Challenging Teachers’ Pedagogic Practice and Assumptions about Social Media
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v21i2.1009Keywords:
social media, teacher professional development, design, learning activitiesAbstract
This article describes an innovative approach to professional development designed to challenge teachers’ pedagogic practice and assumptions about educational technologies such as social media. Developing effective technology-related professional development for teachers can be a challenge for institutions and facilitators who provide this support. To contend with this challenge, we drew on Bain’s (2004) “baker’s dozen” questions to guide the design of an online postgraduate course for teachers. This article discusses the design of the online course and what teachers came to understand about the relationship between social media and teaching as a result of completing the course activities. This small-scale case study utilised qualitative data from three cohorts of participating teachers and found that teachers do change their pedagogical practice and assumptions about social media for their own teaching contexts when they engage in course activities that challenge their existing mental models and encourage critical reasoning and reflection on learning.
References
References
Allen, K., & Nelson, D. (2013). A case study on integrating social media in an online graduate youth development course. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9, 566–574.
Ally, M. (2008). Foundations of educational theory for online learning. Theory and Practice of Online Learning, 2, 15–44.
Bain, K. (2004). What the best college teachers do. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Ball, S. J. (2013). The education debate (2nd ed.). Bristol, England: Policy Press.
Barone, D. M. (2004). Case-study research. Literacy Research Methodologies. 7-27.
Bates, A. W., & Sangra, A. (2011). Managing technology in higher education: Strategies for transforming teaching and learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
Bohle Carbonell, K., Dailey-Hebert, A., & Gijselaers, W. (2013). Unleashing the creative potential of faculty to create blended learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 18, 29–37. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.10.004
Bowen, W. G., & Guthrie, K. M. (2015). Higher education in the digital age (updated ed.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Brinthaupt, T. M., Fisher, L. S., Gardner, J. G., Raffo, D. M., & Woodard, J. B. (2011). What the best online teachers should do. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 7, 515–524.
Chen, B., & Bryer, T. (2012). Investigating instructional strategies for using social media in formal and informal learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(1). Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1027/2073
Dabner, N., Davis, N., & Zaka, P. (2012). Authentic project-based design of professional development for teachers studying online and blended teaching. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 12(1). Retrieved from http://www.citejournal.org/vol12/iss1/currentpractice/article2.cfm
Davis, N., & Fletcher, J. (2010). E-learning for adult literacy, language and numeracy: A review of the literature. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Education. Retrieved from http://thehub.superu.govt.nz/sites/default/files/41963_eLearningAdultLiteracy-76971-15062010_0.pdf
Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2013). Removing obstacles to the pedagogical changes required by Jonassen’s vision of authentic technology-enabled learning. Computers & Education, 64, 175–182. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.008
Gagnon, G. W., & Collay, M. (2006). Constructivist learning design: Key questions for teaching to standards. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N. D. (2008). Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles, and guidelines (1st ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Herrington, J., Reeves, T. C., & Oliver, R. (2010). A guide to authentic e-Learning (1st ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
Jonassen, D., Howland, J., Morre, J., & Marra, R. M. (2003). Learning to solve problems with technology: A constructivist perspective (2nd ed.). Columbus, OH: Pearson Education.
Jones, M. G., & Harmon, S. W. (2011). The future of online learning in higher education. In D. Surry, R. Gray Jr & J. Stefurak (Eds.), Technology integration in higher education: Social and organizational aspects (pp. 279–290). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. Retrieved from http://www.igi-global.com.ezproxy.aut.ac.nz/gateway/book/46987
Kanuka, H. (2008). Understanding e-learning technologies-in-practice through philosophies-in-practice. In T. Anderson (Ed.), The theory and practice of online learning (2nd ed., pp. 91–118). Edmonton, Canada: Athabasca University Press.
King, E., & Boyatt, R. (2015). Exploring factors that influence adoption of e-learning within higher education: Factors that influence adoption of e-learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46, 1272–1280. http://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12195
Kirkwood, A., & Price, L. (2012). The influence upon design of differing conceptions of teaching and learning with technology. In A. D. Olofsson & J. O. Lindberg (Eds.), Informed design of educational technologies in higher education: Enhanced learning and teaching (pp. 1–20). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. Retrieved from http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/978-1-61350-080-4
Kirkwood, A., & Price, L. (2013). Missing: Evidence of a scholarly approach to teaching and learning with technology in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 18, 327–337. http://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2013.773419
Knowles, M. S. (1972). Innovations in teaching styles and approaches based upon adult learning. Journal of Education for Social Work, 8(2), 32–39.
Laurillard, D. (2002). Rethinking university teaching: A conversational framework for the effective use of learning technologies (2nd ed.). London, England: RoutledgeFalmer.
Laurillard, D. (2014). Thinking about blended learning: A paper for the thinkers in residence programme. Retrieved from http://www.kvab.be/denkersprogramma/files/DP_BlendedLearning_Thinking-about.pdf
Mason, R., & Rennie, F. (2008). E-learning and social networking handbook: Resources for higher education. New York, NY: Routledge.
McLoughlin, C., & Lee, M. J. (2010). Personalised and self-regulated learning in the Web 2.0 era: International exemplars of innovative pedagogy using social software. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(1), 28–43.
Minocha, S., Schroeder, A., & Schneider, C. (2011). Role of the educator in social software initiatives in further and higher education: A conceptualisation and research agenda. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42, 889–903. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01131.x
Newland, B., & Byles, L. (2014). Changing academic teaching with web 2.0 technologies. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 51, 315–325. http://doi.org/ 10.1080/14703297.2013.796727
Nicholas, K., Fletcher, J., & Davis, N. (2013). Using e-learning and digital technologies to overcome barriers for second-chance adult literacy learning. Journal of Teaching and Education, 2, 313–321.
Overbay, A., Patterson, A., Vasu, E., & Grable, L. (2010). Constructivism and technology use: Findings from the IMPACTing leadership project. Educational Media International, 47, 1003–1120. http://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2010.492675
Owens, T. (2015). Practising what they preach? An investigation into the pedagogical beliefs and online teaching practices of National Teaching Fellows. International Journal for Academic Development, 20(1), 76–92. http://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2014.983112
Reid, P. (2014). Categories for barriers to adoption of instructional technologies. Education and Information Technologies, 19, 383–407. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-012-9222-z
Richards, L., & Morse, J. M. (2013). Readme first for a user’s guide to qualitative methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Rienties, B., Brouwer, N., & Lygo-Baker, S. (2013). The effects of online professional development on higher education teachers’ beliefs and intentions towards learning facilitation and technology. Teaching and Teacher Education, 29, 122–131. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2012.09.002
Selwyn, N. (2011). Education and technology: Key issues and debates. New York, NY: Continuum International Publishing Group.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. American Educational Research Association, 15(2), 4–14.
Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Stake, R. E. (2006). Multiple case study analysis. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
Teras, H., & Herrington, J. (2014). Neither the frying pan nor the fire: In search of a balanced authentic e-learning design through an educational design research process. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15, 232–253.
Timperley, H. (2008). Teacher professional learning and development (Educational Practices Series No. 18). Brussels, Belgium: The International Academy of Education. Retrieved from http://edu.aru.ac.th/childedu/images/PDF/benjamaporn/EdPractices_18.pdf
Trigwell, K., & Shale, S. (2004). Student learning and the scholarship of university teaching. Studies in Higher Education, 29, 523–536. http://doi.org/10.1080/0307507042000236407
Walker, R. (2002). A reflective cycle for teacher learning: The Christchurch ICT cluster project. In G. Hoban (Ed.), Teacher learning for educational change (pp. 115–142). Buckingham, England: Open University Press.
Waycott, J., & Sheard, J. (2011). Editorial 27(5): Preface to the special issue – assessing students’ Web 2.0 activities in higher education. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(5), iii–ix. Retrieved from http://ajet.org.au/index.php/AJET/article/view/929
Wilson, A. (2012). Effective professional development for e-learning: What do the managers think? British Journal of Educational Technology, 43, 892–900. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01248.x
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
As a condition of publication, the author agrees to apply the Creative Commons – Attribution International 4.0 (CC-BY) License to OLJ articles. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
This licence allows anyone to reproduce OLJ articles at no cost and without further permission as long as they attribute the author and the journal. This permission includes printing, sharing and other forms of distribution.
Author(s) hold copyright in their work, and retain publishing rights without restrictions
