Virtual Literature Circle: Fostering Critical Reading Skill, Collaborative Learning, and Learning Outcomes for EFL Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v29i4.4511Keywords:
Collaborative learning, critical reading, EFL students, Learning Outcome, Virtual Literature Circle, English as a foreign language (EFL), English as a foreign language, reading skillAbstract
Virtual Literature Circle (VLC) shows promise in developing critical reading skills among EFL students, but limited empirical research addresses the specific challenges in fostering collaborative learning, engagement, and learning outcomes. To address this gap, a sequential mixed-method study involving 25 EFL students was conducted. The findings indicate significant improvements in collaborative learning dynamics and engagement that positively influenced critical reading skills. However, challenges such as technological barriers and diverse learning preferences were identified. This study emphasizes the importance of integrating VLC into pedagogical frameworks to create effective, interactive learning environments for EFL students. Overcoming these challenges is essential for transcending disciplinary boundaries and maximizing the benefits of VLC in EFL education. By recognizing and addressing these obstacles, educators can better support EFL students in developing essential critical reading skills, thus enriching their learning experiences.
References
Akbari, Z. (2015). Current challenges in teaching/learning English for EFL learners: The case of junior high school and high school. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 199, 394–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.524
Anugerahwati, M., Rachmajanti, F. S., & Noviya, H. (2021). Maximizing students’ critical reading through virtual literature circle strategy: A conceptual framework. KnE Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v5i3.8542
Basthomi, Y., Ivone, F. M., Kharis, M., & Slamet, J. (2025). Gamifying English proficiency: A needs analysis for EFL student course design. Online Learning, 29(2), 241–268. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v29i2.4506
Byrnes, K. G., Kiely, P. A., Dunne, C. P., McDermott, K. W., & Coffey, J. C. (2021). Communication, collaboration and contagion: “Virtualisation” of anatomy during COVID‐19. Clinical Anatomy, 34(1), 82–89. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.23649
Cortázar, C., Nussbaum, M., Harcha, J., Alvares, D., López, F., Goñi, J., & Cabezas, V. (2021). Promoting critical thinking in an online, project-based course. Computers in Human Behavior, 119(January). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106705
El-Esery, A. M. (2023). Implementing virtual literature circles for developing English learners’ vocabulary acquisition and reading comprehension. International Journal of English Language and Literature Studies, 12(2), 74–85. https://doi.org/10.55493/5019.v12i2.4723
Ferdiansyah, H., Rafi, M. F., Utama, A. P., Aprilia, T., & Slamet, J. (2025). Assessing learning outcomes and self-directed learning through gamification in LMS. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 12, 101696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101696
Ferdiansyah, S., Ridho, M. A., Sembilan, F. D., Sembilan, F. D., & Zahro, S. F. (2020). Online literature circles during the COVID‐19 pandemic: Engaging undergraduate students in Indonesia. TESOL Journal, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.544
Han, S., & Resta, P.E. (2020). Virtually authentic: Graduate students’perspective changes toward authentic learning while collaborating in a virtual world. Online Learning, 24(4), 5-27. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v24i4.2326
Hidayati, D., & Slamet, J. (2025). Interactive multimedia via LMS on a reading comprehension course: Enhancing engagement and learning outcomes in Islamic higher education. Journal of Studies in the English Language, 20(1), 95–122. https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jsel/article/view/277426
Judy Shih, H. (2021). The use of individual and collaborative learning logs and their impact on the development of learner autonomy in the EFL classroom in Taiwan. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 15(3), 195–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2020.1737703
Karatay, H. (2017). The effect of literature circles on text analysis and reading desire. International Journal of Higher Education, 6(5), 65. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v6n5p65
Karnchanachari, S. (2020). Promoting communicative self-efficacy and a positive attitude towards English language learning through a collaborative authentic task. Journal : Language Education and Acquisition Research Network Journal, 13(1), 210–224.
Knoblauch, C. (2022). Combining and balancing project-based and blended learning in education. International Journal of Advanced Corporate Learning (IJAC), 15(1), 35–44. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijac.v15i1.27135
Kumi-Yeboah, A. (2018). Designing a cross-cultural collaborative online learning framework for online instructors. Online Learning, 22(4), 181-201. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i4.1520
Mutakinati, L., Anwari, I., & Yoshisuke, K. (2018). Analysis of students’ critical thinking skill of middle school through stem education project-based learning. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 7(1), 54–65. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v7i1.10495
Ramli, N. N. (2022). The influence of virtual literature circles on students literary competence. Journal of Nusantara Studies (JONUS), 7(2), 358–376. https://doi.org/10.24200/jonus.vol7iss2pp358-376
Rao, P. S. (2019). Collaborative learning in English language classrooms. ACADEMICIA: An International Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 9(2), 5. https://doi.org/10.5958/2249-7137.2019.00020.X
Rokhayati, T., & Alvionita, E. (2022). The use of online literature circles to enhance the students’ critical reading skill. Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 10(1), 94. https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v10i1.4079
Romsi, A., Widodo, J. P., & Slamet, J. (2024). Empowering slow learners: Gamification’s impact on students’ engagement and academic performance in an LMS for undergraduate students. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 14(2), 193–203. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2024.14.2.2040
Sari, D. M. M., & Wardhani, A. K. (2020). Critical thinking as learning and innovation skill in the 21st century. Journal of English Language and Pedagogy, 3(2), 27–34. https://doi.org/10.36597/jelp.v3i2.8778
Sasson, I., Yehuda, I., & Malkinson, N. (2018). Fostering the skills of critical thinking and question-posing in a project-based learning environment. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 29, 203–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.08.001
Slamet, J., & Basthomi, Y. (2024). Assessing gamification-based LMS for EFL students: A self-directed learning framework. Studies in Linguistics, Culture, and FLT, 12(2), 100–122. https://doi.org/10.46687/CVHT3942.%20
Slamet, J., Basthomi, Y., Ivone, F. M., & Eliyanah, E. (2025a). A needs analysis for designing a gamification-based MOOC in English for specific purposes. Studies in Linguistics, Culture, and FLT, 13(1), 120–139. https://doi.org/10.46687/ULRS1031
Slamet, J., Basthomi, Y., Ivone, F. M., & Eliyanah, E. (2025b). Promoting autonomous learning in ESP courses through a gamified MOOC platform: A self-directed learning framework. Journal of Educators Online, 22(2). https://doi.org/10.9743/JEO.2025.22.2.7
Slamet, J., & Mukminatien, N. (2024). Developing an online formative assessment instrument for listening skill through LMS. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 17(1), 188–211. https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/LEARN/index
Su, Y., Li, Y., Liang, J.-C., & Tsai, C.-C. (2019). Moving literature circles into wiki-based environment: The role of online self-regulation in EFL learners’ attitude toward collaborative learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(5–6), 556–586. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1527363
Sunani, S., Nadjmudin, M., Yeni, E., & Herman, H. (2021). Teaching critical reading through online. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris Undiksha, 9(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpbi.v9i1.30012
Sutherland, A., & Incera, S. (2021). Critical reading: What do faculty think students should do? Journal of College Reading and Learning, 51(4), 267–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/10790195.2021.1887777
Tang, S., Long, M., Tong, F., Wang, Z., Zhang, H., & Sutton-Jones, K. L. (2020). A comparative study of problem-based learning and traditional approaches in college English classrooms: Analyzing pedagogical behaviors via classroom observation. Behavioral Sciences, 10(6), 105. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs10060105
Thomas, D. M., & Kim, J. K. (2019). Impact of literature circles in the developmental college classroom. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 49(2), 89–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/10790195.2019.1582371
Wafiroh, L. H., Retnaningdyah, P., & Munir, A. (2023). The power of virtual literature circles to cultivate text connection through student’s role in reading novel: A case study in critical reading class. Proceedings of the 69th TEFLIN International Conference in Conjunction with the 3rd English Education International Conference (EEIC).
Widodo, J. P., Musyarofah, L., & Slamet, J. (2025). The impact of digital-interactive-book gamification-based instruction on academic learning outcomes of students who learn at their own pace: Insight from Indonesia. MEXTESOL Journal, 49(2), 1–11.
Wu, J. (2018). Application of computer aided collaborative learning model in English virtual electronic teaching. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 13(07), 137. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v13i07.8801
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Laili Hibatin Wafiroh, Pratiwi Retnaningdyah, Ahmad Munir

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
As a condition of publication, the author agrees to apply the Creative Commons – Attribution International 4.0 (CC-BY) License to OLJ articles. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
This licence allows anyone to reproduce OLJ articles at no cost and without further permission as long as they attribute the author and the journal. This permission includes printing, sharing and other forms of distribution.
Author(s) hold copyright in their work, and retain publishing rights without restrictions

