TiLTing the Discussion Board: Rethinking the Purpose of Online Discussion in an Online GE Writing Course
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v29i4.3903Keywords:
Discussion, TILT, General Education, Transparency in Teaching and Learning, Discussion Boards, Instructional Redesign, Asynchronous, Asynchronous Communication, Action ResearchAbstract
In 2021, I completed an instructional redesign of an online section of a general education (GE) course titled “Criticizing Television.” The redesign focused on utilizing Transparency in Learning and Teaching (TiLT) to create more meaningful engagement and deeper learning opportunities through discussion boards. Using the action research cycle of look, think, and act, this paper documents the redesign process and analyzes the Instructional Redesign assessment data to explore evidence-based practices for supporting meaningful inquiry and student engagement in online undergraduate general education course using TiLT. Strategies to support meaningful inquiry among students engaged in asynchronous online discussions using TiLT are offered.
References
Ambrose, S.A., Bridge, M.W., DiPietro, M., Lovett, M.C., & Norman, M.K. (2010). How learning works: Seven research-based principles for smart teaching. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Aderibigbe, S. A. (2021). Can online discussions facilitate deep learning for students in General Education? Heliyon, 7, 1-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06414
Baldwin, S. & Ching, Y. (2019). Online course design: a review of the Canvas course evaluation checklist. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 20(3).
Bata, H. (2022). Effectiveness of TILT across online learning platforms. In H. Bata, D. Akella, L. Paudel, N. Wickramage, M. Rogers, & A. Gibson (Eds). Integrating transparency in learning and teaching (TILT): An effective tool for providing equitable opportunity in higher education, 162-178. IGI Global.
Belcher, A., Hall, B., Kelley, K. & Pressey, K. (2015). An analysis of faculty promotion of critical thinking and peer interaction within threaded discussions. Online Learning, 19(4), 1-8, https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v19i4.544
Dixson, M., Kuhlhorst, M., & Reiff, A. (2006). Creating effective online discussion: optimal instructor and student roles. Online Learning, 10(4), 15-29. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v10i4.1743
Douglas, T., James, A., Earwaker, L., Mather, C., & Murray, S. (2020). Online discussion boards: Improving practice and student engagement by harnessing facilitator perceptions. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 17(3), 1-14. Retreived from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1264456
Eblen-Zayas, M. (2021). Promoting transparency when experienced faculty transition to online teaching. The Journal of Faculty Development, 35(2), 65-71.
Eodice, M., Geller, A.E., & Lerner, N. (2016). The meaningful writing project: Learning, teaching, and writing in higher education. Logan, UT: Utah State University Press.
Farrell, M. (2018). Rethinking online discussions for inclusion. Research Gate. DOI:10.13140/RG.2.2.19115.28964
Folk, A.L. (2018). Drawing on students’ funds of knowledge: Using identity and lived experience to join the conversation in research assignments. Journal of Information Literacy, 12(2), 44-59.
Goshtasbpour, F., Swinnerton, B. J. & Pickering, J. D. (2022). Twelve tips for engaging learners in online discussions. Medical Teacher, 44(3), 244-248, DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2021.1898571
Han, S. & Hill, J. (2015). Building understanding in asychronous discussions: examining types of online discourse. Online Learning, 10(4), 29-51. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v10i4.1744
Hammond, M. (2005). A review of recent papers on online discussion in teaching and learning in higher education. Online Learning, 9(3), 9-23. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v9i3.1782
Hew, K.F., Cheung, W.S. & Ng, C.S.L., (2010), Student contribution in asynchronous online discussion: a review of the research and empirical exploration, Instructional Science, 38(6), 571-606. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-008-9087-0
Howard, T. O., Winkelmes, M. & Shegog, M. (2020). Transparency teaching in the virtual classroom: Assessing the opportunities and challenges of integrating transparency teaching methods with online learning. Journal of Political Science Education, 16(2), 198-211. https://doi.org/10.1080/15512169.2018.1550420
Keifer-Boyd, K. (2013). Critical action research activist: Social structure and human agency. In M. Buffington & S. W. McKay (Eds.), Practice theory: Seeing the power of art teacher researchers, 246-251. Alexandria, VA: NAEA Press.
Kelly, R. (2009, Sept. 15). A modular course design benefits online instructor and students. Faculty Focus: Higher Ed Teaching Strategies from Magna Publications. https://www.facultyfocus.com/articles/online-education/a-modular-course-design-benefits-online-instructor-and-students/
Mintz, S. (2020, February 20). Beyond the discussion board. Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved from https://www.insidehighered.com/blogs/higher-ed-gamma/beyond-discussion-board
Pace, D. & Middendorf, J. (2004). Decoding the disciplines: Helping students learn disciplinary ways of thinking. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 98.
Shi, H., Hur, J., Tang, Y. M., & Dennen V. P. (2023). Instructional strategies for engaging online learners: Do learner-centeredness and modality matter? Online Learning, 27(4), 271-294. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v27i4.4038
Simon, E. (2018, November 21). 10 tips for effective online discussions. Educause Review. https://er.educause.edu/blogs/2018/11/10-tips-for-effective-online-discussions
Smith, R. (2021a). Discussion Guidelines [Canvas page]. LMS. LMSlogin URL
--- (2021b). Instructor Feedback [submission comment]. LMS. LMSlogin URL
--- (2021c). ARTEDU 2700.03: Criticizing Television [Syllabus]. University, City.
--- (2022). Discussion Guidelines [Canvas page]. CarmenCanvas. https://carmen.osu.edu/
Stringer, E. (2007). Action research (3rd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Stringer, E. & Ortiz Aragon, A. (2021). Action research (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Valenti, E., Feldbush, T. & Mandernach, J., (2019). Comparison of faculty and student perceptions of videos in the online classroom, Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 16(3). Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1224007.pdf
Wengier, S. & Dubuisson, L. (2023). Promoting student success with TiLT in Asynchrnous Online Classes. Perspectives in Learning, 20(1). Retrieved from https://csuepress.columbusstate.edu/pil/vol20/iss1/10
Winkelmes, M. (2014). Transparency In Learning and Teaching Project. https://tilthighered.com/transparency
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ruth Smith
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
As a condition of publication, the author agrees to apply the Creative Commons – Attribution International 4.0 (CC-BY) License to OLJ articles. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
This licence allows anyone to reproduce OLJ articles at no cost and without further permission as long as they attribute the author and the journal. This permission includes printing, sharing and other forms of distribution.
Author(s) hold copyright in their work, and retain publishing rights without restrictions
