Instructional Strategies that Respond to Global Learners’ Needs in Massive Open Online Courses

Trang Phan

Abstract


Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) are one of the most innovative forms of online instruction delivered to learners of different language, cultural and educational backgrounds around the world. These multicultural learners have diverse communication styles, learning behaviors and needs that are manifested and demonstrated differently in such a large scale online learning environment as MOOCs. There is little research on how aspects of MOOC learners’ diverse cultural backgrounds and learning behaviors are perceived, how these learners are characterized in terms of their learning needs, and how the MOOC instructors and instructional designers respond to these needs in the course design process.

The purpose of this qualitative study was to describe how MOOC learners’ diverse learning needs, stemming from their different language, cultural and educational backgrounds, were perceived and responded to during the course design and delivery. Participants were fifteen instructors and instructional designers in American higher educational institutions who were involved in designing and delivering a wide variety of MOOC subjects on the Coursera hosting platform. The insights of participants into specific instructional strategies that were designed especially for MOOC multicultural learners’ needs were categorized into three themes: language, content and engagement. These strategies aimed to provide support and engage learners with English language barriers, or those who did not have the necessary subject background to keep up with the course, or those who were not familiar with the American education culture. The study also investigated the pedagogical challenges and concerns that the participants faced during and after the delivery of the MOOCs. Typical challenges included confusions caused during the discussion triggered by the subject, the participants’ struggle with the efficiency of peer assessment, and the applicability of the content materials for the global audience.

Keywords


Moocs, online learning, international

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bali, M. (2014). MOOC pedagogy: Gleaning good practice from existing MOOCs.

MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 10(1), 44-56. Retrieved from

http://jolt.merlot.org/vol10no1/bali_0314.pdf

Billington, P., & Fronmueller, M. (2013). MOOCs and the future of higher education.

Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 13(3/4), 36-43.

Bligh, J. (2002). The first year of doctoring: Still a survival exercise. Medical Education, 36, 2–3. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.2002.01129.x

Bruff, D., Fisher, D., McEwen, K., & Smith, B. (2013). Wrapping a MOOC: Student

perceptions of an experiment in blended learning. MERLOT Journal of Online

Learning and Teaching, 9(2), 187-199. Retrieved from

http://jolt.merlot.org/vol9no2/bruff_0613.htm

Engle, D., Mankoff, C., & Carbrey, J. (2015). Coursera’s introductory human physiology course: Factors that characterize successful completion of a MOOC. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(2), 46-67. Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/2010/3317

Gay, G. (2000). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice. New York: Teachers College Press.

Fine, E., & Handelsman, J. (2010). Benefits and challenges of diversity of academic settings. University of Wisconsin-Madison: Women in Science and Engineering Leadership Institute. Retrieved from http://wiseli.engr.wisc.edu/docs/Benefits_Challenges.pdf

Fischer, C. G., & Grant, G. E. (1983). Intellectual levels in college classrooms.

Lexington, MA: D.C: Heath.

Haavind, S., & Sistek-Chandler, C. (2015). The emergent role of the MOOC instructor: A qualitative study of trends toward improving future practice. International Journal on E-Learning, 14(3), 331-350.

Hollands, F., & Tirthali, D., (2014). MOOCs - expectations and reality. Retrieved from:

http://www.academicpartnerships.com/sites/default/files/MOOCs_Expectations_and_Reality.pdf

Jacoby, J. (2014). The disruptive potential of the Massive Open Online Course: A literature review. Journal of Open, Flexible, and Distance Learning, 18(1), 73-85. Retrieved from http://www.jofdl.nz/index.php/JOFDL/article/view/214

Ke, F., Chávez, A. F., & Herrera, F. (2013). Web-based teaching and learning across culture and age. New York: Springer.

Ladson-Billings, G. (1994). The dream-keepers: Successful teachers of African American children. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Liyanagunawardena, T., Adams, A., & Williams, S., (2013). MOOCs: A systematic study

of the published literature 2008-2012. The International Review of Research in

Open and Distributed Learning, 14(3), 202-227. Retrieved from

http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1455/2531

Maringe, F., & Sing, N. (2014). Teaching large classes in an increasingly internationalising higher education environment: Pedagogical, quality and equity issues. Higher Education, 67(6), 761-782. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10734-013-9710-0

Martin, F. G. (2012). Will massive open online courses change how we teach?

Communications of the ACM, 55(8), 26-28.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2240236.2240246

Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Nieto, S. (1999). The light in their eyes: Creating multicultural learning communities. New York: Teachers College Press.

Penner, J. G. (1984). Why many college teachers cannot lecture: How to avoid

communication breakdown in the classroom. Springfield: Charles C. Thomas.

Phan, T., McNeil S., & Robin, B. (2016). Students’ patterns of engagement and course

performance in a massive open online course. Computers & Education, 95, 36-44.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.015

Rensing, C., de Freitas, S., Ley, T., & Muñoz-Merino, P. J. (Eds.). (2014). Open Learning and Teaching in Educational Communities. Proceedings in the 9th European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning, EC-TEL 2014. Graz, Austria: Springer.

Rivard, R. (2013). Learning how to teach. Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved from

https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2013/03/05/moocs-prompt-some-faculty

members-refresh-teaching-styles

Stake, R. E. (2006). Multiple case study analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Stewart, B. (2013). Massiveness + openness = new literacies of

participation? MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9(2), 228–238. Retrieved from http://jolt.merlot.org/vol9no2/stewart_bonnie_0613.htm

Stones, E. (1970). Students’ attitudes toward the size of teaching groups. Educational

Review, 21(2), 98-108. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0013191690210202

Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition.

Chicago: The University of Chicago.

Tomkin, J. H., & Charlevoix, D. (2014). Do professors matter? Using an a/b test to

evaluate the impact of instructor involvement on MOOC student outcomes. In

Proceedings of the First ACM Conference on Learning@ scale Conference (pp.

-78). Atlanta, GA: Learning@ scale.

Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th Ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.

Zhang, Y. (2013). Benefiting from MOOC. In J. Herrington, A. Couros & V. Irvine

(Eds.), Proceedings of EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and

Technology 2013 (pp. 1372-1377). Association for the Advancement of

Computing in Education (AACE): Victoria, British Columbia.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i2.1160