Skills needed for success in online teaching: A qualitative study of experienced instructors
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v28i3.3518Keywords:
online teaching, skills, long-term instructorsAbstract
Although opportunities for online learning in higher education have increased, variations in the quality of online teaching are likely. Instructors at some institutions might be new to online teaching and/or may lack the necessary supports for creating successful virtual learning environments. Therefore, the purpose of this qualitative study was to identify the most valuable skills faculty need to teach successfully online. Instructors (N = 33) with ten or more years of online teaching experience at a highly ranked institution for online education were interviewed about their online teaching experiences. Participants’ responses to the question, “What skills do you think are most valuable for online instructors to have?” were analyzed with 6 major themes emerging. These themes are discussed within existing frameworks that have shaped the field of online education, including the Community of Inquiry framework (COI), the faculty readiness framework, and the Technology Acceptance Model.References
Acuity Scheduling (2006). Acuity Scheduling [Computer software]. https://acuityscheduling.com
Allen, E. I., Seaman, J., Poulin, R. & Straut, T. (2016). Online report card. Tracking online education in the United States. Babson Survey Research Group and Quahog Research Group.
Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing teaching presence in a computer conferencing context. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(2), 1-17.
Caskurlu, S., Maeda, Y., Richardson, J. C., & Lv, J. (2020). A meta-analysis addressing the relationship between teaching presence and students’ satisfaction and learning. Computers & Education, 157, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103966
Chi, A. (2015). Development of the readiness to teach online scale. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Denver]. Digital Commons. https://digitalcommons.du.edu/etd/1018
Cutri, R. M., & Mena, J. (2020). A critical reconceptualization of faculty readiness for online teaching. Distance Education, 41(3), 361-380. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2020.1763167
Galikyan, I., & Admiraal, W. (2019). Students' engagement in asynchronous online discussion: The relationship between cognitive presence, learner prominence, and academic performance. The Internet and Higher Education, 43, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2019.100692
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical thinking in a text-based environment. Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet in Higher Education, 2(2), 87-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2010). The first decade of the community of inquiry framework: A retrospective. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1-2), 5-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.003
Jaschik, S. & Lederman, D. (2019). 2019 survey of faculty attitudes on technology. Inside Higher Ed & Gallup.
Kanuka, H., & Garrison, D. R. (2004). Cognitive presence in online learning. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 15(2), 21-39.
Kelchtermans, G. (2009). Who I am in how I teach is the message: Self‐understanding, vulnerability and reflection. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 15(2), 257-272. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540600902875332
Mansbach, J., & Austin, A. E. (2018). Nuanced perspectives about online teaching: Mid-career and senior faculty voices reflecting on academic work in the digital age. Innovative Higher Education, 43(4), 257-272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-018-9424-4
Martin, F., Ritzhaupt, A., Kumar, S., & Budhrani, K. (2019a). Award-winning faculty online teaching practices: Course design, assessment and evaluation, and facilitation. The Internet and Higher Education, 42, 34-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2019.04.001
Martin, F., Budhrani, K., & Wang, C. (2019b). Examining faculty perception of their readiness to teach online. Online Learning Journal, 23(3), 97-119.
Martin, F., Wang, C., Jokiaho, A., May, B., & Grübmeyer, S. (2019c). Examining Faculty Readiness to Teach Online: A Comparison of US and German Educators. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-learning, 22(1), 53-69.
Mehta, R., & Aguilera, E. (2020). A critical approach to humanizing pedagogies in online teaching and learning. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 7(3), 109-120. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-10-2019-0099
Mohr, S. C., & Shelton, K. (2017). Best practices framework for online faculty professional development: A Delphi study. Online Learning Journal, 21(4), 123-140.
Palloff, R. M., & Pratt, K. (2011). The excellent online instructor: Strategies for professional development. John Wiley & Sons.
Phan, T. T. N., & Dang, L. T. T. (2017). Teacher readiness for online teaching: A critical review. International Journal Open Distance E-Learn, 3(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2020.1839543
Qualtrics XM. (2002). Qualtrics XM [Computer software]. https://qualtrics.com
Saldaña, J. (2016). The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. Sage.
Saunders, F. C., Brooks, J., & Dawson, M. (2020). Exploring staff attitudes to distance learning–what are the opportunities, challenges and impacts on engineering academics and instructional designers. European Journal of Engineering Education, 45(5), 675-690. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2019.1677562
Scherer, R., Howard, S. K., Tondeur, J., & Siddiq, F. (2021). Profiling teachers' readiness for online teaching and learning in higher education: Who's ready? Computers in Human Behavior, 118, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106675
Schmidt, S. W., Hodge, E. M., & Tschida, C. M. (2013). How university faculty members developed their online teaching skills. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 14(3), 131-140.
Seaman, J. E., Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2018). Grade increase: Tracking distance education in the United States. Babson Survey Research Group.
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
Wingo, N. P., Ivankova, N. V., & Moss, J. A. (2017). Faculty perceptions about teaching online: Exploring the literature using the technology acceptance model as an organizing framework. Online Learning Journal, 21(1), 15-35.
Zoom (2002). Zoom [Computer software]. https://zoom.us/
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Mary Ellen Dello Stritto, Naomi Ruth Aguiar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
As a condition of publication, the author agrees to apply the Creative Commons – Attribution International 4.0 (CC-BY) License to OLJ articles. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
This licence allows anyone to reproduce OLJ articles at no cost and without further permission as long as they attribute the author and the journal. This permission includes printing, sharing and other forms of distribution.
Author(s) hold copyright in their work, and retain publishing rights without restrictions
