Exploring the Effect of Scripted Roles on Cognitive Presence in Asynchronous Online Discussions

Authors

  • Larisa Olesova George Mason University
  • Margaret Slavin George Mason University
  • Jieun Lim Purdue University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v20i4.1058

Keywords:

Online discussions, strategies, online learning and teaching

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to identify the effect of scripted roles on students’ level of cognitive presence in asynchronous online threaded discussions. A mixed methods design was used to investigate: (1) what level of cognitive presence is achieved by students’ assigned roles in asynchronous online discussions; (2) differences between students’ cognitive presence when the asynchronous online discussions occur during a 5-week intensive summer courses versus 15-week regular semesters (fall and spring); and (3) the impact of the types of questions on students’ cognitive presence in role-based asynchronous online discussions across three semesters in an online introductory nutrition course. The participants of this study were 129 undergraduate students at a major public University in the mid-Atlantic region of the United States. The results of this research corresponds to the findings of previous research that scripted roles can be an effective strategy to improve both learning processes and outcomes. In addition, this study didn’t find any differences in students’ level of cognitive presence when they enrolled in 5-week summer courses or 15-week regular semesters in fall and spring. Finally, this study found evidence that the types of questions related to the level of cognitive presence, i.e., higher level questions can lead to higher level of cognitive presence and vice versa.

Author Biographies

Larisa Olesova, George Mason University

Senior Instructional Designer, George Mason University

Margaret Slavin, George Mason University

Assistant Professor

Jieun Lim, Purdue University

Graduate Student

References

Akyol, Z., & Garrison, D. R. (2011). Understanding cognitive presence in an online and blended community of inquiry: Assessing outcomes and processes for deep approaches to learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(2), 233-250.

Bradley, M. E., Thom, L. R., Hayes, J., & Hay, C. (2008). Ask and you will receive: how question type influences quantity and quality of online discussions. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 888-900.

Brush, T. A. (1998). Embedding cooperative learning into the design of integrated learning systems: Rationale and guidelines. Educational Technology Research and Development, 46(3), 5-18.

Cohen, N. L., Carbone, E. T., & Beffa-Negrini, P. A. (2011). The Design, Implementation, and Evaluation of Online Credit Nutrition Courses: A Systematic Review. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 43(2), 76–86. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2010.04.001

De Wever, B., Van Keer, H., Schellens, T., & Valcke, M. (2009). Structuring asynchronous discussion groups: the impact of role assignment and selfâ€assessment on students' levels of knowledge construction through social negotiation. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25(2), 177-188.

De Wever, B., Van Keer, H., Schellens, T., & Valcke, M. (2010). Roles as a structuring tool in online discussion groups: The differential impact of different roles on social knowledge construction. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(4), 516-523.

deNoyelles, A., Zydney, J. M., & Chen, B. (2014). Strategies for creating a community of inquiry through online asynchronous discussions. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 10(1), 153–165.

Ertmer, P. A., Sadaf, A., & Ertmer, D. J. (2011). Student-content interactions in online courses: The role of question prompts in facilitating higher-level engagement with course content. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 23(2-3), 157-186.

Flegal KM, Kruszon-Moran D, Carroll MD, Fryar CD, & Ogden CL. (2016). TRends in obesity among adults in the united states, 2005 to 2014. JAMA, 315(21), 2284–2291. http://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.6458

Franko, D. L., Cousineau, T. M., Trant, M., Green, T. C., Rancourt, D., Thompson, D., … Ciccazzo, M. (2008). Motivation, self-efficacy, physical activity and nutrition in college students: Randomized controlled trial of an internet-based education program. Preventive Medicine, 47(4), 369–377. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.06.013

Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (1999). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The internet and higher education, 2(2), 87-105.

Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of distance education, 15(1), 7-23.

Gunawardena, C. N., Lowe, C. A., & Anderson, T. (1997). Analysis of a global online debate and the development of an interaction analysis model for examining social construction of knowledge in computer conferencing. Journal of educational computing research, 17(4), 397-431.

Hare, A. P. (1994). Types of Roles in Small Groups: A Bit of History and a Current Perspective. Small Group Research, 25(3), 433-448.

Järvelä, S., & Häkkinen, P. (2002). Web-based cases in teaching and learning–the quality of discussions and a stage of perspective taking in asynchronous communication. Interactive learning environments, 10(1), 1-22.

Korownyk, C., Kolber, M. R., McCormack, J., Lam, V., Overbo, K., Cotton, C., Allan, G. M. (2014). Televised medical talk shows-what they recommend and the evidence to support their recommendations: a prospective observational study. BMJ : British Medical Journal, 349. http://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org.mutex.gmu.edu/10.1136/bmj.g7346

Lobry de Bruyn, L. (2004). Monitoring online communication: can the development of convergence and social presence indicate an interactive learning environment?. Distance Education, 25(1), 67-81.

Matvienko, O., Lewis, D. S., & Schafer, E. (2001). A college nutrition science course as an intervention to prevent weight gain in female college freshmen. Journal of Nutrition Education, 33(2), 95–101.

Moore, M. G. (1989). Three types of interaction. American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1-6.

Mudrack, P. E., & Farrell, G. M. (1995). An examination of functional role behavior and its consequences for individuals in group settings. Small Group Research, 26(4), 542-571.

Myers, C. A., Slack, T., Martin, C. K., Broyles, S. T., & Heymsfield, S. B. (2016). Change in Obesity Prevalence across the United States Is Influenced by Recreational and Healthcare Contexts, Food Environments, and Hispanic Populations. PLOS ONE, 11(2), e0148394. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148394

Ogden, C.L, Carroll, M.D, Lawman, H.G, & et al. (2016). Trends in obesity prevalence among children and adolescents in the united states, 1988-1994 through 2013-2014. JAMA, 315(21), 2292–2299. http://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.6361

Pozzi, F. (2011). The impact of scripted roles on online collaborative learning processes. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6(3), 471-484.

Richardson, J. C., & Ice, P. (2010). Investigating students' level of critical thinking across instructional strategies in online discussions. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1), 52-59.

Richardson, J. C., A. Sadaf, and P.A. Ertmer. 2012. Relationship between types of question prompts and critical thinking in online discussions. In Educational Communities of Inquiry: Theoretical Framework, Research and Practice: Theoretical Framework, Research and Practice, ed. Z. Akyol and D.R. Garrison, 197-222. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.

Schellens, T., & Valcke, M. (2005). Collaborative learning in asynchronous discussion groups: What about the impact on cognitive processing? Computers in Human behavior, 21(6), 957-975.

Schellens, T., Van Keer, H., & Valcke, M. (2005). The impact of role assignment on knowledge construction in asynchronous discussion groups a multilevel analysis. Small Group Research, 36(6), 704-745.

Strijbos, J. W., Martens, R. L., Jochems, W. M., & Broers, N. J. (2004). The effect of functional roles on group efficiency using multilevel modeling and content analysis to investigate computer-supported collaboration in small groups. Small Group Research, 35(2), 195-229.

Swan, K., Garrison, D. R., & Richardson, J. (2009). A constructivist approach to online learning: the Community of Inquiry framework. In C.R. Payne (Ed.), Information technology and constructivism in higher education: Progressive learning frameworks (pp. 43-57). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.

Wansink, B. (2005). Position of the American Dietetic Association: food and nutrition misinformation. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 106(4), 601–607.

Wise, A. F., & Chiu, M. M. (2012, January). Statistical Discourse Analysis of a Role-Based Online Discussion Forum: Patterns of Knowledge Construction. In System Science (HICSS), 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on (pp. 3378-3386). IEEE.

Wise, A., Saghafian, M., & Padmanabhan, P. (2012). Towards more precise design guidance: specifying and testing the functions of assigned student roles in online discussions. Educational Technology Research & Development, 60(1), 55-82. doi:10.1007/s11423-011-9212-7

Xie, K., Miller, N. C., & Allison, J. R. (2013). Toward a social conflict evolution model: Examining the adverse power of conflictual social interaction in online learning. Computers & Education, 63, 404-415.

Xie, K., Yu, C., & Bradshaw, A. C. (2014). Impacts of role assignment and participation in asynchronous discussions in college-level online classes. The Internet and Higher Education, 20, 10-19.

Downloads

Published

2016-12-16

Issue

Section

Special Conference Issue: AERA Online Teaching and Learning SIG