The Role of Social Relationships with Peers and Teachers for Undergraduate Students’ Subjective Wellbeing in the Context of University Synchronous Online Learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v29i4.4389Keywords:
subjective wellbeing in university, higher education, academic well being, online learning, distance learning, swb, student well being, undergraduate, undergraduate students, social relationships, social interactions, synchronous learningAbstract
Social interactions with peers and teachers significantly impact students’ subjective wellbeing (SWB) by influencing their achievements, mental health, and motivation. Students who study online often lack these interactions, leading to lower SWB. However, studies show that the experience of social relationships varies by context. Therefore, examining the specific context of an online programme integrated within the university with partially regulated social interactions and active students and teachers’ engagement in the learning process provides a more comprehensive understanding of the online students' social experiences, distinct from other online learning formats. The aim of the present study was to find out what such students find important in social interactions for their SWB and whether they are satisfied with the quality of these interactions. To gather insights from the experiences of participants, data were collected from eight semi-structured interviews with second year undergraduate students of a synchronous online programme. Thematic analysis revealed the importance of communication for SWB in the university setting, noting the significance of relationships among teachers and peers. While participants recognised the lack of personal social interactions with online peers, they found that academic communication with them may decrease feelings of detachment. Teacher relationships played a pivotal role in students’ SWB and positive learning experience, suggesting that strong teacher support can offset a potential decrease in student SWB in online programs with limited peer interactions.
References
Allardt, E. (1993). Having, loving, being: An alternative to the Swedish model of welfare research. In M. Nussbaum & A. Sen (Eds.), The Quality of Life (pp. 88–94). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0198287976.003.0008
Bağrıacık Yılmaz, A. (2022). Teacher-student interaction within the context of online teaching and learning: In A. S. Zimmerman (Ed.), Advances in Educational Technologies and Instructional Design (pp. 1–20). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-8407-4.ch001
Bekele, W. B., & Ago, F. Y. (2022). Sample size for interview in qualitative research in social sciences: A guide to novice researchers. Research in Educational Policy and Management, 4(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.46303/repam.2022.3
Berry, S. (2019). The offline nature of online community. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 20(2). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i2.3896
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Bücker, S., Nuraydin, S., Simonsmeier, B. A., Schneider, M., & Luhmann, M. (2018). Subjective well-being and academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 74, 83–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2018.02.007
Chattu, V. K., Sahu, P. K., Seedial, N., Seecharan, G., Seepersad, A., Seunarine, M., Sieunarine, S., Seymour, K., Simboo, S., & Singh, A. (2020). Subjective well-being and its relation to academic performance among students in medicine, dentistry, and other health professions. Education Sciences, 10(9), 224. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10090224
Chen, X., Tian, L., & Huebner, E. S. (2020). Bidirectional relations between subjective well-being in school and prosocial behavior among elementary school-aged children: A longitudinal study. Child & Youth Care Forum, 49(1), 77–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10566-019-09518-4
Datu, J. A. D., & King, R. B. (2018). Subjective well-being is reciprocally associated with academic engagement: A two-wave longitudinal study. Journal of School Psychology, 69, 100–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2018.05.007
Diener, E. (1994). Assessing subjective well-being: Progress and opportunities. Social Indicators Research, 31(2), 103–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01207052
El’Konin, D. B. (1999). Toward the problem of stages in the mental development of children. Journal of Russian & East European Psychology, 37(6), 11–30. https://doi.org/10.2753/RPO1061-0405370611
Foley, K., & Marr, L. (2019). Scaffolding extracurricular online events to support distance learning university students. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2019(1), Article 1. https://oro.open.ac.uk/66936/
Hagenauer, G., & Volet, S. E. (2014). Teacher–student relationship at university: An important yet under-researched field. Oxford Review of Education, 40(3), 370–388. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2014.921613
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
Hopwood, I. (2022). Peerless? How students’ experience of synchronous online teaching can disrupt the development of relationships to peers, teachers, subject and self. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 18, 007. https://doi.org/10.58459/rptel.2023.18007
Kanonire, T. (2019). Subjective well-being of primary school students with different achievement levels. Psychology. Journal of Higher School of Economics, 16(2), 378-390. https://doi.org/10.17323/1813-8918-2019-2-378-390
Kanonire, T., Federiakin, D. A., & Uglanova, I. L. (2020). Multicomponent framework for students’ subjective well-being in elementary school. School Psychology, 35(5), 321–331. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000397
Kasperski, R., & Blau, I. (2023). Social capital in high-schools: Teacher-student relationships within an online social network and their association with in-class interactions and learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(2), 955–971. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1815220
Kiltz, L., Rinas, R., Daumiller, M., Fokkens-Bruinsma, M., & Jansen, E. P. W. A. (2020). ‘When They Struggle, I Cannot Sleep Well Either’: Perceptions and Interactions Surrounding University Student and Teacher Well-Being. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 578378. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.578378
Konu, A., & Rimpelä, M. (2002). Well-being in schools: A conceptual model. Health Promotion International, 17(1), 79–87. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/17.1.79
Korhonen, J., Linnanmäki, K., & Aunio, P. (2014). Learning difficulties, academic well-being and educational dropout: A person-centred approach. Learning and Individual Differences, 31, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2013.12.011
Maunder, R. E. (2018). Students’ peer relationships and their contribution to university adjustment: The need to belong in the university community. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 42(6), 756–768. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2017.1311996
McCabe, J. (2022). Peer relations and friendship among postsecondary students. In J. E. Côté & S. Pickard, Routledge Handbook of the Sociology of Higher Education (2nd ed., pp. 132–144). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003262497-13
Murray-Harvey, R. (2010). Relationship influences on students’ academic achievement, psychological health and well-being at school. Educational and Child Psychology, 27(1), 104–115.
Nelson, M. M., & Schunn, C. D. (2009). The nature of feedback: How different types of peer feedback affect writing performance. Instructional Science, 37(4), 375–401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-008-9053-x
O’ Shea, S., Stone, C., & Delahunty, J. (2015). “I ‘feel’ like I am at university even though I am online.” Exploring how students narrate their engagement with higher education institutions in an online learning environment. Distance Education, 36(1), 41–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2015.1019970
Özdoğan, A. Ç. (2021). Subjective well-being and social-emotional loneliness of university students: The mediating effect of the meaning of life. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 5(1), 18–30. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.2021066865
Putwain, D. W., Loderer, K., Gallard, D., & Beaumont, J. (2020). School‐related subjective well‐being promotes subsequent adaptability, achievement, and positive behavioural conduct. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(1), 92–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12266
Sargeant, J. (2012). Qualitative Research Part II: Participants, Analysis, and Quality Assurance. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 4(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-11-00307.1
Tackie, H. N. (2022). (Dis)Connected: Establishing Social Presence and Intimacy in Teacher–Student Relationships During Emergency Remote Learning. AERA Open, 8, 233285842110695. https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584211069525
Thurlings, M., Vermeulen, M., Bastiaens, T., & Stijnen, S. (2013). Understanding feedback: A learning theory perspective. Educational Research Review, 9, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2012.11.004
Tian, L., Wang, D., & Huebner, E. S. (2015). Development and validation of the brief adolescents’ subjective well-being in school scale (BASWBSS). Social Indicators Research, 120(2), 615–634. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-014-0603-0
Tian, L., Yu, T., & Huebner, E. S. (2017). Achievement goal orientations and adolescents’ subjective well-being in school: The mediating roles of academic social comparisondirections. Frontiers in Psychology, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00037
Tian, L., Zhang, L., Huebner, E. S., Zheng, X., & Liu, W. (2016). The longitudinal relationship between school belonging and subjective well-being in school among elementary school students. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 11(4), 1269–1285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-015-9436-5
Tichavsky, L. P., Hunt, A., Driscoll, A., & Jicha, K. (2015). “It’s Just Nice Having a Real Teacher”: Student perceptions of online versus face-to-face instruction. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2015.090202
Tormey, R. (2021). Rethinking student-teacher relationships in higher education: A multidimensional approach. Higher Education, 82(5), 993–1011. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-021-00711-w
Tuominen-Soini, H., Salmela-Aro, K., & Niemivirta, M. (2012). Achievement goal orientations and academic well-being across the transition to upper secondary education. Learning and individual differences, 22(3), 290-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.01.002
Vagos, P., & Carvalhais, L. (2022). Online versus classroom teaching: Impact on teacher and student relationship quality and quality of life. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 828774. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.828774
Vygotsky, L. S. (2017). The problem of teaching and mental development at school age [ Problema obuchenija i umstvennogo razvitija v shkol’nom vozraste ]. Changing English, 24(4), 359–371. https://doi.org/10.1080/1358684X.2017.1395165
Wallace, R. M. (2003). Online learning in higher education: A review of research on interactions among teachers and students. Education, Communication & Information, 3(2), 241–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/14636310303143
Widlund, A., Tuominen, H., & Korhonen, J. (2018). Academic well-being, mathematics performance, and educational aspirations in lower secondary education: Changes within a school year. Frontiers in psychology, 9, 297. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00297
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ekaterina Andronova
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
As a condition of publication, the author agrees to apply the Creative Commons – Attribution International 4.0 (CC-BY) License to OLJ articles. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
This licence allows anyone to reproduce OLJ articles at no cost and without further permission as long as they attribute the author and the journal. This permission includes printing, sharing and other forms of distribution.
Author(s) hold copyright in their work, and retain publishing rights without restrictions
