"I Sing the Body Electric": Embodied Presence in the Community of Inquiry Framework
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v27i4.4029Abstract
Even prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, more K-12 teachers in the United States were teaching online than ever before, particularly in rural and economically distressed communities (US Department of Education, 2011), and since March 2020, nearly every teacher has become, at least for a little while, a virtual teacher. The purpose of this study was to better understand the embodied experiences of women “sojourner” teachers—that is, teachers who move among online, face-to-face, and hybrid teaching spaces (Howell, 2020). Working from a feminist poststructuralist perspective, I gathered qualitative data from four sojourner teachers in the Midwestern and Mid-Atlantic United States. These data revealed participants’ complex relationships with their bodies while teaching online and how their bodies fit into their perceptions of what it means to be a good virtual teacher. I argue that the current domains of the Community of Inquiry (CoI) framework (Garrison et al., 2000) are limited and would benefit from the explicit inclusion of embodiment to facilitate discussion about the interplay of physical and intellectual labor and, potentially, the real effects embodied identities have on teachers’ experiences in virtual classrooms.
References
Almeida, S. (2015). Race-based epistemologies: The role of race and domination in knowledge production. Wagadu, 13, 79-105.
Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing teaching presence in a computer conferencing context. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(2), 1-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v5i2.1875
Annand, D. (2019). Conceptual failures of the Community of Inquiry framework. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education, 34(2). https://www.ijede.ca/index.php/jde/article/view/1133
Arbaugh, J.B., Cleveland-Innes, M., Diaz, S.R., Garrison, D.R., Ice, P., Richardson, & Swan, K.P. (2008). Developing a Community of Inquiry instrument: Testing a measure of the Community of Inquiry framework using a multi-institutional sample. The Internet and Higher Education, 11(3-4), 133-136. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.06.003
Archambault, L., Kennedy, K., Shelton, C., Dalal, M., McAllister, L., & Huyett, S. (2016). Incremental progress: Re-examining fieldexperiences in K-12 online learning contexts in the United States. Journal of Online Learning Research, 2(3), 303-326.
Atkinson, B. (2008). Apple jumper, teacher babe, and bland uniformer teachers: Fashioning feminine teacher bodies. Educational Studies, 44, 98-121. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131940802368372
Baxter, J. (2003). Positioning gender in discourse: A feminist methodology. Palgrave Macmillan.
Bolldén, K. (2016). The emergence of online teaching practices: A socio-material analysis. Learning, Media, and Technology, 41(3), 444-462. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2015.1044536
Broadie, S. (2001). Soul and body in Plato and Descartes. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 101, 295-308. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511551086.008
Brophy, J. E. (2010). Developing a corporeal cyberfeminism: Beyond cyberutopia. New Media & Society, 12(6), 929-945. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1461444809350901
Carspecken, P. (1996). Critical ethnography in educational research. Routledge.
Chávez, K., & Mitchell, K. M. W. (2020). Exploring bias in student evaluations: Gender, race, and ethnicity. PS: Political Science & Politics, 53(2), 270-274. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1049096519001744
Cheung, D. H., Ng, A. K., Kiang, K., & Chan, H. H. (2018). Creating a community of inquiry in the science classroom: An effective pedagogy for teaching diverse students? Journal of Further and Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2018.1491959
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage.
Creswell, J. W., & Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory into Practice, 39(3), 124-130. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip3903_2
Cunningham, U. (2014). Teaching the disembodied: Othering and activity systems in a blended synchronous learning situation. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15(6), 33-51. http://dx.doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i6.1793
Davis, K. (Ed.). (1997). Embodied practices: Feminist perspectives on the body. Sage.
Dewey, J. (1897). My pedagogic creed. E. L. Kellogg & Co.
DiPalma, C. (2003). Teaching women’s studies, e-mailing cancer. In D. P. Freedman, & M. Stoddard Holmes (Eds.), The teacher’s body: Embodiment, authority, and identity in the academy (pp. 41-58). State University of New York Press.
Dreyfus, H. L. (2009). On the internet (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Ess, C. (2003). Liberal arts and distance education: Can Socratic virtue (aretē) and Confucius’ exemplary person (junzi) be taught online? Arts & Humanities in Higher Education, 2(2), 117-137. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1474022203002002002
Fairclough, N. (2013). Language and power (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Garrett, R., & Wrench, A. (2012). “Society has taught us to judge”: Cultures of the body in teacher education. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 40(2), 111-126. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2012.669826
Garrison, D. R. (2022). Shared metacognition in a Community of Inquiry. Online Learning Journal, 26(1), 6-18. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v26i1.3023
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 87−105. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 7−23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08923640109527071
Gordon, W. J. J. (1972). On being explicit about creative process. Journal of Creative Behavior, 6(4), 295-300. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.1972.tb00940.x
Graziano, K. J., & Bryans-Bongey, S. (2018). Surveying the national landscape of online teacher training in K-12 teacher preparation programs. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 34(4), 259-277. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2018.1498040
Grumet, M. (2003). Afterword: My teacher’s body. In D. P. Freedman, & M. Stoddard Holmes (Eds.), The teacher’s body: Embodiment, authority, and identity in the academy (pp. 249-258). State University of New York Press.
hooks, b. (1994). Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. Routledge.
Howell, C. D. (2019). Our professional obligations in the education marketplace. Curriculum and Teaching Dialogue, 21(1-2), 131-133.
Howell, C. D. (2020). “A rose by any other name”: The significance of naming in online, face-to-face, and hybrid teaching. Curriculum and Teaching Dialogue, 22(1-2), 61-75.
Hudac, M. C. (1991). Merleau-Ponty on the Cartesian dubito: A critical analysis. History of Philosophy Quarterly, 8(2), 207-219.
Ingalls, R. (2006). Unmasking the brilliant disguise: Smallness, authority and the irony of a teacher’s body. Review of Education, Pedagogy, and Cultural Studies, 28(3-4), 239-252. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10714410600873167
Jackson, A. Y., & Mazzei, L. A. (2012). Thinking with theory. Routledge.
Jones, S., & Hughes-Decatur, H. (2012). Speaking of bodies in justice-oriented, feminist teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 63(1), 51-61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022487111422535
Kennedy, K., & Archambault, L. (2012). Offering preservice teachers field experiences in K-12 online learning: A national survey of teacher education programs. Journal of Teacher Education, 63(3), 185-200. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022487111433651
Lewis, P. (2016). Teaching while black: A new voice on race and education in New York City. Fordham University Press.
Lindsay, G. M., Jeffrey, J., & Singh, M. (2009). Paradox of a graduate human science curriculum experienced online: A faculty perspective. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 40(4), 181-186. http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/00220124-20090401-07
Mallozzi, C. (2014). “The personal has become political”: A secondary teacher’s perceptions of her body in the classroom. Journal of Pedagogy, 5(2), 183-207. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/jped-2014-0009
Maddrell, J. A., Morrison, G. R., Watson, & G. S. (2017). Presence and learning in a community of inquiry. Distance Education, 38(2), 245-258. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2017.1322062
Merleau-Ponty, M. (2005). Phenomenology of perception (C. Smith, Trans.). Taylor & Francis e-Library. (Original work published 1945)
Michel, A. (2015). Dualism at work: The social circulation of embodiment theories in use. Signs and Society, 3(S1), S41-S69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/679306
Olpak, Y. Z. (2022). Community of Inquiry framework: Research trends between 2000-2020. Online Learning Journal, 26(1), 350-368. https://olj.onlinelearningconsortium.org/index.php/olj/article/view/2737/1185
Price Herndl, C. (2003). Johnny Mnemonic meets the bimbo: Feminist pedagogy and postmodern performance. In D. P. Freedman, & M. Stoddard Holmes (Eds.), The teacher’s body: Embodiment, authority, and identity in the academy (pp. 59-68). State University of New York Press.
Radtke, R., & Skouge, J. (2003). My body, myself: A quadriplegic’s perception of and approach to teaching. In D. P. Freedman, & M. Stoddard Holmes (Eds.), The teacher’s body: Embodiment, authority, and identity in the academy (pp. 83-98). State University of New York Press.
Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (1999). Assessing social presence in asynchronous text-based computer conferencing. Journal of Distance Education, 14(2), 50−71.
Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, R., & Archer, W. (2001). Methodological issues in the content analysis of computer conference transcripts. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 12(1), 8−22.
Rourke, L., & Kanuka, H. (2009). Learning in communities: A review of the literature. Journal of Distance Education, 23(1), 19-48.
Smith, J. E. H. (Ed.). (2017). Embodiment: A history. Oxford University Press.
Spangler Gerald, A. (2003). Teaching pregnant: A case for holistic pedagogy. In D. P. Freedman, & M. Stoddard Holmes (Eds.), The teacher’s body: Embodiment, authority, and identity in the academy (pp. 179-186). State University of New York Press.
St. Louis, K. & Calabrese Barton, A. (2002). Tales from the science education crypt: A critical reflection of positionality, subjectivity, and reflexivity in research. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 3(3), Art. 19. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs020319
Trinh, M. (1989). Woman, native, other. Indiana University Press.
Uitto, M., & Syrjälä, L. (2008). Body, caring and power in teacher-pupil relationships: Encounters in former pupils’ memories. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 52(4), 355-371. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00313830802184517
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2023, January 25). Labor force statistics from current population survey. https://www.bls.gov/cps/cpsaat11.htm
U.S. Department of Education. (2021). Integrated Postsecondary Data System (IPEDS), fall enrollment component 2021 provisional data. National Center for Education Statistics. https://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/TrendGenerator/app/build-table/2/42?rid=57&cid=85
U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2022, January 31). K-12 education: Department of Education should help states address student testing issues and financial risks associated with virtual schools, particularly virtual charter schools. https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-22-104444
Weedon, C. (1999). Feminism, theory, and the politics of difference. Blackwell.
Xin, C. (2012). A critique of the Community of Inquiry framework. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education, 26(1). https://www.ijede.ca/index.php/jde/article/view/755
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Crystal D. Howell
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
As a condition of publication, the author agrees to apply the Creative Commons – Attribution International 4.0 (CC-BY) License to OLJ articles. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
This licence allows anyone to reproduce OLJ articles at no cost and without further permission as long as they attribute the author and the journal. This permission includes printing, sharing and other forms of distribution.
Author(s) hold copyright in their work, and retain publishing rights without restrictions
