu/jls/article/view/1513
Zhao, Y., Wang, N., Li, Y., Zhou, R., & Li, S. (2020). Do cultural differences affect users’ e‐learning adoption? A meta‐analysis. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(1), 20-41. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13002
Zomorodian, K., Parva, M., Ahrari, I., Tavana, S., Hemyari, C., Pakshir, K., Jafari, P., & Sahraian, A. (2012). The effect of seating preferences of the medical students on educational achievement. Med Educ Online, 17. https://doi.org/10.3402/meo.v17i0.10448
Zydney, J. M., Warner, Z., & Angelone, L. (2020). Learning through experience: Using design based research to redesign protocols for blended synchronous learning environments. Computers & Education, 143, 103678. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103678
As a condition of publication, the author agrees to apply the Creative Commons – Attribution International 4.0 (CC-BY) License to OLJ articles. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
This licence allows anyone to reproduce OLJ articles at no cost and without further permission as long as they attribute the author and the journal. This permission includes printing, sharing and other forms of distribution.
Author(s) hold copyright in their work, and retain publishing rights without restrictions