Compensation Still Matters: Language Learning Strategies in the Third Millennium ESL Learners

Karim Hajhashemi, Alireza Shakarami, Nerina Caltabiano


Digital media play enormous roles in much of the learning, communication, socializing and ways of working of “Net-Generation” learners who are growing up in a wired world. Living in this digital era may require different ways of communicating, thinking, approaching learning, prioritizing strategies, interpersonally communicating, and possibly developing compensatory techniques for information gaps among other categories of Language Learning Strategies. The Net-Geners therefore, need new skills and new strategies to perform successfully as learners and workers. This study uses a mixed-methods approach that includes concurrent quantitative and qualitative data (i) to identify the Net-Generation learner’s strategy preferences based on the “Strategies Inventory for Language Learning” (SILL) categories currently considered the most comprehensive strategy inventory and (ii) to identify possible emergent compensation strategies among Net-Geners as a comprehensive study of the strategies used by the Net-Geners is clearly beyond the scope of this article. The results indicate that compensation strategies have undergone a number of modifications and are used differently by the Net-Geners in order to compensate their knowledge gap and help enhance their ESL learning.


Net-Generation, modification, emerging, language learning strategies, compensation strategies, ESL

Full Text:



Ardasheva, Y., & Tretter, T. R. (2012). Perceptions and use of language learning strategies among ESL teachers and ELLs. TESOL Journal, 3(4), 552-585. doi: 10.1002/tesj.33

Bandura, A. (1992). Social cognitive theory. In R. Vasta (Ed.), Six theories of child development: Revised formulations and current issues (Vol. 6, pp. 1-60). London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

Breen, M. P. (2014). Learner contributions to language learning: New directions in research. NY, USA: Routledge.

Chamot, A. U. (2005). Language learning strategy instruction: Current issues and research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 112—130.

Chamot, A. U., Barnhardt, S., El-Dinary, P., & Robbins, J. (1996). Methods for teaching learning strategies in the foreign language classroom. In R. L. Oxford (Ed.), Language learning strategies around the world: Cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 175-188). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai'i Press.

Chamot, A. U., & Kupper, L. (1989). Learning strategies in foreign language instruction. Foreign Language Annals, 22, 13-24.

Chamot, A. U., & O'Malley, J. M. (1994). Teaching for Strategic Learning: Theory and Practice. In J. E. Alatis (Ed.), Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics 1993. Washington, D.C: Georgetown University Press.

Chapelle, C. A. (2009). The Relationship between Second Language Acquisition Theory and Computer-Assisted Language Learning. The Modern Language Journal, 93, 741-753. doi: 10.2307/25612271

Cohen, A. D., & Macaro, E. (2008). Language learner strategies: 30 years of research and practice. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

DeKeyser, R. (2015). Skill acquisition theory. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (pp. 94-112). NY: Routledge.

Dörnyei, Z., & Ryan, S. (2015). The psychology of the language learner revisited. New York, NY: Routledge.

Dunne, D., & Martin, R. (2006). Design thinking and how it will change management education: An interview and discussion. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 5(4), 512-523.

Edstrom, A. (2013). Preparing an L2 Role-play: How Students Manage L2 Deficits. Canadian Modern Language Review, 69(3), 274-297.

Hajhashemi, K., Shakarami, A., Anderson, N., Yazdi-Amirkhiz, S. Y., & Zou, W. (2013). Relations between Language Learning Strategies, Language Proficiency and Multiple Intelligences. Academic Research International, 4(6), 418-429.

Hampel, R., & Baber, E. (2003). Using internet-based audio-graphic and video conferencing for language teaching and learning. In U. Felix (Ed.), Language Learning Online (Language Learning and Language Technology (Vol. 3, pp. 38-41). Lisse, Nertherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.

Hauck, M., & Hurd, S. (2005). Exploring the link between language anxiety and learner self-management in open language learning contexts. European Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 2.

Heidar, D. M. (2012). First Language Acquisition: Psychological Considerations and Epistemology. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(2), 411-416.

Hsiao, T., & Oxford, R. L. (2002). Comparing Theories of Language Learning Strategies: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis. Modern Language Journal, 86(1), 368-383.

Mitchell, R., Myles, F., & Marsden, E. (2013). Second Language Learning Theories (3rd ed.). NY: Routledge.

O’Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning Strategies in Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Oblinger, D. G., & Oblinger, J. L. (2005). Is it age or IT: First steps toward understanding the Net generation. In D. G. Oblinger & J. L. Oblinger (Eds.), Educating the net generation (pp. 2.1-2.20). North Carolina, State University: Educause.

Oxford, R. L. (1989). Use of language learning strategies: A synthesis of studies with implications for strategy training. System, 17(2), 235-247. doi:

Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.

Prakongchati, N. (2007). Factors related to the use of language learning strategies by thai public university freshmen PhD thesis. Suranaree University of Technology. Retrieved from

Radwan, A. A. (2011). Effects of L2 proficiency and gender on choice of language learning strategies by university students majoring in English. The Asian EFL Journal Quarterly March 2011, 13(1).

Rezaei, S., Derakhshan, A., & Bagherkazemi, M. (2011). Critical thinking in language education. Critical Thinking in Language Education, 2(4), 769-777. doi: 10.4304/jltr.2.4.769-777

Rovali, A. P. (2004). A constructivist approach to online college learning. Internet and Higher Education, 7(1), 79-93.

Salahshour, F., Sharifi, M., & Salahshour, N. (2013). The Relationship between Language Learning Strategy Use, Language Proficiency Level and Learner Gender. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 70, 634-643. doi:

Shakarami, A., Abdullah, M. H., Abdullah, F. S., & Hoon, T. B. (2011). Remembering differently: Use of memory strategies among net-generation ESL learners. Educational Research and Reviews, 6(4), 350-357.

Spivey, N. N. (1997). The Constructivist Metaphor:Reading, Writing, and the Making of Meaning (Vol. 1). San Diego: Academic Press.

Tang, M., & Tian, J. (2014). Associations between Chinese EFL graduate students' beliefs and language learning strategies. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 18(2), 131-152. doi: 10.1080/13670050.2014.882882

Tornow, J. (1997). Link/age: Composing in the on-line classroom. Logan, UT: Utah State University Press.

VanPatten, B. (2015). Input processing in adult second language acquisition. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (pp. 113-134). NY: Routledge.

Vassiliki, S., & Marie-Josee, H. (2005). CASLA through a social constructivist perspective: WebQuest in project-driven language learning. ReCALL, 17(2), 217-228.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

Wenden, A. (1991). Learner strategies for learner autonomy. London: Prentice -Hall International.

White, C. (1995). Autonomy and strategy use in distance foreign language learning: Research findings. System, 23(2), 207-221.


Copyright (c) 2017 Karim Hajhashemi, Alireza Shakarami, Nerina Caltabiano