A Sense of Belonging in Online Post-Traditional Students: What Matters?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v28i3.4562Keywords:
post-traditional students, sense of belonging, student identity, fostering connections, Community of InquiryAbstract
Online education has experienced a rapid growth and continued to grow, which is driven by the advances in information and communication technologies that facilitate effective interactions both within and outside the online classroom in high education. Despite these advancements, post-traditional students, characterized by their diverse and complex identities, face unique challenges in forming connections within online learning environments. This research focuses on sense of belonging, which is crucial for promoting and consolidating online learning experiences. For post-traditional students, little is currently known about the extent to which they feel a sense of belonging and the factors that influence it. In this research study, we surveyed a sample of online post-traditional learners and used a mixed-methods approach to examine how they feel accepted and valued and how their identities such as academic program, gender, and ethnicity are related to belonging. Our findings indicate that post-traditional learners report an overall moderate level of belonging, with university support, acceptance, and meaningful relationships with faculty and staff being pivotal. Our research did not find significant differences between students in different academic programs or gender groups. However, Hispanic students reported a higher sense of belonging, which can be contextualized within the framework of our university’s designation as a Hispanic-Serving Institution (HSI). By pinpointing the critical and negligible factors affecting sense of belonging, this study provides a comprehensive set of actionable strategies to cultivate a more engaging and supportive online learning environment.
References
American Council on Education. (2023). Post-traditional learners. https://www.acenet.edu/Research-Insights/Pages/Student-Support/Post-Traditional-Learners.aspx
Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497–529. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497
Buchen, I. H. (1998). Servant leadership: A model for future faculty and future institutions. Journal of Leadership Studies, 5(1), 125–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/107179199800500111
Cilliers, J., Fleisch, B., Kotze, J., Mohohlwane, N., Taylor, S., & Thulare, T. (2022). Can virtual replace in-person coaching? Experimental evidence on teacher professional development and student learning. Journal of Development Economics, 155, 102815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2021.102815
DeRossett, T., Marler, E. K., & Hatch, H. A. (2021). The role of identification, generational status, and COVID-19 in academic success. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/stl0000293
Farnsworth, V., Kleanthous, I., & Wenger-Trayner, E. (2016). Communities of Practice as a social theory of learning: A conversation with Etienne Wenger. British Journal of Educational Studies, 64(2), 139–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2015.1133799
Figlio, D., Rush, M., & Yin, L. (2013). Is it live or is it internet? Experimental estimates of the effects of online instruction on student learning. Journal of Labor Economics, 31(4), 763–784. https://doi.org/10.1086/669930
Garrison, D., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15, 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923640109527071
Garrison, D., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2010). The first decade of the community of inquiry framework: A retrospective. The Internet and Higher Education, 13, 5–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.003
Garrison, D. R. (2016). E-learning in the 21st century: A Community of Inquiry framework for research and practice. Taylor & Francis.
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (1999). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2), 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6
Good, C., Rattan, A., & Dweck, C. S. (2012). Why do women opt out? Sense of belonging and women’s representation in mathematics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 700–717. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026659
Hoffman, M., Richmond, J., Morrow, J., & Salomone, K. (2002). Investigating “sense of belonging” in first-year college students. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 4(3), 227–256. https://doi.org/10.2190/DRYC-CXQ9-JQ8V-HT4V
Hurtado, S., & Carter, D. F. (1997). Effects of college transition and perceptions of the campus racial climate on Latino college students’ sense of belonging. Sociology of Education, 70(4), 324–345. https://doi.org/10.2307/2673270
Jaggars, S. S., & Xu, D. (2016). How do online course design features influence student performance? Computers & Education, 95, 270–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.01.014
Johnson, D. R., Soldner, M., Leonard, J. B., Alvarez, P., Inkelas, K. K., Rowan-Kenyon, H. T., & Longerbeam, S. D. (2007). Examining sense of belonging among first-year undergraduates from different racial/ethnic groups. Journal of College Student Development, 48(5), 525–542. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2007.0054
Kaupp, R. (2012). Online penalty: The impact of online instruction on the Latino-white achievement gap. Journal of Applied Research in the Community College, 19(2), 3–11.
Maestas, R., Vaquera, G., & Zehr, L. (2007). Factors impacting sense of belonging at a Hispanic-serving institution. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 6, 237–256. https://doi.org/10.1177/1538192707302801
Meech, S., & Koehler, A. A. (2024). Instructor leadership in online learning: Predictive relationships between servant leadership and the Community of Inquiry framework. Online Learning, 28(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v28i1.3917
Mooney, C., & Becker, B. A. (2021). Investigating the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on computing students’ sense of belonging. ACM Inroads, 12(2), 38–45. https://doi.org/10.1145/3463408
Mowreader, A. (2024). Report: Online education completion lags behind face-to-face instruction. Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved July 21, 2024, from https://www.insidehighered.com/news/student-success/academic-life/2024/01/12/online-learners-less-likely-complete-compared-peers
Peacock, S., & Cowan, J. (2019). Promoting a sense of belonging in online learning Communities of Inquiry. Online Learning, 23(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v23i2.1488
Perez, M. L. (2020). Sense of belonging from a distance: How online students describe, perceive, and experience belonging to the institution [Ed.D. dissertation, Portland State University]. https://www.proquest.com/docview/2426216799/abstract/C4338DDB141245E8PQ/1
Pittman, L. D., & Richmond, A. (2008). University belonging, friendship quality, and psychological adjustment during the transition to college. The Journal of Experimental Education, 76(4), 343–362. https://doi.org/10.3200/JEXE.76.4.343-362
Rourke, L., & Kanuka, H. (2009). Learning in Communities of Inquiry: A review of the literature. Journal of Distance Education, 23(1), 19–48.
Rovai, A. P. (2003). In search of higher persistence rates in distance education online programs. The Internet and Higher Education, 6(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(02)00158-6
Saldana, J. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (4th ed.). Sage.
Slaten, C. D., Elison, Z. M., Deemer, E. D., Hughes, H. A., & Shemwell, D. A. (2018). The development and validation of the university belonging questionnaire. The Journal of Experimental Education, 86(4), 633–651. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2017.1339009
Smith, B. L. (2004). Learning communities: Reforming undergraduate education (1st ed.). Jossey-Bass. https://openlibrary.org/books/OL3291785M
Stover, K., Cowley, K., Gaunt, G., George, O., Henson, K., Liu, T., & Pankey, C. (2024). Comparison of on-campus and virtual self-assessment outcomes for incoming Appalachian STEM undergraduates’ first research experience. Online Learning, 28(1). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v28i1.3834
Strayhorn, T. L. (2018). College students’ sense of belonging: A key to educational success for all students. Routledge.
Swail, W. S. (2003). Retaining minority students in higher education: A framework for success. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report. Jossey-Bass. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED483024
Umbach, P. D., & Wawrzynski, M. R. (2005). Faculty do matter: The role of college faculty in student learning and engagement. Research in Higher Education, 46(2), 153–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-004-1598-1
Wempe, B., & Collins, R. A. (2024). Students perceived social presence and media richness of a synchronous videoconferencing learning environment. Online Learning, 28(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v28i1.3871
Walton, G. M., & Cohen, G. L. (2007). A question of belonging: Race, social fit, and achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(1), 82–96. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.1.82
Walton, G. M., & Cohen, G. L. (2011). A brief social-belonging intervention improves academic and health outcomes of minority students. Science, 331(6023), 1447–1451. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1198364
Zhang, N., & He, X. (2022). A comparison of virtual and in-person instruction in a physical examination course during the COVID-19 pandemic. The Journal of Chiropractic Education, 36(2), 142–146. https://doi.org/10.7899/JCE-21-12
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Li Xu, Sheena Brown

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
As a condition of publication, the author agrees to apply the Creative Commons – Attribution International 4.0 (CC-BY) License to OLJ articles. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
This licence allows anyone to reproduce OLJ articles at no cost and without further permission as long as they attribute the author and the journal. This permission includes printing, sharing and other forms of distribution.
Author(s) hold copyright in their work, and retain publishing rights without restrictions

