Bichronous Learning in Practice: How Immigrant Students Learn Swedish Online
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v29i4.4613Keywords:
Bichronous Learning, Online Language Education, Second Language Learning, Adult Migrant Students, Student Engagement, Swedish for Immigrants (SFI), Remote Teaching, Remote LearningAbstract
As online education becomes increasingly common in language learning, there is a pressing need to understand how students experience bichronous (synchronous and asynchronous) teaching formats in second language learning contexts. Drawing on qualitative group interviews with participants enrolled in an SFI (Swedish for Immigrants) program, the study identifies key benefits and challenges associated with this blended format. Thematic analysis was used to analyse the data, revealing insights into the advantages and limitations of online sessions for language skills development. The findings indicate that bichronous online teaching supports language skills development, feedback practices, structured participation, flexibility, and autonomy. However, the students reported challenges to self-paced learning, peer interaction, and digital competence. Teacher presence, feedback, and session design emerges as crucial for students’ engagement and participation. These insights suggested an enhanced approach to online teaching, combining synchronous and asynchronous methods for second language learning. Recommendations for optimising online second language teaching were discussed, emphasising the importance of adaptive pedagogical strategies, technological support, and individualised approaches to meet diverse learner needs.
References
Alqahtani, M. H. (2022). Every cloud has a silver lining: The experience of online learning in English language classes at Saudi universities in the post–COVID-19 era. Frontiers in Education, 7, 1027121. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.1027121
Alvarez, J. (2021). Fungerar SFI-undervisning på distans?: En kvalitativ studie om en förändrad undervisningssituation bland lärare på sfi [Master’s thesis, Jönköping University]. DiVA. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-52230
Bailey, D., Almusharraf, N., & Hatcher, R. (2021). Finding satisfaction: Intrinsic motivation for synchronous and asynchronous communication in the online language learning context. Education and Information Technologies, 26(3), 2563–2583. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10369-z
Bond, M. (2021). Schools and emergency remote education during the COVID-19 pandemic: A living rapid systematic review. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4425683
Bradley, L., Guichon, N., & Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2025). Migrants’ and refugees’ digital literacies in life and language learning. ReCALL, 37(2), 147–156. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344025000047
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Buragohain, D., Punpeng, G., Jaratjarungkiat, S., & Chaudhary, S. (2023). Impact of e-learning activities on English as a second language proficiency among engineering cohorts of Malaysian higher education: A 7-month longitudinal study. Informatics, 10(1), 31. https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics10010031
Calmfors, L., & Gassen, N. S. (Eds.). (2019). Integrating immigrants into the Nordic labour markets. Nordic Council of Ministers. https://doi.org/10.6027/Nord2019-024
Carlsson, M., Eriksson, S., & Rooth, D.-O. (2023). Language proficiency and hiring of immigrants: Evidence from a new field experimental approach (Working Paper No. 2023:1). Linnaeus University. https://doi.org/10.15626/ns.wp.2023.1
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th ed.). Routledge.
Denscombe, M. (1995). Explorations in group interviews: An evaluation of a reflexive and partisan approach. British Educational Research Journal, 21(2), 131–148.
Elwan, R., & Mehmeti, F. (2021). Språket är tillgång till allt: En kvalitativ studie om SFI-lärares upplevelser av omställningen till digitaliserad distansundervisning [Bachelor’s thesis, Lund University]. Lund University Publications. http://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/record/9052222
Fejes, A., & Dahlstedt, M. (2017). Popular education, migration and a discourse of inclusion. Studies in the Education of Adults, 49(2), 214–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/02660830.2018.1463656
Foged, M., & Van Der Werf, C. (2023). Access to language training and the local integration of refugees. Labour Economics, 84, 102366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2023.102366
Frey, J. H., & Fontana, A. (1991). The group interview in social research. The Social Science Journal, 28(2), 175–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/0362-3319(91)90003-M
Fröjd, E., & Ström, J. (2021). The effects of digital tools on EFL/ESL learners’ vocabulary acquisition/learning [Bachelor’s thesis, Malmö University]. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A1544660
Fujii, S., Mitsugi, M., Nakamura, K., Ono, Y., Yamagami, T., Takeuchi, N., Ishizuka, H., & Kibler, R. (2022). A comparative study of learner satisfaction in synchronous and asynchronous online courses among Japanese EFL learners. Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 26(2), 97–120. https://doi.org/10.25256/PAAL.26.2.6
Han, H., Røkenes, F. M., & Krumsvik, R. J. (2023). Student teachers’ perceptions of flipped classroom in EFL teacher education. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11839-w
Hollister, B., Nair, P., Hill-Lindsay, S., & Chukoskie, L. (2022). Engagement in online learning: Student attitudes and behavior during COVID-19. Frontiers in Education, 7, 851019. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.851019
Ji, H., Park, S., & Shin, H. W. (2022). Investigating the link between engagement, readiness, and satisfaction in a synchronous online second language learning environment. System, 105, 102720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2022.102720
Kohnke, L., & Moorhouse, B. L. (2022). Facilitating synchronous online language learning through Zoom. RELC Journal, 53(1), 296–301. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688220937235
Kollberg, M. (2021). Det har blivit ett helt annat arbete—Det är ett nytt yrke, tycker jag.: En kvalitativ studie om SFI-lärares upplevelser av undervisning under pandemin [Bachelor’s thesis, Stockholm University]. Diva. https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:su:diva-194999
Lester, J. N., Cho, Y., & Lochmiller, C. R. (2020). Learning to do qualitative data analysis: A starting point. Human Resource Development Review, 19(1), 94–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484320903890
Lock, J., Eaton, S., & Kessy, E. (2017). Fostering self-regulation in online learning in K–12 education. Northwest Journal of Teacher Education, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.15760/nwjte.2017.12.2.2
Lowenthal, P. R., West, R. E., Archambault, L., Borup, J., & Belt, E. (2021). Faculty perceptions of using synchronous video-based communication technology. Online Learning, 25(4). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v25i4.2890
Mays, T., & Ross, S. (2022). Sense of community in synchronous and asynchronous online courses: Perceptions and experiences of nontraditional students. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 25(1).
Martin, F., Polly, D., & Ritzhaupt, A. (2020). Bichronous online learning: Blending asynchronous and synchronous online learning. EDUCAUSE Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/9/bichronous-online-learning-blending-asynchronous-and-synchronous-online-learning
Martin, F., Kumar, S., Ritzhaupt, A., & Polly, D. (2024). Bichronous online learning: Perspectives, best practices, benefits, and challenges from award-winning online instructors. Online Learning, 28(2). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v28i2.3945
Moustakas, L., & Kiakou, A. (2020). Barriers encountered by adult learners in the context of learning a foreign language: The age parameter. International Journal of Innovation and Research in Educational Sciences, 7(3).
Moallem, M. (2015). The impact of synchronous and asynchronous communication tools on learner self-regulation, social presence, immediacy, intimacy, and satisfaction in collaborative online learning. The Online Journal of Distance Education and e-Learning, 3(3), 55–77.
Mohammadi, G. (2023). Teachers’ CALL professional development in synchronous, asynchronous, and bichronous online learning through project-oriented tasks: Developing CALL pedagogical knowledge. Journal of Computers in Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-023-00260-4
Murphy, E., Rodríguez‐Manzanares, M. A., & Barbour, M. (2011). Asynchronous and synchronous online teaching: Perspectives of Canadian high school distance education teachers. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(4), 583–591. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01112.x
Öllsjö, M., & Söderlund, S. (2020). SFI-lärares erfarenheter av distansundervisning våren 2020 [Master’s thesis, Mälardalens Universitet]. DiVa. https://mdh.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A1574300
Perveen, A. (2016). Synchronous and asynchronous e-language learning: A case study of Virtual University of Pakistan. Open Praxis, 8(1), 21–39. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.8.1.212
Presley, R. G., Cumberland, D. M., & Rose, K. (2023). A comparison of cognitive and social presence in online graduate courses: Asynchronous vs. synchronous modalities. Online Learning, 27(2). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v27i2.3046
Rahman, N. D., Abd Rahim, S., Tobi, B., & Musa, M. A. H. (2022). Bichronous online learning: L2 learners’ perceptions. International Journal of Education, Psychology and Counselling, 7(47). https://doi.org/10.35631/IJEPC.747051
Rathert, S., & Ağçam, R. (2022). Learning at risk? Language teaching under emergency remote conditions. Pedagogika, 146(2), 39–59. https://doi.org/10.15823/p.2022.146.2
Reichenberg, M., & Berhanu, G. (2019). Overcoming language barriers to citizenship: Predictors of adult immigrant satisfaction with language training programme in Sweden. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, 14(3), 279–289. https://doi.org/10.1177/1746197918809575
Steber, S., & Rossi, S. (2021). The challenge of learning a new language in adulthood: Evidence from a multi-methodological neuroscientific approach. PLOS ONE, 16(2), e0246421. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246421
Taber, K. (2013). Classroom-based research and evidence-based practice: An introduction (2nd ed.). SAGE.
Tai, K. W. H. (2024). Transcending the boundaries of mode in online language teaching: A translanguaging perspective on ESL teachers’ synchronous small group online tutorials. System, 121, 103185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2023.103185
Tao, J., & Gao, X. (2022). Teaching and learning languages online: Challenges and responses. System, 107, 102819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2022.102819
Taskiran, A., Yazici, M., & Erdem Aydin, I. (2024). Contribution of automated feedback to the English writing competence of distance foreign language learners. E-Learning and Digital Media, 21(1), 24–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/20427530221139579
Truhlar, A. M., Williams, K. M., & Walter, M. T. (2018). Student engagement with course content and peers in synchronous online course discussions. Online Learning, 22(4). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i4.1389
Tusino, T., Perdanakusuma, H., Dewi, P., & Saputro, W. T. (2022). Synchronous learning in speaking class: English as a foreign language learners’ voices. Lingua Cultura, 16(1), 83–88. https://doi.org/10.21512/lc.v16i1.7867
Utomo, D. T. P., & Ahsanah, F. (2022). The implementation of bichronous online learning: EFL students’ perceptions and challenges. Journal of English Language Teaching, 11(2), 134–147. https://doi.org/10.15294/elt.v11i2.54273
Viriya, C. (2022). Exploring the impact of synchronous, asynchronous, and bichronous online learning modes on EFL students’ self-regulated and perceived English language learning. rEFLections, 29(1), 88–111. https://doi.org/10.61508/refl.v29i1.260525
Villaver, M., & Justiniane, L. B. (2023). Challenges of English language learners towards remote independent study: Developing a theory. Journal of Learning and Development Studies, 3(1), 52–61. https://doi.org/10.32996/jlds.2023.3.1.6
Witthaus, G. (2023). Refugees and online engagement in higher education: A capabilitarian model. Online Learning, 27(2). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v27i2.3762
Zhang, F., & Du, Y. (2023). Students’ willingness to communicate in the online synchronous one-on-one foreign language classroom. International Journal of Chinese Language Teaching. https://doi.org/10.46451/ijclt.20230306
Zuhriyah, M., & Fajarina, M. (2022). The effectiveness of blended synchronous and asynchronous learning for teaching reading comprehension. Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Pendidikan, 14(1), 795–802. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v14i1.1237
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Rasha Al Massalmeh, Pernilla Nilsson, Jeanette Sjöberg, Marie Utterberg
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
As a condition of publication, the author agrees to apply the Creative Commons – Attribution International 4.0 (CC-BY) License to OLJ articles. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
This licence allows anyone to reproduce OLJ articles at no cost and without further permission as long as they attribute the author and the journal. This permission includes printing, sharing and other forms of distribution.
Author(s) hold copyright in their work, and retain publishing rights without restrictions
