Culturally Responsive Teaching Knowledge and Practices of Online Faculty
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v20i4.1043Keywords:
Cultural responsiveness, culturally responsive teaching, culturally responsive educational practices, online teachingAbstract
Cultural differences between faculty and their students can create important challenges that affect the quality and efficacy of online teaching and learning. The objectives of this study were to: (a) create and pilot test an assessment for online faculty to measure culturally responsive teaching knowledge (CRT) and culturally responsive educational practices (CREP) in teaching and advising students of color, military students, LGBTQ students, religious minority students, and international students; (b) describe participants’ CRT knowledge, value, and CREP; and (c) examine differences between their knowledge and their practices. The combined pilot and main study sample was comprised of 47 completed surveys. Internal consistency reliability was high for all subscales (.895-.970); subscale intra-class correlation coefficients ranged from .526-.833. The pilot round revealed strong face and content validity. Campbell-Fiske multitrait-multimethod matrix generated evidence of construct validity. Within-group comparisons of subscale scores using Wilcoxon Signed-ranks test revealed some significant differences between perceived knowledge and practice. Mann Whitney U test did not reveal significant differences in subscale scores or overall score by sector, degree level taught, or gender. The results have important implications for faculty training, professional development, mentoring, and support. Faculty who teach online who understand and value culturally responsive pedagogy and have the knowledge and skills to implement best practices in meeting the needs of diverse learners will enhance both teaching and learning. Culturally responsive knowledges and practice are particularly important as online programs are becoming ubiquitous across traditional institutions of higher education and their core faculty are teaching an increasingly diverse student body.References
Allen, E., & Seaman, J. (2011). Going the distance: Online education in the United States. Babson Survey Research Group. Retrieved from http://www.onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/goingthedistance.pdf
Allen, E., & Seaman, J. (2013). Changing the course: Ten years of tracking online education in the United States. Babson survey research group. Retrieved from http://www.onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/changingcourse.pdf
Banks, J. A. (2008). An introduction to multicultural education (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Arminio, J., Grabosky, T. K., & Lang, J. (2016). Student veterans and service members in higher education. New York, NY: Routledge.
Banks, J. A. (2016). Cultural diversity and education (6th ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
Barker, M. J. (2011). Racial context, currency and connections: Black doctoral student and white advisor perspectives on cross-race advising. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 48(4), 387-400. doi:10.1080/14703297.2011.617092
Blakeâ€Beard, S., Bayne, M. L., Crosby, F. J., & Muller, C. B. (2011). Matching by race and gender in mentoring relationships: Keeping our eyes on the prize. Journal of Social Issues, 67(3), 622-643. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2011.01717.x
Cate, C. A., & Albright, G. (2014). Supporting student veterans: Utilizing game-based role-plays with virtual humans to build military cultural competency and helping behaviors in faculty and staff. Online Learning: Official Journal of the Online Learning Consortium, 19(1). Retrieved from http://olj.onlinelearningconsortium.org/index.php/jaln
Campbell, D. T., & Fisk, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitraitmultimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81-105.
Felder, P. (2010). On doctoral student development: Exploring faculty mentoring in the shaping of African American doctoral student success. Qualitative Report, 15(2), 455-474. Retrieved from http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR15-2/felder.pdf
Felder, P. P., & Barker, M. J. (2013). Extending Bell’s concept of interest convergence: A framework for understanding the African American doctoral student experience. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 8, 1-20. Retrieved from http://ijds.org/Volume8/IJDSv8p001-020Felder0384.pdf
Felder, P., & Barker, M. J. (2014). African Americans and the doctoral experience: A case comparison through Bell’s interest convergence. Journal of Progressive Policy and Practice, 2(1), 79-100.
Ford, K., & Vignare, K. (2014). The evolving military learner population: A review of the literature. Online Learning: Official Journal of the Online Learning Consortium, 19(1). Retrieved from http://olj.onlinelearningconsortium.org/index.php/jaln
Gay, G. (2010). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Gay, G. (2013). Teaching to and through cultural diversity. Curriculum Inquiry, 43(1), 48-70.
Gleeson, T. D., & Hemmer, P. A. (2014). Providing care to military personnel and their families: How we can all contribute. Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 89(9), 1201-1203. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000000368
Guerra, J. C. (2006). Language, culture, identity and citizenship in college classrooms and communities. New York, NY: Routledge.
Harper, S. R., & Quaye, S. J. (Eds.). (2010). Student engagement in higher education: Theoretical perspectives and practical approaches for diverse populations. New York, NY: Routledge.
Heitner, K. L., & Sherman, K. C. (2013). The role of career colleges: Implications for serving racial and ethnic minority students. Journal of Psychological Issues in Organizational Culture, 3(S1), 78-103. doi:10.1002/jpoc.21098
Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 465-491. Retrieved from http://www.hs.iastate.edu/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/Toward_a_Theory_of_Culturally_Relevant_Pedagogy.pdf
Mutakabbir, Y. T., & Nuriddin, A. T. (2016). Religious minority students in higher education. New York, NY: Routledge.
Nieto, S. (1999). The light in their eyes: Creating multicultural learning opportunities. New York, NY: Teachers College.
Olesova, L., Yang, D., & Richardson, J. C. (2011). Cross-cultural differences in undergraduate students' perceptions of online barriers. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 15(3), 68-80. Retrieved from http://olj.onlinelearningconsortium.org/index.php/jaln
Sadykova, G., & Dautermann, J. (2009). Crossing cultures and borders in international online distance higher education. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 13(2), 89-114. Retrieved from http://olj.onlinelearningconsortium.org/index.php/jaln
Starr-Glass, D. (2011). Military learners: Experience in the design and management of online learning environments. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 7(1), 147-158. Retrieved from http://jolt.merlot.org/vol7no1/starr-glass_0311.pdf
Starr-Glass, D. (2014). Rules of engagement: Considering good policy and practice with online military learners. Online Learning: Official Journal of the Online Learning Consortium, 19(1). Retrieved from http://olj.onlinelearningconsortium.org/index.php/jaln
Steele, J. L., Salcedo, N., & Coley, J. (2010). Service members in school: Military veterans’ experiences using the Post-9/11 GI Bill and pursuing postsecondary education. Retrieved from http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG1083.html
Wood, J. L., & Palmer, R. T. (2016). Black men in higher education. New York, NY: Routledge.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
As a condition of publication, the author agrees to apply the Creative Commons – Attribution International 4.0 (CC-BY) License to OLJ articles. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
This licence allows anyone to reproduce OLJ articles at no cost and without further permission as long as they attribute the author and the journal. This permission includes printing, sharing and other forms of distribution.
Author(s) hold copyright in their work, and retain publishing rights without restrictions