A Critical Analysis of Characteristics that Influence the Effect of Instructor Discussion Interaction on Student Outcomes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v21i4.1075Keywords:
online learning, instructional strategy, instructor engagement, Community of Inquiry, teacher presence, discussionAbstract
Teacher presence facilitates students’ social and cognitive presence in online courses. Instructor interaction in discussion forums, a widely adopted instructional strategy, establishes teacher presence but research on the optimal frequency and content of instructor interaction in discussion is underdeveloped. This research evaluated 1625 instructor posts in 36 graduate-level courses in education to determine their impact on students’ perceptions of the quality of the instructor and course, students’ perceptions of their learning, and students’ actual achievement. Findings suggest the frequency of instructor interaction in discussion has no effect on student outcomes, but posts that are instructional improve students’ perceptions of their learning, and posts that are conversational improve students’ perceptions of instructor and course quality and their actual academic achievement. Implications for instructors and policymakers are addressed.References
Akyol, Z., & Garrison, D. R. (2011). Understanding cognitive presence in an online and blended community of inquiry: Assessing outcomes and processes for deep approaches to learning. British Journal Of Educational Technology,42(2), 233-250.
Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, D. R., and Archer W. (2001). Assessing teaching presence in a computer conferencing context. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(2).
Annand, D. (2011). Social presence within the community of inquiry framework. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 12(5).
Arbaugh, J. B. (2014). System, scholar or students? Which most influences online MBA course effectiveness? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 30(4), 349-362.
Baran, E., Correia, A., & Thompson, A. (2011). Transforming online teaching practice: critical analysis of the literature on the roles and competencies of online teachers. Distance Education,32(3), 421-439.
Chickering, A & Gamson, Z. (1987). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. American Association for Higher Education Bulletin. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED282491.pdf
Cho, M. & Tobias, S. (2016). Should instructors require discussion in online courses? Effects on online discussion on community of inquiry, learner time, satisfaction and achievement. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(2).
Davidson-Shivers, G. (2009). Frequency and types of instructor-interactions in online instruction. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 8(1). Retrieved from http://www.ncolr.org/jiol/issues/pdf/8.1.2.pdf
Ertmer, P. A., & Koehler, A. A. (2015). Facilitated versus non-facilitated online case discussions: Comparing differences in problem space coverage. Journal of Computing in Higher Education,27(2), 69-93.
Garrison, R., Anderson, T. & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2-3), 87-105.
Garrison, R. & Cleveland-Innes, M. (2005). Facilitating cognitive presence in online learning: interaction is not enough. The American Journal of Distance Education, 19(3), 133-148.
Hew, K. (2015). Student perceptions of peer versus instructor facilitation of asynchronous online discussions: further findings from three cases. Instructional Science: An International Journal of the Learning Sciences, 43(1), 19-38.
Hosler, K. A., & Arend, B. D. (2012). The importance of course design, feedback, and facilitation: student perceptions of the relationship between teaching presence and cognitive presence. Educational Media International,49(3), 217-229.
IDEA. (nd). Student ratings of instruction diagnostic feedback. Retrieved from http://ideaedu.org/services/student-ratings-of-instruction/diagnostic-feedback/
Kauffman, H. (2015). A review of predictive factors of student success in and satisfaction with online learning. Research in Learning Technology, 23.
Knowles, M. (1988). The modern practice of adult education: from pedagogy to andragogy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Cambridge Adult Education.
Li, D., Benton, S., Brown, R., Sullivan, P. & Ryalls, K. (2016). Analysis of IDEA student ratings of instruction system 2015 pilot data. Retrieved from http://ideaedu.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Technical-Report-19.pdf
Mandernach, B., Gonzales, R., & Garrett, A. (2006). An examination of online instructor presence via threaded discussion participation. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 2(4). Retrieved from http://jolt.merlot.org/vol2no4/mandernach.pdf
Mazzolini, M. & Maddison, S. (2007). When to jump in: The role of the instructor in online discussion forums. Computers & Education, 49(2), 193-213.
Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M. & Jones, K. (2010). Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development. Retrieved from https://www2.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/tech/evidence-based-practices/finalreport.pdf
Merriam, S., Caffarella, R. & Baumgartner, L. (2007). Learning in adulthood: A comprehensive guide, 3rd Edition. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Moore, M. & Kearsley, G. (1996). Distance education: A system’s view. Boston, MA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
Nandi, D., Hamilton, M., & Harland, J. (2012). Evaluating the quality of interaction in asynchronous discussion forums in fully online courses. Distance Education, 33(1), 5-30.
Phirangee, K., Epp, C., & Hewitt, J. (2016). Exploring the relationships between facilitation methods, students’ sense of community, and their online behaviors. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 20(2).
Rockinson-Szapkiw, A., Wendt, J., Wighting, M. & Nisbet, D. (2016). The predictive relationship among the community of inquiry framework, perceived learning and online, and graduate students’ course grades in online synchronous and asynchronous courses. The International Reivew of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(3).
Rourke, L. & Kanuka, H. (2009). Learning in communities of inquiry: A review of the literature. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education, 23(1).
Schiewer, T. (2013). Teacher-student relationships. Pedagogy, 13(3), pp. 544-548.
Sebastianelli, R., Swift, C., & Tamimi, N. (2015). Factors affecting perceived learning, satisfaction, and quality in the online MBA: A structural equation modeling approach. Journal of Education for Business, 90(6).
Shea, P., Li, C., & Pickett, P. (2006). A study of teaching presence and student sense of learning community in fully online and web-enhanced college courses. Internet and Higher Education, 9.
Tello, S. F. (2007). An analysis of student persistence in online education. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, 3(3).
Thoms, B., Garrett, N., Soffer, M., & Ryan, T. (2008). Resurrecting graduate conversation through an online learning community. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, 4(3), 59-68.
Vaughan, N. Cleveland-Innes, D. & Garrison, D. (2013). Teaching in blended learning environments: Creating and sustaining communities of inquiry. Edmonton, AB: AU Press.
Whipp, J. & Lorentz, R. (2009). Cognitive and social help giving in online teaching: An exploratory study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 57(2), 169-192.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
As a condition of publication, the author agrees to apply the Creative Commons – Attribution International 4.0 (CC-BY) License to OLJ articles. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
This licence allows anyone to reproduce OLJ articles at no cost and without further permission as long as they attribute the author and the journal. This permission includes printing, sharing and other forms of distribution.
Author(s) hold copyright in their work, and retain publishing rights without restrictions
