Using Instructor-Generated Video Lectures in Online Mathematics Courses Improves Student Learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v19i3.484Keywords:
Online general studies mathematics, video lectures, learning aidsAbstract
Low retention rates in online freshman-level mathematics courses are a concern, especially at postsecondary institutions that serve academically unprepared students. The purpose of this study was to determine if student performance in an online College Algebra course that relies heavily on text-based multimedia tools can be improved by replacing publisher-generated educational resources with instructor-generated video lectures. The original online College Algebra course placed the publisher-generated educational resources in the role of content provider by enabling all publisher-generated learning aids within the online homework system and treating instructor-generated educational materials as supplemental resources. In contrast, the redesigned online College Algebra course enhanced the course instructor’s teaching presence by requiring students to complete instructor-generated guided note-taking sheets while watching instructor-generated video lectures, treating publisher-generated learning aids as supplemental resources by removing them from within the online homework system. Results indicate students who enrolled in a redesigned online College Algebra course that strategically placed the instructor in the role of content provider performed significantly better on both online and handwritten assessments than did students who enrolled in an online College Algebra course that placed the publisher-generated educational resources in that role.References
Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2014). Grade Change: Tracking Online Education in the United States. Babson Survey Research Group. Retrieved from http://www.onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/gradechange.pdf.
Engelbrecht, J., & Harding, A. (2005). Teaching undergraduate mathematics on the Internet Part 2: Attributes and possibilities. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 58(2), 253-276.
Finnegan, C., Morris, L., & Lee, K. (2009). Differences by course discipline on student behavior, persistence, and achievement in online courses of undergraduate general education. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory and Practice, 10(1), 39-54.
Fish, W., & Wickersham, L. (2009). Best Practices for Online Instructors: Reminders. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 10(3), 279-284.
Jaggars, S., Edgecombe, N., Stacey, G., & Columbia University, C. (2013). Creating an Effective Online Instructor Presence. Community College Research Center, Columbia University.
Lehman, R., & Conceicao, S. (2014). Motivating and Retaining Online Students: Research-Based Strategies that Work. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Smith, G., & Ferguson, D. (2004). Diagrams and math notation in e-learning: Growing pains of a new generation. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 35(5). 681-695.
Smith, G., Torres-Ayala, A., & Heindel, A. (2008). Disciplinary differences in e-learning instructional design: The case of mathematics. Journal of Distance Education, 22(3), 66-88.
Weems, G. H. (2002). Comparison of beginning algebra taught onsite versus online. Journal of Developmental Education, 26(1), 10-18.
Xu, D. & Jaggars, S. (2011). The effectiveness of distance education across Virginia’s community colleges: Evidence from introductory college-level math and English courses. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 33(3), 360-377.
Zavarella, C. A. & Ignash, J. (2009). Instructional Delivery in Developmental Mathematics: Impact on Retention. Journal of Developmental Education, 32(3), 2-13.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
As a condition of publication, the author agrees to apply the Creative Commons – Attribution International 4.0 (CC-BY) License to OLJ articles. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
This licence allows anyone to reproduce OLJ articles at no cost and without further permission as long as they attribute the author and the journal. This permission includes printing, sharing and other forms of distribution.
Author(s) hold copyright in their work, and retain publishing rights without restrictions
