Disconnected in the digital age: Barriers to flow in online learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v30i3.4967Keywords:
engagement, flow, digital age, online education, higher educationAbstract
Disengagement among students learning online in higher education is an enduring challenge that can undermine learning outcomes, retention, and overall satisfaction. While engagement is widely recognized as essential to academic success, the unique conditions of online learning, such as reduced interpersonal interaction, feelings of isolation, and competing external demands, often hinder meaningful participation and enjoyable experiences. Using a hermeneutic phenomenological approach, this study applied flow theory (Csikszentmihalyi, 2008) to better understand the experiences of online students and the barriers to achieving an optimal state of learning. Data were collected through written reflections, interviews, and journaling with Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis (Smith et al., 2022) used to interpret findings of non-flow. The research highlighted how lack of interest, time, resistance to distractions, and prior experience in education prevents students from experiencing flow. This unique, reflective, and human-sensitive methodology encouraged a richer understanding of non-flow and offered insights into the stimuli and inhibitors to flow. The implications for students and higher education providers are encouraging better awareness of distractions and how to focus attention, as well as the potential for gaining experience in industry to nurture interest and personal connection to learning.
References
Allen, E. I., & Seaman, J. (2014). Grade change: Tracking online education in the United States. Babson Survey Research Group.
Anderson, T., & Cuttler, C. (2020). Open to open? An exploration of textbook preferences and strategies to offset textbook costs for online versus on-campus students. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i5.4141
Bakker, A. B. (2008). The work-related flow inventory: Construction and initial validation of the WOLF. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 72(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2007.11.007
Bedi, A. (2023). Keep learning: Student engagement in an online environment. Online Learning, 27(2), 119–136. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v27i2.3287
Bourelle, A., Bourelle, T., Knutson, A. V., & Spong, S. (2016). Sites of multimodal literacy: Comparing student learning in online and face-to-face environments. Computers and Composition, 39, 55e70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2015.11.003
Bryson, C., & Hand, L. (2007). The role of engagement in inspiring teaching and learning. Innovations in Education & Teaching International, 44(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/14703290701602748
Carpentier, J., Mageau, G. A., & Vallerand, R. J. (2012). Ruminations and flow: Why do people with a more harmonious passion experience higher well-being? Journal of Happiness Studies: An Interdisciplinary Forum on Subjective Well-Being, 13(3), 501–518. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-011-9276-4
Chaker, R., Bouchet, F., & Bachelet, R. (2022). How do online learning intentions lead to learning outcomes? The mediating effect of the autotelic dimension of flow in a MOOC. Computers in Human Behavior, 134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107306
Cowley, B. U., Palomaki, J., Tammi, T., Frantsi, R., Inkila, V. P., Lehtonen, N., et al. (2019). Flow experiences during visuomotor skill acquisition reflect deviation from a power-law learning curve, but not overall level of skill. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1126. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01126
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). Beyond boredom and anxiety. Experiencing flow in work and play. Jossey-Bass.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1982). Intrinsic motivation and effective teaching: A flow analysis. In Bess, J. (Ed.), New directions for teaching and learning: Motivating professors to teach effectively. Jossey-Bass.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2008). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. Harper Collins.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2014). Learning, “flow,” and happiness. In Applications of Flow in Human Development and Education. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9094-9_7
Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Csikszentmihalyi, I. S. (Eds.). (1988). Optimal experience: Psychological studies of flow in consciousness. Cambridge University Press.
Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Nakamura, J. (2010). Effortless attention in everyday life: A systematic phenomenology. In B. Bruya (Ed.), Effortless attention: A new perspective in the cognitive science of attention and action (pp. 179–190). Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Dixson, M. D. (2015). Measuring student engagement in the online course: The online student engagement scale (OSE). Online Learning, 19(4). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v19i4.561
Edwards, R. (1993). Mature women students: Separating or connecting family and education. Taylor and Francis.
Engeser, S., & Rheinberg, F. (2008). Flow, performance and moderators of challenge-skill balance. Motivation & Emotion, 32(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-008-9102-4
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
Garrison, D. R. (2003). Cognitive presence for effective asynchronous online learning: The role of reflective inquiry self-direction and metacognition. In J. Bourne & J. C. Moore (Eds.), Elements of quality online education: Practice and direction (pp. 47–58). The Sloan Consortium.
Garrison, D. R. (2007). Online community of inquiry review: Social, cognitive, and teaching presence issues. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 11(1), 61–72. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ842688.pdf
Getenet, S., & Tualaulelei, E. (2023). Using interactive technologies to enhance student engagement in higher education online learning. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 39(4), 220–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2023.2244597
Glazier, R. A. (2016). Building rapport to improve retention and success in online classes. Journal of Political Science Education, 12(4), 437–456. https://doi.org/10.1080/15512169.2016.1155994
Gray, J. A., & DiLoreto, M. (2016). The effects of student engagement, student satisfaction, and perceived learning in online learning environments. International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, 11(1). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1103654.pdf
Greenland, S., & Moore, C. (2014). Patterns of student enrolment and attrition in Australian open access online education: A preliminary case study. Open Praxis, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.6.1.95
Guo, Z., Xiao, L., Van Toorn, C., Lai, Y., & Seo, C. (2016). Promoting online learners’ continuance intention: An integrated flow framework. Information & Management, 53, 279–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2015.10.010
Guthrie, J. T., & Anderson, E. (1999). Engagement in reading: Processes of motivated, strategic, and knowledgeable social readers. In J. T. Guthrie & D. E. Alvermann (Eds.), Engaged reading: Process, practices and policy implications (pp. 17–46). Teachers College Press.
Guthrie, J. T., & Wigfield, A. (2000). Engagement and motivation in reading. In M. Kamil & P. Mosenthal (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 403–422). Lawrence Erlbaum.
Heidegger, M. (1978). Being and time. Trans J. Macquarrie & E. Robinson. Oxford Basil Blackwell.
Heutte, J., Fenouillet, F., Martin-Krumm, C., Gute, G., Raes, A., Gute, D., Bachelet, R., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2021). Optimal experience in adult learning: Conception and validation of the flow in education scale (Eduflow-2). Frontiers in Psychology, 12. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.828027
Horvath, D., Stirling, E., Bevacqua, J., Coldrey, M., Buultjens, P., Buultjens, M., & Larsen, A. (2019). Plan, prepare and connect: How investing in understanding and tracking the evolving needs of online students informs the development of targeted programs for transition and success. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 16(1), 1–14. http://doi.org/10/14453/jutlp.v16i1.4
Hranstinski, S. (2009). A theory of online learning as online participation. Computers & Education, 52(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.06.009
Jefferies, A., & Hyde, R. (2010). Building the future students’ blended learning experiences from current research findings. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 8(2), 133–140.
Jones, B. D. (2010). An examination of motivation model components in face-to-face and online instruction. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 8(3), 915–944. https://doi.org/10.25115/ejrep.v8i22.1455
Kashdan, T. B., & Rottenberg, J. (2010). Psychological flexibility as a fundamental aspect of health. Clinical Psychology Review, 30(7). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2010.03.001
Knowles, M. S., Holton III, E. F., & Swanson, R. A. (2020). The adult learner: The definitive classic in adult education and human resources development (9th ed.). Taylor & Francis Group.
Kumasaka, K. (2024). Phenomenological understandings of higher education students with flow in the online learning environment [Doctoral thesis, Curtin University]. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/95647
Kumasaka, K., Walker, R., & Pelliccione, L. (2025a). Online higher education student engagement: Finding flow. Distance Education, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2025.2571896
Kumasaka, K. (2025b). The essential lens: A hermeneutic phenomenological approach to understanding flow experiences. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2025.2567055
Lambrinidis, G. (2014). Supporting online, non-traditional students through the introduction of effective e-learning tools in a pre-university enabling programme. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 36(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2014.899053
Laming, M., Martin-Lynch, P., & Morris, A. (2016). Mature-age men’s experiences of higher education: Australia and England compared [Final Report]. SRHE Research Scoping Study Award. Society of Research into Higher Education. https://researchportal.murdoch.edu.au/esploro/outputs/report/Mature-age-mens-experiences-of-Higher-Education/991005544681707891
Landhausser, A., & Keller, J. (2012). Flow and its affective, cognitive and performance related consequences. In S. Engeser (Ed.), Advances in flow research. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2359-1_4
Liao, L-F. (2006). A flow theory perspective on learner motivation and behavior in distance education. Distance Education, 27(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587910600653215
Liu, X., Gong, Z., Miao, K., Yang, P., Liu, H., Feng, Z., & Chen, Z. (2022). Attitude and performance for online learning during covid-19 pandemic: A meta-analytic evidence. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(19), 12967. https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/19/12967
Ma, X., Yue, Z. Q., Gong, Z. Q., Zhang, H., Duan, N. Y., Shi, Y. T., Wei, G. X., & Li, Y. F. (2017). The effect of diaphragmatic breathing on attention, negative affect and stress in healthy adults. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 874. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00874
Martin, F., & Bolliger, D. U. (2018). Engagement matters: Student perceptions on the importance of engagement strategies in the online learning environment. Online Learning, 22(1), 205–222. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i1.1092
Meishar-Tal, H., Weinblat, A., & Shapira, N. (2022). Distractions in online learning among higher education students. INTED2022 Proceedings, pp. 2723–2730.
Meyer, A., Klingenberg, K., & Wilde, M. (2016). The benefits of mouse keeping – an empirical study on students’ flow and intrinsic motivation in biology lessons. Research in Science Education, 46, 79–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-014-9455-5
Moneta, G. B. (2021). On the conceptualization and measurement of flow. In C. Peifer & S. Engeser (Eds.), Advances in flow research. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53468-4_2
Moore, C., & Greenland, S. (2017). Employment-driven online student attrition and the assessment policy divide: An Australian open-access higher education perspective. Journal of Open, Flexible & Distance Learning, 21(1). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1148193.pdf
Moss, D. (2004). Creating space for learning: Conceptualising women and higher education through space and time. Gender and Education, 16(3), 283–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540250042000251452
Mrazek, M. D., Smallwood, J., & Schooler, J. W. (2012). Mindfulness and mind-wandering: Finding convergence through opposing constructs. Emotion, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026678
Muir, T., Milthorpe, N., Stone, C., Dyment, J., Freeman, E., & Hopwood, B. (2019). Chronicling engagement: Students’ experience of online learning over time, Distance Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2019.1600367Sp
Nakamura, J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2002). The concept of flow. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology. Oxford University Press.
Norsworthy, C., Jackson, B., & Dimmock, J. A. (2021). Advancing our understanding of psychological flow: A scoping review of conceptualizations, measurements, and applications. Psychological Bulletin, 147(8). https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000337
Palomaki, J., Tammi, T., Lehtonen, N., Seittenranta, N., Laakasuo, M., Abuhamdeh, S., et al. (2021). The link between flow and performance is moderated by task experience. Computers in Human Behavior, 124, 106891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106891
Patterson, M. E., & Williams, D. R. (2002). Collecting and analyzing qualitative data: Hermeneutic principles, methods and case examples. Sagamore Publishing. https://www.fs.fed.us/rm/pubs_other/rmrs_2002_patterson_m001.pdf
Pinchbeck, J., & Heaney, C. (2022). Case report: The impact of online forum use on student retention in a level 1 distance learning module. Athens Journal of Education, 9(1), 103–118. https://doi.org/10.30958/aje.9-1-7
Pittaway, S. M., & Moss, T. (2014). “Initially, we were just names on a computer screen”: Designing engagement in online teacher education. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 39(7), 140–156. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2014v39n7.10
Ragusa, A. T., & Crampton, A. (2017). Online learning: Cheap degrees or educational pluralization? British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(6). https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12489
Redmond, P., Heffernan, A., Abawi, L., Brown, A., & Henderson, R. (2018). An online engagement framework for higher education. Online Learning, 22(1), 183–204. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i1.1175
Robinson, H. A., Kilgore, W., & Warren, S. J. (2017). Care, communication, learner support: Designing meaningful online collaborative learning. Online Learning, 21(4). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v21i4.1240
Rovai, A. P. (2002). Building sense of community at a distance. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 3(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v3i1.79
Seligman, M. E. P. (2002). Authentic happiness: Using the new positive psychology to realize your potential for lasting fulfillment. Free Press.
Shin, N. (2006). Online learner’s “flow” experience: An empirical study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 37(5), 705–720. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00641.x
Smith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2022). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theory, method and research (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
Stone, C., O’Shea, S., May, J., Delahunty, J., & Partington, Z. (2016). Opportunity through online learning: Experiences of first-in-family students in online open-entry higher education. Australian Journal of Adult Learning, 56(2). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1107574.pdf
Stone, C., & O’Shea, S. (2019a). Myths and realities: The reality of studying online in Australian higher education. Student Success, 10(2), 33–45. https://doi.org/10.5204/ssj.v10i2.1299
Stone, C., & O’Shea, S. (2019b). Older, online and first: Recommendations for retentions and success. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 35(1). https://hdl.handle.net/10779/uow.27737706
Sung, E., & Mayer, R. E. (2012). Five facets of social presence in online distance education. Computers in Human Behaviour, 28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.04.014
Tse, D., Nakamura, J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2021). Living well by “flowing well”: The indirect effect of autotelic personality on well-being through flow experience. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 16(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2020.1716055
Turk, M., Toraman Turk, S., Muftuoglu, A. C., Karakaya, O., & Karakaya, K. (2024). Students’ expectations and experiences about engagement strategies in online courses: A mixed methods study. Online Learning, 28(2), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v28i2.3937
van Manen, M. (1990). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. State University of New York Press.
Veletsianos, G., Kimmons, R., Larsen, R., & Rogers, J. (2021). Temporal flexibility, gender, and online learning completion. Distance Education, 42(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2020.1869523
Velikonja, O., Curic, K., Ozura, A., Jazbec, S. S. (2010). Influence of sports climbing and yoga on spasticity, cognitive function, mood and fatigue in patients with multiple sclerosis. Clinical Neurology of Neurosurgery, 112, 597–601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2010.03.006
Wang, T. (2023). Navigating generative AI (ChatGPT) in higher education: Opportunities and challenges. In C. Anutariya, D. Liu, Kinshuk, A. Tlili, J. Yang, & M. Chang, M. (Eds.), Smart learning for a sustainable society. ICSLE 2023. Lecture notes in educational technology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-5961-7_28
Waugh, M., & Su-Searle, J. (2014). Student persistence and attrition in an online M.S. program: Implications for program design. International Journal of E-Learning, 13(1). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1030608
Wilson, A. (2015). A guide to phenomenological research. Nursing Standard, 29(34). https://doi.org/10.7748/ns.29.34.38.e8821
Xavier, M., & Meneses, J. (2022). Persistence and time challenges in an open online university: A case study of the experiences of first-year learners. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(31). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00338-6
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Katie Kumasaka, Rebecca Walker, Lina Pelliccione
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
As a condition of publication, the author agrees to apply the Creative Commons – Attribution International 4.0 (CC-BY) License to OLJ articles. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
This licence allows anyone to reproduce OLJ articles at no cost and without further permission as long as they attribute the author and the journal. This permission includes printing, sharing and other forms of distribution.
Author(s) hold copyright in their work, and retain publishing rights without restrictions
