Classroom Community and Time: Comparing Student Perceptions in Traditional vs. Accelerated Online Courses
Keywords:Community, Classroom community, online learning, connectedness, social presence, time, accelerated courses
Online educators regularly experiment with ways to create a sense of classroom community in the online courses they design and teach. They do this in part to battle feelings of isolation and loneliness but also to align with prevailing theories of learning (e.g., social constructivism) as well as to mimic idealized in-person face-to-face learning experiences. However, little is known about how well a sense of community is developed in accelerated online courses. Given this, we investigated students’ perceptions of classroom community in traditional length online courses (e.g., 15-week courses) and accelerated online courses (e.g., 7-week courses) taught by the same instructors. The results showed that there was not a statistically significant difference in students’ perceptions of classroom community between the 15-week and 7-week courses. Students in this study rated the accelerated 7-week courses as having a higher sense of classroom community. In this paper, we present the results of our inquiry. We conclude with the implications of our research on research and practice.
Ahmady, S., Kohan, N., Bagherzadeh, R., Rakshhani, T., & Shahabi, M. (2018). Validity testing of classroom community scale in virtual environment learning: A cross sectional study.
Annals of Medicine and Surgery, 36, 256-260. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2018.08.021
Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2016). Online report card: Tracking online education in the United States. Babson Survey Research Group & Quahog Research Group. http://onlinelearningsurvey.com/ reports/onlinereportcard.pdf
Angelino, L. M., Williams, F. K., & Natvig, D. (2007). Strategies to engage online students and reduce attrition rates. The Journal of Educators Online, 4(2), 1-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.9743/JEO.2007.2.1
Akyol, Z., & Garrison, D. R. (2008). The development of a community of inquiry over time in an online course: Understanding the progression and integration of social, cognitive and teaching presence. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 12, 3-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v12i3-4.1680
Anderson, T. (2008). The theory and practice of online learning (2nd ed.). AU Press.
Berge, Z., & Collins, M. (1995). Computer-mediated communication and the online classroom: Overview and perspectives (Vol. 1). Hampton Press.
Boston, W., Díaz, S. R., Gibson, A. M., Ice, P., Richardson, J., & Swan, K. (2009). An exploration of the relationship between indicators of the community of inquiry framework and retention in online programs. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 13(3), 67-83. http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v13i3.1657
Boston, W., Ice, P. & Gibson, A. (2011). Comprehensive assessment of student retention in online learning environments. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 14(1). http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/spring141/boston_ice_gibson141.pdf
Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organization Science, 2(1), 40-57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.40
Cameron, B. A., Morgan, K., Williams, K. C., & Kostelecky, K. L. (2009). Group Projects: Student perceptions of the relationship between social tasks and a sense of community in online group work. American Journal of Distance Education, 23(1), 20–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08923640802664466
Dawson, S. (2006). A study of the relationship between student communication interaction and sense of community. Internet and Higher Education, 9(3), 153–162. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2006.06.007
Dewey, J. (1933). How we think. D.C. Heath.
Dewey, J. (1959). Dewey on education. Columbia University.
Drouin, M. A. (2008). The relationship between students' perceived sense of community and satisfaction, achievement, and retention in an online course. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 9(3), 267-284.
Fisher, M., & Baird, D.E. (2005). Online learning design that fosters student support, self‐regulation, and retention. Campus-Wide Information Systems, 22(2), 88-107. https://doi.org/10.1108/10650740510587100
Fitzgerald, M. (2022, February). How online learning is reshaping higher education. U.S. News. https://www.usnews.com/news/education-news/articles/2022-02-15/how-online-learning-is-reshaping-higher-education
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (1999). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 2(2-3), 87-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6
Gerard, T. L., Brathwaite, S. N., Lawrence, J. H., & Barber, W. S. (2021). Examining the Importance of Community & Connections in Online Learning. Journal of Educational Informatics, 2(2), 3-16.
Glazier, R. A. (2020, July). A shift to online classes this fall could lead to a retention crisis. EdSurge. https://www.edsurge.com/news/2020-07-06-a-shift-to-online-classes-this-fall-could-lead-to-a-retention-crisis
Harasim, L. (1987). Teaching and learning on-line: Issues in computer-mediated graduate courses. Canadian Journal of Educational Communication, 16(2), 117-135. http://dx.doi.org/10.21432/T2TK6K
Harasim, L. M. (1990). Online education: Perspectives on a new environment. Greenwood Publishing.
Hart, C. M. D., Friedmann, E. A. Z., & Hill, M. (2015). Online course-taking and student outcomes in California community colleges. Paper presented at the American Educational
Research Association, Chicago, IL.
Hobson, T. D., & Puruhito, K. K. (2018). Going the distance: Online course performance and motivation of distance learning students. Online Learning, 22(4), 129-140. http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i4.1516
Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020, March 27). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. EDUCAUSE Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning
Jaggars, S. S. (2011). Online learning: Does it help low-income and underprepared students? (CCRC Working Paper No. 26, Assessment of Evidence Series). Columbia University.
Jaggars, S. S., & Xu, D. (2010). Online learning in the Virginia Community College system. Columbia University.
Jonassen, D. H. (1995). Supporting communities of learners with technology: A vision for integrating technology with learning in schools. Educational Technology, 35(4), 60-63.
Kaufmann, R., & Vallade, J. I. (2020). Exploring connections in the online learning environment: student perceptions of rapport, climate, and loneliness. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1749670
Kirwan, J. R., & Roumell, E. A. (2015). Building a conceptual framework for online educator dispositions. Journal of Educators Online, 12(1), 30-61. http://dx.doi.org/10.9743/JEO.2015.1.7
Lave, J. (1991). Situated learning in communities of practice. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 63–82). American Psychological Association.
Leech, N. L., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2007). An array of qualitative data analysis tools: A call for data analysis triangulation. School Psychology Quarterly, 22(4), 557. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1045-3818.104.22.1687
Lipman, M. (1991). Thinking in education. Cambridge Univiversity Press.
Lockee, B.B. (2021). Online education in the post-COVID era. Nature Electronics, 4, 5–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41928-020-00534-0
Moallem, M. (2015). The impact of synchronous and asynchronous communication tools on learner self-regulation, social presence, immediacy, intimacy and satisfaction in collaborative online learning. Online Journal of Distance Education and e-Learning, 3(3), 55-77.
Ouzts, K. (2006). Sense of community in online courses. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 7(3), 285–296.
Phirangee, K., & Malec, A. (2017). Othering in online learning: An examination of social presence, identity, and sense of community. Distance Education, 38(2), 160-172. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2017.1322457
Picciano, A.G. (2002). Beyond student perceptions: Issues of interaction, presence and performance in an online course. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 6(1), 21- 40. http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v6i1.1870
Ragusa, A. T., & Crampton, A. (2018). Sense of connection, identity and academic success in distance education: Sociologically exploring online learning environments. Rural Society, 27(2), 125-142. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10371656.2018.1472914
Reese, S. A. (2015). Online learning environments in higher education: Connectivism vs. dissociation. Education and information technologies, 20(3), 579-588. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10639-013-9303-7
Rogoff, B. (1994). Developing understanding of the idea of communities of learners. Mind, culture, and activity, 1(4), 209-229.
Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (1999). Assessing social presence in asynchronous text-based computer conferencing. Journal of Distance Education, 14(2), 50-71.
Rovai, A. P. (2000). Building and sustaining community in asynchronous learning networks. Internet and Higher Education, 3(4), 285-297. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(01)00037-9
Rovai, A. P. (2002). Development of an instrument to measure classroom community. Internet and Higher Education, 5, 197-211. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(02)00102-1
Rovai, A. P. (2002). Sense of community, perceived cognitive learning, and persistence in asynchronous learning networks. Internet and Higher Education, 5(4), 319-332. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(02)00130-6
Rovai, A. P. (2003). Strategies for grading online discussions: Effects on discussions and classroom community in Internet-based university courses. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 15(1), 89-107. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02940854
Saldana, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). SAGE.
Seaman, J. E., Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2018). Grade increase: Tracking distance education in the United States. Babson Survey Research Group.
Shea, P., & Bidjerano, T. (2014). Does online learning impede degree completion? A national study of community college students. Computers & Education, 75, 103-111. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.02.009
Shea, P., & Bidjerano, T. (2019). Effects of online course load on degree completion, transfer, and dropout among community college students of the state university of New York. Online Learning, 23(4), 6-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v23i4.1364
Shen, D., Nuankhieo, P., Huang, X., Amelung, C., & Lafey, J. (2008). Using social network analysis to understand sense of community in an online learning environment. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 39(1), 17–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.2190/EC.39.1.b
Soles, B., & Maduli-Williams, D. (2019). Student perceptions of an accelerated online master's in education administration program through the lens of social presence. Educational Leadership and Administration: Teaching and Program Development, 30, 56-82.
Stewart, W. H. (2021). A global crash-course in teaching and learning online: A thematic review of empirical Emergency Remote Teaching (ERT) studies in higher education during Year 1 of COVID-19. Open Praxis, 13(1), 89-102. http://dx.doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.13.1.1177
Swan, K. (2002). Building learning communities in online courses: The importance of interaction. Education Communication and Information, 2(1), 23–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1463631022000005016
Thomas, L., Herbert, J., & Teras, M. (2014). A sense of belonging to enhance, participation, success and retention in online programs. The International Journal of the First Year in Higher Education, 5(2), 69–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.5204/intjfyhe.v5i2.233
Tu, C. H. (2001). How Chinese perceive social presence: An examination of interaction in online learning environment. Educational media international, 38(1), 45-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09523980010021235
Venable, M. (2011, December). Who is the instructor? Developing social presence in an online course. Online College.org. http://www.onlinecollege.org/2011/12/27/who-is-the-instructor-developing-social-presence-in-an-online-course/
Walther, J. B. (1992). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A relational perspective. Communication Research, 19, 52-90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/009365092019001003
Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23(1), 3–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365096023001001
Watts, L. (2016). Synchronous and asynchronous communication in distance learning: A review of the literature. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 17(1), 23-32.
Welch, A., & Napoleon, L. (2015). Professional teaching dispositions of online instructors: Why they matter. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 171, 584-589. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.164
Wenger, E. (1999). Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press.
Wenger, E. (2000). Communities of practice and social learning systems. Organization, 7(2), 225-246. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/135050840072002
Wilson, B. G., Ludwig-Hardman, S., Thornam, C. L., & Dunlap, J. C. (2004). Bounded community: Designing and facilitating learning communities in formal courses. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 5(3), 1-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v5i3.204
Wladis, C., Wladis, K., & Hachey, A. C. (2014). The role of enrollment choice in online education: Course selection rationale and course difficulty as factors affecting retention. Online Learning, 18(3). http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v18i3.391
Zajac, L. K., & Lane, A. J. (2020). Student perceptions of faculty presence and caring in accelerated online courses. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 21(2), 67-78.
As a condition of publication, the author agrees to apply the Creative Commons – Attribution International 4.0 (CC-BY) License to OLJ articles. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
This licence allows anyone to reproduce OLJ articles at no cost and without further permission as long as they attribute the author and the journal. This permission includes printing, sharing and other forms of distribution.
Author(s) hold copyright in their work, and retain publishing rights without restrictions