Relationship Between Metacognition and Online Community of Inquiry in an Online Case-Based Course
Keywords:Online Case-Based Instruction, Metacognition, Community of Inquiry, Self-Regulation, Co-Regulation
This study explored students’ perceived metacognition (self-regulation and co-regulation) in relation to the online presence within the Community of Inquiry (CoI) framework in an online case-based instruction (CBI) course. Forty-seven online graduate students enrolled in an instructional design course participated in the study. Data were collected through CoI survey instrument and shared metacognition questionnaire online survey.The findings revealed that students perceived cognitive presence is higher and less variable among three online presences and metacognition in online CBI. The correlation between two interdependent dimensions of metacognition (self-regulation and co-regulation) was significantly high. Also, co-regulation showed stronger relationships with the three online presences (social, teaching, and cognitive) than self-regulation. Additionally, social presence demonstrated the strongest association with both self-regulation and co-regulation, followed by cognitive presence. These results suggest that students with higher perceived social presence tend to have high metacognition. However, students with higher perceived teaching presence are relatively less likely (or unlikely) to have higher metacognition as teaching presence was found to be the most variable among students, which means that teaching presence was perceived differently.
Akyol, Z. (2013). Metacognitive development within the community of inquiry. In Educational communities of inquiry: Theoretical framework, research and practice (pp. 30-44). IGI Global.
Akyol, Z., & Garrison, D.R. (2011). Assessing metacognition in an online community of inquiry. The Internet and Higher Education, 14 (3), 183-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.01.005.
Akyol, Z., & Garrison, D. R. (2019). The development of a Community of Inquiry over time in an online course: Understanding the progression and integration of social, cognitive and teaching Presence. Online Learning. 12. 10.24059/olj.v12i3-4.1680.
Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing teacher presence in a computer conferencing context. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(2), 1-17.
Arbaugh, J. B., Cleveland-Innes, M., Diaz, S. R., Garrison, D. R., Ice, P., Richardson, J. C., et al. (2008). Developing a community of inquiry instrument: Testing a measure of the community of inquiry framework using a multi-institutional sample. The Internet and Higher Education, 11(3), 133–136.
Cho, M. H., Kim, Y., & Choi, D. (2017). The effect of self-regulated learning on college students' perceptions of community of inquiry and affective outcomes in online learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 34, 10-17.
Choi, I., & Lee, K. (2009). Designing and implementing a case-based learning environment for enhancing ill-structured problem solving: Classroom management problems for prospective teachers. Educational Technology and Research Development, 57, 99-129. DOI 10.1007/s11423-008-9089-2
communities of inquiry: Theoretical framework, research and practice (pp. 30-44). IGI Global.
DiDonato, N. (2013). Effective self- and co-regulation in collaborative learning groups: An analysis of how students regulate problem solving of authentic interdisciplinary tasks. Instructional Science, 41(1), 25-47. DOI 10.1007/s11251-012-9206-9
Ertmer, P.A., & Koehler, A. A. (2014). Online case-based discussions: Examining coverage of the afforded problem space. Educational Technology Research and Development, 62(5), 617– 636.
Garrison, D. R. (2017). E-Learning in the 21st century: A Community of Inquiry framework for research and practice (3rd ed.). Routledge/Taylor and Francis.
Garrison, D. R. (2022). Shared metacognition in a Community of Inquiry. Online Learning, 26(1), 6-18. DOI: 10.24059/olj.v26i1.3023
Garrison, D. R., & Akyol, Z. (2015). Toward the development of a metacognition construct for the community of inquiry framework. Internet and Higher Education, 24, 66–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.10.001
Garrison, D. R., & Arbaugh, J. B. (2007). Researching the community of inquiry framework: Review, issues, and future directions. The Internet and Higher Education, 10(3), 157–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2007.04.001
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education,15(1), 7-23.
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2010a). The first decade of the community of inquiry framework: A retrospective. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1–2), 5–9. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.003
Garrison, D.R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 87–105.
Garrison, D.R., Cleveland-Innes, M., & Fund T.S. (2010b). Exploring causal relationships among teaching, cognitive and social presence: Student perceptions of the community of inquiry framework. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1-2), 31-36. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.002
Kilis, S., & Yıldırım, Z. (2018). Investigation of community of inquiry framework in regard to self-regulation, metacognition and motivation. Computers & Education, 126, 53-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.032
Koehler, A.A., Cheng, Z., Fiock, H., Wang, H., Janakiraman, S., & Chartier, K. (2022). Examining students' use of online case-based discussions to support problem solving: Considering individual and collaborative experiences. Computers & Education, 179, 104407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104407
Sadaf, A., Kim, S. Y., & Wang, Y. (2021). A comparison of cognitive presence, learning, satisfaction, and academic performance in case-based and non-case-based online discussions. American Journal of Distance Education, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2021.1888667
As a condition of publication, the author agrees to apply the Creative Commons – Attribution International 4.0 (CC-BY) License to OLJ articles. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
This licence allows anyone to reproduce OLJ articles at no cost and without further permission as long as they attribute the author and the journal. This permission includes printing, sharing and other forms of distribution.
Author(s) hold copyright in their work, and retain publishing rights without restrictions