Higher Education Instructor Perception of Helpfulness of Inclusive and Equitable Online Teaching Strategies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v27i4.4019Abstract
Online learners are increasingly diverse (NCES, 2022), which underlines the need for instructors to be inclusive and equitable in online teaching. Inclusion refers to providing opportunities for all learners in the online course, so they can actively participate and feel welcomed and belong in the course, and equity ensures that all learners have fair treatment and access to the opportunities and resources needed to succeed. In this survey-based research, we developed an Inclusive and Equitable Online Teaching Strategies (IEOTS) instrument with 45 strategies and examined instructor perceptions of the helpfulness of these strategies. These strategies focused on instructor self-awareness and commitment, getting to know the learners, course design, course facilitation, and evaluation. Based on the 478 online instructor survey responses, descriptive statistics showed that the instructors rated the strategies between somewhat helpful and helpful. In the open-ended question, student choice was described as an important aspect of the online course being inclusive and equitable. Analysis conducted based on the learner (student level), instructor (gender, ethnicity, teaching experience and teaching expertise), course (delivery modality), and organizational differences (required training, collaboration with instructional designer) found that instructor perceptions of helpfulness was higher for the course design subscale for instructors who taught online asynchronously rather than synchronously; higher for the know your learner subscale for instructors who taught graduate students rather than those who taught undergraduate students, and between those who attended training for online teaching compared to those who had not. In addition to supporting diverse online students, this study has implications for online instructors, instructional designers, and administrators who provide support to integrate these strategies effectively.
References
Archambault, L., Leary, H., & Rice, K. (2022). Pillars of online pedagogy: A framework for teaching in online learning environments. Educational Psychologist, 57(3), 178-191. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2022.2051513
Baker, R., Dee, T., Evans, B., & John, J. (2022). Bias in online classes: Evidence from a field experiment. Economics of Education Review, 88, 102259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2022.102259
Bolliger, D. U., & Martin, F. (2018). Instructor and student perceptions of online student engagement strategies. Distance Education, 39(4), 568-583. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2018.1520041
Bolliger, D., & Martin, F. (2021). Critical design elements in online courses. Distance Education, 42(3), 352-372. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2021.1956301
Burgstahler, S. (2015). Opening doors or slamming them shut? Online learning practices and students with disabilities. Social Inclusion, 3(6), 69-79. http://dx.doi.org/10.17645/si.v3i6.420
Cai, Q. & Robinson, D. (2021). Design, redesign, and continuous refinement of an online graduate course: a case study for implementing universal design for learning. Journal of Formative Design in Learning, 1-11.
Carballo, R., Morgado, B., & Cortés-Vega, M. D. (2021). Transforming faculty conceptions of disability and inclusive education through a training programme. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 25(7), 843-859. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2019.1579874
CAST (2018). Universal Design for Learning Guidelines version 2.2. http://udlguidelines.cast.org
Conaway, W., & Bethune, S. (2015). Implicit bias and first name stereotypes: What are the implications for online instruction? Online Learning, 19(3), 162-178. http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v19i3.674
Comer, D. R., Lenaghan, J. A., & Sengupta, K. (2015). Factors that affect students’ capacity to fulfill the role of online learner. Journal of Education for Business, 90(3), 145-155.
Davies, P. L., Schelly, C. L., & Spooner, C. L. (2013). Measuring the effectiveness of Universal Design for Learning intervention in postsecondary education. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 26(3), 195-220.
Faulkner, S. L., Watson, W. K., Pollino, M. A., & Shetterly, J. R. (2021). “Treat me like a person, rather than another number”: University student perceptions of inclusive classroom practices. Communication Education, 70(1), 92-111. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2020.1812680
Garris, C. P., & Fleck, B. (2022). Student evaluations of transitioned-online courses during the COVID-19 pandemic. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 8(2), 119. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/stl0000229
Gay, G. (2018). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice. Teachers CollegePpress.
Grant, K. S. L., & Lee, V. J. (2014). Wrestling with issues of diversity in online courses. Qualitative Report, 19(12), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2014.1275
Hanson, C., & Burke, M. (2021). From understanding to action: An examination of transformative learning in asynchronous online equity, diversity, and inclusion training for first-time teaching assistants. Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA).
Howard T. C., Navarro O. (2016). Critical race theory 20 years later: Where do we go from here? Urban Education, 51, 253-273.
Ismailov, M., & Chiu, T. K. (2022). Catering to inclusion and diversity with universal design for learning in asynchronous online education: A self-determination theory perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 190.
Jiang, A. L., & Zhang, L. J. (2021). University teachers' teaching style and their students' agentic engagement in EFL learning in China: a self-determination theory and achievement goal theory integrated perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 704269.
Kerr, R., Merciai, I., & Eradze, M. (2018). Addressing cultural and linguistic diversity in an online learning environment. Educational Media International, 55(4), 317-332. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2018.1547546
Kieran, L., & Anderson, C. (2019). Connecting universal design for learning with culturally responsive teaching. Education and Urban Society, 51(9), 1202-1216.
Kumar, K., Sharma, B. N., Nusair, S., & Khan, G. J. (2019, December). Anonymous online peer assessment in an undergraduate course: An analysis of students’ perceptions and attitudes in the South Pacific. In 2019 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Education (TALE) (pp. 1-8). IEEE.
Licona, M. M., & Gurung, B. (2011). Online multicultural education: Asynchronous discussions in online multicultural education. Multicultural Education, 19(1), 2-8. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ986884.pdf
Lin, P. S., & Kennette, L. N. (2021). Creating an inclusive learning community to better serve minority students. Journal of Effective Teaching in Higher Education, 4(3), 1-18.
Lombardi, A. R., & Murray, C. (2011). Measuring university faculty attitudes toward disability: Willingness to accommodate and adopt Universal Design principles. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 34(1), 43-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/JVR-2010-0533
Madden, J. (2020). Teaching online: Issues of equity and access in writing-centric formats. Feminist Studies, 46(2), 502-509. https://doi.org/10.15767/feministstudies.46.2.0502
Martin, F., Ahlgrim-Delzell, L., & Budhrani, K. (2017). Systematic review of two decades (1995 to 2014) of research on synchronous online learning, American Journal of Distance Education, 31(1), 3-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2017.1264807
Martin, F., Sun, T., & Westine, C. D. (2020). A systematic review of research on online teaching and learning from 2009 to 2018, Computers & Education, 159, 104009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104009
Martin, F., Wang, C., & Sadaf, A. (2018). Student perception of helpfulness of facilitation strategies that enhance instructor presence, connectedness, engagement and learning in online courses, The Internet and Higher Education, 37, 52-65.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2018.01.003
Merriam-Webster. (n.d.). Equity. In Merriam-Webster.com dictionary. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/equity
Merriam-Webster. (n.d.). Inclusion. In Merriam-Webster.com dictionary. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/inclusion
Morong, G., & DesBiens, D. (2016). Culturally responsive online design: Learning at intercultural intersections. Intercultural Education, 27(5), 474-492. https://doi.org/10.1080/14675986.2016.1240901
Montelongo, R., & Eaton, P. W. (2019). Online learning for social justice and inclusion: The role of technological tools in graduate student learning. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 37(1-2), 33-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-11-2018-0135
Nardi, P. M. (2018). Doing survey research: A guide to quantitative methods. Routledge.
National Center for Education Statistics. (1996). [Washington, D.C.] :[NCES]
Ober, T. M., Brodsky, J. E., Lodhi, A., & Brooks, P. J. (2021). How did Introductory Psychology students experience the transition to remote online instruction amid the COVID-19 outbreak in New York City? Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology. Advanced online publication. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/stl000026
Ortiz, K., Rice, M., McKeown, T., & Tonks, D. (2020). Inclusion in online learning environments. Journal of Online Learning Research, 6(3), 171-176.
Ortega, A., Andruczyk, M., & Marquart, M. (2018). Addressing microaggressions and acts of oppression within online classrooms by utilizing principles of transformative learning and liberatory education. Journal of Ethnic & Cultural Diversity in Social Work, 27(1), 28-40. https://doi.org/10.1080/15313204.2017.1417945
Passey, D. (2017). Developing inclusive practices with technologies for online teaching and learning: a theoretical perspective. Bordón. Revista de pedagogía, 69(3), 25-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.13042/Bordon.2017.53523
Pedro, N. S., & Kumar, S. (2020). Institutional support for online teaching in quality assurance frameworks. Online Learning, 24(3), 50-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v24i3.2309
Quinlan, M. M., Bates, B. R., & Angell, M. E. (2012). ‘What can I do to help?’: Postsecondary students with learning disabilities' perceptions of instructors' classroom accommodations. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 12(4), 224-233. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-3802.2011.01225.x
Rao, K. (2021). Inclusive instructional design: Applying UDL to online learning. The Journal of Applied Instructional Design, 10(1). https://dx.doi.org/10.51869/101/kr
Reedy, A. K. (2019). Rethinking online learning design to enhance the experiences of Indigenous higher education students. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 35(6), 132-149. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.5561
Stephens, G. E., & Roberts, K. L. (2017). Facilitating collaboration in online groups. Journal of Educators Online, 14(1), 1-16. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1133614
Stone, C., Freeman, E., Dyment, J. E., Muir, T., & Milthorpe, N. (2019). Equal or equitable? The role of flexibility within online education. Australian and International Journal of Rural Education, 29(2), 26-40.
Tapanes, M. A., Smith, G. G., & White, J. A. (2009). Cultural diversity in online learning: A study of the perceived effects of dissonance in levels of individualism/collectivism and tolerance of ambiguity. The Internet and Higher Education, 12(1), 26-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.12.001
Tate, T., & Warschauer, M. (2022). Equity in online learning. Educational Psychologist, 57(3), 192-206.
Woodley, X., Hernandez, C., Parra, J., & Negash, B. (2017). Celebrating difference: Best practices in culturally responsive teaching online. TechTrends, 61(5), 470-478. https://doi.org/10.1080/14675986.2016.1240901
Wyss, V. L., Freedman, D., & Siebert, C. J. (2014). The development of a discussion rubric for online courses: Standardizing expectations of graduate students in online scholarly discussions. TechTrends, 58(2), 99-107. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11528-014-0741-x
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Florence Martin, Beth Oyarzun, Ayesha Sadaf
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
As a condition of publication, the author agrees to apply the Creative Commons – Attribution International 4.0 (CC-BY) License to OLJ articles. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
This licence allows anyone to reproduce OLJ articles at no cost and without further permission as long as they attribute the author and the journal. This permission includes printing, sharing and other forms of distribution.
Author(s) hold copyright in their work, and retain publishing rights without restrictions
