The Effect of Video Camera, Microphone and Chat Box Use on Social Presence and Engagement in an Online Group Activity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v28i4.4133Keywords:
Online learning, engagement, interpersonal connections, video cameras, communicationAbstract
With the rapidly expanding availability of online courses, concerns have been raised about student engagement and connection within the online environment. Using an experimental design, we examined the effects of video camera, microphone, and chat box communication mediums on students’ experiences of social presence, peer rapport, motivation, satisfaction, and anxiety. A total of 133 undergraduate students were randomly assigned to a video, audio, or chat box condition and asked to complete an online interactive group task and a post-task survey. One-ways ANOVAs indicated that participants in the chat box condition reported lower levels of social presence, peer rapport, motivation and satisfaction compared to both the video and audio conditions, with no differences between the video and audio conditions. Those in the video condition reported higher anxiety levels than those in the chat box condition. We recommend that students participate in their online classes using video cameras and/or microphones to increase engagement and interpersonal connections with peers.
References
Al-Fanar Media. (2022, October 14). E-learning statistics 2022: What the data show. https://al-fanarmedia.org/2022/10/e-learning-statistics-2022-what-the-data-show/
Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2017). Digital compass learning. Distance Education Enrollment Report 2017. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED580868.pdf
Alsharo, M., Gregg, D., & Ramirez, R. (2017). Virtual team effectiveness: The role of knowledge sharing and trust. Information & Management, 54(4), 479-490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2016.10.005
APUEDGE. (2018, December 27). How to alleviate loneliness when you study online. Online Learning Archives–Edge. https://onlinelearningtips.com/2018/12/alleviate-loneliness/
Arbaugh, J., Cleveland-Innes, M., Diaz, S. R., Garrison, D. R., Ice, P., Richardson, J. C., & Swan, K. P. (2008). Developing a community of inquiry instrument: Testing a measure of the community of inquiry framework using a multi-institutional sample. The Internet and Higher Education, 11(3-4), 133-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.06.003
Axelson, R. D., & Flick, A. (2010). Defining student engagement. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 43(1), 38-43. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091383.2011.533096
Benson, T. A., Cohen, A. L., & Buskist, W. 2005). Rapport: Its relation to student attitudes and behaviors toward teachers and classes. Teaching of Psychology, 32(4), 237-239. https://doi.org10.1207/s15328023top3204_8
Blanca Mena, M. J., Alarcón Postigo, R., Arnau Gras, J., Bono Cabré, R., & Bendayan, R. (2017). Non-normal data: Is ANOVA still a valid option? Psicothema, 29, 552-557.
Blau, I., Weiser, O., & Eshet-Alkalai, Y. (2017). How do medium naturalness and personality traits shape academic achievement and perceived learning? An experimental study of face-to-face and synchronous E-learning. Research in Learning Technology, 25(0). https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v25.1974
Britt, M. (2015). How to better engage online students with online strategies. College Student Journal, 49(3), 399-404.
Castelli, F. R., & Sarvary, M. A. (2021). Why students do not turn on their video cameras during online classes and an equitable and inclusive plan to encourage them to do so. Ecology and Evolution, 11(8), 3565-3576. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7123
Chiu, T. K., Lin, T. J., & Lonka, K. (2021). Motivating online learning: The challenges of COVID-19 and beyond. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 30(3), 187-190.
Conrad, R., & Donaldson, J. A. (2012). Continuing to engage the online learner: More activities and resources for creative instruction. John Wiley & Sons.
Curran, J. M., & Rosen, D. E. (2006). Student attitudes toward college courses: An examination of influences and intentions. Journal of Marketing Education, 28(2), 135-148. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475306288401
Fabriz, S., Mendzheritskaya, J., & Stehle, S. (2021). Impact of synchronous and asynchronous settings of online teaching and learning in higher education on students’ learning experiences during COVID-19. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 733554. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.733554
Falloon, G. (2011). Making the connection. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(3), 187-209. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2011.10782569
Faranda, W. T., & Clarke, I. (2004). Student observations of outstanding teaching: Implications for marketing educators. Journal of Marketing Education, 26(3), 271-281. https://doi.org/10.1177/02734753042687
Frisby, B. N., & Martin, M. M. (2010). Instructor–student and student–student rapport in the classroom. Communication Education, 59(2), 146-164. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520903564362
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2010). The first decade of the community of inquiry framework: A retrospective. Internet and Higher Education, 13, 5-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.003
Gremler, D. D., & Gwinner, K. P. (2000). Customer-employee rapport in service relationships. Journal of Service Research, 3(1), 82-104. https://doi.org/10.1177/109467050031006
Hailey, D. E., Grant-Davie, K., & Hult, C. A. (2001). Online education horror stories worthy of Halloween: A short list of problems and solutions in online instruction. Computers and Composition, 18(4), 387-397. https://doi.org/10.1016/s8755-4615(01)00070-6
Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64-74. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18809
Hambley, L. A., O’Neill, T. A., & Kline, T. J. (2007). Virtual team leadership: The effects of leadership style and communication medium on team interaction styles and outcomes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 103(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.09.004
Hanesty, E., Neviyarni, N., & Karneli, Y. (2020). Factors affecting student learning motivation during the COVID -19 pandemic. International Journal of Applied Counseling and Social Sciences, 2(1), 100-107.
Ishii, K., Lyons, M. M., & Carr, S. A. (2019). Revisiting media richness theory for today and future. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 1(2), 124-131. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.138
Kaufmann, R., & Vallade, J. I. (2022). Exploring connections in the online environment: Student perceptions of rapport, climate, and loneliness. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(10), 1794-1808. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1749670
Kim, K. J., & Bonk, C. J. (2006). The future of online teaching and learning in higher education. Educause Quarterly, 29(4), 22-30.
Kock, N. (2005). Media richness or media naturalness? The evolution of our biological communication apparatus and its influence on our behavior toward E-communication tools. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 48(2), 117-130. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpc.2005.849649
Krishen, A. S. (2013). Catch it if you can. Journal of Marketing Education, 35(3), 220-230. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475313495857
Kuh, G. D. (1995). The other curriculum: Out-of-Class experiences associated with student learning and personal development. The Journal of Higher Education, 66(2), 123. https://doi.org/10.2307/2943909
Kushlev, K., & Epstein-Shuman, A. (2022). Lights, cameras (on), action! Camera usage during Zoom classes facilitates student engagement without increasing fatigue. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/5bz3j
Lederman, D. (2018, January 5). New U.S. data show continued growth in college students studying online. Inside Higher Ed. https://www.insidehighered.com/digital-learning/article/2018/01/05/new-us-data-show-continued-growth-college-students-studying#.Y_jNyJZHQO0.link
Martin, F., & Bolliger, D. U. (2018). Engagement matters: Student perceptions on the importance of engagement strategies in the online learning environment. Online Learning, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i1.1092
McEvoy, G. M. (2011). Increasing intrinsic motivation to learn in organizational behavior classes. Journal of Management Education, 35(4), 468-503. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562911408098
McPartlan, P. (2019). Motivation for and within online college courses (22621640) [Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Irvine]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
Muilenburg, L. Y., & Berge, Z. L. (2007). Student barriers to online learning: A factor analytic study. Distance Education, 26(1), 29-48.
Nilson, L. B. (2016). Teaching at its best: A research-based resource for college instructors. John Wiley & Sons.
Olson, J. S., Olson, G. M., & Meader, D. K. (1995). What mix of video and audio is useful for small groups doing remote real-time design work? Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.
Parkes, R. S., & Barrs, V. R. (2021). Interaction identified as both a challenge and a benefit in a rapid switch to online teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, 48(6), 629-635. https://doi.org/10.3138/jvme-2020-0063
Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (2005). How college affects students: A third decade of research. Jossey-Bass.
Peper, E., Wilson, V., Martin, M., Rosegard, E., & Harvey, R. (2021). Avoid Zoom fatigue, be present and learn. NeuroRegulation, 8(1), 47-56. https://doi.org/10.15540/nr.8.1.47
Riedl, R. (2022). On the stress potential of videoconferencing: Definition and root causes of Zoom fatigue. Electronic Markets, 32, 153-177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-021-00501-3
Redmond, P., Alexsen, M., Maloney, S., Turner, J., Brown, A., Basson, M., Galligan, L., Lawrence, J., & Henderson, R. (2023). Student perceptions of online engagement. Online Learning Journal, 27(1), 383-403. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v27i1.3320
Rovai, A., Wighting, M. J., & Liu, J. (2005). School climate. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 6(4), 361-374.
Sacco, D. F., & Ismail, M. M. (2014). Social belongingness satisfaction as a function of interaction medium: Face-to-face interactions facilitate greater social belonging and interaction enjoyment compared to instant messaging. Computers in Human Behavior, 36, 359-364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.04.004
Saghafian, M., & O’Neill, D. K. (2017). A phenomenological study of teamwork in online and face-to-face student teams. Higher Education, 75(1), 57-73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0122-4
Schielzeth, H., Dingemanse, N. J., Nakagawa, S., Westneat, D. F., Allegue, H., Teplitsky, C., Réale, D., Dochtermann, N. A., Garamszegi, L. Z., & Araya‐Ajoy, Y. G. (2020). Robustness of linear mixed‐effects models to violations of distributional assumptions. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 11(9), 1141-1152. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210x.13434
Sederevičiūtė-Pačiauskienė, Ž., Valantinaitė, I., & Asakavičiūtė, V. (2022). “Should I turn on my video camera?” The students’ perceptions of the use of video cameras in synchronous distant learning. Electronics, 11(5), 813. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11050813
Shin, M., & Bolkan, S. (2020). Intellectually stimulating students’ intrinsic motivation: The mediating influence of student engagement, self-efficacy, and student academic support. Communication Education, 70(2), 146-164. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2020.1828959
Shingjergji, K., Iren, D., Urlings, C. & Klemke, R. (2021). Sense the classroom: AI-supported synchronous online education for a resilient new normal. Proceedings of the Doctoral Consortium of Sixteenth European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning, Italy, 64-70.
Shockley, K. M., Gabriel A. S., Roberston, D., Rosen, C. C., Chawla, N., Ganster, M. L., & Ezerins, M. E. (2021). The fatiguing effects of camera use in virtual meetings: A within-person field experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 106(8), 1137-1155. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000948
Skinner, E. A., & Belmont, M. J. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(4), 571-581. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.85.4.571
SoundOut. (2015, March 29). Defining student engagement: A literature review. SoundOut Education Consulting. https://soundout.org/defining-student-engagement-a-literature-review/
Spreng, R. A., MacKenzie, S. B., & Olshavsky, R. W. (1996). A reexamination of the determinants of consumer satisfaction. Journal of Marketing, 60(3), 15. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251839
Suarsi, P. D. K., & Wibawa, I. M. C. (2021). The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on student learning motivation. Jurnal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar, 5(2), 194-201.
Tallent-Runnels, M. K., Thomas, J. A., Lan, W. Y., Cooper, S., Ahern, T. C., Shaw, S. M., & Liu, X. (2006). Teaching courses online: A review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 76(1), 93-135. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543076001093
Tien, I. S., Imundo, M. N. & Bjork, M. N. (2022). Viewing oneself during synchronous online learning increases appearance anxiety and decreases memory for lecture content. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 37, 443-451. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.4048
Tseng, H. W., & Yeh, H. (2013). Team members’ perceptions of online teamwork learning experiences and building teamwork trust: A qualitative study. Computers & Education, 63, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.11.013
Vakil, J. B. (2020). Adapting instruction using disruptive technology during the COVID-19 Pandemic: How STEM teacher educators, pre-service teachers, K-12 educators, and 6th–12th grade students rapidly adapt to online learning (28890203) [Doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
West, B. T., Welch, K. B., & Galecki, A. T. (2014). Linear mixed models: A practical guide using statistical software (2nd ed.). CRC Press.
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Shayna Minosky, Nachwa El Aini, Brandon Justus, Tanisha Bali
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
As a condition of publication, the author agrees to apply the Creative Commons – Attribution International 4.0 (CC-BY) License to OLJ articles. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
This licence allows anyone to reproduce OLJ articles at no cost and without further permission as long as they attribute the author and the journal. This permission includes printing, sharing and other forms of distribution.
Author(s) hold copyright in their work, and retain publishing rights without restrictions
