It Helped Push Me Through the Class’: Community College Student Perceptions of the Role of Instructor Immediacy Behaviors in Completing an Online Course
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v28i3.4080Keywords:
Online teaching, online learning, immediacy, immediacy behaviors, transactional distanceAbstract
For decades, the number of students enrolling in online courses has been increasing, and this trend toward online education has been further intensified as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. The completion rate of online courses is not as high as in-person instruction, and researchers and practitioners have long been invested in identifying ways in which online education can be optimized. One dimension of online education that has received scholarly attention is the transactional distance that exists between students and instructors, which, if not appropriately minimized, can lead to a variety of negative student outcomes. Scholars have also identified a variety of verbal and nonverbal immediacy behaviors that can help online instructors decrease this transactional distance and promote a variety of positive student outcomes. To date, the study of immediacy behaviors in online college courses has focused primarily on four-year institutions utilizing quantitative methods. As complement to this research, we interviewed 12 community college students to better understand how a particular set of immediacy behaviors (i.e., a “welcome” phone call, sending personalized emails, using humor, creating videos, and sending “check-in” emails) influenced students’ desire and ability to remain in and complete an online course. Implications of these findings for practice and future research are discussed.
References
Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2015). Grade Level: Tracking Online Education in the United States. Babson Survey Research Group.
Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2017). Digital learning compass: Digital education enrollment report 2017. Babson Survey Research Group. https://www.onlinelearningsurvey.com/faculty.html
Andersen, J. F. (1979). Instructor immediacy as a predictor of teaching effectiveness. In D. Nimmo (Ed.), Communication yearbook 3 (pp. 543-559). Transaction Books.
Anderson, B., & Simpson, M. (2012). History and heritage in open, flexible, and distance education. Journal of Open, Flexible and Distance Learning, 16(2), [1–10.].
Arbaugh, J. B. (2001). How instructor immediacy behavior affects student satisfaction and learning in web-based courses. Business Administration Quarterly 64(4), 42-54.
Bahr, P. R., Jackson, G., McNaughtan, J., Oster, M., & Gross, J. (2017). Unrealized potential:
Community college pathways to STEM baccalaureate degrees. Journal of Higher Education, 88(3), 430-478.
Bahr, P. R., McNaughtan, J., & Jackson, G. R. (2022). Reducing the loss of
community college students who demonstrate potential in STEM. Research in Higher
Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-022-09713-8
Bailie, J. L. (2012). The criticality of verbal immediacy in online instruction: A modified Delphi study. Journal of Educators Online, 9(2).
Bair, D., & Bair, M. (2011). Paradoxes of online teaching. International Journal for Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 5(2), 1-15.
Baker, C. (2010). The impact of instructor immediacy and presence for online student affective learning, cognition, and motivation. The Journal of Educators Online, 7(1).
Baker, J., & Woods, R. H. (2004). Immediacy, cohesiveness, and the online classroom. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 15(2), 133-151.
Batts, D., Pagliari, L., Mallett, W., & McFadden, C. (2010). Training for faculty who teach online. Community College Enterprise, 16(2), 21-31. http://www.schoolcraft.cc.mi.us/cce/
Bawa, P. (2016, January-March). Retention in online courses: Exploring issues and solutions - a literature review. SAGE Open, 1-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2158244015621777
Bello, R., Brandau, F., & Horne, D. (2020). The enhancement of verbal immediacy in online university classes: A student-generated taxonomy. International Journal of Communication, 14-17.
Campbell, D. E. (2014). The influence of instructor immediacy behaviors on student performance in an online course (and the problem of method variance). Teaching of Psychology, Vol.41(2) 163-166.
Chang, N. (2018). The vital importance of faculty presence in an online learning environment. 2661-2671. Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology (4th ed.). IGI Global.
Christophel, D. M. (1990). The relationship among instructor immediacy behaviors, student motivation, and learning. Communication Education, 39, 323-340.
Croxton, R. A. (2014). The role of interactivity in student satisfaction and persistence in online learning. Merlot Journal of Online Learning and Teaching 10(2), 314–325.
Dennen, V. P., Darabi, A. A., & Smith, L. J. (2007, May). Instructor-learner interaction in online courses: The relative perceived importance of particular instructor actions on performance and satisfaction. Online Learning, 28(1), 65-79.
Dilling, J., Varga, M. A., & Mandernach, B. J. (2020). Comparing teaching and social presence
in traditional and online community college learning environments. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 44(10-12), 854-869.
Dixson, M. D., Greenwell, M.R., Rogers-Stacy, C., Weister, T., & Lauer, S. (2017). Nonverbal immediacy behaviors and online student engagement: bringing past instructional research into the present virtual classroom. Communication Education, 66(1), 37-53,
Edwards, A., & Edwards, C. (2001). The impact of instructor verbal and nonverbal immediacy on student perceptions of attractiveness and homophily. Journal of Excellence in College Teaching, 12(2), 5–17.
Falloon, G. (2011). Making the Connection: Moore’s theory of transactional distance and its relevance to the use of a virtual classroom in postgraduate online instructor education. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(3), 187–209.
Fletcher, T., & Bullock, S. M. (2015). Reframing pedagogy while teaching about teaching
online: A collaborative self-study. Professional Development in Education, 41(4), 690-706. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2014.938357
Gaytan, J. (2015). Comparing faculty and student perceptions regarding factors that affect
student retention in online education. American Journal of Distance Education,
29(1), 56-66. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2015.994365
Glazier, R. A. (2016). Building rapport to improve retention and success in online classes. Journal of Political Science Education, 12(4), 437-456. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15512169.2016.1155994
Gorham, J. (1988). The relationship between verbal instructor immediacy behaviors and student learning. Communication Education, 37, 40-53.
Harrison, L. M., & Mathuews, K. B. (2022). Three priorities for the future of online education. Journal of Thought, 56, 3-16.
Janesick, V. J. (2015). "Stretching" exercises for qualitative researchers. Sage Publications.
Jackson, L. C., Jones, S. J., & Rodriguez, R. C. (2010). Faculty actions that result in student satisfaction in online courses. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 14(4), 78-96. http://onlinelearningconsortium.org/read/journal-issues/
Jensen, K. K. (1999). Training instructors to use verbal immediacy. Communication Research Reports, 16(3), 223-232.
Johnson, E. J., & Card, K. (2007). The effects of instructor and student immediacy behaviors in writing improvement and course satisfaction in a web-based undergraduate course. The International Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 4(2), 1-21.
Kanuka, H. (2001). University student perceptions of the use of the Web in distance-related programs. The Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 31(3), 49.
Ladyshewsky, R. K. (2013). Instructor presence in online courses and student satisfaction. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 7(1), Article 13.
Legg, A. M., & Wilson, J. H. (2009). E-Mail from professor enhances student motivation and
attitudes. Teaching of Psychology, 36(3), 205–211.
Mehrabian, A. (1969). Some referents and measures of nonverbal behavior. Behavioral Research
Methods and Instrumentation, (1), 213-217.
Mehrabian, A. (1981). Silent messages: Implicit communication or emotions and attitudes. (2nd ed.). Wadsworth.
Melrose, S., & Bergeron, K. (2006). Online graduate study of health care learners' perceptions of instructional immediacy. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 7(1), 1-13.
Menchaca, M.P., & Bekele, T.A. (2008). Learner and instructor identified success factors in distance education. Distance Education 29(3), 231-252.
Meyer, K. (2014). How community college faculty members may improve student learning productivity in their online courses. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 38, 575-587. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10668926.2012.676501
Moore, M. G. (1973). Toward a theory of independent learning and teaching. The
Journal of Higher Education, 44(9), 661–679. https://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1980599
Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (1996). Distance education: A systems view. Wadsworth.
Moore, M. G. (1991). Editorial: Distance education theory. The American Journal of Distance Education, 5(3), 1–6.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2014). http://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/datacenter/
Pagliari, L, Batts, D., &. McFadden, C. (2009). Desired versus actual training for online
instructors in community colleges. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 12(3).
Pelowski, S., Frissell, L., Cabral, K., & Yu, T. (2005). So far but yet so close: Student chat room immediacy, learning, and performance in an online course. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 16(4), 395.
Ray, J. (2009). Faculty perspective: Training and course development for the online classroom. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 5(2), 263-276.
Richmond, V. P., & McCroskey, J. C. (2000). Nonverbal behavior in human relations (4th ed.). Allyn & Bacon.
Roberts, A., & Friedman, D. (2013). The impact of teacher immediacy on student participation: An objective cross-disciplinary examination. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 25, 38–46
Russo, T. & Benson, S. (2005). Learning with invisible others: Perceptions of online presence and their relationship to cognitive and affective learning. Educational Technology and Society, 8(1), 54-62.
Schutt, M., Allen, B. S., & Laumakis, M. A. (2009). The effects of instructor immediacy behaviors in online learning environments. Quarterly Review of Distance Education., 10(2), 135-148.
Sevnarayan, K. (2022). Reimaging eLearning technologies to support students: On reducing transactional distance at an open and distance eLearning institution. E-Learning and Digital Media, 19(4), 421-439.
Shaw, K. (2012). Leadership through instructional design in higher education. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 7(3).
Shea, P., & Bidjerano, T. (2018). Online course enrollment in community college and degree
completion: The tipping point. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(2), 282-293.
Shea, P., & Bidjerano, T. (2019). Effects of online course load on degree completion, transfer,
and dropout among community college students of the State University of New York. Online Learning, 23(4), 6-22.
Smalley, S. (2021). Half of all students take online courses. Inside Higher Ed.
Stein, D. S., Wanstreet, C. E., Calvin, J., Overtoom, C. & Wheaton, J. E., (2005). Bridging the transactional distance gap in online learning environments, The American Journal of Distance Education, 19(2), 105-118.
Tate, T., & Warschauer, M. (2022). Equity in online learning. Educational Psychologist, 57(3),
192-206.
Tinto, V. (2012). Enhancing student success: Taking the classroom success seriously.
The International Journal of the First Year in Higher Education, 3(1), 1-8.
Ustati, R. & Hassan, S. (2013). Distance learning student’s need: Evaluating interactions from Moore’s theory of transactional distance. The Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 14(2), 291-303.
Weidlich, J. & Bastiaens, T. (2018). Technology matters: The impact of transactional distance on satisfaction in online distance learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(3). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i3.3417
Wilson, J. H., & Ryan, R. G. (2013). Professor-student rapport scale: Six items predict student outcomes. Teaching of Psychology, 40(2), 130-133.
Yuen, V. (2020, October 7). The $78 billion community college funding shortfall. Center for American Progress. https://www.americanprogress.org/article/78-billion-community-college-funding-shortfall/
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Michelle Orcutt, Grant Jackson, Stephanie Jones
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
As a condition of publication, the author agrees to apply the Creative Commons – Attribution International 4.0 (CC-BY) License to OLJ articles. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
This licence allows anyone to reproduce OLJ articles at no cost and without further permission as long as they attribute the author and the journal. This permission includes printing, sharing and other forms of distribution.
Author(s) hold copyright in their work, and retain publishing rights without restrictions
