Instructional Strategies for Engaging Online Learners
Do Learner-centeredness and Modality Matter?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v27i4.4038Abstract
This study explores how online instructors use different instructional strategies to engage learners, and the active learning indicators that they look for among their students. Additionally, it examines how modality—synchronous versus asynchronous—and instructor learner-centeredness relate to instructional strategy choices. Using a mixed methods approach with a concurrent triangulation design, 101 higher education online instructors were surveyed and 11 were interviewed. Findings show that the use of learner-centered strategies, particularly discussion, occurs at a high rate regardless of an instructor’s learner-centeredness or modality. Interestingly, instructors with high learner-centeredness reported greater use of lectures as a percentage of both synchronous and asynchronous courses than instructors with low learner-centeredness. This finding was counterbalanced by the high learner-centeredness group reporting significantly higher importance for having learners speak and post messages during class.
References
Alqurashi, E. (2019). Predicting student satisfaction and perceived learning within online learning environments. Distance Education. 40, 133–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2018.1553562
Archambault, L., Leary, H., & Rice, K. (2022). Pillars of online pedagogy: A framework for teaching in online learning environments. Educational Psychologist, 57(3), 178–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2022.2051513
APA Work Group of the Board of Educational Affairs. (1997). Learner-centered psychological principles: A framework for school reform and redesign. American Psychological Association.
Belt, E. S., & Lowenthal, P. R. (2023). Synchronous video-based communication and online learning: An exploration of instructors' perceptions and experiences. Education and Information Technologies, 28(5), 4941–4964. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11360-6
Berge, Z. L., & Mrozowski, S. (2001). Review of research in distance education, 1990 to 1999. The American Journal of Distance Education, 15(3), 5–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923640109527090
Berlin, K., & Weaver, K. V. (2021). Teaching strategies students find helpful in online learning courses. College Teaching, 70(3), 319–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2021.1940814
Bigatel, P., & Williams, V. (2015). Measuring student engagement in an online program. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 18(2), 9. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/158589/
Binali, T., Tsai, C.-C., & Chang, H.-Y. (2021). University students’ profiles of online learning and their relation to online metacognitive regulation and internet-specific epistemic justification. Computers & Education, 175, 104315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104315
Blau, I., & Shamir-Inbal, T. (2021). Writing private and shared annotations and lurking in Annoto hyper-video in academia: Insights from learning analytics, content analysis, and interviews with lecturers and students. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69, 763–786. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-09984-5
Blum-Smith, S., Yurkofsky, M. M., & Brennan, K. (2021). Stepping back and stepping in: Facilitating learner-centered experiences in MOOCs. Computers and Education, 160, Article 104042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104042
Bolliger, D. U., & Martin, F. (2018). Instructor and student perceptions of online student engagement strategies. Distance Education, 39(4), 568–583. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2018.1520041
Børte, K., Nesje, K., & Lillejord, S. (2020). Barriers to student active learning in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 28(3), 597–615. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1839746
Boyd, M. (2012). From the comfort of your office: Facilitating learner-centered continuing education in the online environment. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 50(2–3), 189–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2011.651195
Cerezo, R., Sánchez-Santillán, M., Paule-Ruiz, M. P., & Núñez, J. C. (2016). Students' LMS interaction patterns and their relationship with achievement: A case study in higher education. Computers & Education, 96, 42–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.02.006
Cheng, X., Ma, X. Y., Luo, C., Chen, J., Wei, W., & Yang, X. (2021). Examining the relationships between medical students’ preferred online instructional strategies, course difficulty level, learning performance, and effectiveness. Advances in Physiology Education, 45(4), 661–669. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00234.2020
Chimbi, G. T., & Jita, L. C. (2021). Policy failures with learner-centered pedagogy: Case studies from the Zimbabwean experiment on project-based learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.14434/ijpbl.v15i1.29268
Choi, H., & Hur, J. (2023). Passive participation in collaborative online learning activities: A scoping review of research in formal school learning settings. Online Learning Journal, 27(1), 127–157. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v27i1.3414
Considine, C. L., Seek, M. W., & Lester, J. (2014). Strategies for effective online course development. Engineering Technology Faculty Publications. 97, 1–7. https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/engtech_fac_pubs/97
Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Sage.
Dennen, V. P., Hall, B. M., & Hedquist, A. (2023). A systematic review of research on intersubjectivity in online learning: Illuminating opportunities for cohesion and mutual understanding in the research conversation. Online Learning Journal, 27(1), 158–186. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v27i1.3430
Dennen, V. P., & Jones, M. K. (2022). The role of the online instructor: A nexus of skills, activities, and values that support learning. In O. Zawacki-Richter & I. Jung (Eds.), Handbook of open, distance and digital education (pp. 1–17). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0351-9_62-1
Dennen, V. P., Yalcin, Y., Hur, J., & Screws, B. (2022). Student webcam behaviors and beliefs: Emergent norms, student performance, and cultural differences. Online Learning Journal, 26, 168–192. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v26i4.3472
Dennen, V. P., (2008). Pedagogical lurking: Student engagement in non-posting discussion behavior. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(4), 1624–1633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2007.06.003
Dennen, V. P. (2005). From message posting to learning dialogues: Factors affecting learner participation in asynchronous discussion. Distance Education, 26(1), 127–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587910500081376
Dixson, M. D. (2015). Measuring student engagement in the online course: The Online Student Engagement Scale (OSE). Online Learning Journal, 19(4). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v19i4.561
Fabriz, S., Mendzheritskaya, J., & Stehle, S. (2021). Impact of synchronous and asynchronous settings of online teaching and learning in higher education on students’ learning experience during COVID-19. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 733554. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.733554
Gilmour, A. (2021). Let’s talk about webcams, and a pedagogy of kindness. Compass: Journal of Learning and Teaching, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.21100/compass.v14i2.1177
Hashim, M. J., Govender, R., Ghenimi, N., Kieu, A., & Khan, M. A. B. (2023). LecturePlus: A learner-centered teaching method to promote deep learning. Advances in Physiology Education, 47(2), 175–180. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00237.2022
Herranen, J. (2016). Inquiry-based and learner-centered chemistry education. LUMAT-B: International Journal on Math, Science and Technology Education, 1(3). https://journals.helsinki.fi/lumatb/article/view/1201
Hrastinski, S. (2008). Asynchronous & synchronous e-learning. Educause Quarterly, 31(4), 51–55. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/101357/
Hrastinski, S. (2009). A theory of online learning as online participation. Computers & Education, 52(1), 78–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.06.009
Karimi, R. (2011). Interface between problem-based learning and a learner-centered paradigm. Advances in Medical Education and Practice, 2011(2), 117–125. https://doi.org/10.2147/amep.s12794
Kear, K., Chetwynd, F., Williams, J., & Donelan, H. (2012). Web conferencing for synchronous online tutorials: Perspectives of tutors using a new medium. Computers & Education, 58(3), 953–963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.015
Kim, D., Park, Y., Yoon, M., & Jo, I. H. (2016). Toward evidence-based learning analytics: Using proxy variables to improve asynchronous online discussion environments. The Internet and Higher Education, 30, 30–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.03.002
Maguire, M., & Delahunt, B. (2017). Doing a thematic analysis: A practical, step-by-step guide for learning and teaching scholars. All Ireland Journal of Higher Education, 9(3), 3351–3359. http://ojs.aishe.org/index.php/aishe-j/article/view/335
Mahmood, S. (2021). Instructional strategies for online teaching in COVID‐19 pandemic. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 3(1), 199–203. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.218
Malinen, S. (2015). Understanding user participation in online communities: A systematic literature review of empirical studies. Computers in Human Behavior, 46, 228–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.004
Martin, F., & Bolliger, D. U. (2018). Engagement matters: Student perceptions on the importance of engagement strategies in the online learning environment. Online Learning Journal, 22(1), 205–222. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i1.1092
Martin F., Sun, T., & Westine, C. D. (2020). A systematic review of research on online teaching and learning from 2009 to 2018. Computers and Education, 159, Article 104009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104009
McCombs, B. L. (2008). From one-size-fits-all to personalized learner-centered learning: The evidence. The FM Duffy Reports, 13(2), 1–12.
McCombs, B. L. (2015). Learner-centered online instruction. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2015(144), 57–71. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.20163
Mikum, S., Suksakulchai, S., Chaisanit, S., & Murphy, E. (2018). Students’ participation in peer-to-peer communication supported by social media. Education and Information Technologies, 23(2), 659–679. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9628-8
Moore, M. J. (1993). Three types of interaction. In K. Harry, M. John, & D. Keegan (Eds.), Distance education theory (pp. 19–24). Routledge.
Moore, J. L., Dickson-Deane, C., & Galyen, K. (2011). e-Learning, online learning, and distance learning environments: Are they the same? The Internet and Higher Education, 14(2), 129–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.10.001
Murphy, E., Rodríguez-Manzanares, M. A., & Barbour, M. (2011). Asynchronous and synchronous online teaching: Perspectives of Canadian high school distance education teachers. British Journal Education Technology. 42(4), 583–591. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01112.x
Nguyen, K. A., Borrego, M., Finelli, C. J., Demonbrun, M., Crockett, C., Tharayil, S., Shekhar, P., Waters, C., & Rosenberg, R. (2021). Instructor strategies to aid implementation of active learning: a systematic literature review. International Journal of STEM Education, 8, Article 9(2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00270-7
Orr, L., Weekley, L., & Reyes, B. (2021). Incorporating innovative instructional strategies to enhance learner engagement in online college courses. In M. Khosrow-Pour (Eds.), Research anthology on developing effective online learning courses (pp. 1411–1428). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-8047-9
Palmero, J. R., Gamez, F. D. G., Magana, E. C., & Vega, E. S. (2023). Effectiveness of the flipped classroom in the teaching of mathematics in an online environment: Identification of factors affecting the learning process. Online Learning Journal, 27(2). https://doi.org//10.24059/olj.v27i2.3239
Ratan, R., Ucha, C., Lei, Y., Lim, C., Triwibowo, W., Yelon, S., Sheahan, A., Lamb, B., Deni, B., & Hua Chen, V. H. (2022). How do social presence and active learning in synchronous and asynchronous online classes relate to students’ perceived course gains? Computers and Education, 191, Article 104621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104621
Ribbe, E., & Bezanilla, M. J. (2013). Scaffolding learner autonomy in online university courses. Digital Education Review, 24, 98–113. https://doi.org/10.1344/der.2013.24.98-112
Rubio, F., Thomas, J. M., & Li, Q. (2018). The role of teaching presence and student participation in Spanish blended courses. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(3), 226–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1372481
Ruthotto, I., Kreth, Q., Stevens, J., Trively, C., & Melkers, J. (2020). Lurking and participation in the virtual classroom: The effects of gender, race, and age among graduate students in computer science. Computers & Education, 151, 103854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103854
Shi, H., Zhou, Y., Dennen, V. P., & Hur, J. (2023). From unsuccessful to successful learning: profiling behavior patterns and student clusters in Massive Open Online Courses. Education and Information Technologies, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12010-1
Srba, I., Savic, M., Bielikova, M., Ivanovic, M., & Pautasso, C. (2019). Employing community question answering for online discussions in university courses: Students’ perspective. Computers and Education, 135, 75–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.02.017
Trust, T., & Goodman, L. (2023). Cameras optional? Examining student camera use from a learner-centered perspective. TechTrends, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-023-00855-9
Wang, C.-H., Shannon, D. M., & Ross, M. E. (2013). Students’ characteristics, self-regulated learning, technology self-efficacy, and course outcomes in online learning. Distance Education, 34(3), 302–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2013.835779
Wang, P., Ma, T., Liu, L. B., Shang, C., An, P., & Xue, Y. X. (2021). A comparison of the effectiveness of online instructional strategies optimized with smart interactive tools versus traditional teaching for postgraduate students. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 747719. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.747719
Ware, H. B. (2006). Learner-centered e-learning: An exploration of learner-centered practices in online and traditional instruction in higher education (Publication No. 29119996) [Doctoral dissertation]. Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
Wilton, L. (2018). Quiet participation: Investigating non-posting activities in online learning. Online Learning, 22(4), 65–88. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i4.1518
Wise, A. F., Speer, J., Marbouti, F., & Hsiao, Y. T. (2013). Broadening the notion of participation in online discussions: Examining patterns in learners' online listening behaviors. Instructional Science, 41(2), 323–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-012-9230-9
Zawacki-Richter, O., Bäcker, E. M., & Vogt, S. (2009). Review of distance education research (2000 to 2008): Analysis of research areas, methods, and authorship patterns. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10(6), 21–50. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v10i6.741
Zhou, X., Chen, L. H., & Chen, C. L. (2019). Collaborative learning by teaching: A pedagogy between learner-centered and learner-driven. Sustainability, 11(4), Article 1174. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11041174
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Hui Shi, Jaesung Hur, Yuen Man Tang, Vanessa P. Dennen
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
As a condition of publication, the author agrees to apply the Creative Commons – Attribution International 4.0 (CC-BY) License to OLJ articles. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
This licence allows anyone to reproduce OLJ articles at no cost and without further permission as long as they attribute the author and the journal. This permission includes printing, sharing and other forms of distribution.
Author(s) hold copyright in their work, and retain publishing rights without restrictions
