Preparing Health Professions Educators for Online and Blended Learning Environments: A Mixed Methods Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v28i3.4515Keywords:
health professions education, online learning, blended learning, distance education, online teacher readiness, faculty readinessAbstract
Online and blended teaching and learning (OBTL) are integral to the future and success of higher education, including health professions education. Institutions with a goal of developing high-quality online and blended programs must prioritize time and resources dedicated to professional development and training. This research study utilized an online professional development course as an intervention to gain deeper insights into the scope of faculty development to effectively teach in online and blended learning environments. The study, utilizing a convergent mixed methods approach, gathered data through a pre- and post- intervention survey measuring health professions faculty readiness to teach online, a knowledge-based test, and post-intervention focus group discussions. Statistically significant differences in survey and test scores were observed between pre- and post-intervention and advantages of the intervention were highlighted in the focus group discussions. These key findings suggest the efficacy and influence of the educational intervention. Additionally, barriers and recommendations for enhancement were identified, including a notable gap between perceived importance and perceived capability among faculty members. This information pinpoints areas where professional development and support may be beneficial. Outcomes of the study provide valuable insights into health professions faculty members' knowledge, readiness, and perceptions related to teaching in online or blended educational environments.
References
Alhasan, M., & Al-Horani, Q. (2021). Students’ perspective on the online delivery of radiography & medical imaging program during COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, 52(4, Supplement), S68–S77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmir.2021.07.009
Bolliger, D. U., & Halupa, C. (2022). An investigation of instructors’ online teaching readiness. TechTrends, 66(2), 185–195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-021-00654-0
Chandrasiri, N. R., & Weerakoon, B. S. (2022). Online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: Perceptions of allied health sciences undergraduates. Radiography, 28(2), 545–549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2021.11.008
Clay, M. (1999). Faculty attitudes toward distance education at the State University of West Georgia. University of West Georgia Distance Learning Report.
Cook, D. A., & Steinert, Y. (2013). Online learning for faculty development: A review of the literature. Medical Teacher, 35(11), 930–937. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2013.827328
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. P. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=DLbBDQAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=Qualitative+Inquiry+and+Research+Design+Choosing+Among+Five+Approaches+FOURTH+EDITION&ots=-in59bKRVt&sig=24yyXjw30WtqbTr54CRGdJos8R4
Daniel, M., Gordon, M., Patricio, M., Hider, A., Pawlik, C., Bhagdev, R., Ahmad, S., Alston, S., Park, S., Pawlikowska, T., Rees, E., Doyle, A. J., Pammi, M., Thammasitboon, S., Haas, M., Peterson, W., Lew, M., Khamees, D., Spadafore, M., … Stojan, J. (2021). An update on developments in medical education in response to the COVID-19 pandemic: A BEME scoping review: BEME Guide No. 64. Medical Teacher, 43(3), 253–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2020.1864310
Ferguson, G. A. (1954). On learning and human ability. Canadian Journal of Psychology / Revue Canadienne de Psychologie, 8, 95–112. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0083598
Hosny, S., Ghaly, M., Hmoud AlSheikh, M., Shehata, M. H., Salem, A. H., & Atwa, H. (2021). Developing, validating, and implementing a tool for measuring the readiness of medical teachers for online teaching post-COVID-19: A multicenter study. Advances in Medical Education and Practice, 12, 755–768. https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S317029
Howe, D., & Heitner, K. L. (2020). Faculty satisfaction teaching online in the time of COVID-19. Walden University Research Conference. https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/researchconference/2020/papers/9
Jeffries, P. R., Bushardt, R. L., DuBose-Morris, R., Hood, C., Kardong-Edgren, S., Pintz, C., Posey, L., & Sikka, N. (2022). The role of technology in health professions education during the COVID-19 pandemic. Academic Medicine, 97(3), S104–S109. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000004523
Johnson, R. B., & Christensen, L. (2019). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and
mixed approaches. Sage.
Joosten, T., & Cusatis, R. (2019). A cross-institutional study of instructional characteristics and student outcomes: Are quality indicators of online courses able to predict student success? Online Learning, 23(4), 354–378. doi:10.24059/olj.v23i4.1432
Kim, S. Y., & Martin, F. (2023). Validation of the Faculty Readiness to Teaching Online (FRTO) scale. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JARHE-03-2023-0108/full/html
Krosnick, J. A., & Petty, R. E. (1995). Attitude strength: An overview. Attitude Strength: Antecedents and Consequences, 1, 1–24.
Kumar, A., Sarkar, M., Davis, E., Morphet, J., Maloney, S., Ilic, D., & Palermo, C. (2021). Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on teaching and learning in health professional education: A mixed methods study protocol. BMC Medical Education, 21(1), 439. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02871-w
Leidl, D. M., Ritchie, L., & Moslemi, N. (2020). Blended learning in undergraduate nursing education—A scoping review. Nurse Education Today, 86, 104318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2019.104318
Martin, F., Budhrani, K., & Wang, C. (2019). Examining faculty perception of their readiness to teach online. Online Learning, 23(3), 97–119.
McDonald, P. L., Lyons, L. B., Straker, H. O., Barnett, J. S., Schlumpf, K. S., Cotton, L., &
Corcoran, M. A. (2014). Educational mixology: A pedagogical approach to promoting adoption of technology to support new learning models in health science disciplines. Online Learning, 18(4).
McQuiggan, C. A. (2012). Faculty Development for online teaching as a catalyst for change. Online Learning, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v16i2.258
Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2009). Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A Meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. Centre for Learning Technology. https://repository.alt.ac.uk/629/
Muscanell, N. (2023). 2023 Faculty and technology report: A first look at teaching preferences since the pandemic. EDUCAUSE. https://www.educause.edu/ecar/research-publications/2023/faculty-and-technology-report-a-first-look-at-teaching-preferences-since-the-pandemic/introduction-and-key-findings
National Center for Education Statistics. (n.d.). The integrated postsecondary education data system fall enrollment component. U.S. Department of Education. https://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/search/ViewTable?tableId=28440
Neary, S., Van Rhee, J., & Roman, C. (2020). The effect of the coronavirus pandemic on physician assistant educators. The Journal of Physician Assistant Education, 31(3), 121. https://doi.org/10.1097/JPA.0000000000000312
Neubauer, N., & Pinto-Zipp, G. (2023). Exploring health science faculty perceptions regarding their readiness to teach online. Journal of Allied Health, 52(1), 1E–8E.
Oxford English Dictionary. (n.d.). Knowledge. In Oxford English Dictionary. Retrieved December 8, 2023 from https://www.oed.com/search/dictionary/?scope=Entries&q=knowledge
Pelletier, K., Brown, M., Brooks, D. C., McCormack, M., Reeves, J., & Arbino, N. (2021). 2021 EDUCAUSE horizon report: Teaching and learning edition. EDUCAUSE.
Pelletier, K., McCormack, M., Reeves, J., Robert, J., & Arbino, N. (2022). 2022 EDUCAUSE Horizon report: Teaching and learning edition. EDUCAUSE.
Raskind, I. G., Shelton, R. C., Comeau, D. L., Cooper, H. L. F., Griffith, D. M., & Kegler, M. C. (2019). A review of qualitative data analysis practices in health education and health behavior research. Health Education & Behavior, 46(1), 32–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198118795019
Richards, K. A. R., & Sinelnikov, O. A. (2019). An interdivision mentoring program: Doctoral students as mentors for preservice teachers. Physical Educator, 76(1), 156–181.
Richardson, J. C., Maeda, Y., Lv, J., & Caskurlu, S. (2017). Social presence in relation to students’ satisfaction and learning in the online environment: A meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 402–417.
Richardson, J. W., Lingat, J. E. M., Hollis, E., & Pritchard, M. (2020). Shifting teaching and learning in online learning spaces: An investigation of a faculty online teaching and learning initiative. Online Learning, 24(1), 67–91.
Scherer, R., Howard, S. K., Tondeur, J., & Siddiq, F. (2021). Profiling teachers’ readiness for online teaching and learning in higher education: Who’s ready? Computers in Human Behavior, 118, 106675.
Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., Howard, S. K., & Tondeur, J. (2023). The more experienced, the better prepared? New evidence on the relation between teachers’ experience and their readiness for online teaching and learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 139, 107530.
Shea, P., & Bidjerano, T. (2010). Learning presence: Toward a theory of self-efficacy, self-regulation, and the development of a communities of inquiry in online and blended learning environments. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1721–1731.
Si, J., Kong, H.-H., & Lee, S.-H. (2021). Exploring medical educators’ readiness and the priority of their educational needs for online teaching. Korean Journal of Medical Education, 33(1), 37.
Simonson, M., & Schlosser, L. A. (2009). Distance education 3rd edition: Definition and glossary of terms. IAP.
Singleton, R., Ruiz Cosignani, D., Kam, M., Clune, M., Charlton, A., & Jowsey, T. (2023). Faculty development for strengthening online teaching capability: A mixed-methods study of what staff want, evaluated with Kirkpatrick’s model of teaching effectiveness. MedEdPublish, 13, 127.
Steinert, Y., Mann, K., Anderson, B., Barnett, B. M., Centeno, A., Naismith, L., Prideaux, D., Spencer, J., Tullo, E., Viggiano, T., Ward, H., & Dolmans, D. (2016). A systematic review of faculty development initiatives designed to enhance teaching effectiveness: A 10-year update: BEME Guide No. 40. Medical Teacher, 38(8), 769–786. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2016.1181851
Thibault, G. E. (2020). The future of health professions education: Emerging trends in the United States. FASEB BioAdvances, 2(12), 685–694. https://doi.org/10.1096/fba.2020-00061
Thomas, R., & Dello Stritto, M. E. (2021). What is the future of online education? The perceptions of instructors with over a decade of online teaching experience. OJDLA. https://ojdla.com/articles/what-is-the-future-of-online-education-the-perceptions-of-instructors-with-over-a-decade-of-online-teaching-experience
Varvel, V. E. (2007). Master online teacher competencies. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 10(1), 1–41.
Williams, S. L. (2006). The effectiveness of distance education in allied health science programs: A meta-analysis of outcomes. The American Journal of Distance Education, 20(3), 127–141.
Wingo, N. P., Ivankova, N. V., & Moss, J. A. (2017). Faculty perceptions about teaching online: exploring the literature using the technology acceptance model as an organizing framework. Online Learning, 21(1), 15–35.
Wright, A. C., Carley, T. C., Alarakyia-Jivani, R., & Nizamuddin, S. (2023). Features of high-quality online courses in higher education: A scoping review. Online Learning, 27(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v27i1.3411
Youngman, K. C., & Vealé, B. L. (2020). Synchronous distance education—Making the connection. Radiologic Science & Education, 25(3), 7–12.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Tanya Custer

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
As a condition of publication, the author agrees to apply the Creative Commons – Attribution International 4.0 (CC-BY) License to OLJ articles. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
This licence allows anyone to reproduce OLJ articles at no cost and without further permission as long as they attribute the author and the journal. This permission includes printing, sharing and other forms of distribution.
Author(s) hold copyright in their work, and retain publishing rights without restrictions

