Implicit Bias and First Name Stereotypes: What are the Implications for Online Instruction?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v19i3.452Keywords:
Implicit bias, stereotype, online education, attitude, student, race, attitudes, online instructorAbstract
The online classroom is perceived as being a non-threatening, unbiased, safe environment due to the lack of visual cues that normally trigger hidden attitudes and biases. However, it is possible that stereotypical student names often trigger implicit bias in instructors leading to group expectations that can often manifest in a variety of ways including lack of attention or negative evaluations. In this study, we explored the relationship of underlying attitudes and biases of online instructors with respect to racially or ethnically identifiable student first names using the Brief Implicit Attitudes Test (BIAT) instrument specifically designed for this purpose. Participants included 147 online instructors with at least a Master’s degree in their given field of expertise. Using an experimental research design, we found that to a small degree, implicit bias does exist with respect to stereotypical student names. This study also found that instructors consciously believed themselves to be warm and accepting of stereotypical names. In other words, what instructors say they feel and what they really feel are distinctly different?References
Axt, J., Ebersole, C.R. & Nosek, B.A. (under review). The rules of implicit evaluation by race, religion and age. University of Virginia
Barnhardt, T. & Geraci, L. (2008). Are awareness questionnaires valid? Investigating the use of posttest questionnaires for assessing awareness in implicit memory tests. Memory & Cognition, 36(1), 53-64. doi: 10.3758/MC.36.1.53
Basow, S., Codos, S., & Martin, J. (2013). The effects of professor’s race and gender on student evaluations and performance. College Student Journal, 47(2), 352-363. Retrieved from MasterFILE Premier database
Blair, I.V. & Banaji, M.R. (1996). Automatic and controlled processes in stereotype priming. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(6), 1142-1163.
Boysen, G.A. (2009). A review of experimental studies of explicit and implicit bias among counselors. Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development, 37, p. 240-249. Retrieved from ERIC database.
Bstan-dzin-rgya-mtsho, & Cuttler, H.C. (2009). The art of happiness: A handbook for living. New York, NY: Penguin Group.
Chugh, D. (2004). Societal and managerial implications of implicit social cognition: Why milliseconds matter. Social Justice Research, 17(2), 203-222. Retrieved from ProQuest database
Crocker, J. & Major, B. (2003). The self-protective properties of stigma: Evolution of a modern classic. Psychological Inquiry, 14(3-4), 232-237.
Dinur, R., Beit-Hallahmi, B., & Hofman, J. E. (1996). First names as identity stereotypes. The Journal of Social Psychology, 136 (2), 191-200.
Erwin, P.G. (1993). First names and perceptions of physical attractiveness. The Journal of Psychology, 127(6), 625-631. Retrieved from MasterFILE Premier database
Erwin, P.G. (1999). Attractiveness of first names and academic achievement. The Journal of Psychology, 133(6), 617-620. Retrieved from HealthSource Nursing Academic Edition
Erwin, P.G. (2006). Children’s evaluative stereotypes of masculine, feminine, and androgynous first names. The Psychological Record, 56, 513-519.
Fazio, R. & Olson, M. (2003). Implicit measures in social cognition research: Their meaning and use. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 297-327. Doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145225
Furguson, R. F. (2003). Teachers’ perceptions and expectations and the black-white test score gap. Urban Education, 38, 460-507. doi: 10.1177/0042085903038004006
Greenwald, A.G. & Banaji, M.R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102(1), 4-27. Retrieved from PsycARTICLES database.
Greenwald, A.G., McGhee, D.E., & Schwartz, J.L.K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1464-1480. Retrieved from http://faculty.washington.edu/agg/pdf/Gwald_McGh_Schw_JPSP_1998.OCR.pdf
Jae, H., & Cowling, J. (2009). Objectivity in grading: The promise of bar codes. College Teaching, 57(1), 51-55. Retrieved from MasterFILE Premier database.
Kawakami, K., Phills, C., Steele, J., & Dovidio, J. (2007). (Close) distance makes the heart grow fonder: Improving implicit racial attitudes and interracial interactions through approach behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(6), 957-971. Retrieved from PsycArticles database.
Mahajan, N., Martinez, M.A., Guiterrez, N.L., Diesendruck, G., Banaji, M.R., & Santos, L.R. (2011). The evolution of intergroup bias: Perceptions and attitudes in Rhesus Macaques. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(3), 387-405. Retrieved from https://faculty.biu.ac.il/~dieseng/Files/The%20Evolution%20of%20Intergroup%20Bias.pdf
Malouff, J. (2008). Bias in grading. College Teaching, 56(3), 191-192. Retrieved from ERIC database
McDavid, J. W. & Harari, H. (1966). Stereotyping of names and popularity in grade-school children. Child Development, 37 (2), 453-459.
Monteith, M., Voils, C., & Ashburn-Nardo, L. (2001). Taking a look underground: Detecting, interpreting, and reacting to implicit racial biases. Social Cognition, 19(4), 395-417. Retrieved from ProQuest Central
Nosek, B. A., Bar-Anan, Y. Sriram, N. & Greenwald, A. G., (2013). Understanding and using the brief implicit association test: I. Recommended scoring procedures. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2196002 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2196002
Peterson, T., VanDam, K., Wheeler, L. (2009). Who do we think we are? Dismantling educators’ assumptions in the online classroom. In T. Bastiaens et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2009 (2227-2231). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
Rubie-Davies, C., Hattie, J., & Hamilton, R. (2006). Expecting the best for students: Teacher expectations and academic outcomes. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 429-444. Retrieved from Academic Search Premier database
Seraydarian, L, & Busse, T. (1981). First-name stereotypes and essay grading. The Journal of Psychology, 108, 253-257. Retrieved from PsycINFO database
Shauki, E., Alagiah, R., Fiedler, B., & Sawon, K. (2009). Do learner’s gender and ethnicity really matter for academic performance evaluation. Journal of International Education in Business, 2(2), 28-51.
Sriram, N. & Greenwald, A.G. (2009). The brief implicit association test. Experimental Psychology, 56(4), 283-294. Retrieved from PsycARTICLES database.
Staats, C. & Patton, C. (2013). State of the science: Implicit bias review 2013. Columbus, OH. Retrieved from http://kirwaninstitute.osu.edu/docs/SOTS-Implicit_Bias.pdf
Steele, C. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual activity and performance. American Psychologist, 52(6), 613-629. Retrieved August 1, 2009 from http://www.nber.org/sewp/events/2005.01.14/Bios+Links/Krieger-rec5-Steele_Threat-in-the-Air.pdf
Turner, J. C., Brown, R. J., & Tajfel, H. (1979). Social comparison and group interest in ingroup favouritism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 9, 187-204.
Uhlmann, E.L. & Nosek, B.A. (2012). My culture made me do it: Lay theories of responsibility for automatic prejudice. Social Psychology, 43(2), 108-113. Retrieved from PsycARTICLES database.
United States Census Bureau. (n.d.). The 2012 statistical abstract: Education: Higher Education: Institutions and enrollment. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/cats/education/higher_education_institutions_and_enrollment.html
U. S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2013). The condition of education 2013 (NCES2013-037). Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=61
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
As a condition of publication, the author agrees to apply the Creative Commons – Attribution International 4.0 (CC-BY) License to OLJ articles. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
This licence allows anyone to reproduce OLJ articles at no cost and without further permission as long as they attribute the author and the journal. This permission includes printing, sharing and other forms of distribution.
Author(s) hold copyright in their work, and retain publishing rights without restrictions
